The Dynamic Multiprocess Framework: Evidence from prospective memory with contextual variability

Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 67, Issue 1-2, 2013, Pages 55-71

  Scullin, Michael K ^a,b   McDaniel, Mark A ^a   Shelton, Jill Talley ^a,c  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive control; Intentions; Monitoring; Prospective memory; Spontaneous retrieval

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BEHAVIOR; EPISODIC MEMORY; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; HUMAN; INTENTIONS; MONITORING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE MEMORY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RECALL; SPONTANEOUS RETRIEVAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

COGNITIVE CONTROL; INTENTIONS; MONITORING; PROSPECTIVE MEMORY; SPONTANEOUS RETRIEVAL;

ADULT; CUES; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; HUMANS; INTENTION; MEMORY, EPISODIC; MENTAL RECALL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84881240224     PISSN: 00100285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. Albiński R., Sedek G., Kliegel M. Differences in target monitoring in a prospective memory task. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2012, 24:916-928.
2. Bisiacchi P.S., Schiff S., Ciccola A., Kliegel M. The role of dual-task and task-switch in prospective memory: Behavioural data and neural correlates. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:1362-1373.
3. Boywitt C.D., Rummel J. A diffusion model analysis of task interference effects in prospective memory. Memory & Cognition 2012, 40:70-82.
4. Brandimonte M.E., Einstein G.O., McDaniel M.A. Prospective memory: Theory and applications 1996, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
5. Brandimonte M.A., Ferrante D., Feresin C., Delbello R. Dissociating prospective memory from vigilance processes. Psicológica 2001, 22:97-113.
6. Brewer G.A. Analyzing response time distributions: Methodological and theoretical suggestions for prospective memory researchers. Journal of Psychology 2011, 219:117-124.
7. Brewer G.A., Knight J.B., Marsh R.L., Unsworth N. Individual differences in event-based prospective memory: Evidence for multiple processes supporting cue detection. Memory & Cognition 2010, 38:304-311.
8. Brewer G.A., Knight J., Meeks J.T., Marsh R.L. On the role of imagery in event-based prospective memory. Consciousness and Cognition 2011, 20:901-907.
9. Bugg J.M., McDaniel M.A., Einstein G.O. Event-based prospective remembering: An integration of prospective memory and cognitive control theories. The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology 2013, 267-283. Oxford University Press. D. Reisberg (Ed.).
10. Burgess P.W., Quayle A., Frith C.D. Brain regions involved in prospective memory as determined by positron emission tomography. Neuropsychologia 2001, 39:545-555.
11. Chen Y.-Z., Huang X.-T., Yuan H. Processing mechanisms underlying a mixed prospective memory. Acta Psychologica Sinica 2010, 42:1040-1049.
12. Cohen A.-L., Dixon R.A., Lindsay D.S. The intention interference effect and aging: Similar magnitude of effects for young and old adults. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2005, 19:1177-1197.
13. Cohen A.-L., Jaudas A., Gollwitzer P.M. Number of cues influence the cost of remembering to remember. Memory & Cognition 2008, 36:149-156.
14. Cohen A.-L., Jaudas A., Hirschhorn E., Sobin Y., Gollwitzer P.M. The specificity of prospective memory costs. Memory 2012, 20:848-864.
15. Cohen A.-L., Kantner J., Dixon R.A., Lindsay D.S. The intention interference effect: The difficulty of ignoring what you intend to do. Experimental Psychology 2011, 58:425-433.
16. Cona G., Bisiacchi P.S., Moscovitch M. The effects of focal and nonfocal cues on the neural correlates of prospective memory: Insights from ERPs. Cerebral Cortex 2013, 10.1093/cercor/bht116.
17. Cook G.I., Marsh R.L., Hicks J.L. Associating a time-based prospective memory task with an expected context can improve or impair intention completion. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2005, 19:345-360.
18. Derogatis L.R. SCL-90: Administration, scoring, and procedure manual - I 1977, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore.
19. DeWitt M.R., Hicks J.L., Ball B.H., Knight J.B. Encountering items previously paired with prospective memory target events can serve to reactivate intentions. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2012, 24:981-990.
20. Dieckmann P., Reddersen S., Wehner T., Rall M. Prospective memory failures as an unexplored threat to patient safety: Results from a pilot study using patient simulators to investigate the missed execution of intentions. Ergonomics 2006, 49:526-543.
21. Diekelmann S., Wilhelm I., Wagner U., Born J. Sleep to implement an intention. Sleep 2013, 36:149-153.
22. Dismukes R.K. Prospective memory in aviation and everyday settings. Prospective memory: Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives 2008, 411-431. Taylor & Francis Group/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York. M. Kliegel, M.A. McDaniel, G.O. Einstein (Eds.).
23. Einstein G.O., McDaniel M.A. Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1990, 16:717-726.
24. Einstein G.O., McDaniel M.A. Prospective memory: Multiple retrieval processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2005, 14:286-290.
25. Einstein G.O., McDaniel M.A. Prospective memory and what costs do not reveal about retrieval processes: A commentary on Smith, Hunt, McVay, and McConnell (2007). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2010, 36:1082-1088.
26. Einstein G.O., McDaniel M.A., Thomas R., Mayfield S., Shank H., Morrisette N., et al. Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2005, 134:327-342.
27. Einstein G.O., McDaniel M.A., Williford C.L., Pagan J.L., Dismukes R.K. Forgetting of intentions in demanding situations is rapid. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2003, 9:147-162.
28. Einstein G.O., Smith R.E., McDaniel M.A., Shaw P. Aging and prospective memory: The influence of increased task demands at encoding and retrieval. Psychology and Aging 1997, 12:479-488.
29. Ellis J.A., Nimmo-Smith I. Recollecting naturally-occurring intentions: A study of cognitive and affective factors. Memory 1993, 1:107-126.
30. Eren-Kanat, S., Ball, B. H., & Brewer, G. A. (2013). IFARM: A model of intention formation and retrieval. In Poster presented at the context and episodic memory symposium. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
31. Evans T.A., Beran M.J. Monkeys exhibit prospective memory in a computerized task. Cognition 2012, 125:131-140.
32. Fink, N. L. (2013). Picture superiority effect in prospective memory: Examining the influence of age and attention load. Unpublished dissertation thesis, Clemson University.
33. Gilbert S.J., Hadjipavlou N., Raoelison M. Automaticity and control in prospective memory: A computational model. PLoS One 2013, 8:e59852.
34. Gollwitzer P.M. Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist 1999, 54:493-503.
35. Gordon B.A., Shelton J.T., Bugg J.M., McDaniel M.A., Head D. Structural correlates of prospective memory. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:3795-3800.
36. Grundgeiger T., Sanderson P., MacDougall H.G., Venkatesh B. Interruption management in the intensive care unit: Predicting resumption times and assessing distributed support. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2010, 16:317-334.
37. Guynn M.J. A two-process model of strategic monitoring in event-based prospective memory: Activation/retrieval mode and checking. International Journal of Psychology 2003, 38:245-256.
38. Harrison T.L., Einstein G.O. Prospective memory: Are preparatory attentional processes necessary for a single focal cue?. Memory & Cognition 2010, 38:860-867.
39. Horn S.S., Bayen U.J., Smith R.E. What can the diffusion model tell us about prospective memory?. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2011, 65:69-75.
40. Horne J.A., Ostberg O. A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms. International Journal of Chronobiology 1976, 4:97-110.
41. Kalpouzos G., Eriksson J., Sjölie D., Molin J., Nyberg L. Neurocognitive systems related to real-world prospective memory. PloS One 2010, 5:e13304.
42. Kelemen W.L., Weinberg W.B., Alford H.S., Mulvey E.K., Kaeochinda K.F. Improving the reliability of event-based laboratory tests of prospective memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:1028-1032.
43. Kelly A.J., Hertzog C., Hayes M.G., Smith A.D. The effects of age and focality on delay-execute prospective memory. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 2013, 20:101-124.
44. Prospective memory: Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives 2008, Taylor & Francis Group/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York. M. Kliegel, M.A. McDaniel, G.O. Einstein (Eds.).
45. Knight J.B., Meeks J.T., Marsh R.L., Cook G.I., Brewer G.A., Hicks J.L. An observation on the spontaneous noticing of prospective memory event-based cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2011, 37:298-307.
46. Kominsky, T. K. (2010). The effects of context expectation on older and younger adults' prospective memory performance. Unpublished dissertation thesis, Oklahoma State University.
47. Kvavilashvili L. Remembering intention as a distinct form of memory. British Journal of Psychology 1987, 78:507-518.
48. Kvavilashvili L., Fisher L. Is time-based prospective remembering mediated by self-initiated rehearsals? Role of incidental cues, ongoing activity, age, and motivation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2007, 136:112-132.
49. Lampinen J.M., Arnal J.D., Hicks J.L. Prospective person memory. Applied memory 2009, 167-184. Nova Science, New York, NY. M. Kelley (Ed.).
50. Lee J.H., McDaniel M.A. Discrepancy-plus-search processes in prospective memory retrieval. Memory & Cognition 2013, 41:443-451.
51. Loft S., Finnerty D., Remington R.W. Using spatial context to support prospective memory in simulated air traffic control. Human Factors 2011, 53:662-671.
52. Loft S., Humphreys M.S. Enhanced recognition of words previously presented in a task with nonfocal prospective memory requirements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2012, 19:1142-1147.
53. Loft S., Kearney R., Remington R. Is task interference in event-based prospective memory dependent on cue presentation?. Memory & Cognition 2008, 36:139-148.
54. Loft S., Remington R.W. Wait a second: Brief delays in responding reduce focality effects in event-based prospective memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2013, 10.1080/17470218.2012.750677.
55. Marsh R.L., Hicks J.L., Cook G.I. Task interference from prospective memories covaries with contextual associations of fulfilling them. Memory & Cognition 2006, 34:1037-1045.
56. Marsh R.L., Hicks J.L., Cook G.I., Hansen J.S., Pallos A.L. Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29:861-870.
57. Marsh R.L., Hicks J.L., Cook G.I. On beginning to understand the role of context in prospective memory. Prospective memory: Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives 2008, 77-100. Taylor & Francis Group/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York. M. Kliegel, M.A. McDaniel, G.O. Einstein (Eds.).
58. Martin B.A., Brown N.L., Hicks J.L. Ongoing task delays affect prospective memory more powerfully than filler task delays. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2011, 65:48-56.
59. Maylor E.A. Age-related impairment in an event-based prospective memory task. Psychology and Aging 1996, 11:74-78.
60. Maylor E.A., Logie R.H. A large-scale comparison of prospective and retrospective memory development from childhood to middle age. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2010, 63:442-451.
61. McBride D.M., Beckner J.K., Abney D.H. Effects of delay of prospective memory cues in an ongoing task on prospective memory task performance. Memory & Cognition 2011, 39:1222-1231.
62. McDaniel M.A., Einstein G.O. Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: A multiprocess framework. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2000, 14:S127-S144.
63. McDaniel M.A., Einstein G.O. Prospective memory: An overview and synthesis of an emerging field 2007, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
64. McDaniel, M. A., LaMontagne, P., Beck, S. M., Scullin, M. K., & Braver, T. S. (in press). Dissociable neural routes to successful prospective memory. Psychological Science, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797613481233.
65. McDaniel M.A., Guynn M.J., Einstein G.O., Breneiser J. Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 2004, 30:605-614.
66. McDaniel M.A., Scullin M.K. Implementation intention encoding does not automatize prospective memory responding. Memory & Cognition 2010, 38:221-232.
67. Meier B., Rey-Mermet A. Beyond monitoring: After-effects of responding to prospective memory targets. Consciousness and Cognition 2012, 21:1644-1653.
68. Meier B., von Wartburg P., Matter S., Reber R., Rothen N. Performance predictions improve prospective memory and influence retrieval experience. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 2011, 65:12-18.
69. Meier B., Zimmermann T.D., Perrig W.J. Retrieval experience in prospective memory: Strategic monitoring and spontaneous retrieval. Memory 2006, 14:872-889.
70. Morgan E.E., Weber E., Rooney A.S., Grant I., Woods S.P., The HIV Neurobehavioral Research Program (HNRP) Group Longer ongoing task delay intervals exacerbate prospective memory deficits in HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND). Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2012, 34:416-427.
71. Morita T. Reminders supporting spontaneous remembering in prospective memory tasks. Japanese Psychological Research 2006, 48:34-39.
72. Moscovitch M. Memory and working with memory: Evaluation of a component process model and comparisons with other models. Memory systems 1994, 269-310. MIT/Bradford Press, Cambridge. D.L. Schacter, E. Tulving (Eds.).
73. Nowinski J.L., Dismukes R.K. Effects of ongoing task context and target typicality on prospective memory performance: The importance of associative cueing. Memory 2005, 13:649-657.
74. Ozgis S., Rendell P.G., Henry J.D. Spaced retrieval significantly improves prospective memory performance of cognitively impaired older adults. Gerontology 2009, 55:229-232.
75. Park D.C., Hertzog C., Kidder D.P., Morrell R.W., Mayhorn C.B. Effect of age on event-based and time-based prospective memory. Psychology and Aging 1997, 12:314-327.
76. Penningroth S.L., Graf P., Gray J.M. The effect of a working memory load on the intention-superiority effect: Examining three features of automaticity. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2012, 26:441-450.
77. Rose N.S., Rendell P.G., McDaniel M.A., Aberle I., Kliegel M. Age and individual differences in prospective memory during a "Virtual Week": The roles of working memory, vigilance, task regularity, and cue focality. Psychology and Aging 2010, 25:595-605.
78. Rummel J., Meiser T. The role of metacognition in prospective memory: Anticipated task demands influence attention allocation strategies. Consciousness and Cognition 2013, 13:931-943.
79. Rummel J., Einstein G.O., Rampey H. Implementation-intention encoding in a prospective memory task enhances spontaneous retrieval of intentions. Memory 2012, 20:803-817.
80. Schult J.C., Steffens M.C. Tuned for the future: Intentions are only accessible when a retrieval opportunity is near. Memory & Cognition 2013, 10.3758/s13421-013-0337-2.
81. Scullin M.K., Bugg J.M. Failing to forget: Prospective memory commission errors can result from spontaneous retrieval and impaired executive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2013, 39:965-971.
82. Scullin M.K., Einstein G.O., McDaniel M.A. Evidence for spontaneous retrieval of suspended but not finished prospective memories. Memory & Cognition 2009, 37:425-433.
83. Scullin M.K., McDaniel M.A. Remembering to execute a goal: Sleep on it!. Psychological Science 2010, 21:1028-1035.
84. Scullin M.K., McDaniel M.A., Einstein G.O. Control of cost in prospective memory: Evidence for spontaneous retrieval processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2010, 36:190-203.
85. Scullin M.K., McDaniel M.A., Shelton J.T., Lee J.H. Focal/nonfocal cue effects in prospective memory: Monitoring difficulty or different retrieval processes?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2010, 36:736-749.
86. Sellen A.J., Louie G., Harris J.E., Wilkins A.J. What brings intentions to mind? An in situ study of prospective memory. Memory 1997, 5:483-507.
87. Shallice T., Burgess P. The domain of supervisory processes and temporal organization of behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 1996, 351:1405-1412.
88. Smith R.E. The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: Investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory & Cognition 2003, 29:347-361.
89. Smith R.E. What costs do reveal and moving beyond the cost debate: Reply to Einstein and McDaniel (2010). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2010, 36:1089-1095.
90. Smith R.E., Hunt R.R., McVay J.C., McConnell M.D. The cost of event-based prospective memory: Salient target events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:734-746.
91. Szarras K., Niedźwieńska A. The role of rehearsals in self-generated prospective memory tasks. International Journal of Psychology 2011, 46:346-353.
92. Unsworth N., Redick T.S., Heitz R.P., Broadway J.M., Engle R.W. Complex working memory span tasks and higher order cognition: A latent-variable analysis of the relationship between processing and storage. Memory 2009, 17:635-654.
93. West R., Craik F.I.M. Age-related decline in prospective memory: The roles of cue accessibility and cue sensitivity. Psychology and Aging 1999, 14:264-272.
94. West R., Krompinger J., Bowry R. Disruptions of preparatory attention contribute to failures of prospective memory. Psychological Bulletin & Review 2005, 12:502-507.
95. West R., McNerney M.W., Travers S. Gone but not forgotten: The effects of cancelled intentions on the neural correlates of prospective memory. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2007, 64:215-225.
96. Wilkins, A. J. (1979). Remembering to remember. In Paper presented at a colloquium of the Department of Experimental Psychology, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.