New technologies for molecular dynamics simulations

Comprehensive Biophysics

Volumn 9, Issue , 2012, Pages 86-104

  Chow, E ^a   Klepeis, J L ^a   Rendleman, C A ^a   Dror, R O ^a   Shaw, D E ^b  

^a D E SHAW RESEARCH   (United States)

^b D E Shaw Research ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Computer architecture; Force field validation; MapReduce; Membrane protein dynamics; Microsecond to millisecond dynamics; Molecular dynamics; Parallel computing; Protein folding; Sampling methods; Trajectory data analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882765120     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-374920-8.00908-5     Document Type: Chapter

References (123)

1. Klepeis J.L., Lindorff-Larsen K., Dror R.O., Shaw D.E. Long-timescale molecular dynamics simulations of protein structure and function. Curr. Op. Struct. Biol. 2009, 19:1-18.
2. Lee E.H., Hsin J., Sotomayor M., Comellas G., Schulten K. Discovery through the computational microscope. Structure 2009, 17:1295-1306.
3. Khalili-Araghi F., Gumbart J., Wen P.C., Sotomayor M., Tajkhorshid E., Schulten K. Molecular dynamics simulations of membrane channels and transporters. Curr. Op. Struct. Biol. 2009, 19:128-137.
4. Shaw D.E., Dror R.O., Salmon J.K., Grossman J.P., Mackenzie K.M., Bank J.A., Young C., Deneroff M.M., Batson B., Bowers K.J., Chow E., Eastwood M.P., Ierardi D.J., Klepeis J.L., Kuskin J.S., Larson R.H., Lindorff-Larsen K., Maragakis P., Moraes M.A., Piana S., Shan Y., Towles B. Millisecond-Scale Molecular Dynamics Simulations on Anton. Proceedings of the Conference on High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (SC09) 2009, ACM, New York.
5. Chen J., Brooks C.L. Khandogin, J. Recent advances in implicit solvent-based methods for biomolecular simulations. Curr. Op. Struct. Biol. 2008, 18:1-9.
6. Monticelli L., Kandasamy S.K., Periole X., Larson R.G., Tieleman D.P., Marrink S.J. The MARTINI coarse-grained force field: Extensions to proteins. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2008, 4:819-834.
7. Shih A.Y., Arkhipov A., Freddolino P.L., Schulten K. Coarse grained protein-lipid model with application to lipoprotein particles. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110:3674-3684.
8. Arkhipov A., Freddolino P.L., Schulten K. Stability and dynamics of virus capsids described by coarse grained modeling. Structure 2008, 14:1767-1777.
9. Kortemme T., Morozov A.V., Baker D. An orientation-dependent hydrogen bonding potential improves prediction of specificity and structure for proteins and protein-protein complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 326:1239-1259.
10. Zheng W., Brooks B.R., Hummer G. Protein conformational transitions explored by mixed elastic network models. Proteins 2007, 69:43-57.
11. Hills R.D., Brooks C.L. Insights from coarse-grained go models for protein folding and dynamics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10:889-905.
12. Beberg, A.L.; Ensign, D.L.; Jayachandran, G.; Khaliq, S.; Pande, V.S. Folding@Home: Lessons from Eight Years of Distributed Computing. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Parallel & Distributed Processing (IPDPS), Rome, Italy, 25-29 May, 2009.
13. Fujutani H., Tanida Y., Ito M., Jayachandran G., Snow C.D., Shirts M.R., Sorin E.J., Pande V.S. Direct calculation of the binding free energies of FKBP ligands using the Fujitsu BioServer massively parallel computer. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 123:084108.
14. Duan Y., Kollman P.A. Pathways to a protein folding intermediate observed in a 1-microsecond simulation in aqueous solution. Science 1998, 282:643.
15. Case D.A., Cheatham T.E., Darden T., Gohlke H., Luo R., Merz K.M., Onufriev A., Simmerling C., Wang B., Woods R. The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26:1668-1688.
16. Plimpton S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 1995, 117:1-19.
17. Shaw D.E. A fast, scalable method for the parallel evaluation of distance-limited pairwise particle interactions. J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26:1318-1328.
18. Bowers K.J., Dror R.O., Shaw D.E. Zonal methods for the parallel execution of range-limited N-body simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 2007, 221:303-329.
19. Plimpton S., Hendrickson B. Parallel molecular dynamics simulations of organic materials. Int. J. Mod. Phys. 1994, C5:295-298.
20. Plimpton S., Hendrickson B.A. New parallel method for molecular dynamics simulation of macromolecular systems. J. Comput. Chem. 1996, 17:326-337.
21. Liem S.Y., Brown D., Clarke J.H.R. Molecular dynamics simulations on distributed memory machines. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1991, 67:261-267.
22. Kalé L., Skeel R., Bhandarkar M., Brunner R., Gursoy A., Krawetz N., Phillips J., Shinozaki A., Varadarajan K., Schulten K. NAMD2: Greater scalability for parallel molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 1991, 151:283-312.
23. Snir M.A. Note on N-body computations with cutoffs. Theor. Comput. Sys. 2004, 37:295-318.
24. MPI: A Message-Passing Interface Standard, Version 2.2 2009, High Performance Computing Center (HLRS), Stuttgart.
25. Brooks B.R., Brooks C.L., MacKerell A.D., Nilsson L., Petrella R.J., Roux B., Won Y., Archontis G., Bartels C., Boresch S., Caflisch A., Caves L., Cui Q., Dinner A.R., Feig M., Fischer S., Gao J., Hodoscek M., Im W., Kuczera K., Lazaridis T., Ma J., Ovchinnikov V., Paci E., Pastor R.W., Post C.B., Pu J.Z., Schaefer M., Tidor B., Venable R.M., Woodcock H.L., Wu X., Yang W., York D.M., Karplus M. CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program. J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 30:1545-1615.
26. Bowers K.J., Chow E., Xu H., Dror R.O., Eastwood M.P., Gregersen B.A., Klepeis J.L., Kolossváry I., Moraes M.A., Sacerdoti F.D., Salmon J.K., Shan Y., Shaw D.E. Scalable Algorithms for Molecular Dynamics Simulations on Commodity Clusters. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing (SC06) 2006, IEEE, New York.
27. Hess B., Kutzner C., van der Spoel D., Lindahl E. GROMACS 4: Algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2008, 4:435-447.
28. Phillips J.C., Braun R., Wang W., Gumbart J., Tajkhorshid E., Villa E., Chipot C., Skeel R.D., Kalé L., Schulten K. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26:1781-1802.
29. Allen F., Almasi G., Andreoni W., Beece D., Berne B.J., Bright A., Brunheroto J., Cascaval C., Castanos J., Coteus P., Crumley P., Curioni A., Denneau M., Donath W., Eleftheriou M., Fitch B., Fleischer B., Georgiou C.J., Germain R., Giampapa M., Gresh D., Gupta M., Haring R., Ho H., Hochschild P., Hummel S., Jonas T., Lieber D., Martyna G., Maturu K., Moreira J., Newns D., Newton M., Philhower R., Picunko T., Pitera J., Pitman M., Rand R., Royyuru A., Salapura V., Sanomiya A., Shah R., Sham Y., Singh S., Snir M., Suits F., Swetz R., Swope W.C., Vishnumurthy N., Ward T.J.C., Warren H., Zhou R. Blue Gene: A vision for protein science using a petaflop supercomputer. IBM Sys. J. 2001, 40:310-327.
30. Fitch B.G., Rayshubskiy A., Eleftheriou M., Ward T.J.C., Giampapa M., Pitman M.C., Germain R.S. Blue Matter: Approaching the Limits of Concurrency for Classical Molecular Dynamics. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing (SC06) 2006, IEEE, New York.
31. El-Ghazawi T., Carlson W., Sterling T., Yelick K.U.P.C. Distributed Shared Memory Programming 2005, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
32. Bowers K.J., Dror R.O., Shaw D.E. The midpoint method for parallelization of particle simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124:184109.
33. Hockney R.W., Eastwood J.W. Computer Simulation Using Particles 1988, Taylor & Francis, Bristol, PA.
34. Kumar S., Huang C., Zheng G., Bohm E., Bhatele A., Phillips J.C., Yu H., Kalé L. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD on the IBM Blue Gene/L system. IBM J Res. Dev. 2008, 52:177-188.
35. Chow, E.; Rendleman, C.A.; Bowers, K.J.; Dror, R.O.; Hughes, D.H.; Gullingsrud, J.; Sacerdoti, F.D.; Shaw, D.E. Desmond performance on a cluster of multicore processors. D. E. Shaw Research Technical Report DESRES/TR-2008-01, 2008.
36. Bakker A.F., Bruin C. Design and Implementation of the Delft Molecular-Dynamics Processor. Special Purpose Computers 1988, 198-232. Academic Press, San Diego. B.J. Alder (Ed.).
37. Fine R., Dimmler G., Levinthal C. FASTRUN: A special purpose, hardwired computer for molecular simulation. Proteins 1991, 11:242-253.
38. Auerbach D.J., Paul W., Bakker A.F., Lutz C., Rudge W.E., Abraham F.F. A special purpose parallel computer for molecular dynamics: Motivation, design, implementation, and application. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91:4881-4890.
39. Toyoda S., Miyagawa H., Kitamura K., Amisaki T., Hashimoto E., Ikeda H., Kusumi A., Miyakawa N. Development of MD engine: High-speed accelerator with parallel processor design for molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 1999, 20:185-199.
40. Amisaki T., Toyoda S., Miyagawa H., Kitaailra K. Development of hardware accelerator for molecular dynamics simulations: A computation board that calculates nonbonded interactions in cooperation with fast multipole method. J. Comput. Chem. 2003, 24:582-592.
41. Narumi T., Ohno Y., Okimoto N., Koishi T., Suenaga A., Futatsugi N., Yanai R., Himeno R., Fujikawa S., Ikei M., Taiji M. A 55T FLOPS Simulation of Amyloid-forming Peptides from Yeast Prion Sup35 with the Special-Purpose Computer System MDGRAPE-3 2006, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing (SC06); Tampa, FL, USA, 11-17 November.
42. Shaw, D.E.; Deneroff, M.M.; Dror, R.O.; Kuskin, J.S.; Larson, R.H.; Salmon, J.K.; Young, C.; Batson, B.; Bowers, K.J.; Chao, J.C.; Eastwood, M.P.; Gagliardo, J.; Grossman, J.P.; Ho, C.R.; Ierardi, D.J.; Kolossváry, I.; Klepeis, J.L.; Layman, T.; McLeavey, C.; Moraes, M.A.; Mueller, R.; Priest, E.C.; Shan, Y.; Spengler, J.; Theobald, M.; Towles, B.; Wang, S.C. Anton: A Special-Purpose Machine for Molecular Dynamics Simulation. Proceedings of the 34th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA '07), ACM: New York, 2007.
43. Chiu, M.; Herbordt, M.C. Efficient Particle-Pair Filtering for Acceleration of Molecular Dynamics Simulation. Proceedings of International Conference on Field Programmable Logic and Applications (FPL 2009), Prague, Czech Republic, 31 August-2 September, 2009.
44. Chiu M., Herbordt M.C. Molecular dynamics simulations on high performance reconfigurable computing systems. ACM Trans. Reconfig. Technol. Syst. (ACM-TRETS) 2010, 3(4). Art. 23.
45. Complete Unified Device Architecture Programming Guide 2009, NVIDIA CUDA, NVIDIA Corporation, Santa Clara, CA.
46. NVIDIA's Next Generation CUDA Computer Architecture: Fermi 2009, NVIDIA Corporation, Santa Clara, CA.
47. Hardy D.J., Stone J.E., Schulten K. Multilevel summation of electrostatic potentials using graphics processing units. J. Parallel Comput. 2009, 35:164-177.
48. Stone J.E., Phillips J.C., Freddolino P.L., Hardy D.J., Trabuco L.G., Schulten K. Accelerating molecular modeling applications with graphics processors. J. Comput. Chem. 2007, 28:2618-2640.
49. Friedrichs M.S., Eastman P., Vaidyanathan V., Houston M., LeGrand S., Beberg A.L., Ensign D.L., Bruns C.M., Pande V.S. Accelerating molecular dynamic simulation on graphics processing units. J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 30:864-872.
50. Eastman P., Pande V.S. Efficient nonbonded interactions for molecular dynamics on a graphics processing unit. J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 31:1268-1272.
51. Anderson J.A., Lorenz C.D., Travesset A. General purpose molecular dynamics simulations fully implemented on graphics processing units. J. Comput. Phys. 2008, 227:5342-5359.
52. Phillips J.C., Stone J.E., Schulten K. Adapting a Message-Driven Parallel Application to GPU-Accelerated Clusters. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing (SC08) 2008, Austin, TX, USA, 15-21 November IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ.
53. Taiji M., Narumi T., Ohno Y., Futatsugi N., Suenaga A., Takada N., Konagaya A. Protein Explorer: A Petaflops Special-Purpose Computer System for Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing (SC03) 2003, IEEE, New York.
54. Makino J., Kokubo E., FGBRushige T. Performance Evaluation and Tuning of GRAPE-6: Towards 40 "Real" Tflops. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing (SC03) 2003, IEEE, New York.
55. Madina, D.; Taiji, M. Circuit and Physical Design of the MDGRAPE-4 On-Chip Network Links. Proceedings of the 2008 International Workshop on System Level Interconnect Prediction, Newcastle, GBR, 5-8 April, 2008, pp. 59-64.
56. Larson, R.H.; Salmon, J.K.; Dror, R.O.; Deneroff, M.M.; Young, C.; Grossman, J.P.; Shan, Y.; Klepeis, J.L.; Shaw, D.E. High-Throughput Pairwise Point Interactions in Anton, a Specialized Machine for Molecular Dynamics Simulation. Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA '08), IEEE: New York, 2008.
57. Kuskin, J.S.; Young, C.; Grossman, J.P.; Batson, B.; Deneroff, M.M.; Dror, R.O.; Shaw, D.E. Incorporating Flexibility in Anton, a Specialized Machine for Molecular Dynamics Simulation. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA '08), IEEE: New York, 2008.
58. Young C., Bank J.A., Dror R.O., Grossman J.P., Salmon J.K., Shaw D.E. A 32×32×32, Spatially Distributed 3D FFT in Four Microseconds on Anton. Proceedings of the Conference on High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (SC09) 2009, ACM, New York.
59. Grzesiek S., Sassa H.-J. From biomolecular structure to functional understanding: New NMR developments narrow the gap. Curr. Op. Struct. Biol. 2009, 19:585-595.
60. Hornak V., Abel R., Okur A., Strockbine B., Roitberg A., Simmerling C. Comparison of multiple amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters. Proteins 2006, 65:712-725.
61. MacKerell A.D., Feig M., Brooks C.L. III. Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: Limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25:1400-1415.
62. Showalter S.A., Brüschweiler R. Validation of molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules using NMR spin relaxation as benchmarks: Application to the AMBER99SB force field. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2007, 3:961-975.
63. Showalter S.A., Brüschweiler R. Quantitative molecular ensemble interpretation of NMR dipolar couplings without restraints. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129:4158-4159.
64. Maragakis P., Lindorff-Larsen K., Eastwood M.P., Dror R.O., Klepeis J.L., Arkin I.T., Jensen M.Ø., Xu H., Trbovic N., Friesner R.A., Palmer A.G., Shaw D.E. Microsecond molecular dynamics simulation shows effect of slow loop dynamics on backbone amide order parameters of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112:6155-6158.
65. Buck M., Bouguet-Bonnet S., Pastor R.W., MacKerell A.D. Importance of the CMAP correction to the CHARMM22 protein force field: Dynamics of hen lysozyme. Biophys. J. 2006, 90:L36-L38.
66. Trbovic N., Kim B., Friesner R.A., Palmer A.G. Structural analysis of protein dynamics by MD simulations and NMR spin-relaxation. Proteins 2008, 71:684-694.
67. Best R.B., Buchete N.V., Hummer G. Are current molecular dynamics force fields too helical?. Biophys. J. 2008, 95:L07-L09.
68. Best R.B., Hummer G. Optimized molecular dynamics force fields applied to the helix-coil transition of polypeptides. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113:9004-9015.
69. Lindorff-Larsen K., Piana S., Palmo K., Maragakis P., Klepeis J.L., Dror R.O., Shaw D.E. Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the amber ff99SB protein force field. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinformat. 2010, 78:1950-1958.
70. Orozco M., Noy A., Pérez A. Recent advances in the study of nucleic acid flexibility by molecular dynamics. Curr. Op. Struct. Biol. 2008, 18:185-193.
71. Pérez A., Marchán I., Svozil D., Sponer J., Cheatham T.E., Laughton C.A., Orozco M. Refinement of the AMBER force field for nucleic acids: Improving the description of alpha/gamma conformers. Biophys. J. 2007, 92:3817-3829.
72. Pérez A., Luque F.J., Orozco M. Dynamics of B-DNA on the microsecond time scale. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129:14739-14745.
73. Klauda J.B., Brooks B.R., MacKerell A.D., Venable R.M., Pastor R.W. An ab initio study on the torsional surface of alkanes and its effect on molecular simulations of alkanes and a DPPC bilayer. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109:5300-5311.
74. Klauda J.B., Eldho N.V., Gawrisch K., Brooks B.R., Pastor R.W. Collective and noncollective models of NMR relaxation in lipid vesicles and multilayers. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112:5924-5929.
75. Sonne J., Jensen M.Ø., Hansen F.Y., Hemmingsen L., Peters G.H. Reparameterization of all-atom dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine lipid parameters enables simulation of fluid bilayers at zero tension. Biophys. J. 2007, 92:4157-4167.
76. Venable R.M., Chen L.E., Pastor R.W. Comparison of the extended isotropic periodic sum and particle mesh Ewald methods for simulations of lipid bilayers and monolayers. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113:5855-5862.
77. Stone A.J. Intermolecular potentials. Science 2008, 321:787-789.
78. Kaminski G.A., Stern H.A., Berne B.J., Friesner R.A. Development of an accurate and robust polarizable molecular mechanics force field from ab initio quantum chemistry. J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108:621-627.
79. Kim B., Young T., Harder E., Friesner R.A., Berne B.J. Structure and dynamics of the solvation of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor in explicit water: A comparative study of the effects of solvent and protein polarizability. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109:16529-16538.
80. Anisimov V.M., Vorobyov I.V., Roux B., MacKerell A.D. Polarizable empirical force field for the primary and secondary alcohol series based on the classical Drude model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2007, 3:1927-1946.
81. Schnieders M.J., Baker N.A., Ren P., Ponder J.W. Polarizable atomic multipole solutes in a Poisson-Boltzmann continuum. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126:124114.
82. Harder E., Anisimov V.M., Whitfield T.W., MacKerell A.D., Roux B. Understanding the dielectric properties of liquid amides from a polarizable force field. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112:3509-3521.
83. Ponder J.W., Wu C., Ren P., Pande V.S., Chodera J.D., Mobley D.L., Schnieders M.J., Haque I., Lambrecht D.S., DiStasio R.A., Head-Gordon M., Clark G.N.I., Johnson M.E., Head-Gordon T. Current status of the AMOEBA polarizable force field. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114:2549-2564.
84. Donchev A.G., Galkin N.G., Illarionov A.A., Khoruzhii O.V., Olevanov M.A., Ozrin V.D., Pereyaslavets L.B., Tarasov V.I. Assessment of performance of the general purpose polarizable force field QMPFF3 in condensed phase. J. Comput. Chem. 2008, 29:1242-1249.
85. Khoruzhii O., Donchev A.G., Galkin N., Illarionov A., Olevanov M., Ozrin V., Queen C., Tarasov V. Application of a polarizable force field to calculations of relative protein-ligand binding affinities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105:10378-10383.
86. Horn H.W., Swope W.C., Pitera J.W., Madura J.D., Dick T.J., Hura G.L., Head-Gordon T. Development of an improved four-site water model for biomolecular simulations: TIP4P-Ew. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120:9665-9678.
87. Cieplak P., Caldwell J., Kollman P. Molecular mechanical models for organic and biological systems going beyond the atom centered two body additive approximation: Aqueous solution free energies of methanol and n-methyl acetamide, nucleic acid base, and amide hydrogen bonding and chloroform/water partition coefficients of the nucleic acid bases. J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 22:1048-1057.
88. Elking D., Darden T., Woods R.J. Gaussian induced dipole polarization model. J. Comput. Chem. 2007, 28:1261-1274.
89. Applequist J., Carl J.R., Fung K.K. An atom dipole interaction model for molecular polarizability. Application to polyatomic molecules and determination of atom polarizabilities. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94:2952-2960.
90. Thole B.T. Molecular polarizabilities calculated with a modified dipole interaction. Chem. Phys. 1981, 59:341-350.
91. Donchev A.G., Ozrin V.D., Subbotin M.V., Tarasov O.V., Tarasov V.I. A quantum mechanical polarizable force field for biomolecular interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102:7829-7834.
92. Palmo K., Mannfors B., Mirkin N.G., Krimm S. Inclusion of charge and polarizability fluxes provides needed physical accuracy in molecular mechanics force fields. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006, 429:628-632.
93. Palmo K., Mannfors B., Mirkin N.G., Krimm S. Potential energy functions: From consistent force fields to spectroscopically determined polarizable force fields. Biopolymers 2003, 68:383-394.
94. Nevins N., Lii J.H., Allinger N.L. Molecular mechanics (MM) calculations on conjugated hydrocarbons. J. Comput. Chem. 1996, 17:695-729.
95. Bell G., Hey T., Szaley A. Beyond the data deluge. Science 2009, 323:1297-1298.
96. Humphrey W., Dalke A., Schulten K. VMD-Visual Molecular Dynamics. J. Mol. Graphics 1996, 14:33-38.
97. Seeber M., Cecchini M., Rao F., Settanni G., Caflisch A. Wordom: A program for efficient analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:2625-2627.
98. Tu T., Rendleman C.A., Borhani D.W., Dror R.O., Gullingsrud J., Jensen M.Ø., Klepeis J.L., Maragakis P., Miller P., Stafford K.A., Shaw D.E. A Scalable Parallel Framework for Analyzing Terascale Molecular Dynamics Simulation Trajectories. Proceedings of the Conference on High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (SC08) 2008, IEEE, New York.
99. Tu, T.; Rendleman, C.A.; Miller, P.J.; Sacerdoti, F.; Dror, R.O.; Shaw, D.E. Accelerating Parallel Analysis of Scientific Simulation Data via Zazen. Proceedings of the 8th USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies (FAST '10), USENIX Association: Berkeley, CA, 2010.
100. Dean J., Ghemawat S. MapReduce: Simplified data processing on large clusters. Commun. ACM 2008, 51:107-113.
101. Ghemawat, S.; Gobioff, H.; Leung, S.-T. The Google File System. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (SOSP'03), Bolton Landing, NY, USA, 19-22 October 2003.
102. Hadoop. http://hadoop.apache.org/.
103. Ramanathan, A.; Agarwal, P.K.; Kurnikova, M.; Langmead, C.J. An Online Approach for Mining Collective Behaviors from Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Proceedings of the 13th Annual International Conference on Research in Computational Molecular (RECOMB), 138-154. Tucson, AZ, USA, 18-21 May, 2009.
104. Wriggers W., Stafford K.A., Shan Y., Piana S., Maragakis P., Lindorff-Larsen K., Miller P.J., Gullingsrud J., Rendleman C.A., Eastwood M.P., Dror R.O., Shaw D.E. Automated event detection and activity monitoring in long molecular dynamics simulations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2009, 5:2595-2605.
105. Dror R.O., Jensen M.Ø., Borhani D.W., Shaw D.E. Exploring Atomic-resolution physiology on a femtosecond to millisecond timescale using molecular dynamics simulations. J. Gen. Physiol. 2009, 135:555-562.
106. Martinez-Mayorga K., Pitman M.C., Grossfield A., Feller S.E., Brown M.F. Retinal counterion switch mechanism in vision evaluated by molecular simulations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128:16502-16503.
107. Grossfield A., Pitman M.C., Feller S.E., Soubias O., Gawrisch K. Internal hydration increases during activation of the G-protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin. J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 381:478-486.
108. Khelashvili G., Grossfield A., Feller S.E., Pitman M.C., Weinstein H. Structural and dynamic effects of cholesterol at preferred sites of interaction with rhodopsin identified from microsecond length molecular dynamics simulations. Proteins 2009, 76:403-417.
109. Lyman E., Higgs C., Kim B., Lupyan D., Shelley J.C., Farid R., Voth G.A. A role for a specific cholesterol interaction in stabilizing the apo configuration of the human A(2A) adenosine receptor. Structure 2009, 17:1660-1668.
110. 2-adrenergic receptor reconciles structural and biochemical observations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:4689-4694.
111. 2 adrenergic receptors. Biochemistry 2009, 48:4789-4797.
112. 2 adrenoceptor complex. Nature 2011, 469:236-240.
113. 2-adrenergic receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108:18684-18689.
114. Bjelkmar P., Niemelä P.S., Vattulainen I., Lindahl E. Conformational changes and slow dynamics through microsecond polarized atomistic molecular simulation of an integral Kv1.2 ion channel. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2009, 5:e1000289.
115. + channels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107:5833-5838.
116. Kubelka J., Hofrichter J., Eaton W.A. The protein folding 'speed limit.'. Curr. Op. Struct. Biol. 2004, 14:76-88.
117. Kubelka J., Chiu T.K., Davies D.R., Eaton W.A., Hofrichter J. Sub-Microsecond protein folding. J. Mol. Biol. 2006, 359:546-553.
118. Ensign D.L., Kaason P.M., Pande V.S. Heterogeneity even at the speed limit of folding: Large-scale molecular dynamics study of a fast-folding variant of the villin headpiece. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 374:806-816.
119. Freddolino P.L., Schulten K. Common structural transitions in explicit-solvent simulations of villin headpiece folding. Biophys. J. 2009, 97:2338-2347.
120. Freddolino P.L., Liu F., Gruebele M., Schulten K. Ten-microsecond molecular dynamics simulation of a fast-folding WW domain. Biophys. J. 2008, 94:L75-L77.
121. Freddolino P.L., Park S., Roux B., Schulten K. Force field bias in protein folding simulations. Biophys. J. 2009, 96:3772-3780.
122. Shaw D.E., Maragakis P., Lindorff-Larsen K., Piana S., Dror R.O., Eastwood M.P., Bank J.A., Jumper J.M., Salmon J.K., Shan Y., Wriggers W. Atomic-level characterization of the structural dynamics of proteins. Science 2010, 330:341-346.
123. McCammon J.A., Gelin B.R., Karplus M. Dynamics of folded proteins. Nature 1977, 267:585-590.