Teachers' source evaluation self-efficacy predicts their use of relevant source features when evaluating the trustworthiness of web sources on special education

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 821-836

  Andreassen, Rune ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE; INFORMATION LITERACY; ONLINE LEARNING; SELF-EFFICACY BELIEFS; SELF-EFFICACY THEORIES; SOURCE EVALUATIONS; SOURCE FEATURES; SPECIAL EDUCATION;

RESEARCH; WEBSITES;

EDUCATION;

EID: 84882448872     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01366.x     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Akinoglu, O., (2009). Internet and Internet use: teacher trainees' perspective. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 36, 97-103.
2. Andreassen, R., (2012). Self-directed professional development of teachers: how they search for information about special education needs. Paper presented at the fourth winter conference of the Association for Teacher Education in Europe, Coimbra, Portugal.
3. Arnseth, H. C., Hatlevik, O., Kløvstad, V., Kristiansen, T., &, Ottestad, G., (2007). ITU monitor 2007. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
4. Bandura, A., (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
5. Barbeite, F. G., &, Weiss, E. M., (2004). Computer self-efficacy and anxiety scales for an Internet sample: testing measurement equivalence of existing measures and development of new scales. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 1-15.
6. Bates, R., &, Khasawneh, S., (2007). Self-efficacy and college students' perceptions and use of online learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 175-191.
7. Bazerman, C., (1985). Physicists reading physics: schema-laden purposes and purpose-laden schema. Written Communication, 2, 3-23.
8. Braasch, J. L. G., Lawless, K. A., Goldman, S. R., Manning, F., Gomez, K. W., &, MacLeod, S., (2009). Evaluating search results: an empirical analysis of middle school students' use of source attributes to select useful sources. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41, 63-82.
9. Bråten, I., &, Strømsø, H. I., (2006). Epistemological beliefs, interest, and gender as predictors of Internet-based learning activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 1027-1042.
10. Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., &, Britt, A., (2009). Trust matters: examining the role of source evaluation in students' construction of meaning within and across multiple texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 44, 6-28.
11. Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., &, Olaussen, B. S., (2003). Self-regulated learning and the use of information and communications technology in Norwegian teacher education. In, D. M. McInerney, &, S. Van Etten, (Eds), Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning (Vol. 3): sociocultural influences and teacher education programs (pp 199-221). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
12. Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., &, Salmerón, L., (2011). Trust and mistrust when students read multiple information sources about climate change. Learning and Instruction, 21, 180-192.
13. Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., &, Samuelstuen, M. S., (2005). The relationship between Internet-specific epistemological beliefs and learning within Internet technologies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33, 141-171.
14. Brem, S. K., Russell, J., &, Weems, L., (2001). Science on the Web: student evaluations of scientific arguments. Discourse Processes, 32, 191-213.
15. Britt, M. A., &, Aglinskas, C., (2002). Improving students' ability to identify and use source information. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 485-522.
16. Britt, M. A., &, Gabrys, G. L., (2000). Teaching advanced literacy skills for the World Wide Web. In, C. R. Wolfe, (Ed.), Learning and teaching on the World Wide Web (pp 73-90). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17. Brownlee, J., &, Carrington, S., (2000). Opportunities for authentic experience and reflection: a teaching programme designed to change attitudes towards disablility for pre-service teachers. Support for Learning, 15, 99-105.
18. Demiralay, R., &, Karadeniz, S., (2010). The effects of use of information and communication technologies on elementary student teachers' perceived information literacy self-efficacy. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 10, 841-851.
19. Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., &, Hong, Y., (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: a world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267-285.
20. Ericsson, K. A., &, Simon, H. A., (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215-251.
21. Eysenbach, G., (2008). Credibility of health information and digital media: new perspectives and implications for youth. In, M. J. Metzger, &, A. J. Flanagin, (Eds), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp 123-154). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
22. Flanagin, A. J., &, Metzger, M. J., (2008). Digital media and youth: unparalleled opportunity and unprecedented responsibility. In, M. J. Metzger, &, A. J. Flanagin, (Eds), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp 5-27). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
23. Flores, M. A., (2005). How do teachers learn in the workplace? Findings from an empirical study carried out in Portugal. Journal of In-Service Education, 31, 485-508.
24. Fogg, B. J., Soohoo, C., Danielson, D., Marable, L., Stanford, J., &, Tauber, E. R., (2002). How do people evaluate a web site's credibility: results from a large study. Retrieved July 1, 2010 from http://www.consumerwebwatch. org/dynamic/web-credibility-reports-evaluate-abstract.cfm
25. Gerjets, P., Kammerer, Y., &, Werner, B., (2011). Measuring spontaneous and instructed evaluation processes during web search: integrating concurrent thinking-aloud protocols and eye-tracking data. Learning and Instruction, 21, 220-231.
26. Gronlund, N. E., (1995). Measurement and evaluation in teaching (5th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
27. Hill, J. R., &, Hannafin, M. J., (1997). Cognitive strategies and learning from the World Wide Web. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45, 4, 37-64.
28. Hoy, A., &, Davis, H. A., (2006). Teacher self-efficacy and its influence on the achievement of adolescents. In, F. Pajares, &, T. Urdan, (Eds), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp 117-137). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
29. Iding, M., &, Klemm, E. B., (2005). Pre-service teachers critically evaluate scientific information on the World Wide Web: what makes information believable? Computers in the Schools, 21, 7-18.
30. Iding, M. K., Crosby, M. E., Auernheimer, B., &, Klemm, E. B., (2009). Web site credibility: why do people believe what they believe? Instructional Science, 37, 43-63.
31. Information System of Primary and Lower Secondary Education (2011). Data om grunnskolen 2011-12 [Data on primary and lower secondary education 2011-2012]. Retrieved January 6, 2012, from https://www.wis.no/stat09/ application/main.jsp?languageId=1#
32. Joo, Y. J., Bong, M., &, Choi, H. J., (2000). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and Internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48, 2, 5-17.
33. Kammerer, Y., Bråten, I., Gerjets, P., &, Strømsø , H. I., (2010). Internet-specific epistemic beliefs predict users' source monitoring during web search. Paper presented at the EARLI SIG meeting on Comprehension of Text and Graphics, Tübingen, Germany.
34. Kammerer, Y., Bråten, I., Gerjets, P., &, Strømsø , H. I., in press. The role of Internet-specific epistemic beliefs in laypersons' source evaluations and decisions during web search on a medical issue. Computers in Human Behavior.
35. Kerlinger, F. N., &, Lee, H. B., (2000). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed.). Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt College Publishers.
36. Kurbanoglu, S. S., (2003). Self-efficacy: a concept closely linked to information literacy and lifelong learning. Journal of Documentation, 59, 635-646.
37. Lundeberg, M. A., (1987). Metacognitive aspects of reading comprehension: studying understanding in legal case analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 407-432.
38. Mehdinezhad, V., (2008). Evaluation of teacher education programs by students and graduates (Doctoral dissertation, University of Turku, Finland). Retrieved October 5, 2010, from https://oa.doria.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/ 38831/diss2008valmeh.pdf?sequence=1
39. Metzger, M. J., &, Flanagin, A. J., (Eds) (2008). Digital media, youth, and credibility. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
40. Norwegian Ministry of Knowledge (2008). Kvalitet i skolen [Quality in school]. Retrieved October 5, 2010, from http://www.regjeringen.no/pages/ 2084909/PDFS/STM200720080031000DDDPDFS.pdf
41. Nunnally, J. C., (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill.
42. Pirolli, P., &, Card, S. K., (1999). Information foraging. Psychological Review, 106, 643-675.
43. Probert, E., (2009). Information literacy skills: teacher understandings and practice. Computers & Education, 53, 24-33.
44. Rayner, K., (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
45. Rieh, S. Y., &, Belkin, N. J., (1998). Understanding judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in WWW. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 35, 279-289.
46. Rieh, S. Y., &, Hilligoss, B., (2008). College students' credibility judgments in the information-seeking process. In, M. J. Metzger, &, A. J. Flanagin, (Eds), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp 49-71). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
47. Rouet, J. F., Britt, M. A., Mason, R. A., &, Perfetti, C. A., (1996). Using multiple sources of evidence to reason about history. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 478-493.
48. Rouet, J. F., Favart, M., Britt, M. A., &, Perfetti, C. A., (1997). Studying and using multiple documents in history: effects of discipline expertise. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 85-106.
49. Salmerón, L., Kammerer, Y., Llorens, A., &, Garcia-Carrión, P., (2010). In Google we trust? Web page selections when searching for a controversial topic. Paper presented at the EARLI SIG meeting on Comprehension of Text and Graphics, Tübingen, Germany.
50. Sanchez, C. A., Wiley, J., &, Goldman, S. R., (2006). Teaching students to evaluate source reliability during Internet research tasks. In, S. A. Barab, K. E. Hay, &, D. T. Hickey, (Eds), Proceedings of the seventh international conference on the learning sciences (pp 662-666). Bloomington, IN: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
51. Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., &, Meece, J. L., (2008). Motivation in education: theory, research, and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
52. Shih, P. C., Muñoz, D., &, Sánchez, F., (2006). The effect of previous experience with information and communication technologies on performance in a web-based learning program. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 962-970.
53. Stadtler, M., &, Bromme, R., (2007). Dealing with multiple documents on the WWW: the role of metacognition in the formation of documents models. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 191-210.
54. Stahl, S. A., Hynd, C. R., Britton, B. K., McNish, M. M., &, Bosquet, D., (1996). What happens when students read multiple source documents in history? Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 430-456.
55. Strømsø, H. I., &, Bråten, I., (2010). The role of personal epistemology in the self-regulation of Internet-based learning. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 91-111.
56. Sundar, S. S., (2008). The MAIN model: a heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In, M. J. Metzger, &, A. J. Flanagin, (Eds), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp 73-100). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
57. Taraborelli, D., (2008). How the Web is changing the way we trust. In, K. Waelbers, A. Briggle, &, P. Brey, (Eds), Current issues in computing and philosophy (pp 194-204). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
58. Tsai, M. J., &, Tsai, C. C., (2003). Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: the role of Internet self-efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40, 43-50.
59. VandenBos, G. R., (Ed.) (2007). APA dictionary of psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
60. Wathen, C. N., &, Burkell, J., (2002). Believe in or not: factors influencing credibility on the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 134-144.
61. Wen, J. R., &, Shih, W. L., (2008). Exploring the information literacy competence standards for elementary and high school teachers. Computers & Education, 50, 787-806.
62. Wiley, J., Goldman, S. R., Graesser, A. C., Sanchez, C. A., Ash, I. K., &, Hemmerich, J., (2009). Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in Internet science tasks. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 1060-1106.
63. Williams, D., &, Coles, L., (2007). Teachers' approaches to finding and using research evidence: an information literacy perspective. Educational Research, 49, 185-206.
64. Wineburg, S., (1991). Historical problem solving: a study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 73-87.
65. Winne, P. H., (2010). Improving measurements of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 45, 267-276.
66. Wittwer, J., Bromme, R., &, Jucks, R., (2004). Kann man dem Internet trauen wenn es um die Gesundheit geht? Die Glaubwürdigkeitsbeurteilung medizinischer Fachinformationen im Internet durch Laien [Is the Internet a reliable source of health-related information? Laypersons' credibility judgments about medical information on the Internet]. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 2, 48-56.
67. Wyatt, D., Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P. B., Stein, S., Evans, P., &, Brown, R., (1993). Comprehension strategies, worth and credibility monitoring, and evaluations: cold and hot cognition when experts read professional articles that are important to them. Learning and Individual Differences, 5, 49-72.
68. Zimmerman, B. J., &, Schunk, D. H., (Eds) (2011). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. New York: Routledge.