Perspective taking and automatic intergroup evaluation change: Testing an associative self-anchoring account

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 104, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 786-802

  Todd, Andrew R ^a   Burgmer, Pascal ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Automaticity; Intergroup attitudes; Perspective taking; Prejudice; Self anchoring

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTION; PREJUDICE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SELF EVALUATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; MALE; PREJUDICE; SELF-ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84880984385     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0031999     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.). (2005). The handbook of attitudes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Ames, D. L., Jenkins, A. C., Banaji, M. R., & Mitchell, J. P. (2008). Taking another's perspective increases self-referential neural processing. Psychological Science, 19, 642-644. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02135.x
4. Apperly, I. A. (2011). Mindreaders: The cognitive basis of "theory of mind." Hove, England: Psychology Press.
5. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
6. Batson, C. D., Polycarpou, M. P., Harmon-Jones, E., Imhoff, H. J., Mitchener, E. C., Bednar, L. L., Highberger, L. (1997). Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 105-118. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.105
7. Blatt, B., LeLacheur, S. F., Galinsky, A. D., Simmens, S. J., & Greenberg, L. (2010). Does perspective-taking increase satisfaction in medical encounters? Academic Medicine, 85, 1445-1452. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181eae5ec
8. Bodenhausen, G. V., Todd, A. R., & Richeson, J. A. (2009). Controlling prejudice and stereotyping: Antecedents, mechanisms, and contexts. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 111-135). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
9. Bruneau, E. G., & Saxe, R. (2012). The power of being heard: The benefits of "perspective-giving" in the context of intergroup conflict. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 855-866. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.017
10. Bullock, J. G., Green, D. P., & Ha, S. E. (2010). Yes, but what's the mechanism? (Don't expect an easy answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 550-558. doi:10.1037/a0018933
11. Cadinu, M. R., & Rothbart, M. (1996). Self-anchoring and differentiation processes in the minimal group setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 661-677. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.661
12. Crisp, R. J., & Turner, R. N. (2012). The imagined intergroup contact hypothesis. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 46, pp. 125-182). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-394281-4.00003-9
13. Davis, M. H., Conklin, L., Smith, A., & Luce, C. (1996). Effect of perspective taking on the cognitive representation of persons: A merging of self and other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 713-726. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.713
14. Davis, M. H., Soderlund, T., Cole, J., Gadol, E., Kute, M., Myers, M., & Weihing, J. (2004). Cognitions associated with attempts to empathize: How do we imagine the perspective of another? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1625-1635. doi:10.1177/0146167204271183
15. De Houwer, J., Teige-Mocigemba, S., Spruyt, A., & Moors, A. (2009). Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 347-368. doi:10.1037/a0014211
16. Deutsch, R., & Gawronski, B. (2009). When the method makes a difference: Antagonistic effects on "automatic evaluations" as a function of task characteristics of the measure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 101-114. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.09.001
17. Devine, P. G., Forscher, P. S., Austin, A. J., & Cox, W. T. L. (2012). Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: A prejudice habit-breaking intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1267-1278. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.06.003
18. Dijksterhuis, A. (2004). I like myself but I don't know why: Enhancing implicit self-esteem by subliminal evaluative conditioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 345-355. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.345
19. Dovidio, J. F., ten Vergert, M., Stewart, T. L., Gaertner, S. L., Johnson, J. D., Esses, V. M., Pearson, A. R. (2004). Perspective and prejudice: Antecedents and mediating mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1537-1549. doi:10.1177/0146167204271177
20. Eagly, A. H., & Kite, M. E. (1987). Are stereotypes of nationalities applied to both women and men? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 451-462. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.451
21. Epley, N., Keysar, B., Van Boven, L., & Gilovich, T. (2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 327-339. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.327
22. Epley, N., & Waytz, A. (2010). Mind perception. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 498-541). New York, NY: Wiley.
23. Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and uses. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225
24. Fiedler, K., Schott, M., & Meiser, T. (2011). What mediation analysis can (not) do. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1231-1236. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.007
25. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
26. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press. doi:10.4135/9781446218617. n9
27. Galinsky, A. D., & Ku, G. (2004). The effects of perspective-taking on prejudice: The moderating role of self-evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 594-604. doi:10.1177/0146167203262802
28. Galinsky, A. D., Ku, G., & Wang, C. S. (2005). Perspective-taking and self- other overlap: Fostering social bonds and facilitating social coordination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8, 109-124. doi: 10.1177/1368430205051060
29. Galinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and ingroup favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 708-724. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.708
30. Galinsky, A. D., Wang, C. S., & Ku, G. (2008). Perspective-takers behave more stereotypically. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 404-419. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.2.404
31. Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2005). Accessibility effects on implicit social cognition: The role of knowledge activation and retrieval experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 672-685. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.672
32. Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692-731. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692
33. Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2011). The associative- propositional evaluation model: Theory, evidence, and open questions. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 44, pp. 59-127). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-385522-0.00002-0
34. Gawronski, B., Bodenhausen, G. V., & Becker, A. P. (2007). I like it, because I like myself: Associative self-anchoring and post-decisional change of implicit evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 221-232. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.04.001
35. Gawronski, B., Deutsch, R., LeBel, E. P., & Peters, K. R. (2008). Response interference as a mechanism underlying implicit measures: Some traps and gaps in the assessment of mental associations with experimental paradigms. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 218-225. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.24.4.218
36. Gawronski, B., Peters, K. R., & LeBel, E. P. (2008). What makes mental associations personal or extra-personal? Conceptual issues in the methodological debate about implicit attitude measures. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1002-1023. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00085.x
37. Gawronski, B., & Sritharan, R. (2010). Formation, change, and contextualization of mental associations: Determinants and principles of variations in implicit measures. In B. Gawronski & B. K. Payne (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 216-240). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
38. Goldman, A. I. (2006). Simulating minds: The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of mindreading. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
39. Goldstein, N. J., & Cialdini, R. B. (2007). The spyglass self: A model of vicarious self-perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 402-417. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.402
40. Gramzow, R. H., & Gaertner, L. (2005). Self-esteem and favoritism toward novel in-groups: The self as an evaluative base. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 801-815. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.801
41. Greenwald, A. G., & Farnham, S. D. (2000). Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 1022-1038. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.1022
42. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. K. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
43. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
44. Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Metaanalysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17-41. doi:10.1037/a0015575
45. Grumm, M., Nestler, S., & von Collani, G. (2009). Changing explicit and implicit attitudes: The case of self-esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 327-335. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.10.006
46. Han, H. A., Czellar, S., Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2010). Malleability of attitudes or malleability of the IAT? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 286-298. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.11.011
47. Hofmann, W., De Houwer, J., Perugini, M., Baeyens, F., & Crombez, G. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 390-421. doi:10.1037/a0018916
48. Jacoby, J., & Sassenberg, K. (2011). Interactions do not only tell us when, but can also tell us how: Testing process hypotheses by interaction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 180-190. doi:10.1002/ejsp.762
49. Karpinski, A., & Hilton, J. L. (2001). Attitudes and the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 774-788. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.774
50. Kaufman, G. F., & Libby, L. K. (2012). Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 1-19. doi:10.1037/a0027525
51. Kawakami, K., Dovidio, J. F., Moll, J., Hermsen, S., & Russin, A. (2000). Just say no (to stereotyping): Effects of training in the negation of stereotypic associations on stereotype activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 871-888. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.871
52. Kawakami, K., Phills, C. E., Steele, J. R., & Dovidio, J. F. (2007). (Close) distance makes the heart grow fonder: Improving implicit racial attitudes and interracial interactions through approach behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 957-971. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.957
53. Krueger, J. I. (2007). From social projection to social behaviour. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 1-35. doi:10.1080/10463280 701284645
54. Macrae, C. N., Bodenhausen, G. V., Milne, A. B., & Jetten, J. (1994). Out of mind but back in sight: Stereotypes on the rebound. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 808-817. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.5.808
55. Maner, J. K., Luce, C. L., Neuberg, S. L., Cialdini, R. B., Brown, S., & Sagarin, B. J. (2002). The effects of perspective-taking on motivations for helping: Still no evidence for altruism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1601-1610. doi:10.1177/014616702237586
56. Mitchell, C. J., De Houwer, J., & Lovibond, P. F. (2009). The propositional nature of human associative learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 183-198. doi:10.1017/S0140525X09000855
57. Mitchell, J. P. (2009). Inferences about mental states. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: Series B. Biological Sciences, 364, 1309-1316. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0318
58. Neel, R., & Shapiro, J. R. (2012). Is racial bias malleable? Whites' lay theories of racial bias predict divergent strategies for interracial interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 101-120. doi:10.1037/a0028237
59. Nosek, B. A., & Hansen, J. J. (2008a). The associations in our heads belong to us: Searching for attitudes and knowledge in implicit evaluation. Cognition and Emotion, 22, 553-594. doi:10.1080/02699930701438186
60. Nosek, B. A., & Hansen, J. J. (2008b). Personalizing the Implicit Association Test increases explicit evaluation of the target concepts. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 226-236. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.24.4.226
61. Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2004). Reducing the influence of extrapersonal associations on the Implicit Association Test: Personalizing the IAT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 653-667. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.653
62. Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2006). Reducing automatically activated racial prejudice through implicit evaluative conditioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 421-433. doi:10.1177/0146167205284004
63. Olson, M. A., Fazio, R. H., & Han, H. A. (2009). Conceptualizing personal and extrapersonal associations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 152-170. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00164.x
64. Otten, S. (2003). "Me and us" or "us and them"? The self as a heuristic for defining minimal ingroups. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 1-33. doi:10.1080/10463280240000028
65. Pager, D., & Shepherd, H. (2008). The sociology of discrimination: Racial discrimination in employment, housing, credit, and consumer markets. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 181-209. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131740
66. Paluck, E. L., & Green, D. P. (2009). Prejudice reduction: What works? A review and assessment of research and practice. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 339-367. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163607
67. Payne, B. K., Cheng, S. M., Govorun, O., & Stewart, B. D. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277-293. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.277
68. Perkins, A. W., & Forehand, M. R. (2012). Implicit self-referencing: The effect of nonvolitional self-association on brand and product attitude. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 142-156. doi:10.1086/662069
69. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751-783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
70. Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., & DeMarree, K. G. (2007). The meta-cognitive model (MCM) of attitudes: Implications for attitude measurement, change, and strength. Social Cognition, 25, 657-686. doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.657
71. Phills, C. E., Kawakami, K., Tabi, E., Nadolny, D., & Inzlicht, M. (2011). Mind the gap: Increasing associations between the self and Blacks with approach behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 197-210. doi:10.1037/a0022159
72. Pleyers, G., Corneille, O., Luminet, O., & Yzerbyt, V. (2007). Aware and (dis)liking: Item-based analyses reveal that valence acquisition via evaluative conditioning emerges only when there is contingency awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 130-144. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.130
73. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
74. Prestwich, A., Perugini, M., Hurling, R., & Richetin, J. (2010). Using the self to change implicit attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 61-71. doi:10.1002/ejsp.610
75. Richeson, J. A., & Nussbaum, R. J. (2004). The impact of multiculturalism versus color blindness on racial bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 417-423. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2003.09.002
76. Riketta, M. (2005). Cognitive differentiation between self, ingroup, and outgroup: The roles of identification and perceived intergroup conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 97-106. doi:10.1002/ejsp.234
77. Riketta, M., & Dauenheimer, D. (2003). Manipulating self-esteem with subliminally presented words. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 679-699. doi:10.1002/ejsp.179
78. Riketta, M., & Sacramento, C. A. (2008). They cooperate with us, so they are like me: Perceived intergroup relaionship moderates projection from self to outgroups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11, 115-131. doi:10.1177/1368430207084849
79. Robbins, J. M., & Krueger, J. I. (2005). Social projection to ingroups and outgroups: A review and meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 32-47. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0901_3
80. Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R. L., & Rubin, D. B. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
81. Rudman, L. A. (2004). Sources of implicit attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 79-82. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00279.x
82. Schubert, T. W., & Otten, S. (2002). Overlap of self, ingroup, and outgroup: Pictorial measures of self-categorization. Self and Identity, 1, 353-376. doi:10.1080/152988602760328012
83. Schwarz, N. (2007). Attitude construction: Evaluation in context. Social Cognition, 25, 638-656. doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.638
84. Shih, M. J., Stotzer, R., & Gutiérrez, A. S. (2013). Perspective-taking and empathy: Generalizing the reduction of group bias towards Asian Americans to general outgroups. Asian American Journal of Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/a0029790
85. Shih, M., Wang, E., Bucher, A. T., & Stotzer, R. (2009). Perspective taking: Reducing prejudice towards general outgroups and specific individuals. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 565-577. doi: 10.1177/1368430209337463
86. Skorinko, J. L., & Sinclair, S. A. (2013). Perspective taking can increase stereotyping: The role of apparent stereotype confirmation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 10-18. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.07.009
87. Smith, E. R. (1994). Procedural knowledge and processing strategies in social cognition. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 99-151). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
88. Smith, E. R. (1996). What do connectionism and social psychology offer each other? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 893-912.
89. Smith, E. R. (2012). Editorial. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1-3. doi:10.1037/a0026676
90. Smith, E. R., & Conrey, F. R. (2007). Mental representations as states not things: Implications for implicit and explicit measurement. In B. Wittenbrink & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Implicit measures of attitudes (pp. 247-264). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
91. Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845-851. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845
92. Tarrant, M., Calitri, R., & Weston, D. (2012). Social identification structures the effects of perspective taking. Psychological Science, 23, 973-978. doi:10.1177/0956797612441221
93. Todd, A. R., Bodenhausen, G. V., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). Perspective taking combats the denial of intergroup discrimination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 738-745. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.011
94. Todd, A. R., Bodenhausen, G. V., Richeson, J. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2011). Perspective taking combats automatic expressions of racial bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1027-1042. doi: 10.1037/a0022308
95. Todd, A. R., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). The reciprocal link between multiculturalism and perspective-taking: How ideological and selfregulatory approaches to managing diversity reinforce each other. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1394-1398. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.07.007
96. Todd, A. R., Galinsky, A. D., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2012). Perspective taking undermines stereotype maintenance processes: Evidence from social memory, behavior explanation, and information solicitation. Social Cognition, 30, 94-108. doi:10.1521/soco.2012.30.1.94
97. Todd, A. R., Hanko, K., Galinsky, A. D., & Mussweiler, T. (2011). When focusing on differences leads to similar perspectives. Psychological Science, 22, 134-141. doi:10.1177/0956797610392929
98. Turner, R. N., Hewstone, M., Voci, A., & Vonofakou, C. (2008). A test of the extended intergroup contact hypothesis: The mediating role of intergroup anxiety, perceived ingroup and outgroup norms, and inclusion of the outgroup in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 843-860. doi:10.1037/a0011434
99. Vescio, T. K., Sechrist, G. B., & Paolucci, M. P. (2003). Perspective taking and prejudice reduction: The mediational role of empathy arousal and situational attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 455-472. doi:10.1002/ejsp.163
100. Vorauer, J. D., Martens, V., & Sasaki, S. J. (2009). When trying to understand detracts from trying to behave: Effects of perspective taking in intergroup interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 811-827. doi:10.1037/a0013411
101. Vorauer, J. D., & Sasaki, S. J. (2009). Helpful only in the abstract? Ironic effects of empathy in intergroup interaction. Psychological Science, 20, 191-197. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02265.x
102. Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101-126. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.107.1.101
103. Yamaguchi, S., Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Murakami, F., Chen, D., Shiomura, K., Krendl, A. (2007). Apparent universality of positive implicit self-esteem. Psychological Science, 18, 498-500. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01928.x
104. Zhang, H., & Chan, D. K.-S. (2009). Self-esteem as a source of evaluative conditioning. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 1065-1074. doi:10.1002/ejsp.608
105. Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 197-206. doi:10.1086/651257