Diagnostic accuracy of intraarterial and IV MR angiography for the detection of stenoses of the infrainguinal arteries

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 192, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 117-121

  Poschenrieder, Florian ^a   Hamer, Okka W ^a   Herold, Thomas ^a   Schleicher, Thomas ^a   Borisch, Ingitha ^a   Feuerbach, Stefan ^a   Zorger, Niels ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Arterial stenoses; Digital subtraction angiography; Infrainguinal arteries; Intraarterial MR angiography; IV MR angiography

Indexed keywords

GADODIAMIDE;

ABSENCE OF SIDE EFFECTS; ADULT; AGED; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INGUINAL REGION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TIBIAL ARTERY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOWER EXTREMITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 58149215882     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.1230     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Paetzel C, Zorger N, Bachthaler M, et al. Magnetic resonance-guided percutaneous angioplasty of femoral and popliteal artery stenoses using real-time imaging and intra-arterial contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Invest Radiol 2005; 40:257-262
2. Zorger N, Volk M, Hamer OW, et al. Intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in humans for the detection of infrainguinal arterial stenoses before and after percutaneous angioplasty. AJR 2005; 185:867-872
3. Huegli RW, Aschwanden M, Bongartz G, et al. Intraarterial MR angiography and DSA in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison. Radiology 2006; 239: 901-908
4. Schulte AC, Bongartz G, Huegli R, et al. Intraarterial versus IV gadolinium injections for MR angiography: quantitative and qualitative assessment of the infrainguinal arteries. AJR 2005; 185:735-740
5. Omary RA, Henseler KP, Unal O, et al. Comparison of intraarterial and IV gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography with digital subtraction angiography for the detection of renal artery stenosis in pigs. AJR 2002; 178:119-123
6. Frayne R, Omary RA, Unal O, Strother CM. Determination of optimal injection parameters for intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000; 11:1277-1284
7. Hussain ST, Smith RE, Wood RF, Bland M. Observer variability in volumetric blood flow measurements in leg arteries using duplex ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1996; 22:287-291
8. Baum RA, Rutter CM, Sunshine JH, et al. Multicenter trial to evaluate vascular magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremity. American College of Radiology Rapid Technology Assessment Group. JAMA 1995; 274:875-880
9. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33:159-174
10. Singh H, Cardella JF, Cole PE, et al.; SCVIR Standards of Practice Committee. Quality improvement guidelines for diagnostic arteriography. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2002; 13:1-6
11. Manke C, Nitz WR, Djavidani B, et al. MR imaging-guided stent placement in iliac arterial stenoses: a feasibility study. Radiology 2001; 219:527-534
12. Rofsky NM, Johnson G, Adelman MA, et al. Peripheral vascular disease evaluated with reduced-dose gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1997; 205:163-169
13. Ho KY, Leiner T, de Haan MW, Kessels AG, Kitslaar PJ, van Engelshoven JM. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography. Radiology 1998; 206:683-692
14. Meaney JF, Ridgway JP, Chakraverty S, et al. Stepping-table gadolinium-enhanced digital subtraction MR angiography of the aorta and lower extremity arteries: preliminary experience. Radiology 1999; 211:59-67
15. Loewe C, Schoder M, Rand T, et al. Peripheral vascular occlusive disease: evaluation with contrast-enhanced moving-bed MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography in 106 patients. AJR 2002; 179:1013-1021
16. Pandharipande PV, Lee VS, Reuss PM, et al. Two-station bolus-chase MR angiography with a stationary table: a simple alternative to automated-table techniques. AJR 2002; 179:1583-1589
17. Runge VM, Dickey KM, Williams NM, Peng X. Local tissue toxicity in response to extravascular extravasation of magnetic resonance contrast media. Invest Radiol 2002; 37:393-398
18. Harpur ES, Worah D, Hals PA, et al. Preclinical safety assessment and pharmacokinetics of gadodiamide injection, a new magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent. Invest Radiol 1993; 28[suppl 1]:S28-S43
19. Collidge TA, Thomson PC, Mark PB, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: retrospective study of a renal replacement therapy cohort. Radiology 2007; 245:168-175
20. Hahn WY, Hecht EM, Friedman B, Babb JS, Jacobowitz GR, Lee VS. Distal lower extremity imaging: prospective comparison of 2-dimensional time of flight, 3-dimensional time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, and 3-dimensional bolus chase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2007; 31:29-36