Evaluation and feedback for effective clinical teaching in postgraduate medical education: Validation of an assessment instrument incorporating the CanMEDS roles

Medical Teacher

Volumn 34, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 893-901

  Fluit, Cornelia ^a   Bolhuis, Sanneke ^a   Grol, Richard ^a   Ham, Marieke ^a   Feskens, Remco ^b   Laan, Roland ^a   Wensing, Michel ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Institute for Educational Measurement   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MEDICAL SCHOOL; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY; TEACHING; VALIDATION STUDY; WORKPLACE;

ADULT; EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL; FACULTY, MEDICAL; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TEACHING; WORKPLACE;

EID: 84869823624     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: 1466187X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.699114     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Afonso NM, Cardozo LJ, Mascarenhas OA, Aranha AN, Shah C. 2005. Are anonymous evaluations a better assessment of faculty teaching performance? A comparative analysis of open and anonymous evaluation processes. Fam Med 37(1):43-47.
2. Auewarakul C, Downing SM, Jaturatamrong U, Praditsuwan R. 2005. Sources of validity evidence for an internal medicine student evaluation system: An evaluative study of assessment methods. Med Educ 39(3):276-283
3. Beckman TJ. 2004. How reliable are assessments of clinical teaching? A review of the published instruments. J Gen Int Med 19(9):971-977
4. Bentler PM. 1990. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psych Bulletin 107(2):238-246
5. Boerboom TB, Dolmans DH, Jaarsma AD, Muijtjens AM, Van Beukelen P, Scherpbier AJ. 2011. Exploring the validity and reliability of a questionnaire for evaluating veterinary clinical teachers' supervisory skills during clinical rotations. Med Teach 33(2):e84-e91.
6. Bolhuis S. 2006. Professional development between teachers' practical knowledge and external demands: Plea for a broad socail-constructivist and critical approach. In: Oser FK, Achtenwagen F, Renold U, editors. Competence oriented teacher training. Old research demands and new pathways. Rotterdam/Tapei: Sense Publishers. pp 237-249
7. Boor K, Scheele F, van der Vleuten CPM, Scherpbier AJJA, Teunissen PW, Sijtsma K. 2007. Psychometric properties of an instrument to measure the clinical learning environment. Med Educ 41(1):92-99.
8. Browne PM, Cudeck R. 1993. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Long JS, editor. Testin structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. pp 136-162
9. Burchell B, Marsh C. 1992. The effect of questionniare length on survey response. Qual Quan 26:233-244
10. Cheetham G, Chivers G. 2001. How professionals learn: An investigation of informal learning amongst people working in professions. J Eur Ind Train 25(5):248-292
11. De Villiers MR, De Villiers PJ, Kent AP. 2005. The Delphi technique in health sciences education research. Med Teach 27(7):639-643
12. Dolmans DH, Wolfhagen HA, Gerver WJ, De Grave W, Scherpbier AJ. 2004. Providing physicians with feedback on how they supervise students during patient contacts. Med Teach 26(5):409-414
13. Dornan T, Boshuizen H, King N, Scherpbier A. 2007. Experience-based learning: A model linking the processes and outcomes of medical students' workplace learning. Med Educ 41(1):84-91.
14. Downing SM. 2003. Validity: On meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ 37(9):830-837
15. Downing SM, Haladyna TM. 2004. Validity threats: Overcoming interference with proposed interpretations of assessment data. Med Educ 38(3):327-333
16. Fluit CR, Bolhuis S, Grol R, Laan R, Wensing M. 2010. Assessing the quality of clinical teachers: A systematic review of content and quality of questionnaires for assessing clinical teachers. J Gen Int Med 25(12):137-145
17. Frank JR, Danoff D. 2007. The CanMEDS initiative: Implementing an outcomes-based framework of physician competencies. Med Teach 29(7):642-647
18. Hattie J, Timperley H. 2007. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res 77:81-112
19. Iglesias C, Torgerson D. 2000. Does length of questionnaire matter? A randomised trial of response rates to a mailed questionnaire. J Health Serv Res Policy 5(4):219-221
20. Leach DC. 2001. Changing education to improve patient care. Qual Health Care 10(Suppl. 2):ii54-ii58.
21. Leach DC, Philibert I. 2006. High-quality learning for high-quality health care: Getting it right. JAMA 296(9):1132-1134
22. Muthe'n LK, Muthe'n BO. 2004. Mplus user's guide, Vol. 3. Los Angeles, CA: Muthe'n and Muthe'n.
23. Norcini J, Burch V. 2007. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Med Teach 29(9):855-871
24. Scheele F, Teunissen P, Luijk van S, Heineman E, Fluit L, Mulder H. 2008. Introducing competency-based postgraduate medical education in the Netherlands. Med Teach 30(3):248-253
25. Smith CA, Varkey AB, Evans AT, Reilly BM. 2004. Evaluating the performance of inpatient attending physicians: A new instrument for today's teaching hospitals. J Gen Int Med 19(7):766-771
26. Snell L, Tallett S, Haist S, Hays R, Norcini J, Prince K. 2000. A review of the evaluation of clinical teaching: New perspectives and challenges. Med Educ 34(10):862-870
27. Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans DH, Wolfhagen IH, Muijtjens AM, Scherpbier AJ. 2008. The development of an instrument for evaluating clinical teachers: Involving stakeholders to determine content validity. Med Teach 30(8): E272-e277
28. Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans DH, Wolfhagen IH, Muijtjens AM, Scherpbier AJ. 2010. The Maastricht Clinical Teaching Questionnaire (MCTQ) as a valid and reliable instrument for the evaluation of clinical teachers. Acad Med 85(11):1732-1738
29. Stalmeijer RE, Dolmans DH, Wolfhagen IH, Scherpbier AJ. 2009. Cognitive apprenticeship in clinical practice: Can it stimulate learning in the opinion of students? Adv Health Sci Educ 14(4):535-546
30. Streiner DL, Norman GR. 2003. Health measurement scales. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press
31. Subar AF, Ziegler RG, Thompson FE, Johnson CC, Weissfeld JL, Reding D, Kavounis KH, Hayes RB; Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial Investigators. 2001. Is shorter always better? Relative importance of questionnaire length and cognitive ease on response rates and data quality for two dietary questionnaires. Am J Epidemiol 153(4):404-409
32. Teunissen PW, Scheele F, Scherpbier AJ, van der V, Boor K, van Luijk SJ. 2007. How residents learn: Qualitative evidence for the pivotal role of clinical activities. Med Educ 41(8):763-770