Effects of delay of prospective memory cues in an ongoing task on prospective memory task performance

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 39, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1222-1231

  McBride, Dawn M ^a   Beckner, Jaclyn K ^a   Abney, Drew H ^a  

^a ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; LONG TERM MEMORY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECALL; SHORT TERM MEMORY; VISION;

ADULT; CUES; HUMANS; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MENTAL RECALL; MOTION PICTURES AS TOPIC; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84856418424     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: 15325946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0105-0     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 80(3, Pt. 2), 1-46. doi: 10. 1037/h0027577.
2. Brandimonte, M. A., & Passolunghi, M. C. (1994). The effect of cue-familiarity, cue-distinctiveness, and retention interval on prospective remembering. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 565-587.
3. Einstein, G. O., Holland, L. J., McDaniel, M. A., & Guynn, M. J. (1992). Age-related deficits in prospective memory: The influence of task complexity. Psychology and Aging, 7, 471-478.
4. Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 717-726.
5. Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (2005). Prospective memory: Multiple retrieval processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 286-290.
6. Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (2010). Prospective memory and what costs do not reveal about retrieval processes: A commentary on Smith, Hunt, McVay, and McConnell (2007). Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1082-1088.
7. Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Thomas, R., Mayfield, S., Shank, H., Morisette, N., et al. (2005). Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 134, 327-342.
8. Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 1-11. doi: 10. 3758/BF03203630.
9. Harrison, T. L., & Einstein, G. O. (2010). Prospective memory: Are preparatory attentional processes necessary for a single focal cue? Memory & Cognition, 38, 860-867.
10. Loft, S., Kearney, R., & Remington, R. (2008). Is task interference in event-based prospective memory dependent on cue presentation? Memory & Cognition, 36, 139-148.
11. Loft, S., & Yeo, G. (2007). An investigation into the resource requirements of event- based prospective memory. Memory & Cognition, 35, 263-274.
12. Meier, B., Zimmermann, T. D., & Perrig, W. J. (2006). Retrieval experience in prospective memory: Strategic monitoring and spontaneous retrieval. Memory, 14, 872-889. doi: 10. 1080/09658210600783774.
13. Nigro, G., & Cicogna, P. C. (2000). Does delay affect prospective memory performance? European Psychologist, 5, 228-233. doi: 10. 1027/1016-9040. 5. 3. 228.
14. Rubin, D. C., & Wenzel, A. E. (1996). One hundred years of forgetting: A quantitative description of retention. Psychological Review, 103, 734-760. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 103. 4. 734.
15. Scullin, M. K., McDaniel, M. A., Shelton, J. T., & Lee, J. H. (2010). Focal/nonfocal cue effects in prospective memory: Monitoring difficulty or different retrieval processes? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 736-749. doi: 10. 1037/a0018971.
16. Smith, R. E. (2003). The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: Investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 347-361.
17. Smith, R. E. (2010). What costs do reveal and moving beyond the cost debate: Reply to Einstein and McDaniel. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1089-1095.
18. Smith, R. E., Hunt, R. R., McVay, J. C., & McConnell, M. D. (2007). The cost of event-based prospective memory: Salient target events. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 734-746.
19. West, R., & Craik, F. I. M. (1999). Age-related decline in prospective memory: The roles of cue accessibility and cue sensitivity. Psychology and Aging, 14, 264-272.
20. Wixted, J. T., & Ebbesen, E. B. (1991). On the form of forgetting. Psychological Science, 2, 409-415.