Prospective memory in aviationand everyday settings

Prospective Memory: Cognitive, Neuroscience, Developmental, and Applied Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 411-432

  Dismukes, R Key ^a  

^a NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920386351     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203809945     Document Type: Chapter

References (57)

1. Bargh, J., and Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462–479.
2. Boeing. (2005). Statistical summary of commercial jet airplane accidents: Worldwide operations 1959–2004. Aviation safety. Seattle, WA: Author.
3. Brandimonte, M., and Passolunghi, M. C. (1994). Effect of cue familiarity, cue distinctiveness, and retention interval on prospective memory. Quarterly Journal of ExperimentalPsychology, 47A, 565–587.
4. Chasteen, A. L., Park, D. C., and Schwarz, N. (2001). Implementation intentions and facilitation of prospective memory. Psychological Science, 12, 457–461.
5. Cicogna, P. C., Nigro, G., Occhionero, M., and Esposito, M. J. (2005). Time-based prospective remembering: Interference and facilitation in a dual task. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 221–240.
6. Colvin, K., Dodhia, R., and Dismukes, R. K. (2005). Is pilots’ visual scanning adequate to avoid mid-air collisions? In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposiumon Aviation Psychology (pp. 104–109). Oklahoma City, OK: Wright State University.
7. Cook, G. I., Marsh, R. L., and Hicks, J. L. (2005). Associating a time-based prospective memory task with an expected context can improve or impair intention completion. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 345–360.
8. Dekker, S. (2002). The field guide to human error investigations. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate.
9. Dismukes, R. K., Loukopoulos, L. D., and Barshi, I. (November, 2003). Concurrent task demands and pilot error in airport surface operations. Paper presented at the joint meeting of the 56th Annual International Air Safety Seminar IASS, IFA 33rd International Conference, and IATA, Washington, DC.
10. Dismukes, R. K., Young, G. E., and Sumwalt, R. L. (1998). Cockpit interruptions and distractions: Effective management requires a careful balancing act. ASRS Directline, 10, 4–9.
11. Dodhia, R. M., and Dismukes, R. K. (2005, January). A task interrupted becomes a prospective memory task. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for AppliedResearch in Memory and Cognition, Wellington, New Zealand.
12. Edwards, M. B., and Gronlund, S. D. (1998). Task interruption and its effects on memory. Memory, 6, 665–687.
13. Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Smith, R. E., and Shaw, P. (1998). Habitual prospective memory and aging: Remembering intentions and forgetting actions. Psychological Science, 9, 284–288.
14. Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Thomas, R., Mayfield, S., Shank, H., Morrisette, N., et al. (2005). Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 327–342.
15. Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Williford, C. L., Pagan, J. L., and Dismukes, R. K. (2003). Forgetting of intentions in demanding situations is rapid. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 147–162.
16. Ellis, J. A. (1996). Prospective memory or the realization of delayed intentions: A conceptual framework for research. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, and M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 1–22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
17. Ellis, J. A., and Milne, A. (1996). Retrieval cue specificity and the realization of delayed intentions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 862–887.
18. Gawande, A. A., Studdert, D. M., Orav, E. J., Brennan, T. A., and Zinner, J. J. (2003). Risk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery. The New England Journal of Medicine, 348, 229–235.
19. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493–503.
20. Hobbs, A., and Williamson, A. (2003). Associations between errors and contributing factors in aircraft maintenance. Human Factors, 45, 186–201.
21. Holbrook, J. B., Dismukes, R. K., and Nowinski, J. L. (2005, January). Identifying sources of variance in everyday prospective memory performance. Presented at the biennialmeeting of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, Wellington,New Zealand.
22. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., and Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3–28.
23. Kliegel, M., Martin, M., and McDaniel, M. A. (2004). Importance effects on performance in event-based prospective memory tasks. Memory, 12, 553–561.
24. Kliegel, M., McDaniel, M. A., and Einstein, G. O. (2000). Plan formation, retention, and execution in prospective memory: A new approach and age-related effects. Memory and Cognition, 28, 1041–1049.
25. Kvavilashvili, L. (1992). Remembering intentions: A critical review of existing experimental paradigms. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 507–524.
26. Kvavilashvili, L. (1998). Remembering intentions: Testing a new method of investigation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, 533–554.
27. Kvavilashvili, L. (2005, July). Automatic or controlled? Rehearsal and retrieval processes in everyday time- and event-based prospective memory tasks. Paper presented atthe 2nd International Conference on Prospective Memory, Zurich, Switzerland.
28. Kvavilashvili, L., and Ellis, J. A. (1996). Varieties of intention: Some distinctions and classifications. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, and M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 1–22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
29. Latorella, K. (1999). Investigating interruptions: Implications for flightdeck performance (NASA Tech. Memo. No. 209707). Hampton, VA: Langley Ames Research Center.
30. Loukopoulos, L. D., Dismukes, R. K., and Barshi, I. (2003). Concurrent task demands in the cockpit: Challenges and vulnerabilities in routine flight operations. In R. S. Jensen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 737–742). Dayton, OH: Wright State University.
31. Mäntylä, T. (1993). Priming effects in prospective memory. Memory, 1, 203–218.
32. Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., and Landau, J. D. (1998). An investigation of everyday prospective memory. Memory and Cognition, 26, 633–643.
33. McDaniel, M. A., and Einstein, G. O. (1993). The importance of cue familiarity and cue distinctiveness in prospective memory. Memory, 1, 23–41.
34. McDaniel, M. A., Robinson-Riegler, R., and Einstein, G. O. (1998). Prospective remembering: Perceptually driven or conceptually driven processes? Memory and Cognition, 26, 121–134.
35. McGann, D., Ellis, J. A., and Milne, A. (2002). Conceptual and perceptual processes in prospective remembering: Differential influence of attentional resources. Memory and Cognition, 30, 1021–1032.
36. Meacham, J. A., and Colombo, J. A. (1980). External retrieval cues facilitate prospective remembering in children. Journal of Educational Research, 73, 299–301.
37. Meacham, J. A., and Leiman, B. (1982). Remembering to perform future actions. In R. C. Atckinson, J. Freedman, G. Lindzey, and R. F. Thompson (Eds.), Memory observed: Remembering in natural contexts, pp. 327–336. San Francisco: Freeman.
38. National Transportation Safety Board. (1988). Aircraft accident report: Northwest Airlines, McDonnell Douglas DC-9-82, N312RC, Detroit Metropolitan Wayne Country Airport, Romulus, Michigan, August 16, 1987 (NTSB/AAR-88/05). Washington,DC: Author.
39. National Transportation Safety Board. (1989). Aircraft accident report: Delta Air Lines, Boeing.727-232, N473DA, Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport, Texas, August 31, 1988 (NTSB/AAR-89/04). Washington, DC: Author.
40. National Transportation Safety Board. (1995). Aircraft accident report: Runway overrun following rejected takeoff. Continental Airlines flight 795, McDonnell-Douglas MD- 82, N18835, LaGuardia Airport, Flushing, New York, March 2, 1994 (NTSB/AAR-95/01). Washington, DC: Author.
41. National Transportation Safety Board. (1997). Aircraft accident report: Wheels-up landing, Continental Airlines Flight 193, Douglas DC-9, N10556, Houston, Texas, February 19, 1996 (NTSB/AAR-97/01). Washington, DC: Author.
42. National Transportation Safety Board. (2001). Aircraft accident report: Runway overrun during landing, American Airlines flight 1420, McDonnell Douglas MD-82, N215AA, Little Rock, Arkansas, June 1, 1999 (NTSB/AAR-01/02). Washington, DC: Author.
43. Nowinski, J. L., and Dismukes, R. K. (2005). Effects of ongoing task context and target typicality on prospective memory performance: The importance of associative cuing. Memory, 13, 649–657.
44. Nowinski, J. L., Holbrook, J. B., and Dismukes, R. K. (2003). Human memory and cockpit operations: An ASRS study. In R.S. Jensen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 888–893). Dayton, OH: Wright State University.
45. Parasuraman, R. (1986). Vigilance, monitoring, and search. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, and J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. II:Cognitive processes and performance (pp. 43.1–43.39). New York: Wiley.
46. Park, D. C., Hertzog, C., Kidder, D. P., Morrell, R. W., and Mayhorn, C. B. (1997). Effect of age on event-based and time-based prospective memory. Psychology and Aging, 12, 314–327.
47. Reason, J. (1990). Human error. New York: Cambridge University Press.
48. Richards, A. M., and Krauter, E. E. (1999). Cue competition in prospective memory. Psychological Reports, 85, 1011–1024.
49. Sellen, A. J., Louie, G., Harris, J. E., and Wilkins, A. J. (1997). What brings intentions to mind? An in situ study of prospective memory. Memory, 5, 483–507.
50. Shallice, T., and Burgess, P. W. (1991). Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. Brain, 114, 727–741.
51. Slamencka, N. J., and Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592–604.
52. Speier, C., Valachich, J. S., and Vessey, I. (1999). The influence of task interruption on individual decision making: An information overload perspective. Decision Sciences, 30, 337–360.
53. Trafton, J. G., Altmann, E. M., Brock, D. P., and Mintz, F. E. (2003). Preparing to resume an interrupted task: Effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 583–603.
54. Triesman, A., and Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.
55. Vortac, O. U., Edwards, M. B., Fuller, D. K., and Manning, C. A. (1993). Automation and cognition in air traffic control: An empirical investigation. Applied Cognitive Psychology,7, 631–651.
56. West, R., and Craik, F. I. M. (1999). Age-related decline in prospective memory: The roles of cue accessibility and cue sensitivity. Psychology and Aging, 14, 264–272.
57. Wickens, C. D., Goh, J., Helleberg, J., Horrey, W. J., and Talleur, D. A. (2003). Attentional models of multitask pilot performance using advanced display technology. Human Factors, 45, 360–380.