Nanobiotechnology: Implications for the future of nanotechnology in orthopedic applications

Expert Review of Medical Devices

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 105-114

  Sato, Michiko ^a,b   Webster, Thomas J ^b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ceramics; Metals; Nanocomposites; Nanophase; Nanotechnology; Orthopedic; Osteoblasts; Polymers

Indexed keywords

ALLOY; ALUMINUM OXIDE; ARGINYLGLYCYLASPARTIC ACID; BIOMATERIAL; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; COLLAGEN; FIBRONECTIN; HEPARIN BINDING PROTEIN; HYDROXYAPATITE; INTEGRIN RECEPTOR; NANOPARTICLE; POLYETHYLENE; POLYGLACTIN; POLYMER; POLYURETHAN; TITANIUM; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; VERY LATE ACTIVATION ANTIGEN 2; VITRONECTIN; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

BONE REGENERATION; BONE TISSUE; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CERAMICS; CYTOTOXICITY; FIBER; FIBROBLAST; GRAIN; HUMAN; IMPLANT; LUNG TOXICITY; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NONHUMAN; ORTHOPEDIC EQUIPMENT; OSSIFICATION; OSTEOBLAST; OSTEOLYSIS; PNEUMONIA; REVIEW; TOPOGRAPHY; TREATMENT FAILURE; WETTABILITY;

EID: 13644269684     PISSN: 17434440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/17434440.1.1.105     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Webster TJ. Nanophase ceramics as improved bone tissue engineering materials. Am. Ceramic Soc. Bull. 82(6), 1 8 (2003).
2. Emery DFG, Clarke HJ, Grover ML. Stanmore total hip replacement in younger patients: review of a group of patients under 50 years of age at operation. J. Bone Joint Surg. 79(2), 240 246 (1997).
3. Schakenraad, JM. In: Biomaterial Science. Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE (Eds). Academic Press, Inc., CA, USA, 140 141 (1996).
4. Biomaterials Science. Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE (Eds). Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA, 132 213 (1996).
5. Webster TJ. Nanophase ceramics: the future orthopedic and dental implant material. In: Advances in Chemical Engineering, Volume 27. Ying J (Ed.). Academic Press Inc., CA, USA, 125-166 (2003).
6. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 51, 475 483 (2000).
7. El-Ghannan A, Ducheyne P, Shapiro IM. Effect of serum protein adsorption on osteoblast adhesion to bioactive glass and hydroxyapatite. J. Orthop. Res. 17, 340-345 (1999).
8. Lee JH, Lee HB. A wettability gradient as a tool to study protein adsorption and cell adhesion on polymer surfaces. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 4(5), 467-481, (1993).
9. Ruardy TG, Schakenraad JM, Van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Adhesion and spreading of human skin fibroblasts on physicochemically characterized gradient surface. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 29, 24-29 (1995).
10. Ruoslahti E. RGD and other recognition sequences for integrins. Ann. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 12, 697 (1996).
11. Mequita P, Branco R, Afonso A, Vasconcelos M, Cavalheiro J. Mineralized membranes for bone regeneration. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 254-256, 1091-1094 (2004).
12. Søballe K, Overgaard S, Stender E et al. A review of ceramic coatings for implant fixation. J. Long-Term Effect Med. Implants 9(18), 131-151 (1999).
13. Ryes CD, Garcia AJ. α2β1 integrin-specific collagen-mimetic surfaces supporting osteoblastic differentiation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 69A, 591-600 (2004).
14. Underwood PA, Steele JG, Dalton A. Effects of polystyrene surface chemistry on the biological activity of solid phase fibronectin and vitronectin, analyzed with monoclonal antibodies. J. Cell Sci. 104, 793-803 (1993).
15. Anselme K, Bigerelle M, Noël B, Iost A, Hardouin P. Effect of grooved titanium substrate on human osteoblastic cell growth. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 60, 529-540 (2002).
16. Boyan BD, Lohmann CH, Sisk M et al. Both cyclooxygenase-1 and cyclooxygenase-2 mediate osteoblast response to titanium surface roughness. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 55, 350-359 (2001).
17. Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Kim H, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. Osteoinduction of a bioactive titanium metal. Key Eng. Mater. 254-256, 953-956 (2004).
18. Cowin et al. Handbook of Bioengineering. Skalak R, Chien S (Eds). McGraw Hill, NY, USA (1987).
19. Chun AL, Moralez JG, Fenniri H, Webster TJ. Helical rosette nanotubes: a more effective orthopedic implant material. Nanotechnology 15(Suppl.), S1-S6 (2004).
20. Webster TJ, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 21, 1803-1810 (2000).
21. Woo K, Chen VJ, Ma PX. Nanofibrous scaffolding architecture selectively enhances protein adsorption contributing to cell attachment. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 67A, 531-537 (2003).
22. Wen S, Yan D. Grain boundary in some nanomaterials. Ceramics Inter. 21, 109-112 (1995).
23. Klabunde KJ, Stark J, Koper O et al. Nanocrystals as stoichiometric reagents with unique surface chemistry. J. Phys. Chem. 100, 121-141 (1996).
24. Webster TJ, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Osteoblast adhesion of nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 20, 1221 1227 (1999).
25. Thomas, CH, McFarland CD, Jenkins ML et al. The role of vitronectin in the attachment and spatial distribution of bone-derived cells on materials with patterned surface chemistry. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 37, 81 93 (1997).
26. Webster TJ, Schadler LS, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Mechanisms of enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase alumina involve vitronectin. Tissue Engineering 7(3), 291 302 (2001).
27. Kay S, Thapa A, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ. Nanostructured polymer/nanophase ceramic composites enhanced osteoblast and chondrocyte adhesion. Tissue Engineering 8(5), 753 761 (2002).
28. Webster TJ, Ejiofor JU. Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanophase metals: Ti, Ti6AI4V, and CoCrMo. Biomaterials 25, 4731 4739 (2004).
29. Price RL, Ellison K, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ. Nanometer surface roughness increases select osteoblast adhesion on carbon nanofiber compacts. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 70A(1), 129 138 (2004).
30. Price RL, Waid MC, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ. Selective bone cell adhesion on formulations containing carbon nanofibres. Biomaterials 24(11), 1877 1887 (2003).
31. Webster TJ, Waid MC, McKenzie JL, Price RL, Ejiofor JU. Nanobiotechnology: carbon nanofibers as improved neural and orthopedic implants. Nanotechnology 15, 48 54 (2004).
32. Webster TJ, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Nanoceramics surface roughness enhances osteoblast and osteoclast functions for improved orthopedic/dental implant efficacy. Scripta Mater. 44, 1639 1642 (2001).
33. Mustafa K, Odén A, Wennerberg A, Hultenby K, Arvidson K. The influence of surface topography of ceramic abutments on the attachment and proliferation of human oral fibroblasts. Biomaterials 26(4), 373-381 (2005).
34. Vance RJ, Miller DC, Thapa A, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ. Decreased fibroblast cell density on chemically degraded poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid, polyurethane, and polycaprolactone. Biomaterials 25, 2095-2103 (2004).
35. Washburn NR, Yamada KM, Simon CG, Kennedy SB, Amis EJ. High-throughput investigation of osteoblast response to polymer crystallinity: influence of nanometer-scale roughness on proliferation. Biomaterials 25, 1215-1224 (2004).
36. Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Jonstone HJH, Affrossaman S, Curtis ASG. In vitro reaction of endothelial cells to polymer demixed nanotopography. Biomaterials 23, 2945-2954 (2002).
37. Dalby MJ, Childs S, Richle MO, Jonstone HJH, Affrossaman S. Fibroblast reaction to island topography: changes in cytoskeleton and morphology with time. Biomaterials 24, 927-935 (2003).
38. Thapa A, Webster TJ, Haberstroh KM. Nanostructured polymers enhance bladder smooth muscle cell function. Biomaterials 24(17), 2915-2926 (2003).
39. Sun Z, Wataha JC, Hanks CT. Effects of metal ions on osteoblast-like cell metabolism and differentiation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 34, 29-37 (1997).
40. Savarino S, Granchi D, Ciapetti G et al. Effects of metal ions on white blood cells of patients with failed total joint arthroplasties. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 47, 543-550 (1999).
41. Ingham E, Fisher J. Biological reactions to wear debris in total joint replacement. Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs 214H, 21-37 (2000).
42. Green TR, Fisher J, Stone M, Wroblewski BM, Ingham E. Polyethylene particles of a 'critical size' are necessary for the induction of cytokines by macrophages in vitro. Biomaterials 19, 2297-2302 (1998).
43. Que L, Timmie-Topoleski LD. Third-body wear of cobalt-chromium-molybdenum implant alloys initiated by bone and poly(methyl methacrylate) particles. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 50, 322-330 (2000).
44. Hogan J. How safe is nanotech? Special report on nano pollution. New Scientist 177(2388), 14 (2003).
45. Tamura K, Takashi N, Akasaka T et al. Effects of micro/nano particle size on cell function and morphology. Key Engr. Mat. 254-256, 919-922 (2004).
46. Gutwein LG, Webster TJ. Osteoblast and chrondrocyte proliferation in the presence of alumina and titania nanoparticles. J. Nanopar. Res. 4, 231-238 (2002).
47. Gutwein LG, Webster TJ. Increased viable osteoblast density in the presence of nanophase compared to conventional alumina and titania particles. Biomaterials 25(18), 4175-4183 (2004).
48. Warheit DB. Nanoparticles: health impact? Materials Today 32-35 (2004).
49. Seal S, Kuiry SC, Georgieva PG, Agarwal A. Manufacturing nanocomposite parts: present status and future challenges. MRS Bull. 29(1), 16-21 (2004).