Evidence for spontaneous retrieval of suspended but not finished prospective memories

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 425-433

  Scullin, Michael K ^a   Einstein, Gilles O ^b   McDaniel, Mark A ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FURMAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; DECISION MAKING; EXPERIMENT; MEMORY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ATTENTION; CUES; CULTURE; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; INTENTION; MENTAL RECALL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 67649619619     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/MC.37.4.425     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. BRENEISER, J. E., MCDANIEL, M. A., & DERBISH, M. (2008). Prospective memory targets: Focal and task-appropriate. Manuscript submitted for publication.
2. COHEN, A.-L., DIXON, R. A., & LINDSAY, D. S. (2005). The intention interference effect and aging: Similar magnitude of effects for young and old adults. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1177-1197. (Pubitemid 43103761)
3. COHEN, A.-L., JAUDUS, A., & GOLLWITZER, P. M. (2008). Number of cues influences the cost of remembering to remember. Memory & Cognition, 36, 149-156. (Pubitemid 351927948)
4. COHEN, J. D., & O'REILLY, R. C. (1996). A preliminary theory of the interactions between prefrontal cortex and hippocampus that contribute to planning and prospective memory. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 267-295). Mahwah: NJ: Erlbaum.
5. CRAIK, F. I. M. (1986). A functional account of age differences in memory. In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities: Mechanisms and performances (pp. 409-422). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
6. EICHENBAUM, H., YONELINAS, A. P., & RANGANATH, C. (2007). The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 30, 123-152. (Pubitemid 47224758)
7. EINSTEIN, G. O., & MCDANIEL, M. A. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 717-726.
8. EINSTEIN, G. O., & MCDANIEL, M. A. (2005). Prospective memory: Multiple retrieval processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 286-290. (Pubitemid 44211038)
9. EINSTEIN, G. O., & MCDANIEL, M. A. (2009). Prospective memory and what costs do not reveal about retrieval processes: A commentary on Smith, Hunt, McVay, and McConnell (2007). Manuscript submitted for publication.
10. EINSTEIN, G. O., MCDANIEL, M. A., THOMAS, R., MAYFIELD, S., SHANK, H., MORRISETTE, N., & BRENEISER, J. (2005). Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 327-342. (Pubitemid 41323152)
11. GOSCHKE, T., & KUHL, J. (1993). Representation of intentions: Persisting activation in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 1211-1226.
12. GUYNN, M. J. (2003). A two-process model of strategic monitoring in event-based prospective memory: Activation/retrieval mode and checking. International Journal of Psychology, 38, 245-256. (Pubitemid 37177718)
13. KUČERA, H., & FRANCIS, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present- day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
14. KVAVILASHVILI, L., & FISHER, L. (2007). Is time-based prospective remembering mediated by self-initiated rehearsals? Role of incidental cues, ongoing activity, age, and motivation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 112-132.
15. MACE, J. H. (Ed.) (2007). Involuntary memory. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
16. MARSH, R. L., HICKS, J. L., & BINK, M. L. (1998). Activation of completed, uncompleted, and partially completed intentions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 350-361. (Pubitemid 128549079)
17. MARSH, R. L., HICKS, J. L., & COOK, G. I. (2006). Task interference from prospective memories covaries with contextual associations of fulfilling them. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1037-1045. (Pubitemid 44713290)
18. MARSH, R. L., HICKS, J. L., COOK, G. I., HANSEN, J. S., & PALLOS, A. L. (2003). Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 861-870. (Pubitemid 37268931)
19. MARSH, R. L., HICKS, J. L., & WATSON, V. (2002). The dynamics of intention retrieval and coordination of action in event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 652-659.
20. MCDANIEL, M. A., & EINSTEIN, G. O. (2000). Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: A multiprocess framework. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, S127-S144.
21. MCDANIEL, M. A., & EINSTEIN, G. O. (2007). Prospective memory: An overview and synthesis of an emerging field. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. MCDANIEL, M. A., GUYNN, M. J., EINSTEIN, G. O., & BRENEISER, J. (2004). Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 605-614. (Pubitemid 38652231)
23. MOSCOVITCH, M. (1994). Memory and working with memory: Evaluation of a component process model and comparisons with other models. In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds.), Memory systems (pp. 269-310). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. SCHIFFMAN, N., & GREIST-BOUSQUET, S. (1992). The effect of task interruption and closure on perceived duration. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 9-11.
25. SCULLIN, M. K., MCDANIEL, M. A., & EINSTEIN, G. O. (2008, November). Control of monitoring in prospective memory: Evidence for a multiprocess theory. Poster presented at the 49th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago, IL.
26. SHAPIRO, S., & KRISHNAN, H. S. (1999). Consumer memory for intentions: A prospective memory perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5, 169-189.
27. SMITH, R. E. (2003). The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: Investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 347-361. (Pubitemid 38156910)
28. SMITH, R. E., & BAYEN, U. J. (2004). A multinomial model of event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 756-777. (Pubitemid 38845997)
29. SMITH, R. E., HUNT, R. R., MCVAY, J. C., & MCCONNELL, M. D. (2007). The cost of event-based prospective memory: Salient target events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 734-746.
30. TULVING, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. WEST, R., & CRAIK, F. I. M. (1999). Age-related decline in prospective memory: The roles of cue accessibility and cue sensitivity. Psychology & Aging, 14, 264-272. (Pubitemid 29291562)
32. WEST, R., MCNERNEY, M. W., & TRAVERS, S. (2007). Gone but not forgotten: The effects of cancelled intentions on the neural correlates of prospective memory. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 64, 215-225. (Pubitemid 46783066)