Bimanual interference associated with handling different tool transformations

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 893-909

  Massen, Cristina ^a   Sattler, Christine ^b  

^a LEIBNIZ RESEARCH CENTRE FOR WORKING ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN FACTORS   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bimanual coordination; Bimanual interference; Movement planning; Tool transformation; Tool use

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HAND; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84881087360     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0030692     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Baber, C. (2006). Cognitive aspects of tool use. Applied Ergonomics, 37, 3-15. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2005.06.004
2. Beck, B. B. (1980). Animal tool behavior: The use and manufacture of tools. New York, NY: Garland STPM Press.
3. Beisert, M., Massen, C., & Prinz, W. (2010). Embodied rules in tool use: A tool-switching study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 359-372. doi:10.1037/a0016801
4. Berti, A., & Frassinetti, F. (2000). When far becomes near: Remapping of space by tool use. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 415-420. doi:10.1162/089892900562237
5. Bock, O., & Burghoff, M. (1997). Visuomotor adaptation: Evidence for a distributed amplitude control system. Behavioural Brain Research, 89, 267-273. doi:10.1016/S0166-4328(97)00069-7
6. Cardinali, L., Frassinetti, F., Brozzoli, C., Urquizar, C., Roy, A. C., & Farné, A. (2009). Tool-use induces morphological updating of the body schema. Current Biology, 19, R478-R479. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.05 .009
7. Collins, T., Schicke, T., & R0̈der, B. (2008). Action goal selection and motor planning can be dissociated by tool use. Cognition, 109, 363-371. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.001
8. Cunningham, H. A., & Welch, R. B. (1994). Multiple concurrent visualmotor mappings: Implications for models of adaptation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 987-999. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.5.987
9. Diedrichsen, J., Hazeltine, E., Kennerly, S., & Ivry, R. B. (2001). Moving to directly cued locations abolishes spatial interference during bimanual actions. Psychological Science, 12, 493-498. doi:10.1111/1467-9280 .00391
10. Diedrichsen, J., Ivry, R. B., Hazeltine, E., Kennerly, S., & Cohen, A. (2003). Bimanual interference associated with the selection of target locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 64-77. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.29.1.64
11. Durwen, H. F., & Herzog, A. G. (1992). Electromyographic investigation of mirror movements in normal adults: Variation of frequency with site, effort, and repetition of movement. Brain Dysfunction, 5, 310-318.
12. Farné, A., & Làdavas, E. (2000). Dynamic size-change of hand peripersonal space following tool use. Neuroreport, 11, 1645-1649. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200006050-00010
13. Franz, E. A. (1997). Spatial coupling in the coordination of complex actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 684-704.
14. Head, H., & Holmes, H. G. (1911). Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions. Brain, 34, 102-254. doi:10.1093/brain/34.2-3.102
15. Herwig, A., & Massen, C. (2009). Action planning with two-handed tools. Psychological Research, 73, 727-740. doi:10.1007/s00426-008-0176-0
16. Heuer, H. (1993). Structural constraints on bimanual movements. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 55, 83-98. doi:10.1007/ BF00419639
17. Heuer, H., & Hegele, M. (2008). Adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor amplitude transformation with continuous and terminal visual feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior, 40, 368-379. doi:10.3200/JMBR.40.5.368- 379
18. Heuer, H., & Klein, W. (2006a). The modulation of intermanual interactions during the specification of the directions of bimanual movements. Experimental Brain Research, 169, 162-181. doi:10.1007/s00221-005- 0135-6
19. Heuer, H., & Klein, W. (2006b). The influence of movement cues on intermanual interactions. Psychological Research, 70, 229-244. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0218-9
20. Heuer, H., Spijkers, W., Kleinsorge, T., van der Loo, H., & Steglich, C. (1998). The time course of cross-talk during the simultaneous specification of bimanual movement amplitudes. Experimental Brain Research, 118, 381-392. doi:10.1007/s002210050292
21. Holmes, N. P., Calvert, G. A., & Spence, C. (2004). Extending or projecting peripersonal space with tools? Multisensory interactions highlight only the distal and proximal ends of tools. Neuroscience Letters, 372, 62-67. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2004.09.024
22. Holmes, N. P., Calvert, G. A., & Spence, C. (2007). Tool use changes multisensory interactions in seconds: Evidence from the crossmodal congruency task. Experimental Brain Research, 183, 465-476. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1060-7
23. Kelso, J. A. S., Southard, D. L., & Goodman, D. (1979). On the coordination of two-handed movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 229-238. doi:10.1037/0096- 1523.5.2.229
24. Klapp, S. T. (1979). Doing two things at once: The role of temporal compatibility. Memory and Cognition, 7, 375-381. doi:10.3758/ BF03196942
25. Krakauer, J. W., Pine, Z. M., Ghilardi, M. F., & Ghez, C. (2000). Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 8916-8924.
26. Kunde, W., Müsseler, J., & Heuer, H. (2007). Spatial compatibility effects with tool use. Human Factors, 49, 661- 670. doi:10.1518/ 001872007X215737
27. Kunde, W., Pfister, R., & Janczyk, M. (2012). The locus of tooltransformation costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 703-714.
28. Kunde, W., & Weigelt, M. (2005). Goal congruency in bimanual object manipulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 145-156. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.145
29. Longo, M. R., & Lourenco, S. F. (2006). On the nature of near space: Effects of tool use and the transition to far space. Neuropsychologia, 44, 977-981. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.09.003
30. Maravita, A., & Iriki, A. (2004). Tools for the body (schema). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 79-86. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.008
31. Maravita, A., Spence, C., Kennett, S., & Driver, J. (2002). Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans. Cognition, 83, 25-34. doi:10.1016/S0010- 0277(02)00003-3
32. Marteniuk, R. G., MacKenzie, C. L., & Baba, D. M. (1984). Bimanual movement control: Information processing and interaction effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 335-365.
33. Massen, C., & Prinz, W. (2007a). Programming tool-use actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 692-704. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.692
34. Massen, C., & Prinz, W. (2007b). Activation of action rules in action observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 33, 1118-1130. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.1118
35. Massen, C., & Sattler, C. (2010a). Coordinative constraints in bimanual tool use. Experimental Brain Research, 206, 71-79. doi:10.1007/ s00221-010-2399-8
36. Massen, C., & Sattler, C. (2010b). Bimanual interference with compatible and incompatible tool transformations. Acta Psychologica, 135, 201- 208. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.06.007
37. McDowell, M. J., & Wolff, P. H. (1997). A functional analysis of human mirror movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 29, 85-96. doi:10.1080/ 00222899709603472
38. Mechsner, F., Kerzel, D., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination. Nature, 414, 69 -73. doi:10.1038/ 35102060
39. Müsseler, J., & Skottke, E.-M. (2011). Compatibility relationships with simple lever tools. Human Factors, 53, 383-390. doi:10.1177/ 0018720811408599
40. Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation (Vol. 4, pp. 11-28). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
41. Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2003). Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: Measures of effect size for some common research designs. Psychological Methods, 8, 434-447. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.8.4.434
42. Rieger, M., Verwey, W., & Massen, C. (2008). The effect of continuous, nonlinearly transformed visual feedback on rapid aiming movements. Experimental Brain Research, 191, 1-12. doi:10.1007/s00221-008- 1505-7
43. Spijkers, W., & Heuer, H. (1995). Structural constraints on the performance of symmetrical bimanual movements with different amplitudes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 716-740.
44. Spijkers, W., & Heuer, H. (2004). Behavioral principles of interlimb coordination. In S. P. Swinnen & J. Duysens (Eds.), Neuro-behavioral determinants of interlimb coordination (pp. 223-258). Norwell, MA: Kluwer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-9056-3_9
45. Spijkers, W., Heuer, H., Kleinsorge, T., & van der Loo, H. (1997). Preparation of bimanual movements with same and different amplitudes: Specification interference as revealed by reaction time. Acta Psychologica, 96, 207-227. doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(97)00017-6
46. Spijkers, W., Heuer, H., Steglich, C., & Kleinsorge, T. (2000). Specification of movement amplitudes for the left and right hands: Evidence for transient parametric coupling from overlapping-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1091-1105. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.26.3.1091
47. St Amant, R., & Horton, T. E. (2008). Revisiting the definition of animal tool use. Animal Behaviour, 75, 1199-1208. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav .2007.09.028
48. Swinnen, S. P., Dounskaia, N., Levin, O., & Duysens, J. (2001). Constraints during bimanual coordination: The role of direction in relation to amplitude and force requirements. Behavioural Brain Research, 123, 201-218. doi:10.1016/S0166-4328(01)00210-8
49. Swinnen, S. P., Puttemans, V., Vangheluwe, S., Wenderoth, N., Levin, O., & Dounskaia, N. (2003). Directional interference during bimanual coordination: Is interlimb coupling mediated by afferent or efferent processes. Behavioural Brain Research, 139, 177-195. doi:10.1016/S0166- 4328(02)00266-8
50. Verwey, W. B., & Heuer, H. (2007). Nonlinear visuomotor transformations: Locus and modularity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1629-1659. doi:10.1080/17470210601100472
51. Weigelt, C., & Cardoso de Oliveira, S. (2003). Visuomotor transformations affect bimanual coupling. Experimental Brain Research, 148, 439-450.
52. Weigelt, M., Rieger, M., Mechsner, F., & Prinz, W. (2007). Target-related coupling in bimanual reaching movements. Psychological Research, 71, 438-447. doi:10.1007/s00426-005-0043-1
53. Willingham, D. B. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 105, 558-584. doi:10.1037/0033-295X .105.3.558