Evaluation of diabetic peripheral arterial disease in lower limb by using 3.0 T contrast-enhanced MR angiography with simultaneous calf compression

Journal of Interventional Radiology

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 231-236

  Li, Jie ^a   Zhao, Jun Gong ^a   Zhu, Yue Qi ^a   Li, Ming Hua ^a   Wang, Jue ^a   Qiao, Rui Hua ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

Author keywords

Diabetes mellitus; Digital subtraction angiography; Magnetic resonance angiography; Peripheral vascular disease of lower limb; Venous overlap

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIABETIC ANGIOPATHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DISEASE DURATION; FEMALE; GASTROCNEMIUS MUSCLE; GOLD STANDARD; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEG COMPRESSION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

EID: 79957539722     PISSN: 1008794X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Foo TK, Ho VB, Hood MN, et al. High-spatial-resolution multistation MR imaging of lower-extremity peripheral vasculature with segmented volume acquisition: feasibility study [J]. Radiology, 2001, 219: 835-841. (Pubitemid 32476282)
2. Prince MR, Chabra SG, Watts R, et al. Contrast material travel times in patients undergoing peripheral MR angiography [J]. Radiology, 2002, 224: 55-61. (Pubitemid 34680375)
3. Wang Y, Chen CZ, Chabra SG. et al. Bolus arterial-venous transit in the lower extremity and venous contamination in bolus chase three dimensional magnetic resonance angiography [J]. Invest Radiol, 2002, 37: 458-463. (Pubitemid 34803864)
4. Malcolm PN, Craven P, Klass D. Pitfalls and artifacts in performance and interpretation of contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the lower limbs[J]. Clin Radiol, 2010, 65: 651-658.
5. Bilecen D, Schulte AC, Bongartz G, et al. Infragenual cuff-compression reduces venous contamination in contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the Calf [J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2004, 20: 347-351. (Pubitemid 38970948)
6. Koenigkam-Santos M, Sharma P, Kalb B, et al. Lower extremities magnetic resonance angiography with blood pressure cuff compression: quantitative dynamic analysis [J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2009, 29: 1450-1456.
7. Vogt FM, Ajaj VW, Humolal P, et al. Venous compression at high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional MR angiography of periphral arteries[J]. Radiology, 2004, 233: 913-920.
8. Zhang HL, Ho BY, Chao M, et al. Decreased venous contamination on 3D gadolinium-enhanced bolus chase peripheral MR angiography using thigh compression[J]. AJR, 2004, 183: 1041-1047.
9. Diehm N, Kickuth R, Baumgartner I, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography in infrapopliteal arterial disease prospective comparison of 1.5 and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging [J]. Invest Radiol, 2007, 42: 467-470.
10. Berg F, Bangard C, Bovenschulte H, et al. Feasibility of peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 tesla with a hybrid technique comparison with digital subtraction angiography[J]. Invest Radiol, 2008, 43: 642-649.
11. Nielsen YW, Eiberg JP, Logager VB, et al. Whole-body magnetic resonance angiography at 3 tesla using a hybrid protocol in patients with peripheral arterial disease [J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2009, 32: 877-886.