Interference to Ongoing Activities Covaries with the Characteristics of an Event-Based Intention

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 861-870

  Marsh, Richard L ^a   Hicks, Jason L ^b   Cook, Gabriel I ^a   Hansen, Jeffrey S ^a   Pallos, Andrew L ^a  

^a University of Georgia ^*  (United States)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LEARNING; LONG TERM MEMORY; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME; READING; RECALL; SEMANTICS;

ATTENTION; CUES; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; MENTAL RECALL; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; READING; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS; SET (PSYCHOLOGY); VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 0142104934     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.861     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Brandimonte, M. A., Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1996). Prospective memory: Theory and applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Brandimonte, M. A., Ferrante, D., Feresin, C., & Delbello, R. (2001). Dissociating prospective memory from vigilance processes. Psicológica, 22, 97-113.
3. Burgess, P. W., Quayle, A., & Frith, C. D. (2001). Brain regions involved in prospective memory as determined by positron emission tomography. Psychologia, 29, 545-555.
4. Craik, F. I. M. (1986). A functional account of age differences in memory. In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities: Mechanisms and performance (pp. 409-422). New York: Elsevier Science.
5. Darby, R. J., & Maylor, E. A. (1998, November). Effects of the relationship between background and prospective task requirements on age differences in prospective memory. Paper presented at the 7th Cognitive Aging Conference, Atlanta, GA.
6. Einstein, G. O., Holland, L. J., McDaniel, M. A., & Guynn, M. J. (1992). Age-related deficits in prospective memory: The influence of task complexity, Psychology and Aging, 7, 471-478.
7. Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 717-726.
8. Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Manzi, M., Cochran, B., & Baker, M. (2000). Prospective memory and aging: Forgetting intentions over short delays. Psychology and Aging, 12, 671-683.
9. Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Richardson, S. L., Guynn, M. J., & Cunfer, A. R. (1995). Aging and prospective memory: Examining the influences of self-initiated retrieval processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 996-1007.
10. Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Smith, R. E., & Shaw, P. (1998). Habitual prospective memory and aging: Remembering intentions and forgetting actions. Psychological Science, 9, 284-289.
11. Einstein, G. O., Smith, R. E., McDaniel, M. A., & Shaw, P. (1997). Aging and prospective memory: The influence of increased task demands at encoding and retrieval. Psychology and Aging, 12, 479-488.
12. Ellis, J. A. (1996). Prospective memory or the realization of delayed intentions: A conceptual framework for research. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 115-142). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Ellis, J., Kvavilashvili, L., & Milne, A. (1999). Experimental tests of prospective remembering: The influence of cue-event frequency on performance. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 9-23.
14. Ellis, J., & Milne, A. (1996). Retrieval cue specificity and the realization of delayed intentions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 49(A), 862-887.
15. Goschke, T., & Kuhl, J. (1996). Remembering what to do: Explicit and implicit memory for intentions. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 53-91). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
17. Hicks,. J. L., Marsh, R. L., & Russell, E. J. (2000). The properties of retention intervals and their affect on retaining prospective memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1160-1169.
18. Homa, D. (1973). Organization and long-term memory search. Memory & Cognition, 1, 369-379.
19. Juola, J. F., Fischler, I., Wood, C. T., & Atkinson, R. C. (1971). Recognition time for information stored in long-term memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 10, 8-14.
20. Kidder, D. P., Park, D. C., Hertzog, C., & Morrell, R. W. (1997). Prospective memory and aging: The effects of working memory and prospective memory task load. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 4, 93-112.
21. Kliegel, M., Martin, M., McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2001). Varying the importance of a prospective memory task: Differential effects across time- and event-based prospective memory. Memory, 9, 1-11.
22. Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
23. Kvavilashvili, Li (1998). Remembering intentions: Testing a new method of investigation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, 533-554.
24. Mäntylä, T. (1993). Priming effects in prospective memory. Memory, 1, 203-218.
25. Marsh, R. L., Hancock, T. W., & Hicks, J. L. (2002). The demands of an ongoing activity influence the success of event-based prospective memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 604-610.
26. Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (1998). Event-based prospective memory and executive control of working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 336-349.
27. Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Hancock, T. W. (2000). On the interaction of ongoing cognitive activity and the nature of an event-based intention. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, S29-S42.
28. Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Watson, V. (2002). The dynamics of intention retrieval and coordination of action in event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 652-659.
29. Maylor, E. A. (1996). Age-related impairment in an event-based prospective memory task. Psychology and Aging, 11, 74-79.
30. Maylor, E. A. (1998). Changes in event-based prospective memory across adulthood. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 5, 107-128.
31. McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (1993). The importance of cue familiarity and cue distinctiveness in prospective memory. Memory, 1, 23-41.
32. McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2000). Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: A multiprocess framework. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, S127-S144.
33. McDaniel, M. A., Robinson-Riegler, B., & Einstein, G. O. (1998). Prospective remembering: Perceptually driven or conceptually driven processes? Memory & Cognition, 26, 121-134.
34. McEvoy, C. L., Nelson, D. L., & Komatsu, T. (1999). What is the connection between true and false memories? The differential roles of interitem associations in recall and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1177-1194.
35. Meacham, J. A., & Leiman, B. (1982). Remembering to perform future actions. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Memory observed: Remembering in natural contexts (pp. 327-336). San Francisco: Freeman.
36. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Bajo, M. T. (1984). Retrieval processes in perceptual recognition and cued recall: The influence of category size. Memory & Cognition, 12, 498-506.
37. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Retrieved Nov. 19, 2001, from the University of South Florida Web site: http://web.usf.edu/FreeAssociation
38. Park, D. C., Hertzog, C., Kidder, D. P., Morrell, R. W., & Mayhorn, C. B. (1997). Effect of age on event-based and time-based prospective memory, Psychology and Aging, 12, 314-327.
39. Pashler, H. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510-532.
41. Rohrer, D., & Pashler, H. (2002). Concurrent task effects on memory retrieval. Manuscript submitted for publication.
42. Smith, R. E. (2000, July). Successful initiation of delayed intentions requires capacity. Paper presented at the 1st International Conference on Prospective Memory, Hatfield, England.
43. Smith, R. E. (2001, November). Intentions, capacity, and salient target events. Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Orlando, FL.