Early morphological decomposition of suffixed words: Masked priming evidence with transposed-letter nonword primes

Applied Psycholinguistics

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 869-892

  Beyersmann, Elisabeth ^a   Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni ^b   Carreiras, Manuel ^a   Coltheart, Max ^a   Castles, Anne ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b BASQUE FOUNDATION FOR SCIENCE   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884239419     PISSN: 01427164     EISSN: 14691817     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0142716412000057     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Andrews, S. (1996). Lexical retrieval and selection processes: Effects of transposed-letter confusability. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 775-800.
2. Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390-412.
4. Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 94-117.
5. Butterworth, B. (1983). Lexical representations. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production (pp. 257-294). London: Academic Press.
6. Bybee, J. L. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 425-455.
7. Christianson, K., Johnson, R. L., & Rayner, K. (2005). Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1327-1339.
8. Colé, P., Beauvillain, C., & Segui, J. (1989). On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed derived words: A differential frequency effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 1-13.
9. Davis, C. J., & Perea, M. (2005). BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 665-671.
10. Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2009). Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: The case of prefixed words. Memory & Cognition, 37, 895-908.
11. Duñabeitia, J. A., Kinoshita, S., Carreiras, M., & Norris, D. (in press). Is morpho-orthographic decomposition purely orthographic? Evidence from masked priming in the same-different task. Language & Cognitive Processes.
12. Duñabeitia, J. A., Molinaro, N., Laka, I., Estévez, A., & Carreiras, M. (2009). N250 effects for letter transpositions depend on lexicality: Casual or causal? NeuroReport, 20, 381-387.
13. Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2007). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for morpho-orthographic decomposition. Cognition, 105, 691-703.
14. Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2009). There is no clam with coats in the calm coast: Delimiting the transposed-letter priming effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1930-1947.
15. Feldman, L. B., O'Connor, P. A., & Moscoso del Prado Martin, F. (2009). Early morphological processing is morpho-semantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of formthen- meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 684-691.
16. Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680-698.
17. Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 211-251.
18. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: AWindows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, 116-124.
19. Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2000). Effects of prime word frequency and cumulative root frequency in masked morphological priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 421-444.
20. Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2001). Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 127-131.
21. Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2003). On the role of derivational affixes in recognizing complex words: Evidence from masked priming. In R. H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological structure in language processing (pp. 209-232). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
22. Gómez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115, 577-601.
23. Grainger, J., Colé, P., & Segui, J. (1991). Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language and Speech, 30, 370-384.
24. Grainger, J., & vanHeuven,W. J. B. (2003).Modeling letter position coding in printedword perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), The mental lexicon (pp. 1-23). New York: Nova Science.
25. Johnson, R. L., Perea, M., & Rayner, K. (2007). Transposed-letter effects in reading: Evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 209-229.
26. Longtin, C. M., & Meunier, F. (2005). Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 26-41.
27. Longtin, C. M., Segui, J., & Hallé, P. A. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Cognitive Processes, 18, 313-334.
28. Lupker, S. J., Perea, M., & Davis, C. J. (2008). Transposed letter priming effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 93-116.
29. Manelis, L., & Tharp, D. (1977). The processing of affixed words. Memory & Cognition, 5, 690-695.
30. Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3-33.
31. McCormick, S. F., Rastle, K., & Davis,M.H. (2008). Is there a 'fete' in 'fetish'? Effects of orthographic opacity on morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 307-326.
32. McCormick, S. F., Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2009). Adore-able not adorable? Orthographic underspecification studied with masked repetition priming. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 813-836.
33. Meunier, F., & Longtin, C.M. (2007).Morphological decomposition and semantic integration in word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 457-471.
34. Perea, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras,M. (2008). Transposed-letter priming effects for close versus distant transpositions. Experimental Psychology, 55, 397-406.
35. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming - The state of the art (pp. 97-120). New York: Psychology Press.
36. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2007). The role of external letter positions in visual word recognition. Psicothema, 19, 559-564.
37. Peressotti, F., & Grainger, J. (1999). The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming. Perception and Psychophysics, 61, 691-703.
38. Plaut, D. C., & Gonnerman, L. M. (2000). Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 445-485.
39. Rastle, K., & Davis,M. H. (2008).Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 942-971.
40. Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 507-537.
41. Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1090-1098.
42. Rayner, K., White, S., Johnson, R. L., & Liversedge, S. (2006). Raeding wrods with jubmled lettres: There's a cost. Psychological Science, 17, 192-193.
43. R Development Core Team. (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 2.7.1). Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.Rproject.org
44. Rueckl, J. G., & Rimzhim, A. (in press). On the interaction of letter transpositions and morphemic boundaries. Language and Cognitive Processes.
45. Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333-367.
46. Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory & Cognition, 7, 263-272.
47. Taft,M. (2003).Morphological representation as a correlation between form andmeaning. In E. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words (pp. 113-137). Amsterdam: Kluwer.
48. Taft,M. (2004).Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 745-765.
49. Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 638-647.
50. Taft, M., & Nguyen-Hoan, M. (2010). A sticky stick? The locus of morphological representation in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 277-296.
51. Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 221-243.