Exploring the mesenchymal stem cell niche using high throughput screening

Biomaterials

Volumn 34, Issue 31, 2013, Pages 7601-7615

  Rasi Ghaemi, Soraya ^a   Harding, Frances J ^a   Delalat, Bahman ^a   Gronthos, Stan ^b,c   Voelcker, Nicolas H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

High throughput screening; Mesenchymal stem cell; Niche; Surface engineering

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; DIRECTED DIFFERENTIATIONS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRICES; HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; NICHE; STEM CELL TECHNOLOGY; SURFACE ENGINEERING;

CELL CULTURE; CELL PROLIFERATION;

STEM CELLS;

ACTIVIN A; ALBUMIN; BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN 2; BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN 4; CELL ADHESION MOLECULE; COLLAGEN TYPE 1; COLLAGEN TYPE 3; COLLAGEN TYPE 4; FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR 2; LAMININ; SONIC HEDGEHOG PROTEIN; UVOMORULIN; VITRONECTIN; WNT3 PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; CELL ADHESION; CELL DENSITY; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FATE; CELL INTERACTION; CELL POPULATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL RENEWAL; CELL VIABILITY; CHEMICAL BOND; CHONDROGENESIS; COLONY FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COVALENT BOND; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; LONGEVITY; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; MITOGENICITY; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; PHENOTYPE; POLYMERIZATION; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; STEM CELL NICHE; STEREOSPECIFICITY; VISCOELASTICITY; WETTABILITY; WNT SIGNALING PATHWAY;

EID: 84880935297     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.06.022     Document Type: Review

References (179)

1. Discher D.E., Mooney D.J., Zandstra P.W. Growth factors, matrices, and forces combine and control stem cells. Science 2009, 324:1673-1677.
2. Kolf C.M., Cho E., Tuan R.S. Mesenchymal stromal cells. Biology of adult mesenchymal stem cells: regulation of niche, self-renewal and differentiation. Arthritis Res Ther 2007, 9:204.
3. Jones D.L., Wagers A.J. No place like home: anatomy and function of the stem cell niche. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2008, 9:11-21.
4. Fuchs E., Tumbar T., Guasch G. Socializing with the neighbors: stem cells and their niche. Cell 2004, 116:769-778.
5. Knoblich J.A. Mechanisms of asymmetric stem cell division. Cell 2008, 132:583-597.
6. Peerani R., Zandstra P.W. Enabling stem cell therapies through synthetic stem cell-niche engineering. JClin Invest 2010, 120:60-70.
7. Yadlapalli S., Yamashita Y.M. Spindle positioning in the stem cell niche. WIREs Dev Biol 2012, 1:215-230.
8. Scadden D.T. The stem-cell niche as an entity of action. Nature 2006, 441:1075-1079.
9. Dominici M., Le Blanc K., Mueller I., Slaper-Cortenbach I., Marini F., Krause D., et al. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy 2006, 8:315-317.
10. Nombela-Arrieta C., Ritz J., Silberstein L.E. The elusive nature and function of mesenchymal stem cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2011, 12:126-131.
11. Huang S., Leung V., Peng S., Li L., Lu F.J., Wang T., et al. Developmental definition of MSCs: new insights into pending questions. Cell Reprogram 2011, 13:465-472.
12. Huang G.T., Gronthos S., Shi S. Mesenchymal stem cells derived from dental tissues vs. those from other sources: their biology and role in regenerative medicine. JDent Res 2009, 88:792-806.
13. Caplan A.I. The mesengenic process. Clin Plast Surg 1994, 21:429-435.
14. Karp J.M., Leng Teo G.S. Mesenchymal stem cell homing: the devil is in the details. Cell Stem Cell 2009, 4:206-216.
15. Crisan M., Yap S., Casteilla L., Chen C.-W., Corselli M., Park T.S., et al. Aperivascular origin for mesenchymal stem cells in multiple human organs. Cell Stem Cell 2008, 3:301-313.
16. Shi S., Gronthos S. Perivascular niche of postnatal mesenchymal stem cells in human bone marrow and dental pulp. JBone Miner Res 2003, 18:696-704.
17. da Silva Meirelles L., Chagastelles P.C., Nardi N.B. Mesenchymal stem cells reside in virtually all post-natal organs and tissues. JCell Sci 2006, 119:2204-2213.
18. Covas D.T., Panepucci R.A., Fontes A.M., Silva W.A., Orellana M.D., Freitas M.C., et al. Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells obtained from diverse human tissues share functional properties and gene-expression profile with CD146+ perivascular cells and fibroblasts. Exp Hematol 2008, 36:642-654.
19. Alsalameh S., Amin R., Gemba T., Lotz M. Identification of mesenchymal progenitor cells in normal and osteoarthritic human articular cartilage. Arthritis Rheum 2004, 50:1522-1532.
20. Dowthwaite G.P., Bishop J.C., Redman S.N., Khan I.M., Rooney P., Evans D.J.R., et al. The surface of articular cartilage contains a progenitor cell population. JCell Sci 2004, 117:889-897.
21. Feng J., Mantesso A., De Bari C., Nishiyama A., Sharpe P.T. Dual origin of mesenchymal stem cells contributing to organ growth and repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011, 108:6503-6508.
22. Salem H.K., Thiemermann C. Mesenchymal stromal cells: current understanding and clinical status. Stem Cells 2010, 28:585-596.
23. Rojewski M.T., Weber B.M., Schrezenmeier H. Phenotypic characterization of mesenchymal stem cells from various tissues. Transfus Med Hemother 2008, 35:168-184.
24. Shi S., Robey P.G., Gronthos S. Comparison of human dental pulp and bone marrow stromal stem cells by cDNA microarray analysis. Bone 2001, 29:532-539.
25. Zanini C., Bruno S., Mandili G., Baci D., Cerutti F., Cenacchi G., et al. Differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells derived from pancreatic islets and bone marrow into islet-like cell phenotype. PLoS One 2011, 6:e28175.
26. Yu J., Wang Y., Deng Z., Tang L., Li Y., Shi J., et al. Odontogenic capability: bone marrow stromal stem cells versus dental pulp stem cells. Biol Cell 2007, 99:465-474.
27. da Silva Meirelles L., Caplan A.I., Nardi N.B. In search of the invivo identity of mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 2008, 26:2287-2299.
28. Danisovic L., Varga I., Polak S., Ulicna M., Hlavackova L., Bohmer D., et al. Comparison of invitro chondrogenic potential of human mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow and adipose tissue. Gen Physiol Biophys 2009, 28:56-62.
29. Rebelatto C.K., Aguiar A.M., Moretao M.P., Senegaglia A.C., Hansen P., Barchiki F., et al. Dissimilar differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, and adipose tissue. Exp Biol Med 2008, 233:901-913.
30. Hayashi O., Katsube Y., Hirose M., Ohgushi H., Ito H. Comparison of osteogenic ability of rat mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, periosteum, and adipose tissue. Calcif Tissue Int 2008, 82:238-247.
31. Bernardo M.E., Emons J.A., Karperien M., Nauta A.J., Willemze R., Roelofs H., et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow display a better chondrogenic differentiation compared with other sources. Connect Tissue Res 2007, 48:132-140.
32. Yang J., Song T., Wu P., Chen Y., Fan X., Chen H., et al. Differentiation potential of human mesenchymal stem cells derived from adipose tissue and bone marrow to sinus node-like cells. Mol Med Rep 2012, 5:108-113.
33. de la Garza-Rodea A.S., van der Velde-van Dijke I., Boersma H., Gonçalves M.A.F.V., van Bekkum D.W., de Vries A.A., et al. Myogenic properties of human mesenchymal stem cells derived from three different sources. Cell Transplant 2012, 21:153-173.
34. Barlow S., Brooke G., Chatterjee K., Price G., Pelekanos R., Rossetti T., et al. Comparison of human placenta- and bone marrow-derived multipotent mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Dev 2008, 17:1095-1107.
35. Ivanova-Todorova E., Bochev I., Mourdjeva M., Dimitrov R., Bukarev D., Kyurkchiev S., et al. Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells are more potent suppressors of dendritic cells differentiation compared to bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Immunol Lett 2009, 126:37-42.
36. Bochev I., Elmadjian G., Kyurkchiev D., Tzvetanov L., Altankova I., Tivchev P., et al. Mesenchymal stem cells from human bone marrow or adipose tissue differently modulate mitogen-stimulated B-cell immunoglobulin production invitro. Cell Biol Int 2008, 32:384-393.
37. Chang Y.-J., Shih D.T.-B., Tseng C.-P., Hsieh T.-B., Lee D.-C., Hwang S.-M. Disparate mesenchyme-lineage tendencies in mesenchymal stem cells from human bone marrow and umbilical cord blood. Stem Cells 2006, 24:679-685.
38. Kern S., Eichler H., Stoeve J., Kluter H., Bieback K. Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood or adipose tissue. Stem Cells 2006, 24:1294-1301.
39. Yoshimura H., Muneta T., Nimura A., Yokoyama A., Koga H., Sekiya I. Comparison of rat mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow, synovium, periosteum, adipose tissue, and muscle. Cell Tissue Res 2007, 327:449-462.
40. Karaöz E., Demircan P.C., Saǧlam Ö., Aksoy A., Kaymaz F., Duruksu G. Human dental pulp stem cells demonstrate better neural and epithelial stem cell properties than bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Histochem Cell Biol 2011, 136:455-473.
41. Arthur A., Rychkov G., Shi S., Koblar S.A., Gronthos S. Adult human dental pulp stem cells differentiate toward functionally active neurons under appropriate environmental cues. Stem Cells 2008, 26:1787-1795.
42. Zhang W., Walboomers X.F., Shi S., Fan M., Jansen J.A. Multilineage differentiation potential of stem cells derived from human dental pulp after cryopreservation. Tissue Eng 2006, 12:2813-2823.
43. Danisovic L., Varga I., Polak S. Growth factors and chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Cell 2012, 44:69-73.
44. Ling L., Nurcombe V., Cool S.M. Wnt signaling controls the fate of mesenchymal stem cells. Gene 2009, 433:1-7.
45. Saraswati S., Bastakoty D., Young P.P. Molecular and signaling pathways that modulate mesenchymal stem cell self-renewal. Stem cells and cancer stem cells 2012, Vol. 6:131-141. Springer, Dordrecht.
46. Scott M.A., Nguyen V.T., Levi B., James A.W. Current methods of adipogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Dev 2011, 20:1793-1804.
47. Vinatier C., Mrugala D., Jorgensen C., Guicheux J., Noel D. Cartilage engineering: a crucial combination of cells, biomaterials and biofactors. Trends Biotechnol 2009, 27:307-314.
48. Zhang Y., Khan D., Delling J., Tobiasch E. Mechanisms underlying the osteo- and adipo-differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. ScientificWorldJournal 2012, 2012:793823.
49. Cleary M.A., van Osch G.J., Brama P.A., Hellingman C.A., Narcisi R. FGF, TGFbeta and Wnt crosstalk: embryonic to invitro cartilage development from mesenchymal stem cells. JTissue Eng Regen Med 2013, 10.1002/term.1744.
50. Lin G.L., Hankenson K.D. Integration of BMP, Wnt, and notch signaling pathways in osteoblast differentiation. JCell Biochem 2011, 112:3491-3501.
51. Jiang J., Papoutsakis E.T. Stem-cell niche based comparative analysis of chemical and nano-mechanical material properties impacting exvivo expansion and differentiation of hematopoietic and mesenchymal stem cells. Adv Healthc Mater 2012, 2:2542.
52. Zaragosi L., Ailhaud G., Dani C. Autocrine FGF2 signaling is critical for self-renewal of human multipotent adipose-derived stem cells. Stem Cells 2006, 24:2412-2419.
53. Wang L., Huang Y., Kefeng Pan X.J., Liu C.S. Osteogenic responses to different concentrations/ratios of BMP-2 and bFGF in bone formation. Ann Biomed Eng 2010, 38:77-87.
54. Benoit D., Schwartz M., Durney A., Anseth K. Small functional groups for controlled differentiation of hydrogel-encapsulated human mesenchymal stem cells. Nat Mater 2008, 7:816-823.
55. Curran J.M., Chen R., Hunt J.A. Controlling the phenotype and function of mesenchymal stem cells invitro by adhesion to silane-modified clean glass surfaces. Biomaterials 2005, 26:7057-7067.
56. Curran J.M., Chen R., Hunt J.A. The guidance of human mesenchymal stem cell differentiation invitro by controlled modifications to the cell substrate. Biomaterials 2006, 27:4783-4793.
57. Curran J.M., Stokes R., Irvine E., Graham D., Amro N.A., Sanedrin R.G., et al. Introducing dip pen nanolithography as a tool for controlling stem cell behaviour: unlocking the potential of the next generation of smart materials in regenerative medicine. Lab Chip 2010, 10:1662-1670.
58. Moore N.M., Lin N.J., Gallant N.D., Becker M.L. Synergistic enhancement of human bone marrow stromal cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation on BMP-2-derived and RGD peptide concentration gradients. Acta Biomater 2011, 7:2091-2100.
59. Wells N., Baxter M.A., Turnbull J.E., Murray P., Edgar D., Parry K.L., et al. The geometric control of E14 and R1 mouse embryonic stem cell pluripotency by plasma polymer surface chemical gradients. Biomaterials 2009, 30:1066-1070.
60. Keselowsky B., Collard D., Garcia A. Surface chemistry modulates focal adhesion composition and signaling through changes in integrin binding. Biomaterials 2004, 25:5947-5954.
61. Keselowsky B.G., Collard D.M., Garcia A.J. Integrin binding specificity regulates biomaterial surface chemistry effects on cell differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102:5953-5957.
62. Ingber D.E. Mechanical control of tissue morphogenesis during embryological development. Int J Dev Biol 2006, 50:255-266.
63. Eyckmans J., Boudou T., Yu X., Chen C.S. Ahitchhiker's guide to mechanobiology. Dev Cell 2011, 35-47.
64. Schwartz M.A. Cell biology. The force is with us. Science 2009, 323:588-589.
65. McNamara L.E., McMurray R.J., Biggs M.J., Kantawong F., Oreffo R.O., Dalby M.J. Nanotopographical control of stem cell differentiation. JTissue Eng 2010, 2010:120623.
66. Luo W., Jones S.R., Yousaf M.N. Geometric control of stem cell differentiation rate on surfaces. Langmuir 2008, 24:12129-12133.
67. Kilian K.A., Bugarija B., Lahn B.T., Mrksich M. Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010, 107:4872-4877.
68. McBeath R., Pirone D.M., Nelson C.M., Bhadriraju K., Chen C.S. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell 2004, 6:483-495.
69. McMurray R.J., Gadegaard N., Tsimbouri P.M., Burgess K.V., McNamara L.E., Tare R., et al. Nanoscale surfaces for the long-term maintenance of mesenchymal stem cell phenotype and multipotency. Nat Mater 2011, 10:637-644.
70. Engler A., Sen S., Sweeney H., Discher D. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006, 126:677-689.
71. Rowlands A.S., George P.A., Cooper-White J.J. Directing osteogenic and myogenic differentiation of MSCs: interplay of stiffness and adhesive ligand presentation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2008, 295:C1037-C1044.
72. Ruardy T.G., Schakenraad J.M., vanderMei H.C., Busscher H.J. Preparation and characterization of chemical gradient surfaces and their application for the study of cellular interaction phenomena. Surf Sci Rep 1997, 29:3-30.
73. Liu Y., Li C.M. Advanced immobilization and amplification for high performance protein chips. Anal Lett 2012, 45:130-155.
74. Hook A.L., Anderson D.G., Langer R., Williams P., Davies M.C., Alexander M.R. High throughput methods applied in biomaterial development and discovery. Biomaterials 2010, 31:187-198.
75. Reticker-Flynn N.E., Malta D.F., Winslow M.M., Lamar J.M., Xu M.J., Underhill G.H., et al. Acombinatorial extracellular matrix platform identifies cell-extracellular matrix interactions that correlate with metastasis. Nat Commun 2012, 3:1122.
76. Flaim C.J., Chien S., Bhatia S.N. An extracellular matrix microarray for probing cellular differentiation. Nat Methods 2005, 2:119-125.
77. Fernandes T.G., Kwon S.-J., Bale S.S., Lee M.-Y., Diogo M.M., Clark D.S., et al. Three-dimensional cell culture microarray for high-throughput studies of stem cell fate. Biotechnol Bioeng 2010, 106:106-118.
78. Luo W., Chan E.W.L., Yousaf M.N. Tailored electroactive and quantitative ligand density microarrays applied to stem cell differentiation. JAm Chem Soc 2010, 132:2614-2621.
79. Pernagallo S., Unciti-Broceta A., Dìaz-Mochón J.J., Bradley M. Deciphering cellular morphology and biocompatibility using polymer microarrays. Biomed Mater 2008, 3:1-6.
80. Rubina A.Y., Dementieva E.I., Stomakhin A.A., Darii E.L., Pan'kov S.V., Barsky V.E., et al. hydrogel-based protein microchips: manufacturing, properties and applications. BioTechniques 2003, 34.
81. Gobaa S., Hoehnel S., Roccio M., Negro A., Kobel S., Lutolf M.P. Artificial niche microarrays for probing single stem cell fate in high throughput. Nat Methods 2011, 8:949-955.
82. Gilbert P.M., Havenstrite K.L., Magnusson K.E.G., Sacco A., Leonardi N.A., Kraft P., et al. Substrate elasticity regulates skeletal muscle stem cell self-renewal in culture. Science 2010, 329:1078-1081.
83. Serena E., Cimetta E., Zatti S., Zaglia T., Zagallo M., Keller G., et al. Micro-arrayed human embryonic stem cells-derived cardiomyocytes for invitro functional assay. PLoS One 2012, 7:e48483.
84. Hook A.L., Thissen H., Voelcker N.H. Advanced substrate fabrication for cell microarrays. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10:573-579.
85. Anglin E.J., Salisbury C., Bailey S., Hor M., Macardle P., Fenech M., et al. Sorted cell microarrays as platforms for high-content informational bioassays. Lab Chip 2010, 10:3413-3421.
86. Anglin E., Davey R., Herrid M., Hope S., Kurkuri M., Pasic P., et al. Cell microarrays for the screening of factors that allow the enrichment of bovine testicular cells. Cytometry A 2010, 77A:881-889.
87. Goddarda J.M., Hotchkiss J.H. Polymer surface modification for the attachment of bioactive compounds. Prog Polym Sci 2007, 32:698-725.
88. Keenan T.M., Folch A. Biomolecular gradients in cell culture systems. Lab Chip 2008, 8:34-57.
89. Guo A., Zhu X. Surface chemistry for protein microarrays. Int J. Nanosci 2007, 6:109-116.
90. Roccio M., Gobaa S., Lutolf M.P. High-throughput clonal analysis of neural stem cells in microarrayed artificial niches. Integr Biol 2012, 4:391-400.
91. Konagaya S., Kato K., Nakaji-Hirabayashi T., Arima Y., Iwata H. Array-based functional screening of growth factors toward optimizing neural stem cell microenvironments. Biomaterials 2011, 32:5015-5022.
92. Alberti K., Davey R.E., Onishi K., George S., Salchert K., Seib F.P., et al. Functional immobilization of signaling proteins enables control of stem cell fate. Nat Methods 2008, 5:645-650.
93. Kuhl P.R., Griffith-Cima L.G. Tethered epidermal growth factor as a paradigm for growth factor-induced stimulation from the solid phase. Nat Med 1996, 2:1022-1027.
94. Hook A.L., Voelcker N.H., Thissen H. Patterned and switchable surfaces for biomolecular manipulation. Acta Biomater 2009, 5:2350-2370.
95. Gutmann O., Kuehlewein R., Reinbold S., Niekrawietz R., Steinert Chris P., deHeij B. Ahighly parallel nanoliter dispenser for microarray fabrication. Biomed Microdevices 2004, 6:131-137.
96. Falconnet D., Koenig A., Assi F., Textor M.A. Combined photolithographic and molecular-assembly approach to produce functional micropatterns for applications in the biosciences. Adv Funct Mater 2004, 14:749-756.
97. Tang X., Yakut Ali M., Taher M., Saif A. Anovel technique for micro-patterning proteins and cells on polyacrylamide gels. Soft Matter 2012, 8:7197-7206.
98. Hook A.L., Thissen H., Voelcker N.H. Surface plasmon resonance imaging of polymer microarrays to study protein-polymer interactions in high throughput. Langmuir 2009, 25:9173-9181.
99. Tourniaire G., Collins J., Campbell S., Mizomoto H., Ogawa S., Thabureta J.-F., et al. Polymer microarrays for cellular adhesion. Chem Commun 2006, 2118-2120.
100. Rodrìguez-Seguì S.A., Pla-Roca M., Engel E., Planell J.A., Martìnez E., Samitier J. Influence of fabrication parameters in cellular microarrays for stem cell studies. Mater Sci 2009, 20:1525-1533.
101. Kurkuri M.D., Driever C., Johnson G., McFarland G., Thissen H., Voelcker N.H. Multifunctional polymer coatings for cell microarray applications. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10:1163-1172.
102. Anderson D.G., Levenberg S., Langer R. Nanoliter-scale synthesis of arrayed biomaterials and application to human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 2004, 22:863-866.
103. Anderson D.G., Putnam D., Lavik E.B., Mahmood T.A., Langer R. Biomaterial microarrays: rapid, microscale screening of polymer-cell interaction. Biomaterials 2005, 26:4892-4897.
104. Robbins M.E., Hopper E.D., Schoenfisch M.H. Synthesis and characterization of nitric oxide-releasing sol-gel microarrays. Langmuir 2004, 20:10296-10302.
105. Lussi J.W., Falconnet D., Hubbell J.A., Textor M., Csucs G. Pattern stability under cell culture conditions-A comparative study of patterning methods based on PLL-g-PEG background passivation. Biomaterials 2006, 27:2534-2541.
106. Branch D.W., Wheeler B.C., Brewer G.J., Leckband D.E. Long-term stability of grafted polyethylene glycol surfaces for use with microstamped substrates in neuronal cell culture. Biomaterials 2001, 22:1035-1047.
107. Unadkat H.V., Hulsman M., Cornelissen K., Papenburg B.J., Truckenmuller R.K., Carpenter A.E., et al. An algorithm-based topographical biomaterials library to instruct cell fate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011, 108:16565-16570.
108. Millet L.J., Stewart M.E., Nuzzo R.G., Gillette M.U. Guiding neuron development with planar surface gradients of substrate cues deposited using microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 2010, 10:1525-1535.
109. Zelzer M., Majani R., Bradley J.W., Rose F.R., Davies M.C., Alexander M.R. Investigation of cell-surface interactions using chemical gradients formed from plasma polymers. Biomaterials 2008, 29:172-184.
110. Harding F.J., Clements L.R., Short R.D., Thissen H., Voelcker N.H. Assessing embryonic stem cell response to surface chemistry using plasma polymer gradients. Acta Biomater 2012, 8:1739-1748.
111. Khung Y.L., Barritt G., Voelcker N.H. Using continuous porous silicon gradients to study the influence of surface topography on the behaviour of neuroblastoma cells. Exp Cell Res 2008, 314:789-800.
112. Wang P.-Y., Clements L.R., Thissen H., Jane A., Tsai W.-B., Voelcker N.H. Screening mesenchymal stem cell attachment and differentiation on porous silicon gradients. Adv Funct Mater 2012, 22:3414-3423.
113. Bhat R.R., Tomlinson M.R., Genzer J. Orthogonal surface-grafted polymer gradients: a versatile combinatorial platform. JPolym Sci B 2005, 43:3384-3394.
114. Whittle J.D., Barton D., Alexander M.R., Short R.D. Amethod for the deposition of controllable chemical gradients. Chem Comm 2003, 1766-1767.
115. Genzer J. Surface-bound gradients for studies of soft materials behavior. Ann Rev Mater Res 2012, 42:435-468.
116. Arima Y., Iwata H. Effect of wettability and surface functional groups on protein adsorption and cell adhesion using well-defined mixed self-assembled monolayers. Biomaterials 2007, 28:3074-3082.
117. Bai Z., Filiaggi M.J., Sanderson R.J., Lohstreter L.B., McArthur M.A., Dahn J.R. Surface characteristics and protein adsorption on combinatorial binary Ti-M (Cr, Al,Ni) and Al-M (Ta, Zr) library films. JBiomed Mater Res A 2010, 92A:521-532.
118. Yamamoto M., Yanase K., Tabata Y. Generation of type I collagen gradient in polyacrylamide hydrogels by a simple diffusion-controlled hydrolysis of amide groups. Materials 2010, 3:2393-2404.
119. Cosson S., Kobel S.A., Lutolf M.P. Capturing complex protein gradients onbiomimetic hydrogels for cell-based assays. Adv Funct Mater 2009, 19:3411-3419.
120. Burdick J.A., Khademhosseini A., Langer R.S. Fabrication of gradient hydrogels using a microfluidics/photopolymerization process. Langmuir 2004, 20:5153-5156.
121. Li B., Ma Y.X., Wang S., Moran P.M. Influence of carboxyl group density on neuron cell attachment and differentiation behavior: gradient-guided neurite outgrowth. Biomaterials 2005, 26:4956-4963.
122. Li B., Ma Y.X., Wang S., Moran P.M. Atechnique for preparing protein gradients on polymeric surfaces: effects on PC12 pheochromocytoma cells. Biomaterials 2005, 26:1487-1495.
123. Harding F., Goreham R., Short R., Vasilev K., Voelcker N.H. Surface bound amine functional group density influences embryonic stem cell maintenance. Adv Healthc Mater 2013, 2:585-590.
124. Bhat R.R., Chaney B.N., Rowley J., Liebmann-Vinson A., Genzer J. Tailoring cell adhesion using surface-grafted polymer gradient assemblies. Adv Mater 2005, 17:2802-2807.
125. Mei Y., Elliott J.T., Smith J.R., Langenbach K.J., Wu T., Xu C., et al. Gradient substrate assembly for quantifying cellular response to biomaterials. JBiomed Mater Res 2006, 79:974-988.
126. Kapur R., Rudolph A.S. Cellular and cytoskeleton morphology and strength of adhesion of cells on self-assembled monolayers of organosilanes. Exp Cell Res 1998, 244:275-285.
127. Samavedi S., Olsen Horton C., Guelcher S.A., Goldstein A.S., Whittington A.R. Fabrication of a model continuously graded co-electrospun mesh for regeneration of the ligament-bone interface. Acta Biomater 2011, 7:4131-4138.
128. Matsuzawa M., Potember R.S., Stenger D.A., Krauthamer V. Containment and growth of neuroblastoma-cells on chemically patterned substrates. JNeurosci Methods 1993, 50:253-260.
129. Wei J.H., Yoshinari M., Takemoto S., Hattori M., Kawada E., Liu B.L., et al. Adhesion of mouse fibroblasts on hexamethyidisiloxane surfaces with wide range of wettability. JBiomed Mater Res B 2007, 81B:66-75.
130. Choee J.H., Lee S.J., Lee Y.M., Rhee J.M., Lee H.B., Khang G. Proliferation rate of fibroblast cells on polyethylene surfaces with wettability gradient. JAppl Polym Sci 2004, 92:599-606.
131. Moore N.M., Lin N.J., Gallant N.D., Becker M.L. The use of immobilized osteogenic growth peptide on gradient substrates synthesized via click chemistry to enhance MC3T3-E1 osteoblast proliferation. Biomaterials 2010, 31:1604-1611.
132. von Philipsborn A.C., Lang S., Bernard A., Loeschinger J., David C., Lehnert D., et al. Microcontact printing of axon guidance molecules for generation of graded patterns. Nat Protoc 2006, 1:1322-1328.
133. Ilkhanizadeh S., Teixeira A.I., Hermanson O. Inkjet printing of macromolecules on hydrogels to steer neural stem cell differentiation. Biomaterials 2007, 28:3936-3943.
134. Shi J., Wang L., Zhang F., Li H., Lei L., Liu L., et al. Incorporating protein gradient into electrospun nanofibers as scaffolds for tissue engineering. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2010, 2:1025-1030.
135. Valmikinathan C.M., Wang J., Smiriglio S., Golwala N.G., Yu X. Magnetically induced protein gradients on electrospun nanofibers. Comb Chem High T Scr 2009, 12:656-663.
136. Wang X., Wenk E., Zhang X., Meinel L., Vunjak-Novakovic G., Kaplan D.L. Growth factor gradients via microsphere delivery in biopolymer scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering. JControl Release 2009, 134:81-90.
137. Kloxin A., Benton J., Anseth K. In situ elasticity modulation with dynamic substrates to direct cell phenotype. Biomaterials 2010, 31:1-8.
138. Wang P.-Y., Tsai W.-B., Voelcker N.H. Screening of rat mesenchymal stem cell behaviour on polydimethylsiloxane stiffness gradients. Acta Biomater 2012, 8:519-530.
139. Zaari N., Rajagopalan P., Kim S., Engler A., Wong J. Photopolymerization in microfluidic gradient generators: microscale control of substrate compliance to manipulate cell response. Adv Mater 2004, 16:2133-2137.
140. Chatterjee K., Lin-Gibson S., Wallace W.E., Parekh S.H., Lee Y.J., Cicerone M.T., et al. The effect of 3D hydrogel scaffold modulus on osteoblast differentiation and mineralization revealed by combinatorial screening. Biomaterials 2010, 31:5051-5062.
141. Kunzler T.P., Drobek T., Schuler M., Spencer N.D. Systematic study of osteoblast and fibroblast response to roughness by means of surface-morphology gradients. Biomaterials 2007, 28:2175-2182.
142. Li X., MacEwan M.R., Xie J., Siewe D., Yuan X., Xia Y. Fabrication of density gradients of biodegradable polymer microparticles and their use in guiding neurite outgrowth. Adv Funct Mater 2010, 20:1632-1637.
143. Li X., Xie J., Lipner J., Yuan X., Thomopoulos S., Xia Y. Nanofiber scaffolds with gradations in mineral content for mimicking the tendon-to-bone insertion site. Nano Lett 2009, 9:2763-2768.
144. Simon C.G., Eidelman N., Kennedy S.B., Sehgal A., Khatri C.A., Washburn N.R. Combinatorial screening of cell proliferation on poly(D, L-lactic acid)/poly(D, L-lactic acid) blends. Biomaterials 2005, 26:6906-6915.
145. Washburn N.R., Yamada K.M., Simon C.G., Kennedy S.B., Amis E.J. High-throughput investigation of osteoblast response to polymer crystallinity: influence of nanometer-scale roughness on proliferation. Biomaterials 2004, 25:1215-1224.
146. Yang J., Rose F.R.A.J., Gadegaard N., Alexander M.R. Ahigh-throughput assay of cell-surface interactions using topographical and chemical gradients. Adv Mater 2009, 21:300-304.
147. Meredith J.C., Sormana J.L., Keselowsky B.G., Garcia A.J., Tona A., Karim A., et al. Combinatorial characterization of cell interactions with polymer surfaces. JBiomed Mater Res A 2003, 66A:483-490.
148. Engler A., Bacakova L., Newman C., Hategan A., Griffin M., Discher D. Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. Biophys J 2004, 86:617-628.
149. Clements L.R., Wang P.-Y., Tsai W.-B., Thissen H., Voelcker N.H. Electrochemistry-enabled fabrication of orthogonal nanotopography and surface chemistry gradients for high-throughput screening. Lab Chip 2012, 12:1480.
150. Soulez M., Sirois I., Brassard N., Raymond M., Nicodème F., Noiseux N., et al. Epidermal growth factor and perlecan fragments produced by apoptotic endothelial cells co-ordinately activate ERK1/2-dependent antiapoptotic pathways in mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 2010, 28:810-820.
151. Benoit D., Tripodi M., Blanchette J., Langer S., Leinwand L., Anseth K. Integrin-linked kinase production prevents anoikis in human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomed Mater Res 2007, 81A:259-268.
152. Pons S., Martí E. Sonic hedgehog synergizes with the extracellular matrix proteinvitronectin to induce spinal motor neuron differentiation. Development 2000, 127:333-342.
153. Yamada K.M., Even-Ram S. Integrin regulation of growth factor receptors. Nat Cell Biol 2002, 4:E75-E76.
154. Ghaedi M., Tuleuova N., Zern M.A., Wu J., Revzin A. Bottom-up signaling from HGF-containing surfaces promotes hepatic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 2011, 407:295-300.
155. Nakajima M., Ishimuro T., Kato K., Ko I.-K., Hirata I., Arima Y., et al. Combinatorial protein display for the cell-based screening of biomaterials that direct neural stem cell differentiation. Biomaterials 2007, 28:1048-1060.
156. Soen Y., Mori A., Palmer T.D., Brown P.O. Exploring the regulation of human neural precursor cell differentiation using arrays of signaling microenvironments. Mol Syst Biol 2006, 2:37.
157. Flaim C.J., Teng D., Chien S., Bhatia S.N. Combinatorial signaling microenvironments for studying stem cell fate. Stem Cells Dev 2008, 17:29-39.
158. Lutolf M.P., Doyonnas R., Havenstrite K., Koleckar K., Blau H.M. Perturbation of single hematopoietic stem cell fates in artificial niches. Integr Biol 2009, 1:59-69.
159. Huang Y-l, Qiu R.-f, Mai W.-y, Kuang J., Cai X.-y, Dong Y.-g, et al. Effects of insulin-like growth factor-1 on the properties of mesenchymal stem cells invitro. JZhejiang Univ Sci B 2012, 13:20-28.
160. DeLong S.A., Moon J.J., West J.L. Covalently immobilized gradients of bFGF onhydrogel scaffolds for directed cell migration. Biomaterials 2005, 26:3227-3234.
161. Mei Y., Saha K., Bogatyrev S.R., Yang J., Hook A.L., Kalcioglu Z.I., et al. Combinatorial development of biomaterials for clonal growth of human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Mater 2010, 9:768-778.
162. Yang J., Mei Y., Hook A.L., Taylor M., Urquhart A.J., Bogatyrev S.R., et al. Polymer surface functionalities that control human embryoid body cell adhesion revealed by high throughput surface characterization of combinatorial material microarrays. Biomaterials 2010, 31:8827-8838.
163. Pernagallo S., Diaz-Mochon J.J., Bradley M. Acooperative polymer-DNA microarray approach to biomaterial investigation. JChem Soc 2009, 9:397-403.
164. Neuss S., Apel C., Buttler P., Denecke B., Dhanasingh A., Ding X., et al. Assessment of stem cell/biomaterial combinations for stem cell-based tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2008, 29:302-313.
165. Mei Y., Gerecht S., Taylor M., Urquhart A.J., Bogatyrev S.R., Cho S.-W., et al. Mapping the interactions among biomaterials, adsorbed proteins and human embryonic stem cells. Adv Mater 2009, 21:2781-2786.
166. Lo C.-M., Wang H.-B., Dembo M., Wang Y.-l Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophys J 2000, 79:144-152.
167. Tse J.R., Engler A.J. Stiffness gradients mimicking invivo tissue variation regulate mesenchymal stem cell fate. PLoS One 2011, 6:e15978.
168. Sharma R.I., Snedeker J.G. Paracrine interactions between mesenchymal stem cells affect substrate driven differentiation toward tendon and bone phenotypes. PLoS One 2012, 7:e31504.
169. Torres-Costa V., Martínez-Muñoz G., Sánchez-Vaquero V., Muñoz-Noval Á., González-Méndez L., Punzón-Quijorna E., et al. Engineering of silicon surfaces at the micro- and nanoscales for cell adhesion and migration control. Int J Nanomed 2012, 7:623-630.
170. Bettinger C.J., Langer R., Borenstein J.T. Engineering substrate topography at the micro- and nanoscale to control cell function. Angew Chem 2009, 48:5406-5415.
171. Morgenthaler S., Zink C., Spencer N.D. Surface-chemical and -morphological gradients. Soft Matter 2008, 4:419-434.
172. Ramalingam M., Young M.F., Thomas V., Sun L., Chow L.C., Tison C.K., et al. Nanofiber scaffold gradients for interfacial tissue engineering. JBiomater Appl 2013, 27:695-705.
173. Truckenmuller R., Giselbrecht S., Escalante-Marun M., Groenendijk M., Papenburg B., Rivron N., et al. Fabrication of cell container arrays with overlaid surface topographies. Biomed Microdevices 2012, 14:95-107.
174. LaBarge M.A., Nelson C.M., Villadsen R., Fridriksdottir A., Ruth J.R., Stampfer M.R., et al. Human mammary progenitor cell fate decisions are products of interactions with combinatorial microenvironments. Integr Biol 2009, 1:70-79.
175. Rosenthal A., Macdonald A., Voldman J. Cell Patterning Chip for Controlling the Stem Cell Microenvironment 2007, 28:3208-3216.
176. Tzezana R., Reznik S., Blumenthal J., Zussman E., Levenberg S. Regulation of stem cell differentiation by control of retinoic acid gradients in hydrospun 3D scaffold. Macromol Biosci 2012, 12:598-607.
177. Matsusaki M., Sakaue K., Kadowaki K., Akashi M. Three-dimensional human tissue chips fabricated by rapid and automatic inkjet cell printing. Adv Healthc Mater 2012, 3:534-539.
178. Gottwald E., Giselbrecht S., Augspurger C., Lahni B., Dambrowsky N., Truckenmuller R., et al. Achip-based platform for the invitro generation of tissues in three-dimensional organization. Lab Chip 2007, 7:777-785.
179. Ranga A., Lutolf M.P. High-throughput approaches for the analysis of extrinsic regulators of stem cell fate. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2012, 24:236-244.