Magnetic resonance angiography in infrapopliteal arterial disease: Prospective comparison of 1.5 and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 467-476

  Diehm, Nicolas ^a   Kickuth, Ralph ^a   Baumgartner, Iris ^a   Srivastav, Sudesh K ^b   Gretener, Silvia ^a   Husmann, Marc J ^a   Jaccard, Yves ^a   Do, Do Dai ^a   Triller, Juergen ^a   Bonel, Harald M ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b TULANE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

1.5 Tesla; 3 Tesla MRI; Angiography; Calves; Digital subtraction angiography; Magnetic resonance angiography; Magnetic resonance imaging; MRA; Peripheral magnetic resonance angiography; Vascular disease

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTERY DISEASE; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INFRAPOPLITEAL ARTERIAL DISEASE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANK SUM TEST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

EID: 34249067363     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000262581.52315.ef     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Diehm C, Schuster A, Allenberg JR, et al. High prevalence of peripheral arterial disease and co-morbidity in 6880 primary care patients: cross-sectional study. Atherosclerosis. 2004;172:95-105.
2. Diehm N, Shang A, Silvestro A, et al. Association of cardiovascular risk factors with pattern of lower limb atherosclerosis in 2659 patients undergoing angioplasty. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006;31:59-63.
3. Leskinen Y, Salenius JP, Lehtimaki T, et al. The prevalence of peripheral arterial disease and medial arterial calcification in patients with chronic renal failure: requirements for diagnostics. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;40:472-479.
4. Orchard T, Strandness D. Assessment of peripheral vascular disease in diabetes. Report and recommendations of an international workshop sponsored by the American Diabetes Association and the American Heart Association September 18-20, 1992 New Orleans, Louisiana. Circulation. 1993;88:819-828.
5. Criqui MH, Langer RD, Fronek A, et al. Mortality over a period of 10 years in patients with peripheral arterial disease. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:381-386.
6. Schillinger M, Exner M, Mlekusch W, et al. Endovascular revascularization below the knee: 6-month results and predictive value of C-reactive protein level. Radiology. 2003;227:419-425.
7. Soder HK, Manninen HI, Jaakkola P, et al. Prospective trial of infrapopliteal artery balloon angioplasty for critical limb ischemia: angiographic and clinical results. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000;11:1021-1031.
8. Brosi P, Baumgartner I, Silvestro A, et al. Below-the-knee angioplasty in patients with end-stage renal disease. J Endovasc Ther. 2005;12:704-713.
9. Bosiers M, Deloose K, Verbist J, et al. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for treatment of "below-the-knee" critical limb ischemia: early outcomes following the use of sirolimus-eluting stents. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2006;47:171-176.
10. Morsey H, Aslam M, Standfield N. Patients with critical ischemia of the lower limb are at risk of developing kidney dysfunction. Am J Surg. 2003;185:360-363.
11. Aspelin P, Aubry P, Fransson SG, et al. Nephrotoxic effects in high-risk patients undergoing angiography. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:491- 499.
12. Nelemans PJ, Leiner T, de Vet HCW, et al. Peripheral arterial disease: meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of MR angiography. Radiology. 2000;217:105-114.
13. Leiner T, Tordoir JH, Kessels AG, et al. Comparison of treatment plans for peripheral arterial disease made with multi-station contrast medium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasound scanning. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:1255-1262.
14. Baumgartner I, Thoeny HC, Kummer O, et al. Leg ischemia: assessment with MR angiography and spectroscopy. Radiology. 2005;234:833-841.
15. Leiner T, Kessels AG, Nelemans PJ, et al. Peripheral arterial disease: comparison of color duplex US and contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis. Radiology. 2005;235:699-708.
16. Prince MR, Meaney JF. Expanding role of MR angiography in clinical practice. Eur Radiol. 2006;16(Suppl 2):B3-B8.
17. Zhang HL, Khilnani NM, Prince MR, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of time-resolved 2D projection MR angiography for symptomatic infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:938-947.
18. Schulte AC, Bongartz G, Huegli R, et al. Intraarterial versus IV gadolinium injections for MR angiography: quantitative and qualitative assessment of the infrainguinal arteries. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:735-740.
19. Hingorani A, Ascher E, Markevich N, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography versus duplex arteriography in patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization: which is the best replacement for contrast arteriography? J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:717-722.
20. Hany TF, McKinnon GC, Leung DA, et al. Optimization of contrast timing for breath-hold three-dimensional MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;7:551-556.
21. Nael K, Ruehm SG, Michaely HJ, et al. High spatial-resolution CEMRA of the carotid circulation with parallel imaging: comparison of image quality between 2 different acceleration factors at 3.0 Tesla. Invest Radiol. 2006;41:391-399.
22. Prince MR, Chabra SG, Watts R, et al. Contrast material travel times in patients undergoing peripheral MR angiography. Radiology. 2002;224:55-61.
23. Willmann JK, Baumert B, Schertler T, et al. Aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries assessed with 16-detector row CT angiography: prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Radiology. 2005;236:1083-1093.
24. Janka R, Fellner C, Wenkel E, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of peripheral arteries including pedal vessels at 1.0 T: feasibility study with dedicated peripheral angiography coil. Radiology. 2005;235:319-326.
25. Wolff SD, Balaban RS. Assessing contrast on MR images. Radiology. 1997;202:25-29.
26. Landis JR, Koch GG. An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics. 1977;33:363-374.
27. Meissner OA, Rieger J, Rieber J, et al. High-resolution MR imaging of human atherosclerotic femoral arteries in vivo: validation with intravascular ultrasound. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14(2, Part 1):227-231.
28. Reid SK, Pagan-Marin HR, Menzoian JO, et al. Contrast-enhanced moving-table MR angiography: prospective comparison to catheter arteriography for treatment planning in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;12:45-53.
29. Allkemper T, Heindel W, Kooijman H, et al. Effect of field strengths on magnetic resonance angiography: comparison of an ultrasmall super-paramagnetic iron oxide blood-pool contrast agent and gadopentetate dimeglumine in rabbits at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla. Invest Radiol. 2006;41:97-104.
30. Zhang HL, Kent KC, Bush HL, et al. Soft tissue enhancement on time-resolved peripheral magnetic resonance angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;19:590-597.
31. Marchal G, Bosmans H, Van Hecke P, et al. Experimental Gd-DTPA polylysine enhanced MR angiography: sequence optimization. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1991;15:711-715.
32. Joarder R, Gedroyc WM. Magnetic resonance angiography: the state of the art. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:446-453.
33. Busch HP, Hoffmann HG, Rock J, et al. MR angiography of pelvic and leg vessels with automatic table movement technique ("Mobi-Trak")-clinical experience with 450 studies in German. Rofo. 2001;173:405-409.
34. Hentsch A, Aschauer MA, Balzer JO, et al. Gadobutrol-enhanced moving-table magnetic resonance angiography in patients with peripheral vascular disease: a prospective, multi-centre blinded comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:2103-2114.
35. Lenhart M, Herold T, Volk M, et al. Contrast media-enhanced MR angiography of the lower extremity arteries using a dedicated peripheral vascular coil system. First clinical results in German. Rofo. 2000;172:992-999.
36. Lapeyre M, Kobeiter H, Desgranges P, et al. Assessment of critical limb ischemia in patients with diabetes: comparison of MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:1641-1650.
37. Patel ST, Mills JL Sr, Tynan-Cuisinier G, et al. The limitations of magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: comparative analysis with conventional arteriography. J Vasc Surg. 2005;41:462-468.
38. Rofsky NM, Adelman MA. MR angiography in the evaluation of atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease. Radiology. 2000;214:325-338.
39. Zhang HL, Ho BY, Chao M, et al. Decreased venous contamination on 3D gadolinium-enhanced bolus chase peripheral MR angiography using thigh compression. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:1041-1047.