Cue Abstraction and Exemplar Memory in Categorization

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 924-941

  Juslin, Peter ^a   Jones, Sari ^b   Olsson, Henrik ^c   Winman, Anders ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^c UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONCEPT FORMATION; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; LOGIC; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; READING; RECALL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CONCEPT FORMATION; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; LOGIC; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; READING; SET (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 0142104927     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.924     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Aha, D. W. (1997). Lazy learning. Artificial Intelligence Review, 11, 7-10.
2. Allen, S. W., & Brooks, L. R. (1991). Specializing the operation of an explicit rule. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 3-19.
3. Ashby, F. G., Alfonso-Reese, L. A., Turken, A. U., & Waldron, E. M. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychological Review, 105, 442-481.
4. Ashby, F. G., & Ell, S. W. (2001). The neurobiology of human category learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 204-210.
5. Ashby, F. G., & Maddox, W. T. (1993). Relations between prototype, exemplar, and decision bound models of categorization. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 37, 372-400.
6. Ashby, F. G., Waldron, E. M. (1999). On the nature of implicit categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 363-378.
7. Berry, D. C., & Broadbent, D. E. (1984). On the relationship between task performance and associated verbalizable knowledge. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 36, 209-231.
8. Brehmer, B. (1994). The psychology of linear judgment models. Acta Psychologica, 87, 137-154.
9. Bröder, A. (2000). Assessing the empirical validity of the Take-The-Best-heuristic as a model of human probabilistic inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1332-1346.
10. Cooksey, R. W. (1996). Judgment analysis: Theory, methods, and applications. Academic Press: San Diego.
11. DeLosh, E. L., Busemeyer, J. R., & McDaniel, M. A. (1997). Extrapolation: The sine qua non for abstraction in function learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 968-986.
12. Dougherty, M. R. P., Gettys, C. F., & Ogden, E. E. (1999). MINERVADM: A memory processes model for judgments of likelihood. Psychological Review, 106, 180-209.
13. Einhorn, J. H., Kleinmuntz, D. N., & Kleinmuntz, B. (1979). Regression models and process tracing analysis, Psychological Review, 86, 465-485.
14. Erickson, M. A., & Kruschke, J. K. (1998). Rules and exemplars in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 107-140.
15. Estes, W. K. (1956). The problem of inference from curves based on group data. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 134-140.
16. Estes, W. K. (1994). Classification and cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
18. Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103, 650-669.
19. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & the ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Hahn, U., & Chater, N. (1998). Similarity and rules: Distinct? Exhaustive? Empirically distinguishable? Cognition, 65, 197-230.
21. Hammond, K. R. (1955). Probabilistic functioning and the clinical method. Psychological Review, 62, 255-262.
22. Hoffman, P. J. (1960). The paramorphic representation of clinical judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 57, 116-131.
23. Juslin, P., Olsson, H., & Olsson, A-C. (2003). Exemplar effects in multiplecue judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 133-156.
24. Juslin, P., & Persson, M. (2002). PROBabilities from EXemplars (PROBEX): A "lazy" algorithm for probabilistic inference from generic knowledge. Cognitive Science, 26, 563-607.
25. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.) (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Klein, S. B., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., & Chance, S. (2002). Decisions and the evolution of memory: Multiple systems, multiple functions. Psychological Review, 109, 306-329.
27. Kruschke, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99, 22-44.
28. Lamberts, K. (2000). Information-accumulation theory of speeded categorization. Psychological Review, 107, 227-260.
29. Logan, D. O. (1988). Towards an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
30. Maddox, W. T. (1999). On the dangers of averaging across observers when comparing decision bound models and generalized context models of classification. Perception and Psychophysics, 53, 49-70.
31. Markman, A. B., & Makin, V. S. (1998). Referential communication and category acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 331-354.
32. Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207-238.
33. Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical versus statistical predictions: A theoretical analysis and revision of the literature. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
34. Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519-533.
35. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
36. Newell, B. R. Weston, N. J., & Shanks, D. R. (in press). Empirical tests of fast and frugal heuristics: Not everyone "takes the best". Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
37. Nosofsky, R. M. (1984). Choice, similarity, and the context theory of classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 104-114.
38. Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-57.
39. Nosofsky, R. M. (1992). Exemplars, prototypes, and similarity rules. In A. Healy, S. Kosslyn, & R. Shiffrin (Eds.), Essays in honor of William K. Estes (Vol. 1, pp. 149-167). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Nosofsky, R. M., & Johansen, M. K. (2000). Exemplar-based accounts of "multiple-system" phenomena in perceptual categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 375-402.
41. Nosofsky, R. M., & Palmeri, T. J. (1997). An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. Psychological Review, 104, 266-300.
42. Nosofsky, R. M., Palmeri, T. J., & McKinley S. C. (1994). Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning. Psychological Review, 101, 53-79.
43. Nosofsky, R. M., & Zaki, S. R. (1998). Dissociations between categoriza- tion and recognition in amnesic and normal individuals: An exemplar-based interpretation. Psychological Science, 9, 247-255.
44. Palmeri, T. J., & Flanery, M. A. (1999). Learning about categories in the absence of training: Profound amnesia and the relationship between perceptual categorization and recognition memory. Psychological Science, 10, 526-530.
45. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R. & Johnson E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. New York: Cambridge University Press.
46. Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353-363.
47. Pothos, E. M., & Bailey, T. M. (2000). The role of similarity in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 847-862.
48. Rieskamp, J., & Hoffrage, U. (2000). The use of simple heuristics: Bounded rationality and time pressure. Manuscript, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
49. Roberts, S., & Pashler, H. (2000). How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing. Psychological Review, 107, 358-367.
50. Runeson, S., Juslin, P., & Olsson, H. (2000). Visual perception of dynamic properties: Cue heuristics versus direct-perceptual competence. Psychological Review, 107, 525-555.
51. Schacter, D. L., & Tulving, E. (1994). Memory systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190.
53. Sieck, W. R., & Yates, J. F. (2001). Overconfidence effects in category learning: A comparison of connectionist and exemplar memory models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1003-1021.
54. Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3-22.
55. Smith, E. E., Patalano, A. L., & Jonides, J. (1998). Alternative strategies of categorization Cognition, 65, 167-196.
56. Smith, J. D., & Minda, J. P. (1998). Prototypes in the mist: The early epochs of category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1411-1436.
57. Smith, J. D., & Minda, J. P. (2000). Thirty categorization results in search of a model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 3-27.
58. Smith, J. D., & Minda, J. P. (2001). Journey to the center of the category: The dissociation in amnesia between categorization and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 984-1002.
59. Thomson, D. M, & Tulving, E. (1970). Associative encoding and retrieval: Weak and strong cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 255-262.
60. Tversky, A. (1969). Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 76, 31-48.
61. Wattenmaker, W. D. (1993). Incidental concept learning, feature frequency, and correlated properties. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19, 203-222.