Comparison of CT and catheter arteriography for evaluation of peripheral arterial disease

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 481-490

  Bui, Trung D ^a,b,c   Gelfand, Dmitri ^a,b   Whipple, Steven ^a   Wilson, Samuel E ^a,b   Fujitani, Roy M ^b   Conroy, Robert ^a   Pham, Hanh ^a   Gordon, Ian L ^a,b  

^a VA LONG BEACH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTERIOGRAPHY; ARTERY DISEASE; ARTICLE; CATHETER ARTERIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; KIDNEY ARTERY STENOSIS; LEG ARTERY; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; CATHETERIZATION; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SEX FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 29044437946     PISSN: 15385744     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/153857440503900604     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Tatli S, Yucel EK, Lipton MJ: CT and MR imaging of the thoracic aorta: Current techniques and clinical applications. Radiol Clin North Am 42:565-585, 2004.
2. Koelemay MJ, Nederkoorn PJ, Reitsma JB, et al: Systematic review of computed tomographic angiography for assessment of carotid artery disease. Stroke 35:2306-2312, 2004.
3. Josephson SA, Bryant SO, Mak HK, et al: Evaluation of carotid stenosis using CT angiography in the initial evaluation of stroke and TIA. Neurology 63:457-460, 2004.
4. Lawrence JA, Kim D, Kent KC, et al: Lower extremity spiral CT angiography versus catheter angiography. Radiology 194:903-908, 1995.
5. Rieker O, Duber C, Schmiedt E: Prospective comparison of CT angiography of the legs with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. Am J Roentgenol 166:269-276, 1997.
6. Tins B, Oxtoby J, Patel S: Comparison of CT angiography with conventional arterial angiography in aortoiliac occlusive disease. BMJ 74:219-225, 2001.
7. Lawler LP, Fishman EK: Multidetector computed tomography of the aorta and peripheral arteries. Cardio Clin 21:607-629, 2003.
8. Rubin GD: MDCT imaging of the aorta and peripheral vessels. Eur J Radiol 45(suppl 1):S42-49, 2003.
9. Rubin GD, Schmidt AJ, Logan LJ, et al: Multi-detector row CT angiography of lower extremity arterial inflow and runoff: Initial experience. Vascular and interventional radiology. Radiology 221:146-158, 2001.
10. Catalano C, Fraioli F, Laghi A, et al: Infrarenal aortic and lower extremity arterial disease: Diagnostic performance of multidetector row CT angiography. Radiology 231:555-563, 2004.
11. Martin ML, Tay KH, Flak B, et al: Multidetector CT angiography of the aortoiliac system and lower extremities: A prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Am J Roentgenol 180:1085-1091, 2003.
12. Ota H, Takase K, Igarashi K, et al: MDCT compared with digital subtraction angiography for assessment of lower extremity arterial occlusive disease: Importance of reviewing cross-sectional images. Am J Roentgenol 182:201-209, 2004.
13. Romano M, Mainenti PP, Imbriaco M, et al: Multidetector row CT angiography of the abdominal aorta and lower extremities in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement. Eur J Radiol 50:303-308, 2004.
14. Romano M, Amato B, Markabaoui K, et al: Multidetector row computed tomographic angiography of the abdominal aorta and lower limbs arteries. A new diagnostic tool in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Minerva Cardioangiol 52:9-17, 2004.
15. Mesurolle B, Qanadli SD, El Hajjam M, et al: Occlusive arterial disease of abdominal aorta and lower extremities: Comparison of helical CT angiography with transcatheter angiography. Clin Imaging. 28:252-260, 2004.
16. Portugaller HR, Schoellnast H, Hausegger KA, et al: Multislice spiral CT angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease: A valuable tool in detecting significant arterial lumen narrowing? Eur Radiol 14:1681-1687, 2004.
17. Cinat ME, Casalme C, Wilson SE, et al: Computed tomography angiography validates duplex sonographic evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. Am Surg 69:842-847, 2003.
18. Van Hoe L, Baert AL, Gryspeerdt S, et al: Supra- and juxtarenal aneurysms of the abdominal aorta: Preoperative assessment with thin section spiral CT. Radiology 198:443-448, 1996.
19. Kaatee R, Beek FJ, de Lange EE, et al: Renal artery stenosis: Detection and quantification with spiral CT angiography versus optimized digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 205:121-127, 1997.
20. Moriuchi M, Gordon IL, Bergman A, et al: Anatomic and functional assessment of stenosis severity with intravascular ultrasound imaging in vitro. Am J Card Imaging 6:109-116, 1992.
21. Fleischmann D: Use of high-concentration contrast media in multiple-detector-row CT: Principles and rationale. Eur Radiol 13(suppl 5):M14-20, 2003.
22. Fleischmann D: Use of high concentration contrast media: Principles and rationale-vascular district. Eur J Radiol 45(suppl 1):S88-93, 2003.
23. Froedtert Today: World's first 64-channel CT scanner ushers in new era in heart diagnostics. Froedtert & Medical College of Wisconsin, November 2004. 〈http://www.froedtert.com/HealthResources/ ReadingRoom/FroedtertToday/ November2004Issue/ WorldsFirst64ChannelCTScanner.htm〉
24. Dakins D: CT showdown brings audience to edge of their seats. Diagnostic Imaging Online, June 2004. 〈http://www.diagnosticimaging.com/dinews/ 2004063001.shtml〉