Contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography in occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower limb arteries: Results of a prospective intraindividual comparative study with digital subtraction angiography in 76 patients

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 583-589

  Winterer, Jan Thorsten ^a   Laubenberger, Joerg ^a   Scheffler, Klaus ^a   Neumann, Klaus ^a   Bayraktarli, Yilmaz R ^a   Allmann, Karl Heinz ^a   Uhrmeister, Peter ^a   Langer, Mathias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Arteries, occlusion; Extremities, ischemia; Image processing; Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA)

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; BLOOD VESSELS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE;

ARTERY, OCCLUSION; CONTRAST-ENHANCED; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; EXTREMITY, ISCHEMIA; IMAGES PROCESSING; ISCHAEMIA; LOWER LIMB; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MR ANGIOGRAPHY;

ANGIOGRAPHY;

ABDOMINAL AORTA; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HUMAN; ILIAC ARTERY; LEG; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; POPLITEAL ARTERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 0032812584     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199907000-00019     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Muller-Buhl U, Diehm C, Sieben U, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of peripheral arterial occlusive diseases and coronary heart disease. Vasa [Suppl] 1987;21:1-46.
2. Whittemore AD. Digital subtraction angiography in peripheral vascular disease - a surgeon's view. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1983;6:250-1.
3. Guthaner DF, Wexler L, Enzmann DR, et al. Evaluation of peripheral vascular disease using digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 1983;147:393-8.
4. Takahashi M, Koga Y, Bussaka H, Miyawaki M. The value of digital subtraction angiography in peripheral vascular diseases. Br J Radiol 1984;57:123-32.
5. Zeitler E. Diagnostic angiography and digital subtraction angiography in peripheral vascular disorders. Internist 1994;35:457-64.
6. Schiebler ML, Listerud J, Baum RA, et al. Magnetic resonance arteriography of the pelvis and lower extremities. Magn Res Q 1993;9:152-87.
7. Huber TS, Back MR, Ballinger RJ, et al. Utility of magnetic resonance arteriography for distal lower extremity revascularization. J Vasc Surg 1997;26:415-23.
8. McCauley TR, Monib A, Dickey KW, et al. Peripheral vascular occlusive disease: accuracy and reliability of time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 1994;192:351-7.
9. Ho KY, de Haan MW, Kessels AG, Kitslaar PJ, van Engelshoven JM. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: detection with subtracted and nonsubtracted MR angiography. Radiology 1998;206:673-81.
10. Glickerman DJ, Obregon RG, Schmiedl UP, et al. Cardiac-gated MR angiography of the entire lower extremity: a prospective comparison with conventional angiography. AJR 1996;167:445-51.
11. Cambria RP, Kaufman JA, L'Italien GJ, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography in the management of lower extremity arterial occlusive disease: a prospective study. J Vasc Surg 1997;25:380-9.
12. Hoch JR, Tullis MJ, Kennell TW, McDermott J, Acher CW, Turnipseed WD. Use of magnetic resonance angiography for the preoperative evaluation of patients with infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 1996;23:792-801.
13. Quinn SF, Demlow TA, Hallin RW, Eidemiller LR, Szumowski J. Femoral MR angiography versus conventional angiography: preliminary results. Radiology 1993;189:181-2.
14. Owen RS, Carpenter JP, Baum RA, Perloff LJ, Cope C. Magnetic resonance imaging of angiographically occult runoff vessels in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. N Engl J Med 1992;326: 1577-81.
15. Carpenter JP, Baum RA, Holland GA, Barker CF. Peripheral vascular surgery with magnetic resonance angiography as the sole preoperative imaging modality. J Vasc Surg 1994;20:861-71.
16. Baum RA, Rutter CM, Sunshine JH, et al. Multicenter trial to evaluate vascular magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremity. JAMA 1995;274:875-80.
17. Mulligan SA, Matsuda T, Lanzer P, et al. Peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison of MR angiography and color duplex US with conventional angiography. Radiology 1991; 178:695-700.
18. Snidow JJ, Harris VJ, Trerotola SO, et al. Interpretations and treatment decisions based on MR angiography versus conventional arteriography in symptomatic lower extremity ischemia. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1995;6:595-603.
19. Boos M, Lentschig M, Scheffler K, Bongartz GM, Steinbrich W. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of peripheral vessels. Different contrast agent applications and sequence strategies: a review. Invest Radiol 1998;33:538-46.
20. Wasser MN, Westenberg J, van der Hulst VP, et al. Hemodynamic significance of renal artery stenosis: digital subtraction angiography versus systolically gated three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography. Radiology 1997;202:333-8.
21. De Cobelli F, Vanzulli A, Sironi S, et al. Renal artery stenosis: evaluation with breath-hold, three-dimensional, dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced versus three-dimensional, phase-contrast MR angiography. Radiology 1997;205:689-95.
22. Hany TF, Debatin JF, Leung DA, Pfammatter T. Evaluation of the aortoiliac and renal arteries: comparison of breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional catheter angiography. Radiology 1997;204:357-62.
23. De Cobelli F, Mellone R, Salvioni M, et al. Renal artery stenosis: value of screening with three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography with a phased-array multicoil. Radiology 1996;201: 697-703.
24. Bergin CJ, Hauschildt J, Rios G, Belezzuoli EV, Huynh T, Channick RN. Accuracy of MR angiography compared with radionuclide scanning in identifying the cause of pulmonary arterial hypertension. AJR 1997;168:1549-55.
25. Steiner P, McKinnon GC, Romanowski B, Goehde SC, Hany T, Debatin JF. Contrast-enhanced, ultrafast 3D pulmonary MR angiography in a single breath-hold: initial assessment of imaging performance. J Magn Res Imag 1997;7:177-82.
26. Yamashita Y, Mitsuzaki K, Ogata I, Takahashi M, Hiai Y. Three-dimensional high-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the pelvis and lower extremities with use of a phased array coil and subtraction: diagnostic accuracy. J Magn Res Imag 1998;8:1066-72.
27. Earls JP, Patel NH, Smith PA, DeSena S, Meissner MH. Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the aorta and peripheral arteries: evaluation of a multistation examination using two gadopentetate dimeglumine infusions. AJR 1998;171: 599-604.
28. Vosshenrich R, Castillo E, Kopka L, Rodenwaldt J, Grabbe E. Contrast media-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the peripheral vessels using a "tracking technique": preliminary results. Rofo 1998;168:90-4.
29. Schmalbrock P, Hacker VA, Rao A. Three-dimensional steady-state MR angiography of the lower extremities. J Magn Res Imag 1994;4:223-30.