Investigating the role of verbal working memory in young children's sentence comprehension

Language Learning

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 211-242

  Boyle, Whitney ^a   Lindell, Annukka K ^a   Kidd, Evan ^b,c  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c The Australian National University   (Australia)

Author keywords

First language acquisition; Passive voice; Relative clauses; Sentence comprehension; Sentence repetition; Word order; Working Memory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884411025     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: 14679922     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/lang.12003     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Alloway, T. P., & Gathercole, S. (2005). The role of sentence recall in reading and language skills of children with learning difficulties. Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 271-282.
2. Alloway, T. P., Gathercole, S., & Pickering, S. (2006). Verbal and visuospatial short-term and working memory in children: Are they separable? Child Development, 77, 1698-1716.
3. Alloway, T. P., Gathercole, S., Willis, C., & Adams, A. (2004). A structural analysis of working memory and related cognitive skills in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 85-106.
4. Archibald, L., & Gathercole, S. (2006). Nonword repetition: A comparison of tests. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 970-983.
5. Arosio, F., Guasti, M. T., & Stucchi, N. (2011). Disambiguating information and memory resources in children's processing of Italian relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 40, 137-154.
6. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modelling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390-412.
7. Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417-423.
8. Baddeley, A. (2007). Working memory, thought, and action. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Baddeley, A., Allen, R., & Hitch, G. J. (2010). Investigating the episodic buffer. Psychologica Beligica, 50, 223-243.
10. Baddeley, A. D., Allen, R. J., & Vargha-Khadem, F. (2010). Is the hippocampus necessary for visual and verbal binding in working memory? Neuropsychologia, 48, 1089-1095.
11. Baddeley, A. D., Gathercole, S. E., & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review, 105, 158-173.
12. Baddeley, A., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In. G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47-90). New York: Academic Press.
13. Baddeley, A. D., Hitch, G. J., & Allen, R. J. (2009). Working memory and binding in sentence recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 438-456.
14. Barr, D. J. (2008). Analyzing "visual world" eye-tracking data using multilevel logistic regression. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 457-474.
15. Barrouillet, P., & Gaillard, V. (Eds.). (2011). Cognitive development and working memory: A dialogue between neo-Piagetian theories and cognitive approaches. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
16. Bates, E., Devescovi, A., & D'Amico, S. (1999). Processing complex sentences: A crosslinguistic study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 69-123.
17. Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1982). Functionalist approaches to grammar. In E. Wanner & L. Gleitman (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 173-218). New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 3-73). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19. Bates, D., & Maechler, M. (2010). lme4: Linear mixed effects models using S4 classes. R package. Version: 999375-33. Available online at http://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/
20. Bever, T. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language (pp. 279-362). New York: Wiley.
21. Booth, J. R., MacWhinney, B., & Haraskai, Y. (2000). Developmental differences in visual and auditory processing of complex sentences. Child Development, 71, 981-1003.
22. Brandt, S., Kidd, E., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2009). The discourse bases of relativisation: An investigation of young German and English-speaking children's comprehension of relative clauses. Cognitive Linguistics, 20, 539-570.
23. Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113, 234-272.
25. Chang, F., Janciauska, M., & Fitz, H. (2012). Language adaptation and learning: Getting explicit about implicit learning. Language and Linguistic Compass, 6(5), 259-278.
26. Christiansen, M. H., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009). A usage-based approach to recursion in sentence processing. Language Learning, 59 (Suppl. 1), 126-161.
27. Conti-Ramsden, G. M., Botting, N. F., & Faragher, B. (2001). Psycholinguistic markers for specific language impairment (SLI). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 741-748.
28. Conway, C. M., Bauernschmidt, A., Huang, S. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (2010). Implicit statistical learning in language processing: Word predictability is the key. Cognition, 114, 356-371.
29. Conway, C. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2006). Statistical learning within and between modalities: Pitting abstract against stimulus-specific representations. Psychological Science, 17, 905-912.
30. Corrêa, L. (1995). An alternative assessment of children's comprehension of relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 183-203.
31. Cotton, S., Kiely, P., Crewther, D., Thomson, B., Laycock, R., & Crewther, S. (2005). A normative reliability study for the Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices for primary school aged children from Victoria, Australia. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 647-659.
32. Cowan, N. (2005). Working memory capacity. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
33. Cowan, N., Rouder, J. N., Blume, C. L., & Scott Saults, J. (2012). Models of verbal working memory capacity: What does it take to make them work? Psychological Review, 119, 480-499.
34. Dunn, L., Dunn, L., Whetton, C., & Burley, J. (1997). British picture vocabulary scale (2nd ed.). Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
35. Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211-245.
36. Felser, C., Marinis, T., & Clahsen, H. (2003). Children's processing of ambiguous sentences: A study of relative clause attachment. Language Acquisition, 11, 127-163.
37. Fernández, E. (2003). Bilingual sentence processing: Relative clause attachment in English and Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
38. Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of non-canonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 164-203.
39. Fodor, J. D. (1998). Learning to parse? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 285-319.
40. Friedmann, N., Beletti, A., & Rizzi, L. (2009). Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua, 119, 67-88.
41. Gathercole, S. E. (2006). Nonword repetition and word learning: The nature of the relationship. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 513-543.
42. Gathercole, S., Pickering, S., Ambridge, B., & Wearing, H. (2004). The structure of working memory from 4 to 15 years of age. Developmental Psychology, 40, 177-190.
43. Gathercole, S. E., Willis, C., & Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Phonological memory and vocabulary development during the early school years: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 28, 887-898.
44. Gathercole, S., Willis, C., Baddeley, A., & Emslie, H. (1994). The children's test of nonword repetition: A test of phonological short-term memory. Memory, 2, 103-127.
45. Gómez, R. L., & Gerken, L. (2000). Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 178-186.
46. Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 1-76.
47. Gibson, E. (2000). The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In Y. Miyashita, A. Marantz, & W. O'Neil (Eds.), Image, language, brain (pp. 95-126). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Goodluck, H., & Tavakolian, S. (1982). Competence and processing in children's grammar of relative clauses. Cognition, 11, 1-27.
49. Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434-446.
50. Just, M., & Carpenter, P. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122-149.
51. Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., & Conway, A. R. A. (2005). Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence are strongly related constructs: Comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2004). Psychological Bulletin, 131, 66-71.
52. Kaufman, S. B., DeYoung, C. G., Gray, J. R., Jiménez, L., Brown, J., & Mackintosh, N. (2010). Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition, 116, 321-340.
53. Kidd, E. (2012). Implicit statistical learning is directly associated with the acquisition of syntax. Developmental Psychology, 48, 171-184.
54. Kidd, E., & Bavin, E. L. (2002). English-speaking children's understanding of relative clauses: Evidence for general-cognitive and language-specific constraints on development. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 599- 617.
55. Kidd, E., Stewart, A. J., & Serratrice, L. (2011). Children do not overcome lexical biases where adults do: The role of the referential scene in garden-path recovery. Journal of Child Language, 38, 222-234.
56. Logie, R. H. (2011). The functional organization and capacity limits of working memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 240-245.
57. Lombardi, L., & Potter, M. C. (1992). The regeneration of syntax in short term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 713-733.
58. Lust, B., Foley, C., & Dye, C. (2009). The first language acquisition of complex sentences. In E. Bavin (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of child language (pp. 237-257). New York: Cambridge University Press.
59. MacDonald, M., & Christiansen, M. (2002). Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review, 109, 35-54.
60. MacWhinney, B. (1999). The emergence of language from embodiment.In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 213-256). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. Marshall, C., & Nation, K. (2003). Individual differences in semantic and structural errors in children's memory for sentences. Educational and Child Psychology, 20, 7-18.
62. Matthews, D., Lieven, E., Theakson, A., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Pronoun co-referencing errors: Challenges for generativist and usage-based accounts. Cognitive Linguistics, 20, 599-626.
63. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
64. Misyak, J. B., & Christiansen, M. H. (2012). Statistical learning and language: An individual differences study. Language Learning, 62, 302-331.
65. Montgomery, J., & Evans, J. (2009). Complex sentence processing and working memory in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language a Hearing Research, 52, 269-288.
66. Montgomery, J., Evans, J., & Gillam, R. (2009). Relation of auditory attention on complex sentence comprehension in children with specific language impairment: A preliminary study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 123-151.
67. Montgomery, J., Magimairaj, B., & O'Malley, M. (2008). The role of working memory in typically developing children's complex sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 37, 331-354.
68. Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2010). Modeling working memory: A computational implementation of the Time-Based Resource Sharing theory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18, 10-45.
69. O'Grady, W. (2005). Syntactic carpentry: An emergentist approach to syntax. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
70. O'Grady, W. (2011). Relative clauses: Processing and acquisition. In E. Kidd (Ed.), The acquisition of relative clauses: Processing, typology, and function (pp. 13-38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
71. Perruchet, P., & Pacton, S. (2006). Implicit learning and statistical learning: One phenomenon, two approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 233-238.
72. Potter, M. C., & Lombardi, L. (1990). Regeneration in short-term recall of sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 633-654.
73. Potter, M., & Lombardi, L. (1998). Syntactic priming in immediate recall of sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 265-282.
74. Pickering, S., & Gathercole, S. (2001). Working memory test battery for children. London: Psychological Corporation.
75. R Core Development Team (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
76. Raven, J., Court, J., & Raven J. (1987). The raven's coloured matrices. Oxford, UK: Oxford Psychologists Press.
77. Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
78. Rebuschat, P., & Williams, J. N. (Eds.). (2012). Statistical learning and language acquisition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
79. Reddington, M., & Jackson, K. (1981). The Raven's coloured progressive matrices (1956): A Queensland standardization. Australian Council for Educational Research Bulletin for Psychologists, 30, 20-26.
80. Rizzi, L. (1990). Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
81. Robertson, E., & Joanisse, M. (2010). Spoken sentence comprehension in children with dyslexia and language impairment: The role of syntax and working memory. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 141-165.
82. Rohl, M., & Pratt, C. (1995). Phonological awareness, verbal working memory and the acquisition of literacy. Reading and Writing, 7, 327-360.
83. Roland, D., Dick, F., & Elman, J. (2007). Frequency of basic English grammatical structures: A corpus analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 348-379.
84. Romberg, A. R., & Saffran, J. R. (2010). Statistical learning and language acquisition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews in Cognitive Science, 1, 906-914.
85. Saffran, J. R. (2003). Statistical language learning: Mechanisms and constraints. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 110-114.
86. Shah, P., & Miyake, A. (1999). Models of working memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 1-27). New York: Cambridge University Press.
87. Slobin, D., & Bever, T. (1982). Children use canonical sentence schemas: A cross-linguistic study of word order and inflections. Cognition, 12, 229-265.
88. Swanson, H. L. (1996). Individual and age related differences in children's working memory. Memory and Cognition, 24, 70-82.
89. Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
90. Townsend, D., & Bever, T. (2001). Sentence comprehension: The integration of habits and rules. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
91. Trueswell, J. C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N. M., & Logrip, M. L. (1999). The kindergartenpath effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 73, 89-134.
92. Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 285-318.
93. Vasilyeva, M., Huttenlocher, J., & Waterfall, H. (2006). Effect of language intervention on syntactic skill levels in preschoolers. Developmental Psychology, 42, 164-174.
94. Waters, G., & Caplan, D. (1996). The capacity theory of sentence comprehension: Critique of Just and Carpenter (1992). Psychological Review, 103, 761-772.
95. Wells, J., Christiansen, M., Race, D., Acheson, D., & MacDonald, M. (2009). Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 250-271.
96. Wiig, E., Secord, W., & Semel, E. (2001). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals-preschool second edition (CELF Preschool 2). Toronto, Canada: The Psychological Corporation/A Harcourt Assessment Company.
97. Willis, C., & Gathercole, S. (2001). Phonological short-term memory contributions to sentence processing in young children. Memory, 9, 349-363.