Osteogenic differentiation of marrow stromal cells cultured on nanoporous alumina surfaces

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 80, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 955-964

  Popat, Ketul C ^a,b   Chalvanichkul, Kwan Isara ^b   Barnes, George L ^c   Latempa Jr , Thomas Joseph ^d   Grimes, Craigs A ^d   Desai, Tejal A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Boston University   (United States)

^c BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Marrow stromal cells; Nanoporous alumina; Orthopedic biomaterials; Osseointegration

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; ALUMINA; ANODIC OXIDATION; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); ORTHOPEDICS; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

MARROW STROMAL CELLS; NANOPOROUS ALUMINA; ORTHOPEDIC BIOMATERIALS; OSSEOINTEGRATION;

CELL CULTURE;

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; ALUMINUM OXIDE; BIOMATERIAL; CALCEIN; NANOMATERIAL;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE MARROW CELL; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURE MEDIUM; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; IMPLANT; MATERIALS TESTING; MOUSE; NANOPORE; NONHUMAN; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE; STROMA CELL; SURFACE PROPERTY; SYNTHESIS; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; ALUMINUM OXIDE; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE MARROW CELLS; CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; MATERIALS TESTING; MICE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; OSTEOBLASTS; POROSITY; STROMAL CELLS;

EID: 33847219981     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31028     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ishaug SL, Thomson RC, Mikos AG, Langer R. Biomaterials for organ regeneration. In: Meyers RA, editor. Molecular Biology and Biotechnology: A Comprehensive Desk Reference. New York: VCH; 1995. pp 86-93.
2. Ishaug SL, Crane GM, Miller MJ, Yasko AW, Yaszemski MJ, Mikos AG. Bone formation by three-dimensional stromal osteoblast culture in biodegradable polymer scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;36:17-28.
3. Schwartz Z, Boyan BD. Underlying mechanisms at the bone-biomaterial interface. J Cell Biochem 1994;56:340-347.
4. Boyan BD, Hummert TW, Dean DD, Schwartz Z. Role of materials surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response. Biomaterials 1996;30:977-985.
5. Shackelford JF. Bioceramics-Current status and future trends. Bioceram Mater Sci Forum 1999;293:99-106.
6. Langer R, Vacanti JP. Tissue engineering. Science 1993;260:920-926.
7. Chou L, Marek B, Wagner WR. Effects of hydroxyapatites coating crystallinity on biosolubility, cell attachment, and proliferation in vitro. Biomaterials 1999;20:977-985.
8. Klawitter JJ, Hulbert SF. Application of porous ceramics for the attachment of load bearing internal orthopedic applications. J Biomed Mater Symp 1972;2:161-229.
9. Bobyn JD, Pilliar RM, Cameron HU, Weatherly GC. The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980;150:263-270.
10. Leary-Swan EE, Popat KC, Desai TA. Fabrication and evaluation of nanoporous alumina membranes for osteoblast culture. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;72:288-295.
11. Popat KC, Leary-Swan EE, Desai TA. Peptide immobilized nanoporous alumina membranes for enhanced osteoblast adhesion. Biomaterials 2005;26:1969-1976.
12. Lee TM, Wang BC, Yang YC, Chang E. Comparison of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings and hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate composite coatings: In vivo study. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;55:360-367.
13. Bauer TW, Taylor SK, Jiang M, Medendorp SV. An indirect comparison of third-body wear in retrieved hydroxyapatite-coated, porous, and cemented femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;298:11-18.
14. Bloebaum RD, Beeks D, Dorr LD, Savory CG, DuPont JA, Hofmann AA. Complications with hydroxyapatites particulate separation in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;298:19-26.
15. Schwartz Z, Martin JY, Dean DD, Simpson J, Cochran DL. Effect of titanium surface on chondrocytes proliferation, matrix production and differentiation depends on the state of cell maturation. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;30:145-155.
16. Price RL, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanostructured surfaces of carbon and alumina. Med Biol Eng Comput 2003;41:372-375.
17. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Seigel RW, Bizios R. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 2000;21:1803-1810.
18. Tiedeman JJ, Garvin KL, Kile TA, Connolly JR. The role of a composite, demineralized bone matrix and bone marrow in the treatment of osseous defects. Orthopedics 1995;8:1153-1158.
19. Rougraff BT, Kling TJ. Treatment of active unicameral bone cysts with percutaneous injection of demineralized bone matrix and autogenous bone marrow. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84:921-929.
20. Haynesworth SE, Goshima J, Goldberg VM, Caplan AI. Characterization of cells with osteogenic potential from human marrow. Bone 1992;13:81-88.
21. Prockop DJ. Marrow stromal cells as stem cells for nonhematopoietic tissues. Science 1997;276:71-74.
22. Caplan AI, Fink DJ, Goto T, Linton AE, Young RG, Wakitani S, Goldberg VM, Haynesworth SE. Mesenchymal stem cells and tissue repair. In: Jackson DW, editor. The Anterior Cruciate Ligament: Current and Future Concepts. New York: Raven Press; 1993.
23. Altman GH, Horan RL, Martin I, Farhadi J, Stark PR, Volloch V, Richmond JC, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Kaplan DL. Cell differentiation by mechanical stress. FASEB J 2002;16:270-272.
24. Beresford JN, Bennett JH, Devlin C, Leboy PS, Owen ME. Evidence for an inverse relationship between the differentiation of adipocytic and osteogenic cells in rat marrow stromal cell cultures. J Cell Sci 1992;102(Part 2):341-351.
25. Wakitani S, Goto T, Pineda SJ, Young RG, Mansour JM, Caplan AI, Goldberg VM. Mesenchymal cell-based repair of large, full-thickness defects of articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994;76:579-592.
26. Seshi B, Kumar S, Sellers D. Human bone marrow stromal cell: Coexpression of markers specific for multiple mesenchymal cell lineages. Blood Cells Mol Dis 2000;26:234-246.
27. Bianco P, Robey PG. Marrow stromal stem cells. J Clin Invest 2000;105:1663-1668.
28. Harakas NK. Demineralized bone-matrix-induced osteogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984;188:239-251.
29. Urist MR. Bone formation by autoinduction. Science 1965;150:893-899.
30. Urist MR, DeLange RF, Finerman GA. Bone cell differentiation and growth factors. Science 1983;220:680-686.
31. Wang J, Glimcher MJ. Characterization of matrix-induced osteogenesis in rat calvarial bone defects. II. Origins of bone forming cells. Calcif Tissue Int 1999;65:486-493.
32. Wang J, Yang R, Gerstenfeld LC, Glimcher MJ. Characterization of demineralized bone matrix-induced osteogenesis in rat calvarial bone defects. III. Gene and protein expression. Calcif Tissue Int 2000;67:314-320.
33. Lee SJ. Alumina. Encyclopedia of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2004. pp 19-27.
34. Karlsson M, Palsgard E, Wilshaw PR, Di Silvio L. Initial in vitro interaction of osteoblasts with nano-porous alumina. Biomaterials 2003;24:3039-3046.
35. Corning Incorporated Life Sciences. Preparation of Costar Transwell inserts for scanning electron microscopy. Mar 9 2004. Available at: http://www.corning.com/Lifesciences/technical_information/techDocs/sem_tr answell_protocol.pdf.
36. Mehta SS. Analysis of the mechanical properties of bone material using nondestructive ultrasound reflectometry, PhD Dissertation, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 1995.
37. Weiner S, Traub W. Bone structure: From angstroms to microns. FASEB J 1992;6:879-885.
38. Landis WJ. The strength of a calcified tissue depends in part on the molecular structure and organization of its constituent mineral crystals in their organic matrix. Bone 1995;16:533-544.