Moving-table MR angiography of the peripheral runoff vessels: Comparison of body coil and dedicated phased array coil systems

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 180, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 1365-1373

  Huber, A ^a   Scheidler, J ^a   Wintersperger, B ^a   Baur, A ^a   Schmidt, M ^b   Requardt, M ^b   Holzknecht, N ^a   Helmberger, T ^a   Billing, A ^a   Reiser, M ^a  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b SIEMENS AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL OCCLUSION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FLUOROSCOPY; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; ILIAC ARTERY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; PERIPHERAL CIRCULATION; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; TREATMENT INDICATION;

EID: 0037405223     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.180.5.1801365     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Parfrey P, Griffiths S, Barrett B, et al. Contrast material-induced renal failure in patients with diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency, or both: a prospective controlled study. N Engl J Med 1989;320:143-149
2. Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Takashima T, Seez P, Matsuura K. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media: a report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology 1990;175:621-628
3. Waugh JR, Sacharias N. Arteriographic complications in the DSA era. Radiology 1992;182:243-246
4. Shetty AN, Kostaki GB, Vrachliotis TG, Kirsch M, Shirkhoda A, Ellwood R. Contrast-enhanced 3D MRA with preliminary clinical experience in imaging the abdominal aorta and renal and peripheral arterial vasculature. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:603-615
5. Earls JP, Patel NH, Smith PA, DeSena S, Meissner MH. Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the aorta and peripheral arteries: evaluation of a multistation examination using two gadopentetate dimeglumine infusions. AJR 1998;171:599-604
6. Winterer JT, Laubenberger J, Scheffler K, et al. Contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography in occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower limb arteries: results of a prospective intraindividual comparative study with digital subtraction angiography in 76 patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23:583-584
7. Yamashita Y, Misuzaki K, Ogata I, Takahashi M, Hiai Y. Three-dimensional high-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the pelvis and lower extremities with use of a phased array coil and subtraction: diagnostic accuracy. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:1066-1072
8. Sueyoshi E, Sakamoto I, Matsuoka Y, et al. Aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries: comparison of three-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography and conventional angiography. Radiology 1999;210:683-688
9. Huber A, Heuck A, Baur A, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography from the distal aorta to the ankle joint with a step-by-step technique. AJR 2000;175:1291-1298
10. Earls JP, DeSena S, Bluemke DA. Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the entire aorta and iliac arteries with dynamic manual table translation. Radiology 1998;209:844-849
11. Meaney JF, Ridgway JP, Chakraverty S, et al. Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience. Radiology 1999;211:59-67
12. Ho KY, Leiner T, de Haan MW, Kessels AG, Kitslaar PJ, van Engelshoven JM. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: detection with moving bed infusion tracking MR angiography. Radiology 1998;206:683-692
13. Ruehm SG, Hany TF, Pfammatter T, Schneider E, Ladd M, Debatin JF. Pelvic and lower extremity arterial imaging: diagnostic performance of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJR 2000;174:1127-1135
14. Ruehm SG, Wiesner W, Debatin JF. Pelvic and lower extremity veins: contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR venography with a dedicated vascular coil - initial experience. Radiology 2000;215:421-427
15. Lenhart M, Herold T, Volk M, et al. Contrast media-enhanced MR angiography of the lower extremity arteries using a dedicated peripheral vascular coil system: first clinical results [in German]. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2000;172:985-991
16. Janka R, Fellner F, Fellner C, et al. Dedicated phased-array coil for peripheral MRA. Eur Radiol 2000;10:1745-1749
17. Ho VB, Choyke PL, Foo TK, et al. Automated bolus chase peripheral MR angiography: inital practical experiences and future directions of this work-inprogress. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:376-388
18. Riederer SF, Bernstein MA, Breen JF, et al. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography with real-time fluoroscopic triggering: design specifications and technical reliability in 330 patient studies. Radiology 2000;215:584-593
19. Fontaine R, Kim M, Kieny R. Die chirurgische Behandlung der peripheren Durchblutungsstörung. Helv Chir Act 1954;21:499-515
20. Czum JM, Ho VB, Hood MN, Foo TK, Choyke PL. Bolus-chase peripheral 3D MRA using a dual-rate contrast media injection. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:769-775
21. Yamamoto K, Maeda S, Kameoka N, Komatsu S, Ishikawa T. Rotational digital angiography for the evaluation of iliac artery disease. Int J Angiol 1999;8:11-15
22. Fitzgerald J, Andrew H, Conway B, Hackett S, Chalmers N. Outpatient angiography: a prospective study of 3-French catheters in unselected patients. Br J Radiol 1998;71:484-486