The additivity of stimulus-response compatibility with perceptual and motor factors in a visual choice reaction time task

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 105, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 1-7

  Adam, Jos J ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Information processing; Reaction time; Stimulus response compatibility

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FINGER; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; FINGERS; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0345853377     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00042-1     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Adam, J. J., Boon, B., Paas, F. G. W. C., & Umiltà, C. (1998). The up-right/down-left advantage for vertically oriented stimuli and horizontally oriented responses: a dual-strategy hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1582-1595.
2. Brebner, J., Shepard, M., & Cairney, P. (1972). Spatial relationships and S-R compatibility. Acta Psychologica, 36, 1-15.
3. Burle, B., & Bonnet, M. (1997). Further argument for the existence of a pacemaker in the human information processing system. Acta Psychologica, 97, 129-143.
4. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
5. Fitts, P. M., & Deininger, R. L. (1954). S-R compatibility: correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 483-492.
6. Frowein, H. W., & Sanders, A. F. (1978). Effects of visual stimulus degradation, S-R compatibility and foreperiod duration on choice reaction time and movement time. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 12, 106-108.
7. Guiard, Y. (1983). The lateral coding of rotations: a study of the Simon effect with wheel-rotation responses. Journal of Motor Behavior, 15, 331-342.
8. Hasbroucq, T., Guiard, Y., & Kornblum, S. (1989). The additivity of stimulus-response compatibility with the effects of sensory and motor factors in a tactile choice reaction time task. Acta Psychologica, 72, 139-144.
9. Hasbroucq, T., Mouret, I., Seal, J., & Akamatsu, M. (1995). Finger pairings in two-choice reaction time tasks: does the between-hands advantage reflect response preparation?. Journal of Motor Behavior, 27, 251-262.
10. Hasbroucq, T., & Possamaï, C. (1995). Does irrelevant stimulus location affect response selection?. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 349-356.
11. Hasbroucq, T., Rihet, P., Blin, O., & Possamaï, C. (1997). Serotonin and human information processing: fluvoxamine can improve reaction time performance. Neuroscience Letters, 229, 204-208.
12. Kornblum, S. (1965). Response competition and/or inhibition in two-choice reaction time. Psychonomic Science, 2, 55-56.
13. Miller, J., van der Ham, F., & Sanders, A. F. (1995). Overlapping stage models and reaction time additivity: effects of the activation equation. Acta Psychologica, 90, 11-28.
14. Reeve, T. G., & Proctor, R. W. (1988). Determinants of two-choice reaction-time patterns for same-hand and different-hand finger pairings. Journal of Motor Behavior, 20, 317-340.
15. Reeve, T. G., & Proctor, R. W. (1990). The salient-features coding principle for spatial- and symbolic-compatibility effects. In R. W. Proctor, & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 163-180). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
16. Ridderinkhof, K. R. (1993). Interference from irrelevant information. Unpublished dissertation, Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
17. Rihet, P., Hasbroucq, T., Blin, O., & Possamaï, C. (1999). Serotonin and human information processing: an electromyographic study of the effects of fluvoxamineon choice reaction time. Neuroscience Letters, 265, 143-146.
18. Sanders, A. F. (1998). Elements of human performance: reaction processes and attention in human skill. Mahwah, N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor, & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 31-86). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
20. Simon, J. R., & Ruddell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300-304.
21. Spijkers, W. A. C., & Walter, A. (1985). Response processing stages in choice reactions. Acta Psychologica, 58, 191-204.
22. Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315.
23. Umiltà, C., & Nicoletti, R. (1990). Spatial S-R compatibility. In R. W. Proctor, & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: an integrated perspective (pp. 89-116). Amsterdam: North-Holland.