Trust and mistrust when students read multiple information sources about climate change

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 180-192

  Bråten, Ivar ^a   Strømsø, Helge I ^a   Salmerón, Ladislao ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Evaluation of source information; Reading of multiple documents; Text; Topic knowledge

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650174491     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alexander P.A., Jetton T.L. Learning from text: a multidimensional and developmental perspective. Handbook of reading research 2000, Vol. 3:285-310. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, R. Barr (Eds.).
2. Bazerman C. Physicists reading physics: schema-laden purposes and purpose-laden schema. Written Communication 1985, 2:3-23.
3. Brand-Gruwel S., Wopereis I.G.J.H., Vermetten Y. Information problem solving by experts and novices: analysis of complex cognitive skills. Computers in Human Behavior 2005, 21:487-508.
4. Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (in press). When law students read multiple documents about global warming: examining the role of topic-specific beliefs about the nature of knowledge and knowing. Instructional Science.
5. Bråten I., Strømsø H.I., Britt M.A. Trust matters: examining the role of source evaluation in students' construction of meaning within and across multiple texts. Reading Research Quarterly 2009, 44:6-28.
6. Brem S.K., Russell J., Weems L. Science on the web: student evaluations of scientific arguments. Discourse Processes 2001, 32:191-213.
7. Britt M.A., Aglinskas C. Improving students' ability to identify and use source information. Cognition and Instruction 2002, 20:485-522.
8. Britt M.A., Gabrys G.L. Teaching advanced literacy skills for the World Wide Web. Learning and teaching on the World Wide Web 2000, 73-90. Academic, San Diego, CA. C.R. Wolfe (Ed.).
9. Britt M.A., Wiemer-Hastings P., Larson A.A., Perfetti C.A. Using intelligent feedback to improve sourcing and integration in students' essays. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 2004, 14:359-374.
10. Chen S., Chaiken S. The Heuristic-Systematic Model in its broader context. Dual-process theories in social psychology 1999, 73-96. Guilford, New York. S. Chaiken, Y. Trope (Eds.).
11. Hynd-Shanahan C., Shanahan T. Content-area reading/learning: flexibility in knowledge acquisition. Literacy processes: Cognitive flexibility in learning and thinking 2008, 208-233. Guilford, New York. K.B. Cartwright (Ed.).
12. Iding M.K., Crosby M.E., Auernheimer B., Klemm E.B. Web site credibility: why do people believe what they believe?. Instructional Science 2009, 37:43-63.
13. Klemm E.B., Iding M., Speitel T. Do scientists and teachers agree on the credibility of media information sources?. International Journal of Instructional Media 2001, 28:83-91.
14. Lundeberg M.A. Metacognitive aspects of reading comprehension: studying understanding in legal case analysis. Reading Research Quarterly 1987, 22:407-432.
15. Magnusson D. The logic and implications of a person-oriented approach. Methods and models for studying the individual: Essays in honor of Marian Radke-Yarrow 1998, 33-64. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. R. Cairns, L. Bergman, J. Kagan (Eds.).
16. Mason, L., Boldrin, A., & Ariasi, N. (in press). Searching the Web to learn about a controversial topic: are students epistemically active? Instructional Science.
17. Digital media, youth, and credibility 2008, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. M.J. Metzger, A.J. Flanagin (Eds.).
18. Metzger M.J., Flanagin A.J., Zwarun L. College student Web use, perceptions of information credibility, and verification behavior. Computers & Education 2003, 41:271-290.
19. Paxton R.J. The influence of author visibility on high school students solving a historical problem. Cognition and Instruction 2002, 20:197-248.
20. Perfetti C.A., Britt M.A., Rouet J.F., Georgi M.C., Mason R.A. How students use texts to learn and reason about historical uncertainty. Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences 1994, 257-283. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. M. Carretero, J.F. Voss (Eds.).
21. Petty R.E., Cacioppo J.T. Communication and persuation: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change 1986, Springer, New York.
22. Petty R.E., Wegener D.T. The Elaboration Likelihood Model: current status and controversies. Dual-process theories in social psychology 1999, 41-72. Guilford, New York. S. Chaiken, Y. Trope (Eds.).
23. Richter T., Schmid S. Epistemological beliefs and epistemic strategies in self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning 2010, 5:47-65.
24. Rieh S.Y., Hilligoss B. College students' credibility judgments in the information-seeking process. Digital media, youth, and credibility 2008, 49-71. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. M.J. Metzger, A.J. Flanagin (Eds.).
25. Rouet J.F. The skills of document use: From text comprehension to Web-based learning 2006, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
26. Rouet J.F., Britt M.A., Mason R.A., Perfetti C.A. Using multiple sources of evidence to reason about history. Journal of Educational Psychology 1996, 88:478-493.
27. Rouet J.-F., Favart M., Britt M.A., Perfetti C.A. Studying and using multiple documents in history: effects of discipline expertise. Cognition and Instruction 1997, 15:85-106.
28. Sanchez C.A., Wiley J., Goldman S.R. Teaching students to evaluate source reliability during Internet research tasks. Proceedings of the seventh international conference on the learning sciences 2006, 662-666. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Bloomington, IN. S.A. Barab, K.E. Hay, D.T. Hickey (Eds.).
29. Stadtler M., Bromme R. Dealing with multiple documents on the WWW: the role of metacognition in the formation of documents models. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2007, 2:191-210.
30. Stadtler M., Bromme R. Effects of the metacognitive computer-tool met.a.ware on the web search of laypersons. Computers in Human Behavior 2008, 24:716-737.
31. Stahl S.A., Hynd C.R., Britton B.K., McNish M.M., Bosquet D. What happens when students read multiple source documents in history?. Reading Research Quarterly 1996, 31:430-456.
32. Storey, J., Britt, M. A., Wiemer-Hastings, P., & Bråten, I. (2007, July). A cross-disciplinary tool for providing dynamic feedback on multiple document skills. Paper presented at the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse, Glasgow, Scotland.
33. Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., & Britt, M. A. (2009). Do students' beliefs about knowledge and knowing predict their judgment of texts' trustworthiness? Manuscript submitted for publication.
34. Strømsø H.I., Bråten I., Britt M.A. Reading multiple texts about climate change: the relationship between memory for sources and text comprehension. Learning and Instructions 2010, 20:192-204.
35. Strømsø H.I., Bråten I., Samuelstuen M.S. Dimensions of topic-specific epistemological beliefs as predictors of multiple text understanding. Learning and Instruction 2008, 18:513-527.
36. Sundar S.S. The MAIN model: a heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. Digital media, youth, and credibility 2008, 73-100. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. M.J. Metzger, A.J. Flanagin (Eds.).
37. VanSledright B. Confronting history's interpretive paradox while teaching fifth graders to investigate the past. American Educational Research Journal 2002, 39:1089-1115.
38. VanSledright B., Kelly C. Reading American history: the influence on multiple sources on six fifth graders. The Elementary School Journal 1998, 98:239-265.
39. Wineburg S. Historical problem solving: a study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology 1991, 83:73-87.
40. Wineburg S. Reading Abraham Lincoln: an expert/expert study in the interpretation of historical texts. Cognitive Science 1998, 22:319-346.
41. Wittwer J., Bromme R., Jucks R. Kann man dem Internet trauen wenn es um die Gesundheit geht? Die Glaubwürdigkeitsbeurteilung medizinischer Fachinformationen im Internet durch Laien. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie 2004, 2:48-56.
42. Wyatt D., Pressley M., El-Dinary P.B., Stein S., Evans P., Brown R. Comprehension strategies, worth and credibility monitoring, and evaluations: cold and hot cognition when experts read professional articles that are important to them. Learning and Individual Differences 1993, 5:49-72.