Nanoscale topography modulates corneal epithelial cell migration

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 75, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 603-611

  Diehl, K A ^a   Foley, J D ^a   Nealey, P F ^b   Murphy, C J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

Author keywords

Corneal epithelial basement membrane; Epithelial cell migration; Nanoscale topography

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MEMBRANES; CELL CULTURE; ELECTRON BEAMS; LITHOGRAPHY; POLYURETHANES; SILICON WAFERS; X RAY ANALYSIS;

CORNEAL EPITHELIAL BASEMENT MEMBRANE; EPITHELIAL CELL MIGRATION; NANOSCALE TOPOGRAPHY;

SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY;

POLYURETHAN;

ARTICLE; BASEMENT MEMBRANE; CELL CULTURE; CELL MIGRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA EPITHELIUM; HOMEOSTASIS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; KERATOPROSTHESIS; NANOANALYSIS; SIMIAN VIRUS 40; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TOPOGRAPHY; VIRUS CELL TRANSFORMATION; WOUND HEALING; X RAY ANALYSIS; CELL LINE; CELL MOTION; CYTOLOGY; KERATOMETRY; METHODOLOGY; NANOTECHNOLOGY;

CELL LINE, TRANSFORMED; CELL MOVEMENT; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; EPITHELIUM, CORNEAL; HUMANS; NANOTECHNOLOGY;

EID: 33644797636     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30467     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Lauffenburger DA, Horwitz AF. Cell migration: a physically integrated molecular process. Cell 1996;84:359-369.
2. Lu L, Reinach PS, Kao WWY. Corneal epithelial wound healing. Exp Biol Med 2001;226:653-664.
3. Gumbiner BM. Cell adhesion: the molecular basis of tissue architecture and morphogenesis. Cell 1996;84:345-357.
4. Dalton BA, Walboomers XF, Dziegielewski M, Evans MDM, Taylor S, Jansen JA, Steele JG. Modulation of epithelial tissue and cell migration by microgrooves. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;56:195-207.
5. Mello AP, Volkov Y, Kelleher D, Prendergast PJ. Comparative locomotory behavior of T lymphocytes versus T lymphoma cells on flat and grooved surfaces. Ann Biomed Eng 2003;31:1106-1113.
6. Dalton BA, McFarland GA, Steele JG. Stimulation of epithelial tissue migration by certain porous topographies is independent of fluid flux. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;56:83-92.
7. Palmaz JC, Benson A, Sprague EA. Influence of surface topography on endothelialization of intravascular metallic material. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 1999;10:439-444.
8. Goto T, Brunette DM. Surface topography and serum concentration affect the appearance of tenascin in human gingival fibroblasts in vitro. Exp Cell Res 1998;244:474-480.
9. Fitton JH, Dalton BA, Beumer G, Johnson G, Griesser HJ, Steele JG. Surface topography can interfere with epithelial tissue migration. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;42:245-257.
10. Ranucci CS, Moghe PV. Substrate microtopography can enhance cell adhesive and migratory responsiveness to matrix ligand density. J Biomed Mater Res 2001;54:149-161.
11. Steele JG, Johnson G, McLean KM, Beumer GJ, Griesser HJ. Effect of porosity and surface hydrophilicity on migration of epithelial tissue over synthetic polymer. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;50:475-482.
12. Tan J, Shen H, Carter KL, Saltzman WM. Controlling human polymorphonuclear leukocytes motility using microfabrication technology. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;51:694-702.
13. Marois Y, Sigot-Luizard MF, Guidoin R. Endothelial cell behavior on vascular prosthetic grafts: effect of polymer chemistry, surface structure, and surface treatment. ASAIO J 1999;45:272-280.
14. Friedl P, Zaenker KS, Broecker EB. Cell migration strategies in 3-D extracellular matrix: differences in morphology, cell matrix interactions, and integrin function. Microsc Res Tech 1998;45:369-378.
15. Matsuda T, Nakayama Y. Surface microarchitectural design in biomedical applications: in vitro transmural endothelialization on microporous segmented polyurethane films fabricated using an excimer laser. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;31:235-242.
16. Matsuda T, Sugawara T. Control of cell adhesion, migration, and orientation on photochemically microprocessed surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;32:165-173.
17. Thomas TW, DiMilla PA. Spreading and motility of human glioblastoma cells on sheets of silicone rubber depend on substratum compliance. Med Biol Eng Comput 2000;38:360-370.
18. Wong JY, Velasco A, Rajagopalan P, Pham Q. Directed movement of vascular smooth muscle cells on gradient-compliant hydrogels. Langmuir 2003;19:1908-1913.
19. Engler A, Bacakova L, Newman C, Hategan A, Griffin M, Discher D. Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. Biophys J 2004;86:617-628.
20. Brock A, Chang E, Ho CC, LeDuc P, Jiang X, Whitesides GM, Ingber DE. Geometric determinants of directional cell motility revealed using microcontact printing. Langmuir 2003;19:1611-1617.
21. Inoue T, Cox JE, Pilliar RM, Melcher AH. Effect of the surface geometry of smooth and porous-coated titanium alloy on the orientation of fibroblasts in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res 1987;21:107-126.
22. Abrams GA, Bentley E, Nealey PF, Murphy CJ. Electron microscopy of the canine corneal basement membranes. Cells Tissues Organs 2002;170:251-257.
23. Abrams GA, Schaus SS, Goodman SL, Nealey PF, Murphy CJ. Nanoscale topography of the corneal epithelial basement membrane and Descemet's membrane of the human. Cornea 2000;19:57-64.
24. Abrams GA, Goodman SL, Nealey PF, Franco M, Murphy CJ. Nanoscale topography of the basement membrane underlying the corneal epithelium of the rhesus macaque. Cell Tissue Res 2000;299:39-46.
25. Flemming RG, Murphy CJ, Abrams GA, Goodman SL, Nealey PF. Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. Biomaterials 1999;20:573-588.
26. Curtis A, Wilkinson C. New depths in cell behaviour: reactions of cells to nanotopography. In: Lackie JM, Dunn GA, Jones GE, editors. Cell behaviour: control and mechanism of motility. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1999. p 15-26.
27. Teixeira AI, Abrams GA, Murphy CJ, Nealey PF. Cell behavior on lithographically defined nanostructured substrates. J Vacuum Sci Technol 2003;:683-687.
28. Teixeira AI, Abrams GA, Bertics PJ, Murphy CJ, Nealey PF. Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates. J Cell Sci 2003;116:1881-1892.
29. Karuri NW, Liliensiek S, Teixeira AI, Abrams G, Campbell S, Nealey PF, Murphy CJ. Biological length scale topography enhances cell-substratum adhesion of human corneal epithelial cells. J Cell Science 2004;117:3153-3164.
30. Clark P, Connolly P, Curtis AS, Dow JA, Wilkinson CD. Cell guidance by ultrafine topography in vitro. J Cell Science 1991;99:73-77.
31. Foley JD, Grunwald EW, Nealey PF, Murphy CJ. Cooperative modulation of neuritogenesis by PC12 cells by topography and nerve growth factor. Biomaterials 2005;26:3639-3644.
32. Abrams GA, Teixeira AI, Nealey PF, Murphy CJ. Effects of substratum topography on cell behavior. In: Dillow AK, Lowman AM, editors. Biomimetic materials and design. New York: Marcell Dekker; 2002. p 91-137.
33. Odom TW, Love C, Wolfe DB, Paul KE, Whitesides GM. Improved pattern transfer in soft lithography using composite stamps. Langmuir 2002;18:5314-5320.
34. Kim SR, Teixeira AI, Nealey PF, Wendt AE, Abbott NL. Fabrication of polymeric substrates with well-defined nanometer-scale topography and tailored surface chemistry. Adv Mater 2002;14:1468-1472.
35. Araki-Sasaki K, Ohashi Y, Sasabe T, Hayashi K, Watanabe H, Tano Y, Handa H. An SV40-immortalized human corneal epithelial cell line and its characterization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995;36:614-621.
36. Buck RC. Cell migration in repair of mouse corneal epithelium. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci 1979;18:767-784.
37. Latkany R, Tsuk A, Sheu MS, Loh IH, Trinkaus-Randall V. Plasma surface modification of artificial corneas for optimal epithelialization. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;36:29-37.
38. Sugimoto Y, Hagiwara A. Cell locomotion on differently charged substrates. Effects of substrate charge on locomotive speed of fibroblastic cells. Exp Cell Res 1979;120:245-252.
39. Webb K, Hlady V, Tresco PA. Relative importance of surface wettability and charged functional groups on NIH 3T3 fibroblast attachment, spreading and cytoskeletal organization. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;41:422-430.