Nonlinear visuomotor transformations: Locus and modularity

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 60, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 1629-1659

  Verwey, Willem B ^a,b   Heuer, Herbert ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b LEIBNIZ RESEARCH CENTRE FOR WORKING ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN FACTORS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36048950522     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210601100472     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abrams, R. A., van Dillen, L., & Stemmons, V. (1994). Multiple sources of spatial information for aimed limb movements. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance: XV. Conscious and nonconscious processing (pp. 267-290). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
2. Bedford, F. L. (1989). Constraints on learning new mappings between perceptual dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 232-248.
3. Bedford, F. L. (1994). Of computer mice and men. Cahier de Psychologie Cognitive, 13, 405-426.
4. Bock, O., Abeele, S., & Eversheim, U. (2003). Human adaptation to rotated vision: Interplay of a continuous and a discrete process. Experimental Brain Research, 152, 528-532.
5. Bock, O., & Burghoff, M. (1997). Visuo-motor adaptation: Evidence for a distributed amplitude control system. Behavioral Brain Research, 89, 267-273.
6. Clower, D. M., & Boussaoud, D. (2000). Selective use of perceptual recalibration versus visuomotor skill acquisition. Journal of Neurophysiology, 84, 2703-2708.
7. Cruse, H., & Brüwer, M. (1987). The human arm as a redundant manipulator: The control of path and joint angles. Biological Cybernetics, 57, 137-144.
8. Cunningham, H. A. (1989). Aiming error under transformed spatial mappings suggests a structure for visual-motor maps. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 493-506.
9. Cunningham, H. A., & Welch, R. B. (1994). Multiple concurrent visual-motor mappings: Implications for models of adaptation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 987-999.
10. Flanagan, J. R., & Rao, A. (1995). Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: Evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space. Journal of Neurophysiology, 74, 2174-2178.
11. Flash, T., & Hogan, N. (1985). The coordination of arm movements: An experimentally confirmed mathematical model. Journal of Neuroscience, 5, 1688-1703.
12. Fodor, J. A. (1983). Modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Ghahramani, Z., & Wolpert, D. M. (1997). Modular decomposition in visuomotor learning. Nature, 386, 392-395.
14. Ghez, C., Favilla, M., Ghilardi, M. F., Gordon, J., Bermejo, R., & Pullman, S. (1997). Discrete and continuous planning of hand movements and isometric force trajectories. Experimental Brain Research, 115, 217-233.
15. Goodale, M. A., Pelisson, D., & Prablanc, C. (1986). Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature, 320, 748-750.
16. Gottsdanker, R. M. (1952). The accuracy of prediction motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 26-36.
17. Gottsdanker, R. M. (1955). A further study of prediction-motion. American Journal of Psychology, 68, 432-437.
18. Harris, C. M., & Wolpert, D. M. (1998). Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature, 394, 780-784.
19. Hay, J. C. (1974). Motor transformation learning. Perception, 3, 487-496.
20. Helsen, W. F., Elliott, D., Starkes, J. L., & Ricker, K. L. (1998). Temporal and spatial coupling of point of gaze and hand movements in aiming. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 249-259.
21. Hening, W., Favilla, M., & Ghez, C. (1988). Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. V. Gradual specification of response amplitude. Experimental Brain Research, 71, 116-128.
22. Heuer, H. (2003). Motor control. In A. F. Healey & R. W. Proctor (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 4. Experimental psychology (pp. 317-354). New York: Wiley.
23. Heuer, H., & Sangals, J. (1998). Task-dependent mixtures of coordinate systems in visuomotor transformations. Experimental Brain Research, 119, 224-236.
24. Inoue, K., Kawashima, R., Satoh, K., Kinomura, S., Sugiura, M., Goto, R., et al. (2000). A PET study of visuomotor learning and optical rotation. NeuroImage, 11, 505-516.
25. Jeannerod, M. (1999). To act or not to act: Perspectives on the representation of actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 1-29.
26. Jordan, M. I. (1996). Computational aspects of motor control and motor learning. In H. Heuer & S. W. Keele (Eds.), Handbook of perception and action: Vol. 2. Motor skills (pp. 71-120). London: Academic Press.
27. Kawato, M. (1996). Bidirectional theory approach to integration. In T. Inui & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance: XVI. Information integration in perception and communication (pp. 335-367). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Khan, M. A., Lawrence, G., Fourkas, A., Franks, I. M., Elliott, D., & Pembroke, S. (2003). Online versus offline processing of visual feedback in the control of movement amplitude. Acta Psychologica, 113, 83-97.
29. Knoblich, G., & Kircher, T. T. J. (2004). Deceiving oneself about being in control: Conscious detection of changes in visuomotor coupling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 657-666.
30. Koh, K., & Meyer, D. E. (1991). Function learning: Induction of continuous stimulus-response relations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 811-836.
31. Krakauer, J. W., Pine, Z. M., Ghilardi, M. F., & Ghez, C. (2000). Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 8916-8924.
32. Kunde, W., Koch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2004). Anticipated action effects affect the selection, initiation and execution of actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 87-106.
33. Kurata, K., & Hoshi, E. (1999). Reacquisition deficits in prism adaptation after muscimol microinjection into the ventral remotor cortex of monkeys. Journal of Neurophysiology, 81, 1927-1938.
34. Poulton, E. C. (1980). Range effects and asymmetric transfer in studies of motor skill. In C. H. Nadeau, W. R. Halliwell, K. M. Newell, & G. C. Roberts (Eds.), Psychology of motor behavior and sport-1979 (pp. 339-359). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers.
35. Poulton, E. C. (1989). Bias in quantifying judgments. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
36. Prager, A. D., & Contreras-Vidal, J. L. (2003). Adaptation to display rotation and display gain distortions during drawing. Human Movement Science, 22, 173-187.
37. Pratt, J., & Abrams, R. A. (1996). Practice and component submovements: The roles of programming and feedback in rapid aimed limb movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 28, 149-156.
38. Redding, G. M., & Wallace, B. (1992). Adaptive eye-hand coordination: Implications of prism adaptation for perceptual-motor organization. In L. Proteau & D. Elliott (Eds.), Vision and motor control (pp. 105-127). Amsterdam: North Holland.
39. Rieger, M., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2005). Compensation for and adaptation to changes in the environment. Experimental Brain Research, 163, 487-502.
40. Schmidt, R. A., Zelaznik, H. N., Hawkins, B., Frank, J. S., & Quinn, J. T. (1979). Motor-output variability: A theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychological Review, 86, 415-451.
41. Seidler, R. D., Bloomberg, J. J., & Stelmach, G. E. (2001). Patterns of transfer of adaptation among body segments. Behavioural Brain Research, 122, 145-157.
42. Todorov, E., & Jordan, M. I. (2002). Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 1226-1235.
43. van Beers, R. J., Haggard, P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2004). The role of execution noise in movement variability. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91, 1050-1063.
44. van Galen, G. P., & Schomaker, L. R. B. (1992). Fitts' law as a low-pass filter effect of muscle stiffness. Human Movement Science, 11, 11-21.
45. Voigt, E. (1933). Über den Aufbau von Bewegungsgestalten. Neue psychologische Studien, 9, 1-32.
46. Wagenaar, W. A., & Sagaria, S. D. (1975). Misperception of exponential growth. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 416-422.
47. Welch, R. B., Bridgeman, B., Anand, S., & Brownman, K. (1993). Alternating prism exposure causes dual adaptation and generalization to a novel displacement. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 195-204.
48. Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Jordan, M. I. (1995). Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study. Experimental Brain Research, 103, 460-470.
49. Wulf, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). Directing attention to movement effects enhances learning: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 648-660.