Conformational analysis of the partially disordered measles virus N TAIL-XD complex by SDSL EPR spectroscopy

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 98, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1055-1064

  Kavalenka, Aleh ^a   Urbančič, Iztok ^a   Belle, Valérie ^b   Rouger, Sabrina ^c   Costanzo, Stéphanie ^c   Kure, Sandra ^a   Fournel, André ^b   Longhi, Sonia ^c   Guigliarelli, Bruno ^b   Strancar, Janez ^a  

^a JO EF STEFAN INSTITUTE   (Slovenia)

^b AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^c AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MEASLES VIRUS;

EID: 77949599421     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: 15420086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.11.036     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Dyson, H. J., and P. E. Wright. 2005. Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions. Nat, Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6: 197-208.
2. Dunker, A. K., J. D. Lawson, ..., Z. Obradovic. 2001. Intrinsically disordered protein, J. Mol. Graph. Model. 19: 26-59.
3. Tompa, P. 2002. Intrinsically unstructured proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 27: 527-533.
4. Uversky, V. N. 2002. Natively unfolded proteins: a point where biology waits for physics. Protein Sci. 11: 739-756.
5. Fink, A. L. 2005. Natively unfolded proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 15: 35-41.
6. Uversky, V. N., C. J. Oldfield, and A. K. Dunker. 2005. Showing your ID: intrinsic disorder as an ID for recognition, regulation and cell signaling. J. Mol. Recognit. 18: 343-384.
7. Receveur-Bréchot, V., J. M. Bourhis, ..., S. Longhi. 2006. Assessing protein disorder and induced folding. Proteins. 62: 24-45.
8. Ferron, F., S. Longhi, ..., D. Karlin. 2006. A practical overview of protein disorder prediction methods. Proteins. 65: 1-14.
9. Bourhis, J. M., B. Canard, and S. Longhi. 2007. Predicting protein disorder and induced folding: from theoretical principles to practical applications. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 8: 135-149.
10. Dunker, A. K., I. Silman, ..., J. L. Sussman. 2008. Function, and structure of IDPs. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 18: 756-764.
11. Wright, P. E., and H. J. Dyson. 2009. Linking folding and binding. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 19: 31-38.
12. Bourhis, J. M., V. Receveur-Bréchot, ..., S. Longhi. 2005. The intrinsically disordered C-terminal domain of the measles virus nucleoprotein. interacts with the C-terminal domain of the phosphoprotein via two distinct sites and remains predominantly unfolded. Protein Sci. 14: 1975-1992.
13. Dyson, H. J., and P. E. Wright. 2002. Coupling of folding and binding for unstructured proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12: 54-60.
14. Timsit, Y., F. Allemand, ..., M. Springer. 2006. Coexistence of two protein folding states in the crystal structure of ribosomal protein L20. EMBO Rep. 7: 1013-1018.
15. Hoff, A. J. 1989. Advanced EPR: Applications in Biology and Biochemistry. Elsevier, Amsterdam/New York.
16. Columbus, L., and W. L. Hubbell. 2004. Mapping backbone dynamics in solution with site-directed spin labeling: GCN4-58 bZip free and bound to DNA. Biochemistry. 43: 7273-7287.
17. Stopar, D., R. B. Spruijt, and M. A. Hemminga. 2006. Anchoring mechanisms of membrane-associated M13 major coat protein. Chem. Phys. Lipids. 141: 83-93.
18. Longhi, S., V. Receveur-Bréchot, ..., B. Canard. 2003. The C-terminal domain of the measles virus nucleoprotein is intrinsically disordered and folds upon binding to the C-terminal moiety of the phosphoprotein, J. Biol. Chem. 278: 18638-18648.
19. Johansson, K., J. M. Bourhis, ..., S. Longhi. 2003. Crystal structure of the measles virus phosphoprotein domain responsible for the induced folding of the C-terminal domain of the nucleoprotein. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 44567-44573.
20. Bourhis, J., K. Johansson, ..., S. Longhi. 2004. The C-terminal domain of measles virus nucleoprotein belongs to the class of IDPs that fold upon binding to their physiological partner. Virus Res. 99: 157-167.
21. Bourhis, J. M., B. Canard, and S. Longhi. 2005. Désordre structural au sein du complexe réplicatif du virus de la rougeole: implications fonctionnelles. Virologie. 9: 367-383.
22. Bourhis, J. M., B. Canard, and S. Longhi, 2006. Structural disorder within the replicative complex of measles virus: functional implications. Virology. 344: 94-110.
23. Bourhis, J. M., and S. Longhi. 2007. Measles virus nucleoprotein: structural organization and functional role of the intrinsically disordered C-terminal domain. In Measles Virus Nucleoprotein. S. Longhi, editor. Nova Publishers, Hauppage, NY. 1-35.
24. Longhi, S. 2009. Nucleocapsid structure and function. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 329: 103-128.
25. Kingston, R. L., D. J. Hamel, ..., B. W. Matthews. 2004. Structural basis for the attachment of a paramyxoviral polymerase to its template. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 101: 8301-8306.
26. Morin, B., J. M. Bourhis, ..., S. Longhi. 2006. Assessing induced folding of an IDP by SDSL EPR spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B. 110: 20596-20608.
27. Belle, V., S. Rouger, ..., S. Longhi. 2008. Mapping α-helical induced folding within the intrinsically disordered C-terminal domain of the measles virus nucleoprotein by SDSL EPR spectroscopy. Proteins. 73: 973-988.
28. Bernard, C., S. Gely, ..., H. Darbon. 2009. Interaction between the C-terminal domains of N and P proteins of measles virus investigated by NMR. FEBS Lett. 583: 1084-1089.
29. Štrancar, J., A. Kavalenka, ..., M. A. Hemminga. 2009. Analysis of side chain rotational restrictions of membrane-embedded proteins by spin-label ESR spectroscopy. J. Magn. Reson. 197: 245-248.
30. Filipic, B., and J. Strancar. 2001. Tuning EPR spectral parameters with a genetic algorithm. Appl. Soft Comput. 1: 83-90.
31. Strancar, J., T. Koklic, ..., M. A. Hemminga. 2005. Spin label EPRbased characterization of biosystem complexity. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 45: 394-406.
32. Kavalenka, A. A., B. Filipic, ..., J. Strancar. 2005. Speeding up a genetic algorithm for EPR-based spin label characterization of biosystem complexity. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 45: 1628-1635.
33. Stopar, D., J. Strancar, ..., M. A. Hemminga. 2006. Motional restrictions of membrane proteins: a site-directed spin labeling study. Biophys. J. 91: 3341-3348.
34. Ho, B. K., A. Thomas, and R. Brasseur. 2003. Revisiting the Ramachandran plot: hard-sphere repulsion, electrostatics, and H-bonding in the ce-helix. Protein Sci. 12: 2508-2522.
35. Ramachandran, G. N., C. Ramakrishnan, and V. Sasisekharan, 1963. Stereochemistry of polypeptide chain configurations. J. Mol. Biol. 7: 95-99.
36. Engh, R., and R. Huber. 1991. Accurate bond and angle parameters for X-ray protein structure refinement. Acta Crystallogr. A. 47: 392-400.
37. Word, J. M., S. C. Lovell, ..., D. C. Richardson, 1.999. Visualizing and quantifying molecular goodness-of-fit: small-probe contact dots with explicit hydrogen atoms. J. Mol. Biol. 285: 1711-1733.
38. Lovell, S. C., J. M. Word, ..., D. C. Richardson. 2000. The penultimate rotamer library. Proteins. 40: 389-408.
39. Tombolato, F., A. Ferrarini, and J. H. Freed. 2006. Dynamics of the nitroxide side chain in spin-labeled proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B. 110: 26248-26259.
40. Grigoryan, G., A. Ochoa, and A. E. Keating. 2007. Computing van der Waals energies in the context of the rotamer approximation. Proteins. 68: 863-878.
41. Kirkpatrick, S., C. D. Gelatt, Jr., and M. P. Vecchi. 1983. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science. 220: 671-680.
42. Fogel, D. B., T. Back, and Z. Michalewicz. 2000. Evolutionary computation. Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol/Philadelphia.
43. Stopar, D., J. Strancar, ..., M. A. Hemminga. 2005. Exploring the local conformational space of a membrane protein by site-directed spin labeling. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 45: 1621-1627.
44. Tompa, P., and M. Fuxreiter. 2008. Fuzzy complexes: polymorphism and structural disorder in protein-protein interactions. Trends Biochem. Sci. 33: 2-8.