Cognitive representations of tool-use interactions

New Ideas in Psychology

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 239-246

  Massen, Cristina ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ RESEARCH CENTRE FOR WORKING ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN FACTORS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Action planning; Movement planning; Sensorimotor transformation; Stimulus response mapping; Tool use; Visuo motor mapping

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884126572     PISSN: 0732118X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2012.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Adam J.J. The additivity of stimulus-response compatibility with perceptual and motor factors in a visual choice reaction time task. Acta Psychologica 2000, 105:1-7.
2. Baber C. Cognition and tool use: Forms of engagement in human and animal use of tools 2003, Taylor & Francis, London.
3. Baber C. Cognitive aspects of tool use. Applied Ergonomics 2006, 37:3-15.
4. Beisert M., Massen C., Prinz W. Embodied rules in tool use: a tool-switching study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2010, 36:359-372.
5. Bernstein I., Segal E.M. Set and temporal integration. Perception & Psychophysics 1968, 4:233-236.
6. Berti A., Frassinetti F. When far becomes near: remapping of space by tool use. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12:415-420.
7. Biederman I. Mental set and mental arithmetic. Memory & Cognition 1973, 1:383-386.
8. Collins T., Schicke T., Röder B. Action goal selection and motor planning can be dissociated by tool use. Cognition 2008, 109:363-371.
9. Diedrichsen J., Ivry R.B., Hazeltine E., Kennerly S., Cohen A. Bimanual interference associated with the selection of target locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:64-77.
10. Farné A., Làdavas E. Dynamic size-change of hand peripersonal space following tool use. Neuroreport 2000, 11:1645-1649.
11. Gallagher A.G., McClure N., McGuigan J., Ritchie K., Sheehy N.P. An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills. Endoscopy 1998, 30:617-620.
12. Tools, language, and cognition in human evolution 1995, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. C.R. Gibson, T. Ingold (Eds.).
13. Hasbroucq T., Guiard Y., Kornblum S. The additivity of stimulus-response compatibility with the effects of sensory and motor factors in a tactile choice reaction time task. Acta Psychologica 1989, 72:139-144.
14. Herwig A., Massen C. Action planning with two-handed tools. Psychological Research 2009, 73:727-740.
15. Heuer H., Hegele M. The effects of mechanical transparency on adjustment to a complex visuomotor transformation at early and late working age. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2010, 16:399-412.
16. Hoffmann M., Marques H., Arieta A., Sumioka H., Lungarella M., Pfeifer R. Body schema in robotics: a review. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development 2010, 2:304-324.
17. Holmes N.P., Calvert G.A., Spence C. Extending or projecting peripersonal space with tools? Multisensory interactions highlight only the distal and proximal ends of tools. Neuroscience Letters 2004, 372:62-67.
18. Holmes N.P., Calvert G.A., Spence C. Tool use changes multisensory interactions in seconds: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task. Experimental Brain Research 2007, 183:465-476.
19. Iriki A., Tanaka M., Iwamura Y. Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurons. Neuroreport 1996, 7:2325-2330.
20. Janczyk M., Pfister R., Kunde W. On the persistence of tool-based compatibility effects. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 2012, 220:16-22.
21. Johnson-Frey S. What's so special about human tool use?. Neuron 2003, 39:201-204.
22. Johnson-Frey S. The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8:71-78.
23. Jordan M.I. Computational aspects of motor control and motor learning. Handbook of perception and action 1996, Vol. 2:71-120. Academic Press, London. H. Heuer, S.W. Keele (Eds.).
24. Kunde W., Müsseler J., Heuer H. Spatial compatibility effects with tool use. Human Factors 2007, 49:661-670.
25. Longo M., Lourenço S.F. On the nature of near space: effects of tool use and the transition to far space. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:977-981.
26. Maravita A., Iriki A. Tools for the body (schema). Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8:79-86.
27. Maravita A., Spence C., Kennett S., Driver J. Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans. Cognition 2002, 83:25-34.
28. Massen C. Observing human interaction with physical devices. Experimental Brain Research 2009, 199:49-58.
29. Massen C., Prinz W. Programming tool-use actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:692-704.
30. Massen C., Prinz W. Activation of action rules in action observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 2007, 33:1118-1130.
31. Massen C., Prinz W. Movements, actions and tool-use actions: an ideomotor approach to imitation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2009, 364:2349-2358.
32. Massen C., Sattler C. Coordinative constraints in bimanual tool use. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 206:71-79.
33. Massen C., Sattler C. Bimanual interference associated with handling different tool transformations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030692.
34. Mechsner F., Kerzel D., Knoblich G., Prinz W. Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination. Nature 2001, 414:69-73.
35. Merz F., Kalveram K.-Th., Huber K. Der Einfluß kognitiver Faktoren auf Steuerleistungen. Erkennen - Wollen - Handeln 1981, 327-335. Hogrefe, Göttingen. L. Tent (Ed.).
36. Morlaas J. Contribution à l'étude de l'apraxie 1928, Amédée Legrand, Paris.
37. Norman D.A., Shallice T. Attention to action: willed and automatic control of behavior. Consciousness and self-regulation 1986, Vol. 4:11-28. Plenum, New York.
38. Ochipa C., Rothi L.J.G., Heilman K.M. Ideational apraxia: a deficit in tool selection and use. Annals of Neurology 1989, 25:190-193.
39. Osiurak F., Jarry C., Le Gall D. Grasping the affordances, understanding the reasoning: toward a dialectical theory of human tool use. Psychological Review 2010, 117:517-540.
40. Povinelli D.J. Folk physics for apes: The chimpanzee's theory of how the world works 2000, Oxford University Press, New York.
41. Preston B. Cognition and tool use. Mind and Language 1998, 13:513-547.
42. Quinn J.T., Sherwood D.E. Time requirements of changes in program and parameter variables in rapid ongoing movements. Journal of Motor Behavior 1983, 15:163-178.
43. Rieger M., Verwey W., Massen C. The effect of continuous, nonlinearly transformed visual feedback on rapid aiming movements. Experimental Brain Research 2008, 161:1-12.
44. Roth K. Investigations on the basis of the generalized motor programme hypothesis. The motor-action controversy 1988, 261-288. Amsterdam: North-Holland. O.G. Meijer, K. Roth (Eds.).
45. Schmidt R.A. A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review 1975, 82:225-260.
46. Schmidt R.A. Motor control and learning 1986, Human Kinetics, Urbana-Champaign, IL. 2nd ed.
47. Schwartz D.L., Holton D.L. Tool use and the effect of action on the imagination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 2000, 26:1655-1665.
48. Shaffer L.H. Choice reaction with variable S-R mapping. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1965, 70:284-288.
49. Shaffer L.H. Some effects of partial advance information on choice reaction with fixed or variable S-R mapping. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1966, 72:541-545.
50. Sigaud O., Salaün C., Padois V. On-line regression algorithms for learning mechanical models of robots: a survey. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 2011, 59:1115-1129.
51. Smeets J.B.J., van den Dobbelsteen J.J., de Grave D.D.J., van Beers M.J., Brenner E. Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006, 103:18781-18786.
52. Sohn M.H., Carlson R.A. Procedural frameworks for simple arithmetic skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 1998, 24:1052-1067.
53. Sudevan P., Taylor D.A. The cuing and priming of cognitive operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1987, 13:89-103.
54. Sülzenbrück S. The impact of visual feedback type on the mastery of visuo-motor transformations. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 2012, 220:3-9.
55. Sülzenbrück S., Heuer H. Learning the visuomotor transformation of virtual and real sliding levers: simple approximations of complex transformations. Experimental Brain Research 2009, 195:153-165.
56. Sülzenbrück S., Heuer H. Type of visual feedback during practice influences the precision of the acquired internal model of a complex visuo-motor transformation. Ergonomics 2011, 54:34-46.
57. Sutter, C., Sülzenbrück, S., Rieger, M., & Müsseler, J. Limitations of distal effect anticipation when using tools. New Ideas in Psychology, this issue.
58. Verwey W.B., Heuer H. Nonlinear visuomotor transformations: locus and modularity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2007, 60:1629-1659.
59. Wang D.Y.D., Proctor R., Pick D.F. Coding controlled and triggered cursor movements as action effects: influences on the auditory Simon effect for wheel-rotation responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 2007, 33:657-669.
60. Weigelt C., Cardoso de Oliveira S. Visuomotor transformations affect bimanual coupling. Experimental Brain Research 2003, 148:439-450.
61. Willingham D.B. A neuropsychological theory of motor skill learning. Psychological Review 1998, 105:558-584.