What Costs Do Reveal and Moving Beyond the Cost Debate: Reply to Einstein and McDaniel (2010)

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1089-1095

  Smith, Rebekah E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Intentions; Memory; Prospective memory

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954171375     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0019183     Document Type: Note

References (20)

1. Al-Aidroos N., Harrison S., Pratt J. Attentional control settings prevent abrupt onsets from capturing visual spatial attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2010, 63:31-41. doi: 10.1080/17470210903150738.
2. Cohen A.-L., Jaudas A., Gollwitzer P.M. Number of cues influences the cost of remembering to remember. Memory & Cognition 2008, 36:149-156. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.1.149.
3. Einstein G.O., McDaniel M.A. Prospective memory: Multiple retrieval processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2005, 14:286-290.
4. Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (2008). Prospective memory and metamemory: The skilled use of basic attentional and memory processes. In A. S. Benjamin & B. Ross (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 48, pp. 145-173). doi:10.1016/S0079-742(07)48004-5.
5. Einstein G.O., McDaniel M.A. Prospective memory and what costs do not reveal about retrieval processes: A commentary on Smith et al. (2007). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2010, 36:1082-1088.
6. Einstein G.O., McDaniel M.A., Thomas R.A., Mayfield S., Shank H., Morrisette N., Breneiser J. Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2005, 134:327-342. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.327.
7. Loft S., Kearney R., Remington R. Is task interference in event-based prospective memory dependent on cue presentation?. Memory & Cognition 2008, 36:139-148.
8. Marsh R.L., Cook G.I., Hicks J.L. Task interference from event-based intentions can be material specific. Memory & Cognition 2006, 34:1636-1643.
9. McCauley S.R., Levine H.S. Prospective memory in pediatric traumatic brain injury: A preliminary study. Developmental Neuropsychology 2004, 25:5-20. doi: 10.1207/s15326942dn2501&2_2.
10. McDaniel M.A., Einstein G.O. Prospective memory: An overview and synthesis of an emerging field 2007, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
11. Salthouse T.A., Berish D.E., Siedlecki K.L. Construct validity and age sensitivity of prospective memory. Memory & Cognition 2004, 32:1133-1148.
12. Scullin M.K., Einstein G.O., McDaniel M.A. Evidence for spontaneous retrieval of suspended, but not completed prospective memories. Memory & Cognition 2009, 37:425-433. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.4.425.
13. Scullin M.K., McDaniel M.A., Einstein G.O. Control of cost in prospective memory: Evidence for spontaneous retrieval processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2010, 36:190-203. doi: 10.1037/a0017732.
14. Smith R.E. The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: Investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29:347-361. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.347.
15. Smith R.E. Connecting the past and the future: Attention, memory, and delayed intentions. Prospective memory: Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives 2008, 27-50. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. M. Kliegel, M.A. McDaniel, G.O. Einstein (Eds.).
16. Smith R.E., Bayen U.J. A multinomial model of event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2004, 30:756-777. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.756.
17. Smith R.E., Bayen U.J. The effects of working memory resource availability on prospective memory: A formal modeling approach. Experimental Psychology 2005, 52:243-256. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.52.4.243.
18. Smith R.E., Bayen U.J. The source of age differences in event-based prospective memory: A multinomial modeling approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2006, 32:623-635. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.623.
19. Smith R.E., Bayen U.J., Martin C. The cognitive processes underlying event-based prospective memory in school age children and young adults: A formal model-based study. Developmental Psychology 2010, 46:230-244.
20. Smith R.E., Hunt R.R., McVay J.C., McConnell M.D. The cost of event-based prospective memory: Salient target events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:734-746. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.734.