Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

Chest

Volumn 128, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 848-854

  Hofer, Christoph K ^a   Müller, Stefan M ^a   Furrer, Lukas ^a   Klaghofer, Richard ^b   Genoni, Michele ^c   Zollinger, Andreas ^a  

^a TRIEMLI HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

^b Department of Psychosocial Medicine ^*  (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Cardiac preload assessment; Cardiac surgery; Pulse contour analysis; Pulse pressure variation; Stroke volume variation

Indexed keywords

HETASTARCH;

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FLUID THERAPY; GLOBAL ENDDIASTOLIC VOLUME INDEX; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC AREA INDEX; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART PRELOAD; HEART RATE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEART SURGERY; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; LUNG CAPILLARY PRESSURE; OFF PUMP CORONARY SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PULSE PRESSURE; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

EID: 23744504093     PISSN: 00123692     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1378/chest.128.2.848     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Heames RM, Gill RS, Ohri SK, et al. Off-pump coronary artery surgery. Anaesthesia 2002; 57:676-685
2. Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E, et al. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:691-699
3. Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002; 121:2000-2008
4. Berkenstadt H, Margalit N, Hadani M, et al. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery. Anesth Analg 2001; 92:984-989
5. Gunn SR, Pinsky MR. Implications of arterial pressure variation in patients in the intensive care unit. Curr Opin Crit Care 2001; 7:212-217
6. Michard F, Teboul JL. Using heart-lung interactions to assess fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care 2000; 4:282-289
7. Perel A. Assessing fluid responsiveness by the systolic pressure variation in mechanically ventilated patients: systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology 1998; 89:1309-1310
8. Pinsky MR. Probing the limits of arterial pulse contour analysis to predict preload responsiveness. Anesth Analg 2003; 96:1245-1247
9. Godje O, Hoke K, Goetz AE, et al. Reliability of a new algorithm for continuous cardiac output determination by pulse-contour analysis during hemodynamic instability. Crit Care Med 2002; 30:52-58
10. Goedje O, Hoeke K, Lichtwarck-Aschoff M, et al. Continuous cardiac output by femoral arterial thermodilution calibrated pulse contour analysis: comparison with pulmonary arterial thermodilution. Crit Care Med 1999; 27:2407-2412
11. Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Schmidt C, et al. Stroke volume variations for assessment of cardiac responsiveness to volume loading in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28:392-398
12. Reuter DA, Kirchner A, Felbinger TW, et al. Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function. Crit Care Med 2003; 31:1399-1404
13. Wiesenack C, Prasser G, Rodig G, et al. Stroke volume variation as an indicator of fluid responsiveness using pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg 2003; 96:1254-1257
14. Reuter DA, Goresch T, Goepfert MS, et al. Effects of mid-line thoracotomy on the interaction between mechanical ventilation and cardiac filling during cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92:808-813
15. Felbinger TW, Reuter DA, Eltzschig HK, et al. Comparison of pulmonary arterial thermodilution and arterial pulse contour analysis: evaluation of a new algorithm. J Clin Anesth 2002; 14:296-301
16. Du Bois D, Du Bois EF. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. 1916. Nutrition 1989; 5:303-311
17. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983; 148:839-843
18. Jardin F, Farcot JC, Gueret P, et al. Cyclic changes in arterial pulse during respiratory support. Circulation 1983; 68:266-274
19. Preisman S, DiSegni E, Vered Z, et al. Left ventricular preload and function during graded haemorrhage and retranfusion in pigs: analysis of arterial pressure waveform and correlation with echocardiography. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88:716-718
20. Michard F, Boussat S, Thelma D, et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162:134-138
21. Denault AY, Gasior TA, Gorcsan J III, et al. Determinants of aortic pressure variation during positive-pressure ventilation in man. Chest 1999; 116:176-186
22. Marx G, Cope T, McCrossan L, et al. Assessing fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004; 21:132-138
23. Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Kilger E, et al. Optimizing fluid therapy in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery by on-line monitoring of left ventricular stroke volume variations: comparison with aortic systolic pressure variations. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88:124-126
24. Bendjelid K, Romand JA. Fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a review of indices used in intensive care. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29:352-360
25. Hansen RM, Viquerat CE, Matthay MA, et al. Poor correlation between pulmonary arterial wedge pressure and left ventricular end-diastolic volume after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Anesthesiology 1986; 64:764-770
26. Buhre W, Buhre K, Kazmaier S, et al. Assessment of cardiac preload by indicator dilution and transoesophageal echocardiography. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2001; 18:662-667
27. Feissel M, Michard F, Mangin I, et al. Respiratory changes in aortic blood velocity as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients with septic shock. Chest 2001; 119:867-873