Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense

Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 41, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1774-1781

  Marik, Paul E ^a   Cavallazzi, Rodrigo ^b  

^a EASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b University of Louisville School of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

central venous pressure; fluid challenge; hemodynamic monitoring; meta analysis; volume responsive

Indexed keywords

CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; FLUID THERAPY; HEART INDEX; HEART PERFORMANCE; HEART PRELOAD; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REVIEW; SURGICAL PATIENT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; FLUID THERAPY; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL;

EID: 84880538029     PISSN: 00903493     EISSN: 15300293     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a25fd     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. Lopes MR, Oliveira MA, Pereira VO, et al: Goal-directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during highrisk surgery: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 2007; 11:R100
2. Gan TJ, Soppitt A, Maroof M, et al: Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery. Anesthesiology 2002; 97:820-826
3. Conway DH, Mayall R, Abdul-Latif MS, et al: Randomised controlled trial investigating the influence of intravenous fluid titration using oesophageal Doppler monitoring during bowel surgery. Anaesthesia 2002; 57:845-849
4. Wakeling HG, McFall MR, Jenkins CS, et al: Intraoperative oesophageal Doppler guided fluid management shortens postoperative hospital stay after major bowel surgery. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95: 634-642
5. Noblett SE, Snowden CP, Shenton BK, et al: Randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of Doppler-optimized fluid management on outcome after elective colorectal resection. Br J Surg 2006; 93:1069-1076
6. Marik PE, Monnet X, Teboul JL: Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy. Ann Intensive Care 2011; 1:1
7. Shapiro NI, Howell MD, Talmor D, et al: Implementation and outcomes of the Multiple Urgent Sepsis Therapies (MUST) protocol. Crit Care Med 2006; 34:1025-1032
8. Sakr Y, Dubois MJ, De Backer D, et al: Persistent microcirculatory alterations are associated with organ failure and death in patients with septic shock. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:1825-1831
9. Boyd JH, Forbes J, Nakada TA, et al: Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: A positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality. Crit Care Med 2011; 39:259-265
10. Maitland K, Kiguli S, Opoka RO, et al; FEAST Trial Group: Mortality after fluid bolus in African children with severe infection. N Engl J Med 2011; 364:2483-2495
11. de-Madaria E, Soler-Sala G, Sánchez-Payá J, et al: Influence of fluid therapy on the prognosis of acute pancreatitis: A prospective cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106:1843-1850
12. Rosenberg AL, Dechert RE, Park PK, et al; NIH NHLBI ARDS Network: Review of a large clinical series: Association of cumulative fluid balance on outcome in acute lung injury: A retrospective review of the ARDSnet tidal volume study cohort. J Intensive Care Med 2009; 24:35-46
13. Bundgaard-Nielsen M, Secher NH, Kehlet H: "Liberal" vs. "restrictive" perioperative fluid therapy - A critical assessment of the evidence. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009; 53:843-851
14. Hughes RE, Magovern GJ: The relationship between right atrial pressure and blood volume. AMA Arch Surg 1959; 79:238-243
15. Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B: Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest 2008; 134:172-178
16. Dellinger RP, Carlet JM, Masur H, et al; Surviving Sepsis Campaign Management Guidelines Committee: Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:858-873
17. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, et al; International Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee; American Association of Critical- Care Nurses; American College of Chest Physicians; American College of Emergency Physicians; Canadian Critical Care Society; European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; European Respiratory Society; International Sepsis Forum; Japanese Association for Acute Medicine; Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine; Society of Critical Care Medicine; Society of Hospital Medicine; Surgical Infection Society; World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine: Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med 2008; 36:296-327
18. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, et al: Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet 1999; 354:1896-1900
19. Cochran W. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics 1954; 10:101-129
20. Berlin JA, Laird NM, Sacks HS, et al: A comparison of statistical methods for combining event rates from clinical trials. Stat Med 1989; 8:141-151
21. Higgins JP, Thompson SG: Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002; 21:1539-1558
22. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al: Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327:557-560
23. Calvin JE, Driedger AA, Sibbald WJ: The hemodynamic effect of rapid fluid infusion in critically ill patients. Surgery 1981; 90:61-76
24. Reuse C, Vincent JL, Pinsky MR: Measurements of right ventricular volumes during fluid challenge. Chest 1990; 98:1450-1454
25. Wagner JG, Leatherman JW: Right ventricular end-diastolic volume as a predictor of the hemodynamic response to a fluid challenge. Chest 1998; 113:1048-1054
26. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, et al: Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162:134-138
27. Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Kilger E, et al: Optimizing fluid therapy in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery by on-line monitoring of left ventricular stroke volume variations. Comparison with aortic systolic pressure variations. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88:124-126
28. Barbier C, Loubières Y, Schmit C, et al: Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30:1740-1746
29. Kramer A, Zygun D, Hawes H, et al: Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness following coronary artery bypass surgery. Chest 2004; 126:1563-1568
30. Marx G, Cope T, McCrossan L, et al: Assessing fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004; 21:132-138
31. Perel A, Minkovich L, Preisman S, et al: Assessing fluid-responsiveness by a standardized ventilatory maneuver: The respiratory systolic variation test. Anesth Analg 2005; 100:942-945
32. De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, et al: Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: Influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31:517-523
33. Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, et al: Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med 2007; 35:64-68
34. Magder S, Bafaqeeh F: The clinical role of central venous pressure measurements. J Intensive Care Med 2007; 22:44-51
35. Wyffels PA, Durnez PJ, Helderweirt J, et al: Ventilation-induced plethysmographic variations predict fluid responsiveness in ventilated postoperative cardiac surgery patients. Anesth Analg 2007; 105:448-452
36. Auler JO Jr, Galas F, Hajjar L, et al: Online monitoring of pulse pressure variation to guide fluid therapy after cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2008; 106:1201-1206, table of contents
37. Muller L, Louart G, Bengler C, et al: The intrathoracic blood volume index as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients with acute circulatory failure: A comparison with central venous pressure. Anesth Analg 2008; 107:607-613
38. Huang CC, Fu JY, Hu HC, et al: Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure. Crit Care Med 2008; 36:2810-2816
39. Monge García MI, Gil Cano A, Díaz Monrové JC: Brachial artery peak velocity variation to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care 2009; 13:R142
40. Thiel SW, Kollef MH, Isakow W: Non-invasive stroke volume measurement and passive leg raising predict volume responsiveness in medical ICU patients: An observational cohort study. Crit Care 2009; 13:R111
41. Monge García MI, Gil Cano A, Díaz Monrové JC: Arterial pressure changes during the Valsalva maneuver to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35:77-84
42. Moretti R, Pizzi B: Inferior vena cava distensibility as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 2010; 13:3-9
43. Muller L, Toumi M, Bousquet PJ, et al; AzuRéa Group: An increase in aortic blood flow after an infusion of 100 ml colloid over 1 minute can predict fluid responsiveness: The mini-fluid challenge study. Anesthesiology 2011; 115:541-547
44. Lakhal K, Ehrmann S, Benzekri-Lefèvre D, et al: Respiratory pulse pressure variation fails to predict fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care 2011; 15:R85
45. Berkenstadt H, Margalit N, Hadani M, et al: Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery. Anesth Analg 2001; 92:984-989
46. Rex S, Brose S, Metzelder S, et al: Prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients during cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2004; 93:782-788
47. Preisman S, Kogan S, Berkenstadt H, et al: Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: Functional haemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test and static preload indicators. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95:746-755
48. Hofer CK, Müller SM, Furrer L, et al: Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest 2005; 128:848-854
49. Wiesenack C, Fiegl C, Keyser A, et al: Assessment of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated cardiac surgical patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2005; 22:658-665
50. Solus-Biguenet H, Fleyfel M, Tavernier B, et al: Non-invasive prediction of fluid responsiveness during major hepatic surgery. Br J Anaesth 2006; 97:808-816
51. Cannesson M, Slieker J, Desebbe O, et al: Prediction of fluid responsiveness using respiratory variations in left ventricular stroke area by transoesophageal echocardiographic automated border detection in mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care 2006; 10:R171
52. Lee JH, Kim JT, Yoon SZ, et al: Evaluation of corrected flow time in oesophageal Doppler as a predictor of fluid responsiveness. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99:343-348
53. Cannesson M, Attof Y, Rosamel P, et al: Respiratory variations in pulse oximetry plethysmographic waveform amplitude to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room. Anesthesiology 2007; 106:1105-1111
54. Belloni L, Pisano A, Natale A, et al: Assessment of fluid-responsiveness parameters for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: A comparison among LiDCO, transesophageal echochardiography, and pulmonary artery catheter. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2008; 22:243-248
55. Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Cottenceau V, et al: Uncalibrated pulse contour-derived stroke volume variation predicts fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing liver transplantation. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101:761-768
56. Hofer CK, Senn A, Weibel L, et al: Assessment of stroke volume variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness using the modified FloTrac and PiCCOplus system. Crit Care 2008; 12:R82
57. de Waal EE, Rex S, Kruitwagen CL, et al: Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions. Crit Care Med 2009; 37:510-515
58. Cannesson M, Musard H, Desebbe O, et al: The ability of stroke volume variations obtained with Vigileo/FloTrac system to monitor fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg 2009; 108:513-517
59. Zimmermann M, Feibicke T, Keyl C, et al: Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27:555-561
60. Desebbe O, Boucau C, Farhat F, et al: The ability of pleth variability index to predict the hemodynamic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients under general anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2010; 110:792-798
61. Desgranges FP, Desebbe O, Ghazouani A, et al: Influence of the site of measurement on the ability of plethysmographic variability index to predict fluid responsiveness. Br J Anaesth 2011; 107: 329-335
62. Shin YH, Ko JS, Gwak MS, et al: Utility of uncalibrated femoral stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during the anhepatic phase of liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2011; 17:53-59
63. Broch O, Bein B, Gruenewald M, et al: Accuracy of the pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness depends on the perfusion index. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2011; 55:686-693
64. Cannesson M, Le Manach Y, Hofer CK, et al: Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: A "gray zone" approach. Anesthesiology 2011; 115:231-241
65. Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E, et al: Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:691-699
66. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, et al: Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: A systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009; 37:2642-2647
67. Wilson JN, Grow JB. Central venous pressure in optimal blood volume maintenance. Arch Surg 1962; 85:55