The impact of visual feedback type on the mastery of visuo-motor transformations

Zeitschrift fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology

Volumn 220, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 3-9

  Sülzenbrück, Sandra ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ RESEARCH CENTRE FOR WORKING ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN FACTORS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Continuous feedback; Practice conditions; Terminal feedback; Visual feedback; Visuo motor transformations

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855653943     PISSN: 21908370     EISSN: 21512604     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000084     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Bernier, P.-M., Chua, R., & Franks, I. M. (2005). Is proprioception calibrated during visually guided movements? Experimental Brain Research, 167, 292-296.
2. Bock, O. (1992). Adaptation of aimed arm movements to sensory-motor discordance: Evidence for direction-independent gain control. Behavioral Brain Research, 51, 41-50.
3. Bock, O., & Burghoff, M. (1997). Visuo-motor adaptation: Evidence for a distributed amplitude control system. Behavioral Brain Research, 89, 267-273.
4. Flanagan, J. R., & Rao, A. (1995). Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: Evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space. Journal of Neurophysiology, 74, 2174-2178.
5. Goodbody, S. J., & Wolpert, M. (1999). The effect of visuomotor displacements on arm movement paths. Experimental Brain Research, 127, 213-223.
6. Hay, J. C., Pick, H. L., & Ideka, K. (1963). Visual capture produced by prism spectacles. Psychological Science, 2, 215-216.
7. Heuer, H. (2003). Motor control. In A. F. Healy & R. W. Proctor (Eds.), Handbook of psychology. Vol. 4: Experimental psychology (pp. 317-354). New York, NY: Wiley.
8. Heuer, H., & Hegele, M. (2008a). Adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor amplitude transformation with continuous and terminal visual feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior, 40, 368-379.
9. Heuer, H., & Hegele, M. (2008b). Constraints on visuo-motor adaptation depend on the type of visual feedback during practice. Experimental Brain Research, 185, 101-110.
10. Heuer, H., & Sülzenbrück, S. (2009). Trajectories in operating a hand-held tool. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 375-389.
11. Hinder, M. R., Riek, S., Tresilian, J. R., de Rugy, A., & Carson, R. G. (2010). Real-time error detection but not error correction drives automatic visuomotor adaptation. Experimental Brain Research, 201, 191-207.
12. Hinder, M. R., Tresilian, J. R., Riek, S., & Carson, R. G. (2008). The contribution of visual feedback to visuomotor adaptation: How much and when? Brain Research, 1197, 123-134.
13. Jones, K. E., Wessberg, J., & Valbo, A. (2001). Proprioceptive feedback is reduced during adaptation to a visuomotor transformation: Preliminary findings. Neuroreport, 12, 4029-4033.
14. Jordan, M. I. (1996). Computational aspects of motor control and motor learning. In H. Heuer & S. W. Keele (Eds.), Handbook of perception and action. Vol. 2: Motor skills. (pp. 71-120). London, UK: Academic Press.
15. Krakauer, J. W., Ghilardi, M. F., & Ghez, C. (1999). Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 1026-1031.
16. Krakauer, J. W., Pine, Z. M., Ghilardi, M.-F., & Ghez, C. (2000). Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 8916-8924.
17. McNay, E. C., & Willingham, D. B. (1998). Deficit in learning of a motor skill requiring strategy, but not of perceptuomotor recalibration, with aging. Learning & Memory, 4, 411-420.
18. Morasso, P. (1981). Spatial control of arm movements. Experimental Brain Research, 42, 465-470.
19. Pew, R. W., & Rupp, G. L. (1971). Two quantitative measures of skill development. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 1-7.
20. Pine, Z. M., Krakauer, J. W., Gordon, J., & Ghez, C. (1996). Learning of scaling factors and reference axes for reaching movements. Neuroreport, 7, 2357-2361.
21. Proteau, L., & Isabelle, G. (2002). On the role of visual afferent information for the control of aiming movements toward targets of different sizes. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34, 367-384.
22. Proteau, L., Marteniuk, R. G., & Lévesque, L. (1992). A sensorimotor basis for motor learning: Evidence indicating specificity of practice. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 557-575.
23. Schmidt, R. A. (1987). The acquisition of skill: Some modifications to the perception-action relationship through practice. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 77-103). Hillsdale, NY: Erlbaum.
24. Smeets, J. B. J., van den Dobbelsteen, J. J., de Grave, D. D. J., van Beers, M. J., & Brenner, E. (2006). Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 18781-18786.
25. Sülzenbrück, S., & Heuer, H. (2009). Learning the visuomotor transformation of virtual and real sliding levers: Simple approximations of complex transformations. Experimental Brain Research, 195, 153-165.
26. Sülzenbrück, S., & Heuer, H. (2010). The trajectory of adaptation to the visuo-motor transformation of virtual and real sliding levers. Experimental Brain Research, 201, 549-560.
27. Sülzenbrück, S., & Heuer, H. (2011). Type of visual feedback during practice influences the precision of the acquired internal model of a complex visuo-motor transformation. Ergonomics, 54, 34-46.
28. Taylor, J. A., & Ivry, R. B. (2011). Flexible cognitive strategies during motor learning. PLoS Computational Biology, 7, e1001096.
29. Todorov, E. (2005). Stochastic optimal control and estimation methods adapted to the noise characteristics of the sensorimotor system. Neural Computation, 17, 1084-1108.
30. Tong, C., Wolpert, D. M., & Flanagan, J. R. (2002). Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: Evidence from an interference study. Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 1108-1113.
31. Tremblay, L., & Proteau, L. (1998). Specificity of practice: The case of powerlifting. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 69, 284-289.
32. Uhlarik, J., & Cannon, L. (1971). Influences of concurrent and terminal exposure conditions on the nature of perceptual adaptation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 91, 233-239.
33. Verwey, W. B., & Heuer, H. (2007). Nonlinear visuomotor transformations: Locus and modularity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1629-1659.
34. Wang, J., & Sainburg, R. L. (2005). Adaptation to visuomotor rotations remaps movement vectors, not final positions. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 4024-4030.
35. Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Jordan, M. I. (1995). Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study. Experimental Brain Research, 103, 460-470.
36. Wolpert, D. M., & Kawato, M. (1998). Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Networks, 11, 1317-1329.