Micro-nanopatterning as tool to study the role of physicochemical properties on cell-surface interactions

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 101, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 3019-3032

  Singh, Ajay Vikram ^a,b   Patil, Rajendra ^c   Thombre, Dipalee K ^c   Gade, W N ^c  

^a RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PUNE   (India)

Author keywords

AFM; cell surface interactions; e beam lithography; ECM; micro nanopatterning

Indexed keywords

AFM; CELL-SUBSTRATE INTERACTIONS; CELL-SURFACE INTERACTIONS; E-BEAM LITHOGRAPHY; MICRO-NANOPATTERNING; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTY; STATE-OF-THE-ART METHODS; SUBSTRATE MORPHOLOGIES;

CYTOLOGY; MILITARY ELECTRONIC COUNTERMEASURES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; SURFACE CHEMISTRY;

BIOMATERIALS;

BIOMATERIAL; COLLAGEN; ELASTIN; ENTACTIN; FIBRONECTIN; INTEGRIN RECEPTOR; LAMININ; SCLEROPROTEIN; TENASCIN; THROMBOSPONDIN; VITRONECTIN;

ADSORPTION KINETICS; BODY FLUID; CELL COMMUNICATION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FUNCTION; CELL INTERACTION; CELL MIGRATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SIZE; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL SURFACE; CYTOLOGY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HUMAN; MICRONANOPATTERNING; NANOANALYSIS; NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY; NANOFABRICATION; NANOPORE; NANOTOPOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PHYTOREMEDIATION; REVIEW; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOPOGRAPHY;

AFM; CELL-SURFACE INTERACTIONS; E-BEAM LITHOGRAPHY; ECM; MICRO-NANOPATTERNING;

ANIMALS; CELL COMMUNICATION; CELL MEMBRANE; HUMANS; MICROTECHNOLOGY; NANOSTRUCTURES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PHENOMENA;

EID: 84883218240     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34586     Document Type: Review

References (120)

1. Ochsner M, Textor M, Vogel V, Smith ML,. Dimensionality controls cytoskeleton assembly and metabolism of fibroblast cells in response to rigidity and shape. PLoS ONE 2010; 5: e9445.
2. Schuler M, Kunzler TP, de Wild M, Sprecher CM, Trentin D, Brunette DM, Textor M, Tosatti SG. Fabrication of TiO2-coated epoxy replicas with identical dual-type surface topographies used in cell culture assays. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2009; 88A: 12-22.
3. Jäger M, Zilkens C, Zanger K, Krauspe R,. Significance of nano- and microtopography for cell-surface interactions in orthopaedic implants. J Biomed Biotechnol 2007; 2007: 69036.
4. Curtis A,. Tutorial on the biology of nanotopography. IEEE Trans NanoBioscience 2004: 293-295.
5. Anselme K,. Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 667-681.
6. Hakanson M, Textor M, Charnley M,. Engineered 3D environments to elucidate the effect of environmental parameters on drug response in cancer. Integr Biol 2011; 3: 31-38.
7. Csucs G, Michel R, Lussi JW, Textor M, Danuser G,. Microcontact printing of novel co-polymers in combination with proteins for cell-biological applications. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 1713-1720.
8. Falconnet D, Csucs G, Michelle Grandin H, Textor M,. Surface engineering approaches to micropattern surfaces for cell-based assays. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 3044-3063.
9. Schuler M, Trentin D, Textor M, Tosatti SG,. Biomedical interfaces: titanium surface technology for implants and cell carriers. Nanomedicine 2006; 1: 449-463.
10. Geiger B, Spatz JP, Bershadsky AD,. Environmental sensing through focal adhesions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009; 10: 21-33.
11. Kim D-H, Lipke EA, Kim P, Cheong R, Thompson S, Delannoy M, Suh KY, Tung L, Levchenko A. Nanoscale cues regulate the structure and function of macroscopic cardiac tissue constructs. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2010; 107: 565-570.
12. Kanchanawong P, Shtengel G, Pasapera AM, Ramko EB, Davidson MW, Hess HF, Waterman CM. Nanoscale architecture of integrin-based cell adhesions. Nature 2010; 468: 580-584.
13. Karuri NW, Liliensiek S, Teixeira AI, Abrams G, Campbell S, Nealey PF, Murphy CJ. Biological length scale topography enhances cell-substratum adhesion of human corneal epithelial cells. J Cell Sci 2004; 117: 3153-3164.
14. Geiger B, Bershadsky A, Pankov R, Yamada KM,. Transmembrane crosstalk between the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2001; 2: 793-805.
15. Abrams GA, Goodman SL, Nealey PF, Franco M, Murphy CJ,. Nanoscale topography of the basement membrane underlying the corneal epithelium of the rhesus macaque. Cell Tissue Res 2000; 299: 39-46.
16. Abrams G, Murphy C, Wang Z-Y, Nealey P, Bjorling D,. Ultrastructural basement membrane topography of the bladder epithelium. Urol Res 2003; 31: 341-346.
17. Wang Y-L,. Flux at focal adhesions: Slippage clutch, mechanical gauge, or signal depot. Sci STKE 2007; 377: 10.
18. Franz CM, Müller DJ,. Analyzing focal adhesion structure by atomic force microscopy. J Cell Sci 2005; 118: 5315-5323.
19. Castner DG, Ratner BD,. Biomedical surface science: Foundations to frontiers. Surf Sci 2002; 500: 28-60.
20. Plotnikov SV, Pasapera AM, Sabass B, Waterman CM,. Force Fluctuations within focal adhesions mediate ECM-rigidity sensing to guide directed cell migration. Cell 2012; 151: 1513-1527.
21. Biggs MJP, Richards RG, Dalby MJ,. Nanotopographical modification: A regulator of cellular function through focal adhesions. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med 2010; 6: 619-633.
22. Singh AV, Ferri M, Tamplenizza M, Borghi F, Divitini G, Ducati C, Lenardi C, Piazzoni C, Merlini M, Podestà A, Milani P,. Bottom-up engineering of the surface roughness of nanostructured cubic zirconia to control cell adhesion. Nanotechnology 2012; 23: 475101.
23. Singh AV, Galluzzi M, Borghi F, Indrieri M, Vyas V, Podestà A, Gade WN. Interaction of bacterial cells with cluster-assembled nanostructured titania surfaces: An atomic force microscopy study. J Nanoscie Nanotechnol 2013;13:77-85.
24. Singh AV, Vyas V, Patil R, Sharma V, Scopelliti PE, Bongiorno G, Podestà A, Lenardi C, Gade WN, Milani P. Quantitative characterization of the influence of the nanoscale morphology of nanostructured surfaces on bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. PLoS ONE 2011; 6: e25029.
25. Anselme K, Davidson P, Popa AM, Giazzon M, Liley M, Ploux L. The interaction of cells and bacteria with surfaces structured at the nanometre scale. Acta Biomater 2010; 6: 3824-3846.
26. Singh AV, Lenardi C, Gailite L, Gianfelice A, Milani P,. A simple lift-off-based patterning method for micro- and nanostructuring of functional substrates for cell culture. J Micromech Microeng 2009; 19: 115028.
27. Singh AV, Gailite L, Vyas V, Lenardi C, Forti S, Matteoli M, Milani P. Rapid prototyping of nano- and micro-patterned substrates for the control of cell neuritogenesis by topographic and chemical cues. Mater Sci Eng C 2011; 31: 892-899.
28. Singh AV, Vyas V, Salve TS, Cortelli D, Dellasega D, Podestà A, Milani P, Gade WN. Biofilm formation on nanostructured titanium oxide surfaces and a micro/nanofabrication-based preventive strategy using colloidal lithography. Biofabrication 2012; 4: 025001-025001.
29. Sniadecki N, Desai R, Ruiz S, Chen C,. Nanotechnology for cell-substrate interactions. Ann Biomed Eng 2006; 34: 59-74.
30. Andersson H, van den Berg A,. Microtechnologies and nanotechnologies for single-cell analysis. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2004; 15: 44-49.
31. Rossngel SM,. Thin film deposition with physical vapor deposition and related technologies. J Vac Sci Tech 2003; 21: S74.
32. Garcia G, Doménech-Ferrer R, Pi F, Santiso J, Rodríguez- Viejo J,. Combinatorial synthesis and hydrogenation of Mg/Al libraries prepared by electron beam physical vapor deposition. J Comb Chem 2007; 9: 230-236.
33. Craciun D, Socol G, Stefan N, Miroiu M, Mihailescu IN, Galca A-C, Craciun V,. Structural investigations of ITO-ZnO films grown by the combinatorial pulsed laser deposition technique. Amsterdam, PAYS-BAS: Elsevier; 2009. p 4.
34. Watanabe M, Kita T, Fukumura T, Ohtomo A, Ueno K, Kawasaki M. Combinatorial synthesis and high throughput evaluation of thermoelectric power factor in Mg-Si-Ge ternary compounds. Appl Surf Sci 2007; 254: 777-780.
35. Rechendorff K, Hovgaard MB, Chevallier J, Foss M, Besenbacher F,. Tantalum films with well-controlled roughness grown by oblique incidence deposition. Appl Phys Lett 2005; 87: 073105.
36. Byrne T, Lohstreter L, Filiaggi MJ, Bai Z, Dahn JR,. A high throughput approach to quantify protein adsorption on combinatorial metal/metal oxide surfaces using electron microprobe and spectroscopic ellipsometry. Surf Sci 2008; 602: 2927-2935.
37. Rechendorff K, Hovgaard MB, Foss M, Besenbacher F,. Influence of surface roughness on quartz crystal microbalance measurements in liquids. J Appl Phys 2007; 101: 114502-114507.
38. Bai Z, Filiaggi MJ, Sanderson RJ, Lohstreter LB, McArthur MA, Dahn JR. Surface characteristics and protein adsorption on combinatorial binary Ti-M (Cr, Al, Ni) and Al-M (Ta, Zr) library films. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2010; 92A: 521-532.
39. Yang L, Sheldon BW, Webster TJ,. The impact of diamond nanocrystallinity on osteoblast functions. Biomaterials 2009; 30: 3458-3465.
40. Zinger O, Anselme K, Denzer A, Habersetzer P, Wieland M, Jeanfils J, Hardouin P, Landolt D. Time-dependent morphology and adhesion of osteoblastic cells on titanium model surfaces featuring scale-resolved topography. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 2695-2711.
41. Tajima S, Chu JSF, Li S, Komvopoulos K,. Differential regulation of endothelial cell adhesion, spreading, and cytoskeleton on low-density polyethylene by nanotopography and surface chemistry modification induced by argon plasma treatment. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2008; 84A: 828-836.
42. Faghihi S, Azari F, Zhilyaev AP, Szpunar JA, Vali H, Tabrizian M. Cellular and molecular interactions between MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblasts and nanostructured titanium produced by high-pressure torsion. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 3887-3895.
43. Sato M, Webster TJ,. Nanobiotechnology: Implications for the future of nanotechnology in orthopedic applications. Expert Rev Med Devices 2004; 1: 105-114.
44. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Siegel RW, Bizios R,. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 1803-1810.
45. Popat KC, Leoni L, Grimes CA, Desai TA,. Influence of engineered titania nanotubular surfaces on bone cells. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 3188-3197.
46. Park J, Bauer S, Schlegel KA, Neukam FW, von der Mark K, Schmuki P. TiO2 nanotube surfaces: 15 nm-an optimal length scale of surface topography for cell adhesion and differentiation. Small 2009; 5: 666-671.
47. Popat KC, Chalvanichkul KI, Barnes GL, Latempa TJ, Jr, Grimes CA, Desai TA. Osteogenic differentiation of marrow stromal cells cultured on nanoporous alumina surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2007; 80: 955-964.
48. Yang J, Rose FRAJ, Gadegaard N, Alexander MR,. A high-throughput assay of cell-surface interactions using topographical and chemical gradients. Adv Mater 2009; 21: 300-304.
49. Kunzler TP, Drobek T, Sprecher CM, Schuler M, Spencer ND,. Fabrication of material-independent morphology gradients for high-throughput applications. Appl Surf Sci 2006; 253: 2148-2153.
50. von der Mark K, Park J, Bauer S, Schmuki P,. Nanoscale engineering of biomimetic surfaces: Cues from the extracellular matrix. Cell Tissue Res 2010; 339: 131-153.
51. Sundrani D, Darling SB, Sibener SJ,. Hierarchical assembly and compliance of aligned nanoscale polymer cylinders in confinement. Langmuir 2004; 20: 5091-5099.
52. Gadegaard N, Thoms S, Macintyre DS, McGhee K, Gallagher J, Casey B, Wilkinson CDW. Arrays of nano-dots for cellular engineering. Microelectron Eng 2003; 67-68: 162-168.
53. Gates BD, Xu Q, Stewart M, Ryan D, Willson CG, Whitesides GM. New Approaches to nanofabrication: Molding, printing, and other techniques. Chem Rev 2005; 105: 1171-1196.
54. Gardner CE, Ghanem MA, Wilson JW, Smith DC,. Development of a nanowire-based test bed device for molecular electronics applications. Anal Chem 2005; 78: 951-955.
55. Nie Z, Kumacheva E,. Patterning surfaces with functional polymers. Nat Mater 2008; 7: 277-290.
56. Blättler T, Huwiler C, Ochsner M, Städler B, Solak H, Vörös J, Grandin HM. Nanopatterns with biological functions. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2006; 6: 2237-2264.
57. Truskett VN, Watts MPC,. Trends in imprint lithography for biological applications. Trends Biotechnol 2006; 24: 312-317.
58. Guo LJ,. Nanoimprint lithography: Methods and material requirements. Adv Mater 2007; 19: 495-513.
59. Chou SY, Krauss PR, Renstrom PJ,. Imprint Lithography with 25-Nanometer Resolution. Science 1996; 272: 85-87.
60. Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Tare R, Andar A, Riehle MO, Herzyk P, Wilkinson CD, Oreffo RO. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat Mater 2007; 6: 997-1003.
61. Wood MA,. Colloidal lithography and current fabrication techniques producing in-plane nanotopography for biological applications. J R Soc Interface 2007; 4: 1-17.
62. Lim JY, Donahue HJ,. Cell sensing and response to micro- and nanostructured surfaces produced by chemical and topographic patterning. Tissue Eng 2007; 13: 1879-1891.
63. Yang SM, Jang SG, Choi DG, Kim S, Yu HK,. Nanomachining by colloidal lithography. Small 2006; 2: 458-475.
64. Dalby MJ, Yarwood SJ, Riehle MO, Johnstone HJH, Affrossman S, Curtis AS. Increasing fibroblast response to materials using nanotopography: Morphological and genetic measurements of cell response to 13-nm-high polymer demixed islands. Exp Cell Res 2002; 276: 1-9.
65. Dalby MJ, McCloy D, Robertson M, Agheli H, Sutherland D, Affrossman S, Oreffo RO. Osteoprogenitor response to semi-ordered and random nanotopographies. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 2980-2987.
66. Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Johnstone H, Affrossman S, Curtis ASG,. In vitro reaction of endothelial cells to polymer demixed nanotopography. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 2945-2954.
67. Bao Y-Y, Bi L-H, Wu L-X, Mal SS, Kortz U,. Preparation and Characterization of Langmuir-Blodgett films of wheel-shaped Cu-20 tungstophosphate and DODA by two different strategies. Langmuir 2009; 25: 13000-13006.
68. Girard-Egrot AP, Godoy S, Blum LJ,. Enzyme association with lipidic Langmuir-Blodgett films: Interests and applications in nanobioscience. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 2005; 116: 205-225.
69. Renault JP, Bernard A, Bietsch A, Michel B, Bosshard HR, Delamarche E. Fabricating arrays of single protein molecules on glass using microcontact printing. J Phys Chem B 2003; 107: 703-711.
70. Yu AA, Savas TA, Taylor GS, Guiseppe-Elie A, Smith HI, Stellacci F. Supramolecular nanostamping: Using DNA as movable type. Nano Lett 2005; 5: 1061-1064.
71. Akbulut O, Jung JM, Bennett RD, Hu Y, Jung HT, Cohen RE, Mayes AM, Stellacci F. Application of supramolecular nanostamping to the replication of DNA nanoarrays. Nano Lett 2007; 7: 3493-3498.
72. Wu C-C, Reinhoudt DN, Otto C, Subramaniam V, Velders AH,. Strategies for patterning biomolecules with Dip-Pen nanolithography. Small 2011; 7: 989-1002.
73. Liu GY, Xu S, Qian Y,. Nanofabrication of self-assembled monolayers using scanning probe lithography. Acc Chem Res 2000; 33: 457-466.
74. Macdonald W, Campbell P, Fisher J, Wennerberg A,. Variation in surface texture measurements. J Biomed Mater Res Part B 2004; 70: 262-269.
75. Van Gorp A, Bigerelle M, Grellier A, Iost A, Najjar D,. A multi-scale approach of roughness measurements: Evaluation of the relevant scale. Mater Sci Eng C 2007; 27: 1434-1438.
76. Bigrelle M, Gautier A, Lost A,. Roughness characteristic length scales of micro-machined surfaces: A multi-scale modelling. Sens Actuat 2007; 126: 126-137.
77. Gentile F, Tirinato L, Battista E, Causa F, Liberale C, di Fabrizio EM, Decuzzi P. Cells preferentially grow on rough substrates. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 7205-7212.
78. Sakamoto T, Koizumi M, Kawasaki J, Yamaguchi J,. Development of a high lateral resolution TOF-SIMS apparatus for single particle analysis. Appl Surf Sci 2008; 255: 1617-1620.
79. Hajati S, Coultas S, Blomfield C, Tougaard S,. XPS imaging of depth profiles and amount of substance based on Tougaard's algorithm. Surf Sci 2006; 600: 3015-3021.
80. Donnert G, Keller J, Medda R, Andrei MA, Rizzoli SO, Lührmann R, Jahn R, Eggeling C, Hell SW. Macromolecular-scale resolution in biological fluorescence microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103: 11440-11445.
81. Cimatu K, Baldelli S,. Sum frequency generation microscopy of microcontact-printed mixed self-assembled monolayers. J Phys Chem B 2006; 110: 1807-1813.
82. Taminiau TH, Moerland RJ, Segerink FB, Kuipers L, Van Hulst NF,. λ/4 Resonance of an optical monopole antenna probed by single molecule fluorescence. Nano Lett 2007; 7: 28-33.
83. Colburn TJ, Leggett GJ,. Influence of solvent environment and tip chemistry on the contact mechanics of tip-Sample interactions in friction force microscopy of self-assembled monolayers of mercaptoundecanoic acid and dodecanethiol. Langmuir 2007; 23: 4959-4964.
84. Engler AJ, Humbert PO, Wehrle-Haller B, Weaver VM,. Multiscale modeling of form and function. Science 2009; 324: 208-212.
85. Curtis AS, Dalby M, Gadegaard N,. Cell signaling arising from nanotopography: Implications for nanomedical devices. Nanomedicine 2006; 1: 67-72.
86. Bengt K,. Biological surface science. Surf Sci 2002; 500: 656-677.
87. Kasemo B, Gold J,. Implant surfaces and interface processes. Adv Dent Res 1999; 13: 8-20.
88. Wilson CJ, Clegg RE, Leavesley DI, Pearcy MJ,. Mediation of biomaterial-cell interactions by adsorbed proteins: A review. Tissue Eng 2005; 11: 1-18.
89. Yao C, Slamovich EB, Webster TJ,. Enhanced osteoblast functions on anodized titanium with nanotube-like structures. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2008; 85A: 157-166.
90. Sjöström T, Dalby MJ, Hart A, Tare R, Oreffo RO, Su B. Fabrication of pillar-like titania nanostructures on titanium and their interactions with human skeletal stem cells. Acta Biomater 2009; 5: 1433-1441.
91. Takagi J, Petre BM, Walz T, Springer TA,. Global conformational rearrangements in integrin extracellular domains in outside-in and inside-out signaling. Cell 2002; 110: 599-611.
92. Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Walter P. Molecular biology of the cell. New York: Garland science; 2007.
93. Girard PP, Cavalcanti-Adam EA, Kemkemer R, Spatz JP,. Cellular chemomechanics at interfaces: Sensing, integration and response. Soft Mater 2007; 3: 307-326.
94. Curtis A, Wilkinson C,. New depths in cell behaviour: Reactions of cells to nanotopography. Biochem Soc Symp 1999; 65: 15-26.
95. Dalby MJ, Giannaras D, Riehle MO, Gadegaard N, Affrossman S, Curtis ASG,. Rapid fibroblast adhesion to 27 nm high polymer demixed nano-topography. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 77-83.
96. Diehl KA, Foley JD, Nealey PF, Murphy CJ,. Nanoscale topography modulates corneal epithelial cell migration. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2005; 75: 603-611.
97. Loesberg WA, te Riet J, van Delft FC, Schön P, Figdor CG, Speller S, van Loon JJ, Walboomers XF, Jansen JA. The threshold at which substrate nanogroove dimensions may influence fibroblast alignment and adhesion. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 3944-3951.
98. Walboomers XF, Ginsel LA, Jansen JA,. Early spreading events of fibroblasts on microgrooved substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 51: 529-534.
99. Biggs MJ, Richards RG, Gadegaard N, McMurray RJ, Affrossman S, Wilkinson CD, Oreffo RO, Dalby MJ. Interactions with nanoscale topography: Adhesion quantification and signal transduction in cells of osteogenic and multipotent lineage. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2009; 91: 195-208.
100. Lim JY, Hansen JC, Siedlecki CA, Hengstebeck RW, Cheng J, Winograd N, Donahue HJ. Osteoblast adhesion on poly(L-lactic acid)/polystyrene demixed thin film blends: Effect of nanotopography, surface chemistry, and wettability. Biomacromolecules 2005; 6: 3319-3327.
101. Lim JY, Loiselle AE, Lee JS, Zhang Y, Salvi JD, Donahue HJ. Optimizing the osteogenic potential of adult stem cells for skeletal regeneration. J Orthop Res 2011; 29: 1627-1633.
102. Biggs MJ, Richards RG, Gadegaard N, Wilkinson CD, Oreffo RO, Dalby MJ. The use of nanoscale topography to modulate the dynamics of adhesion formation in primary osteoblasts and ERK/MAPK signalling in STRO-1+ enriched skeletal stem cells. Biomaterials 2009; 30: 5094-5103.
103. Kantawong F, Burgess KE, Jayawardena K, Hart A, Burchmore RJ, Gadegaard N, Oreffo RO, Dalby MJ. Whole proteome analysis of osteoprogenitor differentiation induced by disordered nanotopography and mediated by ERK signalling. Biomaterials 2009; 30: 4723-4731.
104. Choi CH, Hagvall SH, Wu BM, Dunn JCY, Beygui RE, Kim CJ. Cell interaction with three-dimensional sharp-tip nanotopography. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 1672-1679.
105. Mendoza MC, Er EE, Zhang W, Ballif BA, Elliott HL, Danuser G, Blenis J. ERK-MAPK Drives Lamellipodia Protrusion by Activating the WAVE2 Regulatory Complex. Mol Cell 2011; 41: 661-671.
106. Enculescu M, Sabouri-Ghomi M, Danuser G, Falcke M,. Modeling of protrusion phenotypes driven by the actin-membrane interaction. Biophys J 2010; 98: 1571-1581.
107. Kalbacova M, Broz A, Babchenko O, Kromka A,. Study on cellular adhesion of human osteoblasts on nano-structured diamond films. Phys Stat Solid B 2009; 246: 2774-2777.
108. Okada S, Ito H, Nagai A, Komotori J, Imai H,. Adhesion of osteoblast-like cells on nanostructured hydroxyapatite. Acta Biomater 2010; 6: 591-597.
109. Arnold M, Cavalcanti-Adam EA, Glass R, Blümmel J, Eck W, Kantlehner M, Kessler H, Spatz JP. Activation of integrin function by nanopatterned adhesive interfaces. ChemPhysChem 2004; 5: 383-388.
110. Walter N, Selhuber C, Kessler H, Spatz JP,. Cellular unbinding forces of initial adhesion processes on nanopatterned surfaces probed with magnetic tweezers. Nano Lett 2006; 6: 398-402.
111. Mrksich M,. Stem cell differentiation: Multipotency retained. Nat Mater 2011; 10: 559-560.
112. Lovmand J, Justesen J, Foss M, Lauridsen RH, Lovmand M, Modin C, Besenbacher F, Pedersen FS, Duch M. The use of combinatorial topographical libraries for the screening of enhanced osteogenic expression and mineralization. Biomaterials 2009; 30: 2015-2022.
113. Unadkat HV, Hulsman M, Cornelissen K, Papenburg BJ, Truckenmüller RK, Post GF, Uetz M, Reinders MJ, Stamatialis D, van Blitterswijk CA, de Boer J,. An algorithm-based topographical biomaterials library to instruct cell fate. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2011; 108: 16565-16570.
114. Slater JH, Frey W,. Nanopatterning of fibronectin and the influence of integrin clustering on endothelial cell spreading and proliferation. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2008; 87A: 176-195.
115. Lehnert D, Wehrle-Haller B, David C, Weiland U, Ballestrem C, Imhof BA, Bastmeyer M. Cell behaviour on micropatterned substrata: Limits of extracellular matrix geometry for spreading and adhesion. J Cell Sci 2004; 117: 41-52.
116. Pulina MV, Hou S-Y, Mittal A, Julich D, Whittaker CA, Holley SA, Hynes RO, Astrof S. Essential roles of fibronectin in the development of the left-right embryonic body plan. Dev Biol 2011; 354: 208-220.
117. Berry CC, Curtis ASG, Oreffo ROC, Agheli H, Sutherland DS,. Human fibroblast and human bone marrow cell response to lithographically nanopatterned adhesive domains on protein rejecting substrates. IEEE Trans NanoBiosci 2007; 6: 201-209.
118. Tang CS, Schmutz P, Petronis S, Textor M, Keller B, Vörös J. Locally Addressable electrochemical patterning technique (LAEPT) applied to poly(L-lysine)-graft-poly(ethylene glycol) adlayers on titanium and silicon oxide surfaces. Biotechnol Bioeng 2005; 91: 285-295.
119. Arnold M, Schwieder M, Blümmel J, Cavalcanti-Adam EA, Lõpez-Garcia M, Kessler H, Geiger B, Spatz JP. Cell interactions with hierarchically structured nano-patterned adhesive surfaces. Soft Mater 2009; 5: 72-77.
120. Salinas CN, Anseth KS,. The influence of the RGD peptide motif and its contextual presentation in PEG gels on human mesenchymal stem cell viability. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2008; 2: 296-304.