Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in patients with critical limb ischaemia and intermittent claudication: Systematic review and meta-analysis

European Radiology

Volumn 23, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 3104-3114

  Jens, Sjoerd ^a   Koelemay, Mark J W ^a   Reekers, Jim A ^a   Bipat, Shandra ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Computed tomography angiography; Critical limb ischemia; Intermittent claudication; Magnetic resonance angiography; Peripheral arterial disease

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CRITICAL LIMB ISCHEMIA; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DISEASE SEVERITY; HUMAN; INTERMITTENT CLAUDICATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; META ANALYSIS; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

ANGIOGRAPHY; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; INTERMITTENT CLAUDICATION; ISCHEMIA; LEG; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84885960383     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-2933-8     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, Nehler MR, Harris KA, Fowkes FG (2007) Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg 45:S5-67
2. Singh H, Cardella JF, Cole PE et al (2003) Quality improvement guidelines for diagnostic arteriography. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:S283-S288
3. Met R, Bipat S, Legemate DA, Reekers JA, Koelemay MJ (2009) Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography in peripheral arterial disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 301:415-424
4. Menke J, Larsen J (2010) Meta-analysis: accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for assessing steno-occlusions in peripheral arterial disease. Ann Intern Med 153:325-334
5. Leiner T, Kessels AG, Schurink GW et al (2004) Comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography in patients with chronic critical ischemia and tissue loss. Invest Radiol 39:435-444
6. Dorweiler B, Neufang A, Kreitner KF, Schmiedt W, Oelert H (2002) Magnetic resonance angiography unmasks reliable target vessels for pedal bypass grafting in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Vasc Surg 35:766-772
7. Cao P, Eckstein HH, De RP et al (2011) Chapter II: diagnostic methods. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 42(Suppl 2):S13-S32
8. Matzke S, Lepantalo M (2001) Claudication does not always precede critical leg ischemia. Vasc Med 6:77-80
9. Ozkan U, Oguzkurt L, Tercan F (2009) Atherosclerotic risk factors and segmental distribution in symptomatic peripheral artery disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:437-441
10. Graziani L, Silvestro A, Bertone V et al (2007) Vascular involvement in diabetic subjects with ischemic foot ulcer: a new morphologic categorization of disease severity. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 33:453-460
11. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:332-336
12. Collins R, Cranny G, Burch J et al (2007) A systematic review of duplex ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis and assessment of symptomatic, lower limb peripheral arterial disease. Health Technol Assess 11:iii-xiii
13. Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J (2003) The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 3:25
14. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:557-560
15. Altman DG (1991) Practical statistics for medical research, 1st edn. Chapman and Hall, London
16. Bipat S, Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J (2007) Multivariate random-effects approach: for meta-analysis of cancer staging studies. Acad Radiol 14:974-984
17. Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Control 19:716-723
18. Egger M, Davey SG, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629-634
19. Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH, Bonsel GJ, Bossuyt PM (2003) The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol 56:1129-1135
20. Fotiadis N, Kyriakides C, Bent C, Vorvolakos T, Matson M (2011) 64-section CT angiography in patients with critical limb ischaemia and severe claudication: comparison with digital subtractive angiography. Clin Radiol 66:945-952
21. Kau T, Eicher W, Reiterer C et al (2011) Dual-energy CT angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease-accuracy of maximum intensity projections in clinical routine and subgroup analysis. Eur Radiol 21:1677-1686
22. Li G-C, Deng G, Qin Y-L et al (2008) The comparative study of 64-slices spiral CT angiography with DSA hi lower extremity arterial occlusive diseases. J Interv Radiol 17:336-339
23. Cia S, Jiang H, Cui X-Y, Wang D-W, Sun Y-T (2007) Application of multi-slice spiral CT angiography in diagnosis of arteriosclerotic occlusive disease of lower extremity. Chin J Med Imaging Technol 23:1022-1025
24. Li X-M, Xiao Y, Tian J-M, Guang J-Z, Tian J-L, Gong J (2007) The diagnostic value of 64-multislice CT in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive diseases: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. J Interv Radiol 16:371-374
25. Bui TD, Gelfand D, Whipple S et al (2005) Comparison of CT and catheter arteriography for evaluation of peripheral arterial disease. Vasc Endovascular Surg 39:481-490
26. Willmann JK, Baumert B, Schertler T et al (2005) Aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries assessed with 16-detector row CT angiography: prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 236:1083-1093
27. Catalano C, Fraioli F, Laghi A et al (2004) Infrarenal aortic and lower-extremity arterial disease: diagnostic performance of multi-detector row CT angiography. Radiology 231:555-563
28. Martin ML, Tay KH, Flak B et al (2003) Multidetector CT angiography of the aortoiliac system and lower extremities: a prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Am J Roentgenol 180:1085-1091
29. Ofer A, Nitecki SS, Linn S et al (2003) Multidetector CT angiography of peripheral vascular disease: a prospective comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. Am J Roentgenol 180:719-724
30. Puls R, Knollmann F, Werk M et al (2001) Multi-slice spiral CT: 3D CT angiography for evaluating therapeutically relevant stenosis in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Rontgenpraxis 54:141-147
31. Rieker O, Duber C, Neufang A, Pitton M, Schweden F, Thelen M (1997) CT angiography versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for assessment of aortoiliac occlusive disease. Am J Roentgenol 169:1133-1138
32. Anzidei M, Napoli A, Zaccagna F et al (2011) First-pass and high-resolution steady-state magnetic resonance angiography of the peripheral arteries with gadobenate dimeglumine: an assessment of feasibility and diagnostic performance. Invest Radiol 46:307-316
33. Bui BT, Miller S, Mildenberger P, Sam A, Sheng R (2010) Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for evaluation of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: results of a phase III multicenter trial. J Magn Reson Imaging 31:1402-1410
34. Gerretsen SC, le Maire TF, Miller S et al (2010) Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine for MR angiography of peripheral arteries. Radiology 255:988-1000
35. Wang CC, Liang HL, Hsiao CC et al (2010) Single-dose time-resolved contrast enhanced hybrid MR angiography in diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease: compared with digital subtraction angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 32:935-942
36. Poschenrieder F, Hamer OW, Herold T et al (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of intraarterial and i.v. MR angiography for the detection of stenoses of the infrainguinal arteries. Am J Roentgenol 192:117-121
37. Owen AR, Robertson IR, Annamalai G et al (2009) Critical lower-limb ischemia: the diagnostic performance of dual-phase injection MR angiography (including high-resolution distal imaging) compared with digital subtraction angiography. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:165-172
38. Berg F, Bangard C, Bovenschulte H et al (2008) Feasibility of peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla with a hybrid technique: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Invest Radiol 43:642-649
39. Andreisek G, Pfammatter T, Goepfert K et al (2007) Peripheral arteries in diabetic patients: standard bolus-chase and time-resolved MR angiography. Radiology 242:610-620
40. Diehm N, Kickuth R, Baumgartner I et al (2007) Magnetic resonance angiography in infrapopliteal arterial disease: prospective comparison of 1.5 and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 42:467-476
41. Deutschmann HA, Schoellnast H, Portugaller HR et al (2006) Routine use of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced moving-table MR angiography in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 29:762-770
42. Gjonnaess E, Morken B, Sandbaek G et al (2006) Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, colour duplex and digital subtraction angiography of the lower limb arteries from the aorta to the tibio-peroneal trunk in patients with intermittent claudication. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 31:53-58
43. Janka R, Fellner C, Wenkel E, Lang W, Bautz W, Fellner FA (2005) Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of peripheral arteries including pedal vessels at 1.0 T: feasibility study with dedicated peripheral angiography coil. Radiology 235:319-326
44. Lapeyre M, Kobeiter H, Desgranges P, Rahmouni A, Becquemin JP, Luciani A (2005) Assessment of critical limb ischemia in patients with diabetes: comparison of MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Am J Roentgenol 185:1641-1650
45. Leiner T, Kessels AG, Nelemans PJ et al (2005) Peripheral arterial disease: comparison of color duplex US and contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis. Radiology 235:699-708
46. Schmitt R, Coblenz G, Cherevatyy O et al (2005) Comprehensive MR angiography of the lower limbs: a hybrid dual-bolus approach including the pedal arteries. Eur Radiol 15:2513-2524
47. de Vries M, Nijenhuis RJ, Hoogeveen RM, de Haan MW, van Engelshoven JM, Leiner T (2005) Contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography using SENSE in multiple stations: feasibility study. J Magn Reson Imaging 21:37-45
48. Bezooijen R, van den Bosch HC, Tielbeek AV et al (2004) Peripheral arterial disease: sensitivity-encoded multiposition MR angiography compared with intraarterial angiography and conventional multiposition MR angiography. Radiology 231:263-271
49. Cronberg CN, Sjoberg S, Albrechtsson U et al (2003) Peripheral arterial disease. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the lower leg and foot compared with conventional angiography. Acta Radiol 44:59-66
50. Huber A, Scheidler J, Wintersperger B et al (2003) Moving-table MR angiography of the peripheral runoff vessels: comparison of body coil and dedicated phased array coil systems. Am J Roentgenol 180:1365-1373
51. Steffens JC, Schafer FK, Oberscheid B et al (2003) Bolus-chasing contrast-enhanced 3D MRA of the lower extremity. Comparison with intraarterial DSA. Acta Radiol 44:185-192
52. Wyttenbach R, Gianella S, Alerci M, Braghetti A, Cozzi L, Gallino A (2003) Prospective blinded evaluation of Gd-DOTA-versus Gd-BOPTA-enhanced peripheral MR angiography, as compared with digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 227:261-269
53. Lenhart M, Herold T, Volk M et al (2000) Contrast media-enhanced MR angiography of the lower extremity arteries using a dedicated peripheral vascular coil system. First clinical results Rofo 172:992-999
54. Lundin P, Svensson A, Henriksen E et al (2000) Imaging of aortoiliac arterial disease. Duplex ultrasound and MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography. Acta Radiol 41:125-132
55. Sueyoshi E, Sakamoto I, Matsuoka Y, Hayashi H, Hayashi K (2000) Symptomatic peripheral vascular tree stenosis. Comparison of subtracted and nonsubtracted 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography with fat suppression. Acta Radiol 41:133-138
56. Lenhart M, Djavidani B, Volk M et al (1999) Contrast medium-enhanced MR angiography of the pelvic and leg vessels with an automated table-feed technique. Rofo 171:442-449
57. Sueyoshi E, Sakamoto I, Matsuoka Y et al (1999) Aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries: comparison of three-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography and conventional angiography. Radiology 210:683-688
58. Winterer JT, Laubenberger J, Scheffler K et al (1999) Contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography in occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower limb arteries: results of a prospective intraindividual comparative study with digital subtraction angiography in 76 patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23:583-589
59. Laissy JP, Debray MP, Menegazzo D et al (1998) Prospective evaluation of peripheral arterial occlusive disease by 2D MR subtraction angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 8:1060-1065
60. Rofsky NM, Johnson G, Adelman MA, Rosen RJ, Krinsky GA, Weinreb JC (1997) Peripheral vascular disease evaluated with reduced-dose gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 205:163-169
61. Li J, Zhao J-G, Zhu Y-Q, Li M-H, Wang J, Qiao R-H (2011) Evaluation of diabetic peripheral arterial disease in lower limb by using 3.0 T contrast-enhanced MR angiography with simultaneous calf compression. J Interv Radiol 20:231-236
62. Wu Q-Y, Lin J, Li D, Zeng M-S (2011) Imaging evaluation of calf arteries in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease by using time-resolved angiography with interleaved stochastic trajectories on MR scanner. Chin J Radiol 45:560-565
63. Zhang L, Chang J, Shi D-C et al (2010) An in vitro experimental study and clinical applications of MR angiography with low-dose contrast agent of lower limb arteries at 3.0 T. Chin J Radiol 44:1078-1083
64. Li D-W, Guo W-L, Lu Z-M, Qi W-X, Guo Q-Y (2009) Application of energy subtract angiography of dual source CT in diagnosis of arterial diseases of the lower extremities. Chin J Med Imaging Technol 25:1806-1809
65. Yang M, Teng G-J, Liu B, Wu M, Jin J-Y, Deng G (2008) Imaging technique and postprocessing of lower extremity arteries using 64-slice CT. J Interv Radiol 17:353-356
66. Yuan F, Liu Y-S, Dong S-Y, Zhao J, Feng K-L (2008) Diagnostic value of 64-slice computed tomography angiography for peripheral arterial occlusive diseases. Chin J Med Imaging Technol 24:1767-1770
67. Wang G-Y, Zhao B, Wang G-B, Zhang Z-F, Qiu X-L (2007) Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the classification of peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Chin J Radiol 41:598-601
68. Yuan F, Liu Y-S, Long M-M, Yuan B, Gu X, Gao G-F (2006) Multiposition dynamic contrast enhanced MR angiography in peripheral vessel diseases at 3.0T MR. Chin J Med Imaging Technol 22:726-729
69. Volodiukhin MI, Ibatullin MM, Mikhailov IM, Malinovskii MN, Ignat'ev IM, Bredikhin RA (2005) Combined bolus magnetic resonance angiography and two-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography in patients with occlusive diseases of lower limb arteries. Angiol Sosud Khir 11:29-36
70. Saito Y, Noda H, Itabashi Y et al (2004) Table-moving MRA of the lower extremities in patients with arterial occlusive disease. Japan J Clin Radiol 49:547-554
71. Zhang L, Jin Z, Xu Z-R (2004) Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance angiography for diabetic foot and arterial disease of lower leg. Chin J Clin Rehabil 8:3626-3627
72. Tomihira A, Hino Y, Sugihara M (2002) Stepping table gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography in arterial occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower extremity arteries. Japan J Clin Radiol 47:525-533
73. Matsumura K, Sato K, Hashida K, Utsumi N, Ishizawa T (2001) Contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography of the systemic aorta and lower extremity arteries for vascular intervention: usefulness of stepping-table method on a 0.5 T system. Japan J Interv Cardiol 16:130-136