Peripheral arteries in diabetic patients: Standard bolus-chase and time-resolved MR angiography

Radiology

Volumn 242, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 610-620

  Andreisek, Gustav ^a   Pfammatter, Thomas ^a   Goepfert, Kerstin ^a   Nanz, Daniel ^a   Hervo, Patrice ^b   Koppensteiner, Renate ^a   Weishaupt, Dominik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b GE HEALTHCARE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIABETIC PATIENT; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FOOT; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; CONSTRICTION, PATHOLOGIC; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIABETIC ANGIOPATHIES; FEMALE; FOOT; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LEG; LOWER EXTREMITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; THIGH; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33846455800     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2422051111     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ruehm SG, Hany TF, Pfammatter T, Schneider E, Ladd M, Debatin JF. Pelvic and lower extremity arterial imaging: diagnostic performance of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1127-1135.
2. Dyet JF, Nicholson AA, Ettles DF. Vascular imaging and intervention in peripheral arteries in the diabetic patient. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2000;16(suppl 1):S16-S22.
3. Koelemay MJ, Lijmer JG, Stoker J, Legemate DA, Bossuyt PM. Magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of lower extremity arterial disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2001;283:1338-1345.
4. Dorweiler B, Neufang A, Kreitner KF, Schmiedt W, Oelert H. Magnetic resonance angiography unmasks reliable target, vessels for pedal bypass grafting in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Vasc Surg 2002;35:766-772.
5. Swan JS, Carroll TJ, Kennell TW, et al. Time-resolved three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the peripheral vessels. Radiology 2002;225:43-52.
6. Hany TF, Carroll TJ, Omary RA, et al. Aorta and runoff vessels: single-injection MR angiography with automated table movement compared with multiinjection time-resolved MR angiography-initial results. Radiology 2001;221:266-272.
7. Binkert CA, Baker PD, Petersen BD, Szumowski J, Kaufman JA. Peripheral vascular disease: blinded study of dedicated calf MR angiography versus standard bolus-chase MR angiography and film hard-copy angiography. Radiology 2004;232:860-866.
8. Baum RA, Rutter CM, Sunshine JH, et al. Multicenter trial to evaluate vascular magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremity. American College of Radiology Rapid Technology Assessment Group. JAMA 1995;274:875-880.
9. Mistretta CA, Grist TM, Korosec FR, et al. 3D time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR DSA: advantages and tradeoffs. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:571-581.
10. Krause UJ, Pabst T, Kenn W, Wittenberg G, Hahn D. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremity. Angiology 2004;55:119-125.
11. Carroll TJ, Korosec FR, Swan JS, Hany TF, Grist TM, Mistretta CA. The effect of injection rate on time-resolved contrast-enhanced peripheral MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14:401-410.
12. Zhang HL, Kent KC, Bush HL, et al. Soft tissue enhancement on time-resolved peripheral magnetic resonance angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19:590-597.
13. Prince MR, Chabra SG, Watts R, et al. Contrast material travel times in patients undergoing peripheral MR angiography. Radiology 2002;224:55-61.
14. Stein B, Martin M, Rubin G. CT angiography and MR angiography in peripheral vascular disease [abstr]. In: Radiological Society of North America scientific assembly and annual meeting program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2004;77.
15. Meissner OA, Verrel F, Tato F, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography in the follow-up of distal lower-extremity bypass surgery: comparison with duplex ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004;15:1269-1277.
16. Pentecost MJ, Criqui MH, Dorros G, et al. Guidelines for peripheral percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the abdominal aorta and lower extremity vessels. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003;14:S495-S515.
17. Schaper NC, Nabuurs-Franssen MH, Huijberts MS. Peripheral vascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2000;16(suppl 1):S11-S15.
18. Meissner OA, Rieger J, Weber C, et al. Critical Limb ischemia: hybrid MR angiography compared with DSA. Radiology 2005;235:308-318.
19. Leiner T. Contrast-enhanced MRA in the workup of peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Imaging Decis 2004;8:20-28.
20. Rutherford RB, Baker JD, Ernst C, et al. Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: revised version. J Vasc Surg 1997;26:517-538.
21. Singh H, Cardella JF, Cole PE, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for diagnostic arteriography. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003;14: S283-S288.
22. Willmann JK, Wildermuth S, Pfammatter T, et al. Aortoiliac and renal arteries: prospective intraindividual comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography and multi-detector row CT angiography. Radiology 2003;226:798-811.
23. Tombach B, Bremer C, Reimer P, et al. Renal tolerance of a neutral gadolinium chelate (gadobutrol) in patients with chronic renal failure: results of a randomized study. Radiology 2001;218:651-657.
24. Kreitner KF, Kalden P, Neufang A, et al. Diabetes and peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:171-179.
25. Owen RS, Carpenter JP, Baum RA, Perloff LJ, Cope C. Magnetic resonance imaging of angiographically occult runoff vessels in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. N Engl J Med 1992;326:1577-1581.
26. Kundel HL, Polansky M. Measurement of observer agreement. Radiology 2003;228:303-308.
27. Janka R, Fellner C, Wenkel E, Lang W, Bantz W, Fellner FA. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of peripheral arteries including pedal vessels at 1.0 T: feasibility study with dedicated peripheral angiography coil. Radiology 2005;235:319-326.
28. Morasch MD, Collins J, Pereles FS, et al. Lower extremity stepping-table magnetic resonance angiography with multilevel contrast, timing and segmented contrast infusion. J Vasc Surg 2003;37:62-71.
29. Du J, Carroll TJ, Wagner HJ, et al. Time-resolved, undersampled projection reconstruction imaging for high-resolution CEMRA of the distal runoff vessels. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:516-522.
30. Herborn CU, Vogt FM, Waltering KU, Reiter KB, Kniemeyer HW, Barkhausen J. Optimization of contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography with mid-femoral venous compression (VENCO). Rofo 2004;176:157-162.
31. Chomel S, Douek P, Moulin P, Vaudoux M, Marchand B. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the foot: anatomy and clinical application in patients with diabetes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:1435-1442.