How the web is changing the way we trust

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 175, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 194-204

  Taraborelli, Dario ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

authority; Credibility; heuristics; information search; trust

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

ALTERNATIVE FRAMEWORK; AUTHORITY; CREDIBILITY; HEURISTIC; INFORMATION SEARCH; INFORMATION SEARCH BEHAVIOR; SIMPLE HEURISTICS; SOURCES OF INFORMATIONS; TRUST; WEB USERS;

WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 84875950629     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. J. M. Joyce. VIII-Epistemic Deference: The Case of Chance. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 107(1pt2):187-206, 2007.
2. F. Recanati. Oratio Obliqua, Oratio Recta. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000.
3. P. de Brabanter, D. Nicolas, I. Stojanovic, and N. Villanueva Fernández. Deferential utterances. "Referring to Objects" Interdisciplines Virtual Workshop, 2005. URL http://www.interdisciplines.org/ objects/papers/1.
4. E. V. Clark. Color, reference, and expertise in language acquisition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94(4):339-343, 2006
5. B. J. Fogg and H. Tseng. The elements of computer credibility. CHI '99: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM Press, New York, 80-87, 1999.
6. S. Y. Rieh and D. R. Danielson. Credibility: A multidisciplinary framework. In B. Cronin, editor, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Information Today, volume 41, 307-364, 2007.
7. B. J. Fogg, C. Soohoo, D. R. Danielson, L. Marable, J. Stanford, and E. R. Tauber. How do users evaluate the credibility of Web sites? A study with over 2,500 participants. In DUX '03: Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Designing for user experiences, ACM Press, 15, 2003.
8. R. Hogarth. Judgment and choice. The psychology of decision. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1987.
9. A. H. Eagly and S. Chaiken. The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich., New York, 1993.
10. R. E. Petty and J. Cacioppo. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19:123-205, 1986.
11. R. E. Petty and D. T. Wegener. The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. In S. Chaiken and Y. Trope, editors, Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology. Guilford Press, New York, 1999.
12. A. H. Eagly and S. Chaiken. Attitude strength, attitude structure, and resistance to change. In Petty and Krosnick [23.39].
13. R. E. Petty, C. Haugtvedt, and S. M. Smith. Elaboration as a determinant of attitude strength: Creating attitudes that are persistent, resistant, and predictive of behavior. In Petty and Krosnick [23.39].
14. B. J. Fogg. Prominence interpretation theory: explaining how people assess credibility online. In CHI '03: CHI '03 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, ACM Press, New York, 722-723, 2003.
15. N. C. Wathen and J. Burkell. Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2):134-144, 2002.
16. S. Y. Rieh. Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2): 145-161, 2002.
17. P. Pirolli. Rational analyses of information foraging on the web. Cognitive Science, 29:343-373, 2005.
18. P. Pirolli. Information Foraging Theory: Adaptive Interaction with Information (Oxford Series in HumanTechnology Interaction). Oxford University Press, 2007.
19. P. Pirolli and S. Card. The evolutionary ecology of information foraging, 1997. URL http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/pirolli97evolutionary.html.
20. P. Pirolli and S. Card. Information foraging. Psychological Review, 106(4): 643-675, 1999.
21. J. Nielsen. Alertbox: When Search Engines Become Answer Engines. Website, August 16 2004. URL http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20040816.html.
22. A. Clark. Natural born cyborgs: Minds, technologies and the future of human intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
23. K. Sterelny. Cognitive load and human decision, or, three ways of rolling the rock up hill. In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, and S. Stich, editors, The Innate Mind: Culture and Cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006.
24. J. Nielsen. Alertbox: Information Pollution. Website, August 11 2003. URL http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20030811.html.
25. S. S. Sundar. Technology and credibility: Cognitive heuristics cued by modality, agency, interactivity and navigability. In M. J. Metzger and A. J. Flanagin, editors, Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility. The MIT Press, 2007.
26. L. D. Catledge and J. E. Pitkow. Characterizing browsing strategies in the worldwide web. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 27(6):1065-1073, 1995.
27. B. A. Huberman. The Laws of the Web : Patterns in the Ecology of Information. The MIT Press, 2003.
28. J. E. Pitkow and M. Recker. Results from the First WorldWide Web User Survey. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 27(2):243-254, 1994.
29. S. Bullock and P. M. Todd. Made to measure: Ecological rationality in structured environments. Minds and Machines, 9(4):497-541, 1999.
30. P. M. Todd. Fast and frugal heuristics for environmentally bounded minds. In G. Gigerenzer and R. Selten, editors, Bounded Rationality. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1999.
31. P. Carruthers. Moderately massive modularity. In A. O'Hear, editor, Mind and Persons. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003. URL http://www.philosophy.umd.edu/Faculty/pcarruthers/Moderatemodularity.htm.
32. P. Carruthers. Simple heuristics meet massive modularity. In S. S. P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, editors, The Innate Mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006.
33. D. Sperber. In defense of massive modularity. In E. Dupoux, editor, Language, Brain and Cognitive Development: Essays in Honor of Jacques Mehler. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002. URL http://www.dan.sperber.com/modularity.htm.
34. S. Bao, G. Xue, X. Wu, Y. Yu, B. Fei, and Z. Su. Optimizing web search using social annotations. In WWW '07: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, ACM Press, New York, 501-510, 2007.
35. Y. Yanbe, A. Jatowt, S. Nakamura, and K. Tanaka. Can social bookmarking enhance search in the Web? In JCDL '07: Proceedings of the 2007 conference on digital libraries, ACM Press, New York, 107-116, 2007
36. S. Brin and L. Page. The anatomy of a search engine. In Proceedings of the Seventh International World Wide Web Conference, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 107-117, 1998.
37. M. O'Brien and M. T. Keane. Modeling result-list searching in the world wide web: The role of relevance topologies and trust bias. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2006.
38. J. Cho and S. Roy. Impact of search engines on page popularity. In WWW '04: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web, ACM Press, New York, 20-29, 2004.
39. R. E. Petty and J. A. Krosnick, editors. Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 1995.