Testing adaptive toolbox models: A bayesian hierarchical approach

Psychological Review

Volumn 120, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 39-64

  Scheibehenne, Benjamin ^a   Rieskamp, Jörg ^a   Wagenmakers, Eric Jan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bayes factor; Bayesian statistics; Cognitive strategies; Mixture models

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; COGNITION; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL;

BAYES THEOREM; COGNITION; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 84881098885     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0030777     Document Type: Article

References (152)

1. Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B. N. Petrov & F. Csaki (Eds.), Second International Symposium on Information Theory (pp. 267-281). Budapest, Hungary: Akademiai Kiado.
2. Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Ashby, F. G., & Maddox, W. T. (2005). Human category learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 149-178. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070217
4. Balasubramanian, V. (1997). Statistical inference, Occam's razor, and statistical mechanics on the space of probability distributions. Neural Computation, 9, 349-368. doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.2.349
5. Ball, C. T., Langholtz, H. J., Auble, J., & Sopchak, B. (1998). Resourceallocation strategies: A verbal protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 70-88. doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2798
6. Bergert, F. B., & Nosofsky, R. M. (2007). A response-time approach to comparing generalized rational and take-the-best models of decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 107-129. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.107
7. Bröder, A. (2000). Assessing the empirical validity of the "take-the-best" heuristic as a model of human probabilistic inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1332-1346. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1332
8. Brown, N. R. (1995). Estimation strategies and the judgment of event frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1539-1553. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.6.1539
9. Brown, N. R., Cui, X. J., & Gordon, R. D. (2002). Estimating national populations: Cross-cultural differences and availability effects. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 811-827. doi:10.1002/acp.830
10. Browne, M. W. (2000). Cross-validation methods. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 108-132. doi:10.1006/jmps.1999.1279
11. Brunswik, E. (1952). The conceptual framework of psychology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12. Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2002). Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
13. Busemeyer, J. R., Byun, E., Delosh, E. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (1997). Learning functional relations based on experience with input-output pairs by humans and artificial neural networks. In K. Lamberts & D. R. Shanks (Eds.), Knowledge, concepts and categories: Studies in cognition (pp. 408-437). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Busemeyer, J. R., & Myung, I. J. (1992). An adaptive approach to human decision making: Learning theory, decision theory, and human performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 177-194.
15. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.121.2.177
16. Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1993). Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review, 100, 432-459. doi:10.1037/0033-295X
17. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204
18. Carlin, B. P., & Chib, S. (1995). Bayesian model choice via Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 57, 473-484. doi:10.2307/2346151
19. Cohen, A. L., Sanborn, A. N., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2008). Model evaluation using grouped or individual data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 692-712. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.4.692
20. Costa-Gomes, M. A., & Crawford, V. P. (2006). Cognition and behavior in two-person guessing games: An experimental study. American Economic Review, 96, 1737-1768. doi:10.1257/aer.96.5.1737
21. Coyle, T. R., Read, L. E., Gaultney, J. F., & Bjorklund, D. F. (1998). Giftedness and variability in strategic processing on a multitrial memory task: Evidence for stability in gifted cognition. Learning and Individual Differences, 10, 273-290. doi:10.1016/S1041-6080(99)80123-X
22. Czerlinski, J., Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1999). How good are simple heuristics? In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd, & the ABC Research Group, Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 97-118). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23. Dawes, R. M. (1979). Robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. American Psychologist, 34, 571-582. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.34.7.571
24. Dawid, A. P. (1991). Fisherian inference in likelihood and prequential frames of reference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 53, 79-109.
25. DeLosh, E. L., Busemeyer, J. R., & McDaniel, M. A. (1997). Extrapolation: The sine qua non for abstraction in function learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 968-986. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.4.968
26. Dennis, S., Lee, M. D., & Kinnell, A. (2008). Bayesian analysis of recognition memory: The case of the list-length effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 361-376. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2008.06.007
27. Domingos, P. (1999). The role of Occam's razor in knowledge discovery. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 3, 409-425. doi:10.1023/A: 1009868929893
28. Dougherty, M. R., Franco-Watkins, A. M., & Thomas, R. (2008). Psychological plausibility of the theory of probabilistic mental models and the fast and frugal heuristics. Psychological Review, 115, 199-211. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.1.199
29. Dougherty, M. R., Gettys, C. F., & Ogden, E. E. (1999). MINERVA-DM: A memory processes model for judgments of likelihood. Psychological Review, 106, 180-209. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.180
30. Einhorn, H. J. (1970). Use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 73, 221-230. doi:10.1037/h0028695
31. Eisenberg, P., & Becker, C. A. (1982). Semantic context effects in visual word recognition, sentence processing, and reading: Evidence for semantic strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 739-756. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.8.5.739
32. Erev, I., & Barron, G. (2005). On adaptation, maximization, and reinforcement learning among cognitive strategies. Psychological Review, 112, 912-931. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.912
33. Erev, I., & Roth, A. E. (2001). On simple reinforcement learning models and reciprocation in the prisoner dilemma game. In G. Gigerenzer & R. Selten (Eds.), The adaptive toolbox (pp. 215-232). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Erickson, M. A., & Kruschke, J. K. (1998). Rules and exemplars in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 107-140. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.127.2.107
35. Estes, W. K. (1956). The problem of inference from curves based on group data. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 134-140. doi:10.1037/h0045156
36. Fiske, A. P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99, 689-723. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.4.689
37. Flavell, J. H. (1982). On cognitive development. Child Development, 53, 1-10. doi:10.2307/1129634
38. Gamerman, D., & Lopes, H. F. (2006). Markov chain Monte Carlo: Stochastic simulation for Bayesian inference. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
39. Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
40. Gelman, A., Meng, X. L., & Stern, H. (1996). Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies. Statistica Sinica, 6, 733-760.
41. Gigerenzer, G., & Brighton, H. (2009). Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 107-143. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01006.x
42. Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451-482. doi:10.1146/annurevpsych- 120709-145346
43. Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103, 650-669. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.4.650
44. Gilks, W. R., Richardson, S., & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (1996). Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.
45. Glöckner, A., Betsch, T., & Schindler, N. (2010). Coherence shifts in probabilistic inference tasks. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23, 439-462. doi:10.1002/bdm.668
46. Gluck, M. A., & Bower, G. H. (1988). From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 227-247. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.117.3.227
47. Grünwald, P. (2000). Model selection based on minimum description length. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 133-152. doi:10.1006/jmps.1999.1280
48. Grünwald, P. (2007). The minimum description length principle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. Grünwald, P. D., Myung, I. J., & Pitt, M. A. (2005). Advances in minimum description length: Theory and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. Han, C., & Carlin, B. P. (2001). Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for computing Bayes factors: A comparative review. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96, 1122-1132. doi:10.1198/016214501753208780
51. Heathcote, A., Brown, S., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2000). The power law repealed: The case for an exponential law of practice. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 185-207. doi:10.3758/BF03212979
52. Hilbig, B. E. (2010). Reconsidering "evidence" for fast-and-frugal heuristics. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 923-930. doi:10.3758/PBR.17.6.923
53. Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95, 528-551. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.528
54. Hoijtink, H. (2001). Confirmatory latent class analysis: Model selection using Bayes factors and (pseudo) likelihood ratio statistics. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 563-588. doi:10.1207/S15327906MBR3604_04
55. Jansen, B. R. J., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (1997). Statistical test of the rule assessment methodology by latent class analysis. Developmental Review, 17, 321-357. doi:10.1006/drev.1997.0437
56. Jansen, B. R. J., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2002). The development of children's rule use on the balance scale task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 81, 383-416. doi:10.1006/jecp.2002.2664
57. Jefferys, W. H., & Berger, J. O. (1992). Ockham's razor and Bayesian analysis. American Scientist, 80, 64-72.
58. Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
59. Juslin, P., Jones, S., Olsson, H., & Winman, A. (2003). Cue abstraction and exemplar memory in categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 924-941. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.924
60. Juslin, P., Olsson, H., & Olsson, A. C. (2003). Exemplar effects in categorization and multiple-cue judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 133-156. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.133
61. Juslin, P., & Persson, M. (2002). PROBabilities from EXemplars (PROBEX): A "lazy" algorithm for probabilistic inference from generic knowledge. Cognitive Science, 26, 563-607. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2605_2
62. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
63. Kalish, M. L., Lewandowsky, S., & Kruschke, J. K. (2004). Population of linear experts: Knowledge partitioning and function learning. Psychological Review, 111, 1072-1099. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1072
64. Karabatsos, G. (2006). Bayesian nonparametric model selection and model testing. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 50, 123-148. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2005.07.003
65. Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773-795. doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572
66. Kass, R. E., & Wasserman, L. (1995). A reference Bayesian test for nested hypotheses and its relationship to the Schwarz criterion. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 928-934. doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476592
67. Kelley, H., & Busemeyer, J. (2008). A comparison of models for learning how to dynamically integrate multiple cues in order to forecast continuous criteria. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 52, 218-240. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2008.01.009
68. Koller, D., Friedman, N., Getoor, L., & Taskar, B. (2007). Graphical models in a nutshell. In L. Getoor & B. Taskar (Eds.), Introduction to statistical relational learning (pp. 13-55). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
69. Kontkanen, P., Myllymaki, P., & Tirri, H. (2001). Comparing prequential model selection criteria in supervised learning of mixture models. In T. Jaakkola & T. Richardson (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (pp. 233-238).
70. Kruglanski, A. W., & Gigerenzer, G. (2011). Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles. Psychological Review, 118, 97-109. doi:10.1037/a0020762
71. Kruschke, J. K. (2011). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R and BUGS. Oxford, England: Elsevier Academic Press.
72. Kruschke, J. K. (2012). Posterior predictive checks can and should be Bayesian: Comment on Gelman and Shalizi, "Philosophy and the Practice of Bayesian Statistics." British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02063.x
73. Lee, M. D. (2011). How cognitive modeling can benefit from hierarchical Bayesian models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55, 1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2010.08.013
74. Lee, M. D., & Cummins, T. D. R. (2004). Evidence accumulation in decision making: Unifying the "take the best" and the "rational" models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 343-352. doi:10.3758/BF03196581
75. Lee, M. D., & Newell, B. R. (2011). Using hierarchical Bayesian methods to examine the tools of decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 832-842.
76. Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2010). A course in Bayesian graphical modeling for cognitive science. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved from http://www.ejwagenmakers.com/BayesCourse/BayesBookWeb.pdf
77. Lemaire, P., & Siegler, R. S. (1995). Four aspects of strategic change: Contributions to children's learning of multiplication. Journal of Exper- imental Psychology: General, 124, 83-97. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.124.1.83
78. Lewandowsky, S., Kalish, M., & Ngang, S. K. (2002). Simplified learning in complex situations: Knowledge partitioning in function learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 163-193. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.131.2.163
79. Lewandowsky, S., & Kirsner, K. (2000). Knowledge partitioning: Contextdependent use of expertise. Memory & Cognition, 28, 295-305. doi: 10.3758/BF03213807
80. Lewis, S. M., & Raftery, A. E. (1997). Estimating Bayes factors via posterior simulation with the Laplace-Metropolis estimator. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92, 648-655.
81. Liang, F., Paulo, R., Molina, G., Clyde, M. A., & Berger, J. O. (2008). Mixtures of g priors for Bayesian variable selection. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103, 410-423. doi:10.1198/016214507000001337
82. Little, D. R., & Lewandowsky, S. (2009). Beyond nonutilization: Irrelevant cues can gate learning in probabilistic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 530-550. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.35.2.530
83. Logan, G. D. (1988). Towards an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492
84. Logan, G. D. (2002). An instance theory of attention and memory. Psychological Review, 109, 376-400. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.109.2.376
85. Loomes, G., Moffat, P. G., & Sugden, R. (2002). A microeconomic test of alternative stochastic theories of risky choice. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 24, 103-130. doi:10.1023/A:1014094209265
86. Lovett, A. (1988). Choice. In J. R. Anderson & C. Lebiere (Ed.), The atomic components of thought (pp. 255-296). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
87. Luan, S., Schooler, L. J., & Gigerenzer, G. (2011). A signal-detection analysis of fast-and-frugal trees. Psychological Review, 118, 316-338. doi:10.1037/a0022684
88. Lunn, D., Spiegelhalter, D., Thomas, A., & Best, N. (2009). The BUGS project: Evolution, critique and future directions. Statistics in Medicine, 28, 3049-3067. doi:10.1002/sim.3680
89. Lunn, D. J., Thomas, A., Best, N., & Spiegelhalter, D. (2000). Win- BUGS-A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility. Statistics and Computing, 10, 325-337. doi:10.1023/A: 1008929526011
90. Marewski, J. N., & Schooler, L. J. (2011). Cognitive niches: An ecological model of strategy selection. Psychological Review, 118, 393-437. doi: 10.1037/a0024143
91. Masson, M. E. J. (2011). A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 679-690. doi:10.3758/s13428-010-0049-5
92. Mata, R., von Helversen, B., & Rieskamp, J. (2011). When easy comes hard: The development of adaptive strategy selection. Child Development, 82, 687-700. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01535.x
93. Meng, X. L. (1994). Posterior predictive p-values. Annals of Statistics, 22, 1142-1160. doi:10.1214/aos/1176325622
94. Milinski, M., & Wedekind, C. (1998). Working memory constrains human cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma. PNAS: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 95, 13755-13758. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.23.13755
95. Myung, I. J. (2000). The importance of complexity in model selection. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 190-204. doi:10.1006/jmps.1999.1283
96. Myung, I. J., & Pitt, M. A. (1997). Applying Occam's razor in modeling cognition: A Bayesian approach. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 79-95. doi:10.3758/BF03210778
97. Myung, J. I., & Pitt, M. A. (2009). Optimal experimental design for model discrimination. Psychological Review, 116, 499-518. doi:10.1037/a0016104
98. Newell, B. R. (2005). Re-visions of rationality? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 11-15. doi:10. 1016/j. tics.2004.11.005
99. Newell, B. R., & Lee, M. D. (2011). The right tool for the job? Comparing an evidence accumulation and a naïve strategy selection model of decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24, 456-481. doi:10.1002/bdm.703
100. Nilsson, H., Rieskamp, J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011). Hierarchical Bayesian parameter estimation for cumulative prospect theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55, 84-93. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2010.08.006
101. Nosofsky, R. M. (1991). Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 3-27. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.17.1.3
102. Nosofsky, R. M., & Johansen, M. K. (2000). Exemplar-based accounts of "multiple-system" phenomena in perceptual categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 375-402.
103. Nosofsky, R. M., Palmeri, T. J., & McKinley, S. C. (1994). Rule-plusexception model of classification learning. Psychological Review, 101, 53-79. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.53
104. Ntzoufras, I. (2009). Bayesian modeling using WinBUGS. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
105. Patalano, A. L., Smith, E. E., Jonides, J., & Koeppe, R. A. (2001). PET evidence for multiple strategies of categorization. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 1, 360-370. doi:10.3758/CABN.1.4.360
106. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 534-552. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.534
107. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The use of multiple strategies in judgment and choice. In N. J. Castellan (Ed.), Individual and group decision making (pp. 19-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
108. Persson, M., & Rieskamp, J. (2009). Inferences from memory: Strategyand exemplar-based judgment models compared. Acta Psychologica, 130, 25-37. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.09.010
109. Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York, NY: International University Press. doi:10. 1037/11494-000
110. Pitt, M. A., & Myung, I. J. (2002). When a good fit can be bad. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 421-425. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01964-2
111. Pitt, M. A., Myung, I. J., & Zhang, S. B. (2002). Toward a method of selecting among computational models of cognition. Psychological Review, 109, 472-491. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.472
112. Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. In P. V. Marsden (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 11-196). Cambridge, England: Blackwell.
113. Rieskamp, J. (2006). Perspectives of probabilistic inferences: Reinforcement learning and an adaptive network compared. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1355-1370. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1355
114. Rieskamp, J., & Hoffrage, U. (2008). Inferences under time pressure: How opportunity costs affect strategy selection. Acta Psychologica, 127, 258-276. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.05.004
115. Rieskamp, J., & Otto, P. E. (2006). SSL: A theory of how people learn to select strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 207-236. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.207
116. Rissanen, J. (1986a). A predictive least-squares principle. IMA Journal of Mathematical Control and Information, 3, 211-222. doi:10.1093/imamci/3.2-3.211
117. Rissanen, J. (1986b). Stochastic complexity and modeling. Annals of Statistics, 14, 1080-1100. doi:10.1214/aos/1176350051
118. Rissanen, J. (1987). Stochastic complexity. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 49, 223-239.
119. Rissanen, J. (1996). Fisher information and stochastic complexity. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 42, 40-47. doi:10.1109/18.481776
120. Rissanen, J. (2007). Information and complexity in statistical modeling. New York, NY: Springer.
121. Roe, R. M., Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (2001). Multialternative decision field theory: A dynamic connectionist model of decision making. Psychological Review, 108, 370-392. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.370
122. Rouder, J. N., & Lu, J. (2005). An introduction to Bayesian hierarchical models with an application in the theory of signal detection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 573-604. doi:10.3758/BF03196750
123. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464. doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136
124. Sewell, D. K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2011). Restructuring partitioned knowledge: The role of recoordination in category learning. Cognitive Psychology, 62, 81-122. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.09.003
125. Shao, J. (1993). Linear model selection by cross-validation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 486-494. doi:10.1080/01621459.1993.10476299
126. Shao, J. (1997). An asymptotic theory for linear model selection. Statistica Sinica, 7, 221-242.
127. Shiffrin, R. M., Lee, M. D., Kim, W., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2008). A survey of model evaluation approaches with a tutorial on hierarchical Bayesian methods. Cognitive Science, 32, 1248-1284. doi:10.1080/03640210802414826
128. Siegler, R. S. (1976). Three aspects of cognitive development. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 481-520. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90016-5
129. Siegler, R. S. (1994). Cognitive variability: A key to understanding cognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 1-5. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10769817
130. Siegler, R. S., & Shipley, C. (1995). Variation, selection, and cognitive change. In T. Simon & G. Halford (Eds.), Developing cognitive competence: New approaches to process modeling (pp. 31-76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
131. Simon, H. A. (1990). Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 1-20. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.000245
132. Speekenbrink, M., & Shanks, D. (2010). Learning in a changing environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 266-298. doi:10.1037/a0018620
133. Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 36, 111-147. doi:10.2307/2984809
134. Stone, M. (1977). Asymptotic equivalence of choice of model by crossvalidation and Akaike's criterion. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 39, 44-47.
135. Todd, P. M., & Gigerenzer, G. (2001). Shepard's mirrors or Simon's scissors? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 704-705. doi:10.1017/S0140525X01650088
136. Todd, P. M., Gigerenzer, G., & the ABC Research Group. (2012). Ecological rationality: Intelligence in the world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
137. Townsend, J. T. (1975). The mind-body equation revisited. In C. Cheng (Ed.), Philosophical aspects of the mind-body problem (pp. 200-218). Honolulu, HI: Honolulu University Press.
138. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981, January 30). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458. doi: 10.1126/science.7455683
139. Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2001). The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychological Review, 108, 550-592. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.550
140. Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2004). Loss aversion and inhibition in dynamical models of multialternative choice. Psychological Review, 111, 757-769. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.757
141. van der Maas, H. L. J., Quinlan, P. T., & Jansen, B. R. J. (2007). Towards better computational models of the balance scale task: A reply to Shultz and Takane. Cognition, 103, 473-479. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.01.009
142. Vandierendonck, A. (1995). A parallel rule activation and rule synthesis model for generalization in category learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 442-459. doi:10.3758/BF03210982
143. Vanpaemel, W. (2010). Prior sensitivity in theory testing: An apologia for the Bayes factor. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54, 491-498. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2010.07.003
144. von Helversen, B., & Rieskamp, J. (2008). The mapping model: A cognitive theory of quantitative estimation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 73-96. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.137.1.73
145. Vrieze, S. I. (2012). Model selection and psychological theory: A discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Psychological Methods, 17, 228-243. doi:10.1037/a0027127
146. Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 779-804. doi:10.3758/BF03194105
147. Wagenmakers, E.-J., Grünwald, P., & Steyvers, M. (2006). Accumulative prediction error and the selection of time series models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 50, 149-166. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2006.01.004
148. Wagenmakers, E.-J., Lodewyckx, T., Kuriyal, H., & Grasman, R. (2010). Bayesian hypothesis testing for psychologists: A tutorial on the Savage- Dickey method. Cognitive Psychology, 60, 158-189. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.12.001
149. Wallace, C. S., & Dowe, D. L. (1999). Refinements of MDL and MML coding. Computer Journal, 42, 330-337. doi:10.1093/comjnl/42.4.330
150. Wetzels, R., Grasman, R. P. P. P., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (in press). A default Bayesian hypothesis test for ANOVA designs. American Statistician.
151. Yang, L. X., & Lewandowsky, S. (2004). Knowledge partitioning in categorization: Constraints on exemplar models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 1045-1064. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.5.1045
152. Zellner, A. (1986). On assessing prior distributions and Bayesian regression analysis with g-prior distributions. In P. Goel & A. Zellner (Eds.), Bayesian inference and decision techniques: Essays in honor of Bruno de Finetti (pp. 233-243). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North- Holland.