Learning the visuomotor transformation of virtual and real sliding levers: Simple approximations of complex transformations

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 195, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 153-165

  Sülzenbrück, Sandra ^a   Heuer, Herbert ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ RESEARCH CENTRE FOR WORKING ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN FACTORS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINEMATICS; LEARNING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOOL USE; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOMECHANICS; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MOVEMENT; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67349248084     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1764-y     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. S Abeele O Bock 2001 Sensorimotor adaptation to rotated visual input: different mechanisms for small versus large rotations Exp Brain Res 140 407 410 (Pubitemid 32938322)
2. W Abend E Bizzi P Morasso 1982 Human arm trajectory formation Brain 105 331 348
3. CG Atkeson JM Hollerbach 1985 Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements J Neurosci 5 2318 2320 (Pubitemid 15226922)
4. O Bock S Abeele U Eversheim 2003 Human adaptation to rotated vision: interplay of a continuous and a discrete process Exp Brain Res 152 528 532 (Pubitemid 37267001)
5. PR Davidson RD Jones HR Sirisena JH Andreae 2000 Detection of adaptive inverse models in the human motor system Hum Mov Sci 19 761 795
6. PM Fitts 1954 The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement J Exp Psychol 47 381 391
7. JR Flanagan AK Rao 1995 Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space J Neurophysiol 74 2174 2178
8. JR Flanagan E Nakano H Imamizu R Osu T Yoshioka M Kawato 1999 Composition and decomposition of internal models in motor learning under altered kinematic and dynamic environments J Neurosci 19 1 5
9. AG Gallagher N McClure J McGuigan K Ritchie NP Sheehy 1998 An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills Endoscopy 30 617 620 (Pubitemid 28479644)
10. C Ghez M Favilla MF Ghilardi J Gordon R Bermejo S Pullman 1997 Discrete and continuous planning of hand movements and isometric force trajectories Exp Brain Res 115 217 233 (Pubitemid 27261139)
11. J Gordon MF Ghilardi SE Cooper C Ghez 1994 Accuracy of planar reaching movements. II. Systematic extent errors resulting from inertial anisotropy Exp Brain Res 99 112 130 (Pubitemid 24169581)
12. H Heuer M Hegele 2008 Adaptation to visuo-motor rotations in younger and older adults Psychol Aging 23 190 202
13. H Heuer M Hegele 2008 Constraints on visuo-motor adaptation depend on the type of visual feedback during practice Exp Brain Res 185 101 110
14. Heuer H, Sülzenbrück S (2009) Trajectories in operating a hand-held tool. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform (in press)
15. Jordan MI (1996) Computational aspects of motor control and motor learning. In: Heuer H, Keele SW (eds) Handbook of perception and action, vol 2: motor skills. Academic, London, pp 71-120
16. K Koh DE Meyer 1991 Function learning: induction of continuous stimulus-response relations J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 17 811 836 (Pubitemid 23556201)
17. JW Krakauer MF Ghilardi C Ghez 1999 Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching Nat Neurosci 2 1026 1031 (Pubitemid 30599568)
18. W Kunde J Müsseler H Heuer 2007 Compatibility effects with tool use Hum Factors 49 661 670 (Pubitemid 47122694)
19. Ishihara S (1999) Ishihara's test for colour deficiency. Kanehara & Co, Tokyo
20. Marteniuk RG, Romanow SKE (1983) Human movement organization and learning as revealed by variability of movement, use of kinematic information, and Fourier analysis. In: Magill RA (ed) Memory and control of action. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 167-197
21. F Magescas C Urquizar C Prablanc 2009 Two modes of error processing in reaching Exp Brain Res 193 337 350
22. P Morasso 1981 Spatial control of arm movements Exp Brain Res 42 223 227 (Pubitemid 11147291)
23. J Müsseler W Kunde D Gausepohl H Heuer 2008 Does a tool eliminate spatial compatibility effects? Eur J Cogn Psychol 20 211 231
24. FP Ottes AM van Gisbergen JJ Eggermont 1984 Metrics of saccade responses to visual double stimuli: two different modes Vision Res 24 1169 1179 (Pubitemid 15190293)
25. C Papaxanthis M Schieppati R Gentili T Pozzo 2002 Imagined and actual arm movements have similar durations when performed under different conditions of direction and mass Exp Brain Res 143 447 452 (Pubitemid 34253293)
26. K Pipereit O Bock J-L Vercher 2006 The contribution of proprioceptive feedback to sensorimotor adaptation Exp Brain Res 174 45 52 (Pubitemid 44337545)
27. C Tong DM Wolpert JR Flanagan 2002 Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: evidence from an interference study J Neurosci 22 1108 1113 (Pubitemid 34141790)
28. DM Wolpert M Kawato 1998 Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control Neural Netw 11 1317 1329 (Pubitemid 28527128)
29. DM Wolpert Z Ghahramani MI Jordan 1995 Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study Exp Brain Res 103 460 470