Dissecting partner recognition by an intrinsically disordered protein using descriptive random mutagenesis

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 425, Issue 18, 2013, Pages 3495-3509

  Gruet, Antoine ^a   Dosnon, Marion ^a   Vassena, Andrea ^a   Lombard, Vincent ^a   Gerlier, Denis ^b   Bignon, Christophe ^a   Longhi, Sonia ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b CENTRE INTERNATIONAL DE RECHERCHE EN INFECTIOLOGIE   (France)

Author keywords

Library; Partner recognition; Protein complementation assay; Protein protein interactions; Split GFP reassembly

Indexed keywords

VIRUS NUCLEOPROTEIN; VIRUS PHOSPHOPROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE LIBRARY; MEASLES VIRUS; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; MUTAGENESIS; NONHUMAN; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN INTERACTION; SATURATION MUTAGENESIS;

MEASLES VIRUS;

EID: 84883289774     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: 10898638     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.06.025     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Uversky VN, Gillespie JR, Fink AL. Why are "natively unfolded" proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions? Proteins 2000;41:415-27.
2. Dunker AK, Lawson JD, Brown CJ, Williams RM, Romero P, Oh JS, et al. Intrinsically disordered protein. J Mol Graphics Modell 2001;19:26-59.
3. Tompa P. Intrinsically unstructured proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 2002;27:527-33.
4. Uversky VN. Natively unfolded proteins: a point where biology waits for physics. Protein Sci 2002;11:739-56.
5. Tompa P. Unstructural biology coming of age. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2011;21:419-25.
6. Uversky VN, Dunker AK. Multiparametric analysis of intrinsically disordered proteins: looking at intrinsic disorder through compound eyes. Anal Chem 2012;84:2096-104.
7. Dunker AK, Cortese MS, Romero P, Iakoucheva LM, Uversky VN. Flexible nets. FEBS J 2005;272:5129-48.
8. Uversky VN, Oldfield CJ, Dunker AK. Showing your ID: intrinsic disorder as an ID for recognition, regulation and cell signaling. J Mol Recognit 2005;18:343-84.
9. Haynes C, Oldfield CJ, Ji F, Klitgord N, Cusick ME, Radivojac P, et al. Intrinsic disorder is a common feature of hub proteins from four eukaryotic interactomes. PLoS Comput Biol 2006;2:e100.
10. Dunker AK, Garner E, Guilliot S, Romero P, Albrecht K, Hart J, et al. Protein disorder and the evolution of molecular recognition: theory, predictions and observations. Pac Symp Biocomput 1998;3:473-84.
11. Wright PE, Dyson HJ. Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. J Mol Biol 1999;293:321-31.
12. Iakoucheva LM, Brown CJ, Lawson JD, Obradovic Z, Dunker AK. Intrinsic disorder in cell-signaling and cancer-associated proteins. J Mol Biol 2002;323:573-84.
13. Gunasekaran K, Tsai CJ, Kumar S, Zanuy D, Nussinov R. Extended disordered proteins: targeting function with less scaffold. Trends Biochem Sci 2003;28:81-5.
14. Chen JW, Romero P, Uversky VN, Dunker AK. Conservation of intrinsic disorder in protein domains and families: II. Functions of conserved disorder. J Proteome Res 2006;5: 888-98.
15. Dyson HJ, Wright PE. Coupling of folding and binding for unstructured proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:54-60.
16. Dyson HJ, Wright PE. Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005;6:197-208.
17. Pancsa R, Fuxreiter M. Interactions via intrinsically disordered regions: what kind of motifs? IUBMB Life 2012;64: 513-20.
18. Wrabl JO, Gu J, Liu T, Schrank TP, Whitten ST, Hilser VJ. The role of protein conformational fluctuations in allostery, function, and evolution. Biophys Chem 2011;159:129-41.
19. Motlagh HN, Hilser VJ. Agonism/antagonism switching in allosteric ensembles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109: 4134-9.
20. Tompa P, Fuxreiter M. Fuzzy complexes: polymorphism and structural disorder in protein-protein interactions. Trends Biochem Sci 2008;33:2-8.
21. Bhattacherjee A, Wallin S. Coupled folding-binding in a hydrophobic/polar protein model: impact of synergistic folding and disordered flanks. Biophys J 2012;102:569-78.
22. Goldsmith M, Tawfik DS. Directed enzyme evolution: beyond the low-hanging fruit. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2012;22:406-12.
23. Goldsmith M, Tawfik DS. Enzyme engineering by targeted libraries. Methods Enzymol 2013;523:257-83.
24. Levin KB, Dym O, Albeck S, Magdassi S, Keeble AH, Kleanthous C, et al. Following evolutionary paths to protein- protein interactions with high affinity and selectivity. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2009;16:1049-55.
25. Soskine M, Tawfik DS. Mutational effects and the evolution of new protein functions. Nat Rev Genet 2010;11:572-82.
26. Salverda ML, Dellus E, Gorter FA, Debets AJ, van der Oost J, Hoekstra RF, et al. Initial mutations direct alternative pathways of protein evolution. PLoS Genet 2011;7:e1001321.
27. McLaughlin RN, Poelwijk FJ, Raman A, Gosal WS, Ranganathan R. The spatial architecture of protein function and adaptation. Nature 2012;491:138-42.
28. Hawkins RE, Russell SJ, Baier M, Winter G. The contribution of contact and non-contact residues of antibody in the affinity of binding to antigen. The interaction of mutant D1.3 antibodies with lysozyme. J Mol Biol 1993;234:958-64.
29. Holm L, Koivula AK, Lehtovaara PM, Hemminki A, Knowles JK. Random mutagenesis used to probe the structure and function of Bacillus stearothermophilus a-amylase. Protein Eng 1990;3:181-91.
30. O'Neill M, Dryden DT, Murray NE. Localization of a protein- DNA interface by random mutagenesis. EMBO J 1998;17: 7118-27.
31. Longhi S, Receveur-Brechot V, Karlin D, Johansson K, Darbon H, Bhella D, et al. The C-terminal domain of the measles virus nucleoprotein is intrinsically disordered and folds upon binding to the C-terminal moiety of the phosphoprotein. J Biol Chem 2003;278:18638-48.
32. Bourhis J, Johansson K, Receveur-Bréchot V, Oldfield CJ, Dunker AK, Canard B, et al. The C-terminal domain of measles virus nucleoprotein belongs to the class of intrinsically disordered proteins that fold upon binding to their physiological partner. Virus Res 2004;99:157-67.
33. Houben K, Marion D, Tarbouriech N, Ruigrok RW, Blanchard L. Interaction of the C-terminal domains of sendai virus N and P proteins: comparison of polymerase-nucleocapsid interactions within the paramyxovirus family. J Virol 2007;81: 6807-16.
34. Jensen MR, Bernado P, Houben K, Blanchard L, Marion D, Ruigrok RW, et al. Structural disorder within sendai virus nucleoprotein and phosphoprotein: insight into the structural basis of molecular recognition. Protein Pept Lett 2010;17: 952-60.
35. Blocquel D, Habchi J, Gruet A, Blangy S, Longhi S. Compaction and binding properties of the intrinsically disordered C-terminal domain of Henipavirus nucleoprotein as unveiled by deletion studies. Mol BioSyst 2012;8:392-410.
36. Habchi J, Blangy S, Mamelli L, Ringkjobing Jensen M, Blackledge M, Darbon H, et al. Characterization of the interactions between the nucleoprotein and the phosphoprotein of Henipaviruses. J Biol Chem 2011;286:13583-602.
37. Habchi J, Mamelli L, Darbon H, Longhi S. Structural disorder within henipavirus nucleoprotein and phosphoprotein: from predictions to experimental assessment. PLoS One 2010;5: e11684.
38. Johansson K, Bourhis JM, Campanacci V, Cambillau C, Canard B, Longhi S. Crystal structure of the measles virus phosphoprotein domain responsible for the induced folding of the C-terminal domain of the nucleoprotein. J Biol Chem 2003;278:44567-73.
39. Bourhis JM, Receveur-Bréchot V, Oglesbee M, Zhang X, Buccellato M, Darbon H, et al. The intrinsically disordered C-terminal domain of the measles virus nucleoprotein interacts with the C-terminal domain of the phosphoprotein via two distinct sites and remains predominantly unfolded. Protein Sci 2005;14:1975-92.
40. Shu Y, Habchi J, Costanzo S, Padilla A, Brunel J, Gerlier D, et al. Plasticity in structural and functional interactions between the phosphoprotein and nucleoprotein of measles virus. J Biol Chem 2012;287:11951-67.
41. Blocquel D, Habchi J, Costanzo S, Doizy A, Oglesbee M, Longhi S. Interaction between the C-terminal domains of measles virus nucleoprotein and phosphoprotein: a tight complex implying one binding site. ProteinSci 2012;21:1577-8.
42. Kingston RL, Hamel DJ, Gay LS, Dahlquist FW, Matthews BW. Structural basis for the attachment of a paramyxoviral polymerase to its template. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:8301-6.
43. Morin B, Bourhis JM, Belle V, Woudstra M, Carrière F, Guigliarelli B, et al. Assessing induced folding of an intrinsically disordered protein by site-directed spin-labeling EPR spectroscopy. J Phys Chem B 2006;110:20596-608.
44. Belle V, Rouger S, Costanzo S, Liquiere E, Strancar J, Guigliarelli B, et al. Mapping a-helical induced folding within the intrinsically disordered C-terminal domain of the measles virus nucleoprotein by site-directed spin-labeling EPR spectroscopy. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinf 2008;73:973-88.
45. Bernard C, Gely S, Bourhis JM, Morelli X, Longhi S, Darbon H. Interaction between the C-terminal domains of N and P proteins of measles virus investigated by NMR. FEBS Lett 2009;583:1084-9.
46. Bischak CG, Longhi S, Snead DM, Costanzo S, Terrer E, Londergan CH. Probing structural transitions in the intrinsically disordered C-terminal domain of the measles virus nucleoprotein by vibrational spectroscopy of cyanylated cysteines. Biophys J 2010;99:1676-83.
47. Gely S, Lowry DF, Bernard C, Ringkjobing-Jensen M, Blackledge M, Costanzo S, et al. Solution structure of the C-terminal Xdomain of the measles virus phosphoprotein and interaction with the intrinsically disordered C-terminal domain of the nucleoprotein. J Mol Recognit 2010;23:435-47.
48. Kavalenka A, Urbancic I, Belle V, Rouger S, Costanzo S, Kure S, et al. Conformational analysis of the partially disordered measles virus NTAIL-XD complex by SDSL EPR spectroscopy. Biophys J 2010;98:1055-64.
49. Ringkjøbing Jensen M, Communie G, Ribeiro ED, Martinez N, Desfosses A, Salmon L, et al. Intrinsic disorder in measles virus nucleocapsids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108: 9839-44.
50. Gruet A, Longhi S, Bignon C. One-step generation of error-prone PCR libraries using Gateway(R) technology. Microb Cell Fact 2012;11:14.
51. Jackrel ME, Cortajarena AL, Liu TY, Regan L. Screening libraries to identify proteins with desired binding activities using a split-GFP reassembly assay. ACS Chem Biol 2010;5: 553-62.
52. Magliery TJ, Wilson CG, Pan W, Mishler D, Ghosh I, Hamilton AD, et al. Detecting protein-protein interactions with a green fluorescent protein fragment reassembly trap: scope and mechanism. J Am Chem Soc 2005;127:146-57.
53. Wilson CG, Magliery TJ, Regan L. Detecting protein-protein interactions with GFP-fragment reassembly. Nat Methods 2004;1:255-62.
54. Cunningham BC, Wells JA. High-resolution epitope mapping of hGH-receptor interactions by alanine-scanning mutagenesis. Science 1989;244:1081-5.
55. Diallo A, Barrett T, Barbron M, Meyer G, Lefevre PC. Cloning of the nucleocapsid protein gene of peste-des-petitsruminants virus: relationship to other morbilliviruses. J Gen Virol 1994;75:233-7.
56. Huang H, Sarai A. Analysis of the relationships between evolvability, thermodynamics, and the functions of intrinsically disordered proteins/regions.ComputBiolChem2012;41:51-7.
57. Dougherty DA, Stauffer DA. Acetylcholine binding by a synthetic receptor: implications for biological recognition. Science 1990;250:1558-60.
58. Tzeng SR, Kalodimos CG. Protein activity regulation by conformational entropy. Nature 2012;488:236-40.
59. Zhang X, Glendening C, Linke H, Parks CL, Brooks C, Udem SA, et al. Identification and characterization of a regulatory domain on the carboxyl terminus of the measles virus nucleocapsid protein. J Virol 2002;76:8737-46.
60. Wong TS, Roccatano D, Zacharias M, Schwaneberg U. A statistical analysis of random mutagenesis methods used for directed protein evolution. J Mol Biol 2006;355: 858-71.