Residents provide feedback to their clinical teachers: Reflection through dialogue

Medical Teacher

Volumn 35, Issue 9, 2013, Pages

  Fluit, Cornelia V ^a   Bolhuis, Sanneke ^a   Klaassen, Tim ^a   De Visser, Marieke ^a   Grol, Richard ^a   Laan, Roland ^a   Wensing, Michel ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EDUCATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; COMMUNICATION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FACULTY, MEDICAL; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; MALE;

EID: 84882936120     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: 1466187X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.785631     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Arah OA, Heineman MJ, Lombarts KMJMH. 2012. Factors influencing residents' evaluations of clinical faculty member teaching qualities and role model status. Med Educ 46:381-389
2. Beckman TJ, Lee MC, Rohren CH, Pankratz VS. 2003. Evaluating an instrument for the peer review of inpatient teaching. Med Teach 25(2):131-135
3. Bernardin H DS, Redmon G. 2006. Attitudes of first-line supervisors toward subordinate appraisals. Hum Resource Manage 32(2-3):315-324
4. Billett S. 2001. Learning in the workplace: Strategies for effective practice. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.
5. Bradley E MS, Curry L, Buckser A, King KL, Kasl V, Anderson R. 2002. Expanding the Anderson model: The role of psychosocial factors in long-term care use. Health Serv Res 37(5):1221-1241
6. Dolmans DHJM, Tigelaar D. 2012. Building bridges between theory and practice in medical education using a design-based research approach: AMEE guide No. 60. Med Teach 34(1):1-10
7. Dierendonck D, van HC, Borrill C, Stride C. 2007. Effects of upward feedback on leadership behavior toward subordinates. J Manage Dev 26(3):228-238
8. Fluit CR, Bolhuis S, Grol R, Laan R, Wensing M. 2010. Assessing the quality of clinical teachers: A systematic review of content and quality of questionnaires for assessing clinical teachers. J Gen Intern Med 25(12):137-145
9. Fluit CR, Bolhuis S, Grol R, Ham M, Feskens R, Laan R, Wensing M. 2012. Evaluation and feedback for effective clinical teaching in postgraduate medical education: Validation of an assessment instrument incorporating the CanMEDS roles. Med Teach 34(11):893-901
10. Frank JR, Danoff D. 2007. The CanMEDS initiative: Implementing an outcomes-based framework of physician competencies. Med Teach 29(7):642-647
11. Hall JL, Leiaecker JK, DiMarco C. 1996. What we know about upward appraisals of management: Facilitating the future use of UPAs. Hum Resource Dev Quart 7(3):209-226
12. Kluger AN, DeNisi A. 2006. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: Historical review, a meta-analysis and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull 119:254-284
13. Leach DC. 2000. Evaluation of competency: An ACGME perspective. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 79(5):487-489
14. Leach DC. 2001. The ACGME competencies: Substance or form? Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. J Am Coll Surg 192(3):396-398
15. Nation JG, Carmichael E, Fidler H, Violato C. 2011. The development of an instrument to assess clinical teaching with linkage to CanMEDS roles: A psychometric analysis. Med Teach 33(6):e290-e296
16. Nicol D, Macfarlane-Dick D. 2006. Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education 31(2):199-218
17. Norcini JJ. 2003. Peer assessment of competence. Med Educ 37(6):539-543
18. Penny AR, Coe R. 2004. Effectiveness of consultation on student ratings feedback: A meta-analysis. Rev Educ Res 74(2):215-253
19. Plomp T, Nieveen N, (editors). 2010. An introduction to educational design research. Enschede: Netzodruk.
20. Ramsey PG, Wenrich MD, Carline JD, Inui TS, Larson EB, LoGerfo JP. 1993. Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance. JAMA 269(13):1655-1660
21. Sargeant JM, Mann KV, Vleuten van de C, Metsemakers JF. 2009. Reflection: A link between receiving and using assessment feedback. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 14(3):399-410
22. Smith AFR, Fortunato VJ. 2008. Factors influencing employee intentions to provide honest upward feedback ratings. J Bus Psychol 22:191-207
23. Snell L, Tallett S, Haist S, Hays R, Norcini J, Prince K, et al. 2000. A review of the evaluation of clinical teaching: New perspectives and challenges. Med Educ 34(10):862-870
24. Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans DH, Wolfhagen IH, Peters WG, van CL, Scherpbier AJ. 2010. Combined student ratings and self-assessment provide useful feedback for clinical teachers. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 15(3):315-328.
25. 't Hart H, Boeije BH, Hox J, (editors). 2005 Onderzoeksmethoden. Amsterdam: Boom Onderwijs. Waldman DAL. 2001. Attitudinal and behavioral outcomes of an upward feedback process. Group Org Manage 26(2):189-205.