Type of visual feedback during practice influences the precision of the acquired internal model of a complex visuo-motor transformation

Ergonomics

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 34-46

  Sülzenbrück, Sandra ^a   Heuer, Herbert ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ RESEARCH CENTRE FOR WORKING ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN FACTORS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Motor learning; Tool use; Visual feedback; Visuo motor transformation

Indexed keywords

CURSOR TRAJECTORY; HAND MOVEMENT; INTERNAL MODELS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MOTOR LEARNING; MOTOR SKILLS; MOVEMENT TIME; OPEN LOOPS; TOOL USE; TRAINING PROCEDURES; VISUAL FEEDBACK; VISUO-MOTOR TRANSFORMATION;

VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

ADAPTATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; LEARNING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SENSORY FEEDBACK; TEACHING;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78650330508     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: 13665847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2010.535023     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Abeele, S. and Bock, O., 2001. Sensorimotor adaptation to rotated visual input: different mechanisms for small versus large rotations. Experimental Brain Research, 140, 407-410.
2. Abend, W., Bizzi, E., and Morasso, P., 1982. Human arm trajectory formation. Brain, 105, 331-348.
3. Atkeson, C.G. and Hollerbach, J.M., 1985. Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements. Journal of Neuroscience, 5, 2318-2320.
4. Bernier, P.M., Chua, R., and Franks, I.M., 2005. Is proprioception calibrated during visually guided movements? Experimental Brain Research, 167, 292-296.
5. Cohen, M.M., 1967. Continuous versus terminal visual feedback in prism aftereffects. Perceptual Motor Skills, 24, 1295-1302.
6. Cohen, M.M., 1974. Changes in auditory localization following prismatic exposure under continuous and terminal visual feedback. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 38, 1202.
7. Cruse, H., et al., 1990. Utilization of sensory information for motor control. In: O. Neumann and W. Prinz, eds. Relationships between perception and action. Current approaches. Berlin: Springer, 43-79.
8. Davidson, P.R., et al., 2000. Detection of adaptive inverse models in the human motor system. Human Movement Science, 19, 761-795.
9. Flanagan, J.R. and Rao, A.K., 1995. Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space. Journal or Neurophysiology, 74, 2174-2178.
10. Fuchs, K.H., 2002. Minimally invasive surgery. Endoscopy, 34, 154-159.
11. Gallagher, A.G., et al., 1998. An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills. Endoscopy, 30, 617-620.
12. Goodbody, S.J. and Wolpert, D.M., 1999. The effect of visuomotor displacements on arm movement paths. Experimental Brain Research, 127, 213-223.
13. Heuer, H., 1988. 'Pseudoautomatisation' in manual control: a simulation study. Ergonomics, 31, 1729-1742.
14. Heuer, H., 2003. Motor control. In: A.F. Healy and R.W. Proctor, eds. Experimental psychology, Vol. 4: Handbook of psychology. New York: Wiley, 317-354.
15. Heuer, H. and Hegele, M., 2008. Constraints on visuo-motor adaptation depend on the type of visual feedback during practice. Experimental Brain Research, 185, 101-110.
16. Heuer, H. and Hegele, M., 2009. Adjustment to a complex visuo-motor transformation at early and late working age. Ergonomics, 92, 1039-1054.
17. Heuer, H. and Sülzenbrück, S., 2009. Trajectories in operating a handheld tool. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 375-389.
18. Hinder, M.R., et al., 2008. The contribution of visual feedback to visuomotor adaptation: how much and when? Brain Research, 1197, 123-134.
19. Jordan, M.I., 1996. Computational aspects of motor control and motor learning. In: H. Heuer and S.W. Keele, eds. Handbook of perception and action. Vol. 2: Motor skills. London: Academic Press, 71-120.
20. Kunde, W., Müsseler, J., and Heuer, H., 2007. Compatibility effects with tool use. Human Factors, 49, 661-670.
21. Lincoln, R.S., 1954. Learning a rate movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 465-470.
22. Morasso, P., 1981. Spatial control of arm movements. Experimental Brain Research, 42, 223-227.
23. Müsseler, J., et al., 2008. Does a tool eliminate spatial compatibility effects? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 211-231.
24. Proteau, L. and Isabelle, G., 2002. On the role of visual afferent information for the control of aiming movements towards targets of different sizes. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34, 367-384.
25. Redding, G.M. and Wallace, B., 1990. Effects on prism adaptation of duration and timing of visual feedback during pointing. Journal of Motor Behavior, 22, 209-224.
26. Schmidt, R.A., 1987. The acquisition of skill: some modifications to the perception-action relationship through practice. In: H. Heuer and A.F. Sanders, eds. Perspectives on perception and action. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 77-103.
27. Sülzenbrück, S. and Heuer, H., 2009. Learning the visuomotor transformation of virtual and real sliding levers: simple approximations of complex transformations. Experimental Brain Research, 195, 153-165.
28. Sülzenbrück, S. and Heuer, H., 2010. The trajectory of adaptation to the visuo-motor transformation of virtual and real sliding levers. Experimental Brain Research, 201, 549-560.
29. Tremblay, L. and Proteau, L., 1998. Specificity of practice: the case of powerlifting. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 69, 284-289.
30. Uhlarik, J.J. and Canon, L.K., 1971. Influence of concurrent and terminal exposure coditions on the nature of perceptual adaptation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 91, 233-239.
31. Verwey, W.B. and Heuer, H., 2007. Nonlinear visuomotor transformations: locus and modularity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1629-1659.
32. Walsh, C.M., et al., 2009. Concurrent versus terminal feedback: it may be better to wait. Academic Medicine, 84, S54-S57.
33. Wolpert, D.M., Ghahramani, Z., and Jordan, M.I., 1995. Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study. Experimental Brain Research, 103, 460-470.
34. Wolpert, D.M. and Kawato, M., 1998. Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Networks, 11, 1317-1329.
35. Wulf, G. and Shea, C.H., 2002. Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 185-211