Routine use of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced moving-table MR angiography in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: Comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 762-770

  Deutschmann, Hannes A ^a   Schoellnast, Helmut ^a   Portugaller, Horst R ^a   Preidler, Klaus W ^b   Reittner, Pia ^a   Tillich, Manfred ^b   Pilger, Ernst ^a   Szolar, Dieter H M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL GRAZ   (Austria)

^b Diagnostikum Graz Süd West ^*  (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LEG; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PELVIS; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33746396046     PISSN: 01741551     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00270-004-0309-9     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Prince MR (1996) Body MR angiography with gadolinium contrast agents. Magn Reson Imaging Clin North Am 4:11-24
2. Ho KY, Leiner T, de Haan MW, Kessels AGH, Kitslaar PJ, van Engelshoven JM (1998) Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: Evaluation with moving-bed infusion tracking MR angiography. Radiology 206:683-692
3. Carriero A, Maggialetti A, Pinto D, Salcuni M, Mansour M, Petronelli S, Bonomo L (2002) Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography MoBI-trak in the study of peripheral vascular disease. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 25:42-47
4. Loewe C, Schoder M, Rand T, Hoffmann U, Sailer J, Kos T, Lammer J, Thurnher S (2002) Peripheral vascular occlusive disease: Evaluation with contrast-enhanced moving-bed MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography in 106 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:1013-1021
5. Winterer JT, Schaefer O, Uhrmeister P, Zimmermann-Paul G, Lehnhardt S, Altehoefer C, Laubenberger J (2002) Contrast enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of relevant stenoses in occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower limb arteries: Diagnostic value of a two-step examination protocol in comparison to conventional DSA. Eur J Radiol 41:153-160
6. Hentsch A, Aschauer MA, Balzer JO, Brossmann J, Busch HP, Davis K, Douek P, Ebner F (2003) Gadobutrol-enhanced moving-table magnetic resonance angiography in patients with peripheral vascular disease: A prospective, multi-centre blinded comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Eur Radiol 13:2103-2114
7. Janka R, Fellner F, Fellner C, Requardt M, Reykowski A, Lang W, Bautz W (2000) Dedicated phased-array coil for peripheral MRA. Eur Radiol 10:1745-1749
8. Goyen M, Ruehm SG, Barkhausen J, Kroger K, Ladd ME, Truemmler KH, Bosk S, Requardt M, Reykowski A, Debatin JF (2001) Improved multi-station peripheral MR angiography with a dedicated vascular coil. J Magn Reson Imaging 13:475-480
9. Huber A, Scheidler J, Wintersperger B, Baur A, Schmidt M, Requardt M, Holzknecht N, Helmberger T, Billing A, Reiser M (2003) Moving-table MR angiography of the peripheral runoff vessels: Comparison of body coil and dedicated phased array coil systems. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:1365-1373
10. Fellner FA, Requardt M, Lang W, Fellner C, Bautz W, Cavallaro A (2003) Peripheral vessels: MR angiography with dedicated phased-array coil with large-field-of-view adapter feasibility study. Radiology 228:284-289
11. Jacob AL, Stock KW, Proske M, Steinbrich W (1996) Lower extremity angiography: Improved image quality and outflow vessel detection with bilaterally antegrade selective digital subtraction angiography. A blinded prospective intraindividual comparison with aortic flush digital subtraction angiography. Invest Radiol 31:184-193
12. Smith TP, Cragg AH, Berbaum KS, Ryals TJ, Sato Y (1990) Techniques for lower-limb angiography: A comparative study. Radiology 174:951-955
13. Gates J, Hartnell GG (2002) Optimized diagnostic angiography in high-risk patients with severe peripheral vascular disease. Radiographics 20:121-133
14. Cohen J (1968) Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 70:213-230
15. Meaney JFM, Ridgway JP, Chakraverty S, Robertson I, Kessel D, Radjenovic A, et al. (1999) Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta: Preliminary experience. Radiology 211:59-67
16. Reid SK, Pagan-Marin HR, Menzoian JO, Woodsin J, Yucel EK (2001) Contrast-enhanced moving-table MR angiography: Prospective comparison to catheter arteriography for treatment planning in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12:45-53
17. Wang Y, Chen CZ, Chabra SG, Winchester PA, Khilnani NM, Watts R, Bush HL Jr, Craig Kent K, Prince MR (2002) Bolus arterial-venous transit in the lower extremity and venous contamination in bolus chase three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography. Invest Radiol 37:458-463
18. Lee JJ, Chang Y, Tirman PJ, Ryum HK, Lee SK, Kim YS, Kang DS (2001) Optimizing of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography by manipulation of acquisition and scan delay times. Eur Radiol 11:754-766
19. Owen RS, Carpenter JP, Baum RA, Perloff LJ, Cope C (1992) Magnetic resonance imaging of angiographically occult runoff vessels in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. N Engl J Med 326:1577-1581