Improving the reliability of event-based laboratory tests of prospective memory

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1028-1032

  Kelemen, William L ^a   Bailey Weinberg, W ^a   Alford, Hannah S ^a   Mulvey, Emily K ^a   Kaeochinda, Kevin F ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248148512     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03213920     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. BRANDIMONTE, M. A., FERRANTE, D., FERESIN, C., & DELBELLO, R. (2001). Dissociating prospective memory from vigilance processes. Psicológica, 22, 97-113.
2. CRONBACH, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing (5th ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
3. EINSTEIN, G. O., & MCDANIEL, M. A. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 717-726.
4. EINSTEIN, G. O., MCDANIEL, M. A., RICHARDSON, S. L., GUYNN, M. J., & CUNFER, A. R. (1995). Aging and prospective memory: Examining the influences of self-initiated retrieval processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 996-1007.
5. ELLIS, J., KVAVILASHVILI, L., & MILNE, A. (1999). Experimental tests of prospective remembering: The influence of cue-event frequency on performance. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 9-23.
6. INTERNATIONAL PERSONALITY ITEM POOL (2001). A scientific collaboratory for the development of advanced measures of personality and other individual differences. Available at ipip.ori.org/.
7. MARSH, R. L., HANCOCK, T. W., & HICKS, J. L. (2002). The demands of an ongoing activity influence the success of event-based prospective memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 604-610.
8. MAYLOR, E. A. (1998). Changes in event-based prospective memory across adulthood. Aging, Neuropsychology, & Cognition, 5, 107-128.
9. MCCARTY, S. M., LOGUE, P. E., POWER, D. G., ZIESAT, H. A., & ROSENSTIEL, A. K. (1980). Alternate-form reliability and age-related scores for Russell's Revised Wechsler Memory Scale. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 48, 296-298.
10. MCDANIEL, M. A., & EINSTEIN, G. O. (1993). The importance of cue familiarity and cue distinctiveness in prospective memory. Memory, 1, 23-41.
11. MCDANIEL, M. A., GUYNN, M. J., EINSTEIN, G. O., & BRENEISER, J. (2004). Cue-focused and reflexive-associated processes in prospective memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 605-614.
12. SCHMIDT, I. W., BERG, I. J., & DEELMAN, B. G. (2001). Prospective memory training in older adults. Educational Gerontology, 27, 455-478.
13. TITOV, N., & KNIGHT, R. G. (2001). A video-based procedure for the assessment of prospective memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 61-83.
14. UTTL, B. (2005a). Age-related changes in event-cued prospective memory proper. In N. Ohta, C. M. MacLeod, & B. Uttl (Eds.), Dynamic cognitive processes (pp. 273-303). New York: Springer.
15. UTTL, B. (2005b). Measurement of individual differences: Lessons from memory assessment in research and clinical practice. Psychological Science, 16, 460-467.