Comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography in patients with chronic critical ischemia and tissue loss

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 39, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 435-444

  Leiner, Tim ^a   Kessels, Alphons G H ^a   Schurink, Geert Willem ^a   Kitslaar, Peter J E H M ^a   De Haan, Michiel W ^a   Tordoir, Jan H M ^a   Van Engelshoven, Jos M A ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Chronic critical ischemia; Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography; Intra arterial digital subtraction angiography; Tissue loss

Indexed keywords

GADODIAMIDE; IOHEXOL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; ISCHEMIA; KNEE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VASCULAR PATENCY;

EID: 3042611559     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000129467.71381.8a     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Murabito JM, Evans JC, Nieto K, et al. Prevalence and clinical correlates of peripheral arterial disease in the Framingham Offspring Study. Am Heart J. 2002;143:961-965.
2. Dalman RL, Taylor LM Jr. Basic data related to infrainguinal revascularization procedures. Ann Vasc Surg. 1990;4:309-312.
3. Kalra M, Gloviczki P, Bower TC, et al. Limb salvage after successful pedal bypass grafting is associated with improved long-term survival. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33:6-16.
4. Lautin EM, Freeman NJ, Schoenfeld AH, et al. Radiocontrast-associated renal dysfunction: a comparison of lower-osmolality and conventional high-osmolality contrast media. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157:59-65.
5. Beard JD, Scott DJ, Evans JM, et al. Pulse-generated runoff: a new method of determining calf vessel patency. Br J Surg. 1988;75:361-363.
6. Wilson YG, George JK, Wilkins DC, et al. Duplex assessment of run-off before femorocrural reconstruction. Br J Surg. 1997;84:1360-1363.
7. Owen RS, Carpenter JP, Baum RA, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of angiographically occult runoff vessels in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:1577-1581.
8. Prince MR, Yucel EK, Kaufman JA, et al. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional abdominal MR arteriography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1993;3:877-881.
9. Prince MR. Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography. Radiology. 1994; 191:155-164.
10. Nelemans PJ, Leiner T, de Vet HC, et al. Peripheral arterial disease: meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of MR angiography. Radiology. 2000;217:105-114.
11. Koelemay MJ, Lijmer JG, Stoker J, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of lower extremity arterial disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2001;285:1338-1345.
12. Kreitner KF, Kalden P, Neufang A, et al. Diabetes and peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:171-179.
13. Dorweiler B, Neufang A, Kreitner KF, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography unmasks reliable target vessels for pedal bypass grafting in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:766-772.
14. Hofmann W, Forstner R, Kofler B, et al. Pedal artery imaging-a comparison of selective digital subtraction angiography, contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasound. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002;24:287-292.
15. Rutherford RB, Baker JD, Ernst C, et al. Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: revised version. J Vasc Surg. 1997;26:517-538.
16. Leiner T, Ho KY, Nelemans PJ, et al. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced moving-bed infusion-tracking (MoBI-track) peripheral MR angiography with flexible choice of imaging parameters for each field of view. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;11:368-377.
17. Willinek WA, Gieseke J, Conrad R, et al. Randomly segmented central k-space ordering in high-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supraaortic arteries: initial experience. Radiology. 2002;225:583-588.
18. Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psycholl Bull. 1968;70:213-230.
19. Dormandy JA, Rutherford RB. Management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). TASC Working Group. TransAtlantic Inter-Society Concensus (TASC). J Vasc Surg. 2000;31:S1-S296.
20. Schweiger H, Klein P, Lang W. Tibial bypass grafting for limb salvage with ringed polytetrafluoroethylene prostheses: results of primary and secondary procedures. J Vasc Surg. 1993;18:867-874.
21. Suggested standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia. Prepared by the Ad Hoc Committee on Reporting Standards, Society for Vascular Surgery/North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg. 1986;4:80-94.
22. Ho KY, de Haan MW, Oei TK, et al. MR angiography of the iliac and upper femoral arteries using four different inflow techniques. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1997;169:45-53.
23. Schoenberg SO, Londy FJ, Licato P, et al. Multiphase-multistep gadolinium-enhanced mr angiography of the abdominal aorta and runoff vessels. Invest Radiol. 2001;36:283-291.
24. Gates J, Hartnell GG. Optimized diagnostic angiography in high-risk patients with severe peripheral vascular disease. Radiographics. 2000; 20:121-133.
25. Polak JF. Femoral angiography. In: Baum S, ed. Abrams' Angiography. 4th ed. Boston: Little, Brown and Company; 1997;1697-1742.
26. Darcy MD. Lower-extremity arteriography: current approach and techniques. Radiology. 1991;178:615-621.
27. Klopp R, Niemer W, Schippel W, et al. Changes in the microcirculation of the intact rat heart after iodinated and gadolinium-containing contrast media. Invest Radiol. 1995;30:69-74.
28. Leiner T, Ho KY, Ho VB, et al. Multicenter phase-II trial of safety and efficacy of NC100150 for steady-state contrast-enhanced peripheral magnetic resonance angiography. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1620-1627.
29. Tombach B, Heindel W. Value of 1.0-M gadolinium chelates: review of preclinical and clinical data on gadobutrol. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1550-1556.
30. Herbom CU, Lauenstein TC, Ruehm SG, et al. Intraindividual comparison of gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadobenate dimeglumine, and gadobutrol for pelvic 3D magnetic resonance angiography. Invest Radiol. 2003;38:27-33.
31. Boos M, Lentschig M, Scheffler K, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of peripheral vessels. Different contrast agent applications and sequence strategies: a review. Invest Radiol. 1998;33: 538-546.
32. Lee JJ, Chang Y, Tirman PJ, et al. Optimizing of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography by manipulation of acquisition and scan delay times. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:754-766.