Assessment of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated cardiac surgical patients

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 22, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 658-665

  Wiesenack, Christoph ^a   Fiegl, C ^a   Keyser, A ^a   Prasser, C ^a   Keyl, C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HEART CENTER FREIBURG BAD KROZINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cardiac output; Cardiac surgical procedures, coronary artery bypass grafting; Critical care; Haemodynamic phenomena, fluid response, stroke volume variation, pulse pressure variation, aortic blood velocity, pulse contour analysis

Indexed keywords

ETOMIDATE; FENTANYL; HETASTARCH; ISOFLURANE; PANCURONIUM;

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BLOOD VOLUME; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HEART OUTPUT; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEART SURGERY; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; LUNG CAPILLARY PRESSURE; MALE; MORBIDITY; PREDICTION; PULSE PRESSURE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL PATIENT; VASCULAR RESISTANCE;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; AORTA; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD VOLUME; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, TRANSESOPHAGEAL; FEMALE; HETASTARCH; HUMANS; INFUSIONS, INTRAVENOUS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PLASMA SUBSTITUTES; PULMONARY WEDGE PRESSURE; RESPIRATION; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; STROKE VOLUME; THERMODILUTION;

EID: 24744434154     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0265021505001092     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Sandham JD, Hull RD, Brant RF et al. A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients. New Engl J Med 2003; 348: 5-14.
2. Perel A. The value of functional hemodynamic parameters in hemodynamic monitoring of ventilated patients. Anaesthetist 2003; 52: 1003-1004.
3. Michard F, Teboul JK. Using heart-lung interactions to assess fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care 2000; 4: 282-289.
4. Rex S, Brose S, Metzelder S et al. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients during cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2004; 93: 782-788.
5. Reuter DA, Kirchner A, Felbinger TW et al. Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function. Crit Care Med 2003; 31: 1399-1404.
6. Tavernier B, Makhotine O, Lebuffe G et al. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 1313-1321.
7. Tousignant CP, Walsh F, Mazer CD. The use of transesophageal echocardiography for preload assessment in critically ill patients. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 351-355.
8. Feissel M, Michard F, Mangin I et al. Respiratory changes in aortic blood velocity as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients with septic shock. Chest 2001; 119:867-873.
9. Marx G, Cope T, McCrossan L et al. Assessing fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004; 21: 132-138.
10. Beaussier M, Coriat P, Perel A et al. Determinants of systolic pressure variation in patients ventilated after vascular surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1995; 9: 547-551.
11. Denault AY, Gasior TA, Gorscan III J et al. Determinants of aortic pressure variation during positive pressure ventilation in man. Chest 1999; 68: 1532-1536.
12. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 134-138.
13. Michard F, Chemla D, Richard C et al. Clinical use of respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure to monitor the hemodynamic effects of PEEP. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 159: 935-939.
14. Berkenstadt H, Margalit N, Hadani M et al. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 984-989.
15. Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Kilger E et al. Optimizing fluid therapy in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery by on-line monitoring of left ventricular stroke volume variations. Comparison with aortic systolic pressure variations. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 124-126.
16. Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Schmidt C et al. Stroke volume variations for assessment of cardiac responsiveness to volume loading in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery. Intens Care Med 2002; 28: 392-398.
17. Pinsky MR. Probing the limits of arterial pulse contour analysis to predict preload responsiveness. Anesth Analg 2003; 96: 1245-1247.
18. Wiesenack C, Prasser C, Rödig G, Keyl C. Stroke volume variation as an indicator of fluid responsiveness using pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg 2003; 96: 1254-1257.
19. Reuter DA, Goresch T, Goepfert MS, Wildhirt SM, Kilger E, Goetz AE. Effects of mid-line thoracotomy on the interaction between mechanical ventilation and cardiac filling during cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 808-813.
20. Gödje O, Hoeke K, Lichtwarck-Aschoff M et al. Continuous cardiac output by femoral arterial thermodilution calibrated pulse contour analysis: comparison with pulmonary artery thermodilution. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 2407-2412.
21. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999; 8: 135-160.
22. Bendjelid K, Romand JA. Fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a review of indices used in intensive care. Intern Care Med 2003; 29: 352-360.
23. Gödje O, Hoke K, Goetz AE et al. Reliability of a new algorithm for continuous cardiac output determination by pulse-contour analysis during hemodynamic instability. Crit Care Med 2002; 30: 52-58.
24. Fujita Y, Yamamoto T, Sano I, Yoshioka N, Hinenoya H. A comparison of changes in cardiac preload variables during graded hypovolemia and hypervolemia in mechanically ventilated dogs. Anesth Analg 2004; 99: 1780-1786.
25. Bouchard MJ, Denault A, Couture P et al. Poor correlation between hemodynamic and echocardiographic indexes of left ventricular performance in the operating room and intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2004; 32: 644-648.
26. Wiesenack C, Prasser C, Keyl C, Rödig G. Assessment of intrathoracic blood volume as an indicator of cardiac preload: single transpulmonary thermodilution technique versus assessment of pressure preload parameters derived from a pulmonary artery catheter. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2001; 15: 584-588.
27. Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients. Chest 2002; 121: 2000-2008.
28. Gödje O, Friedl R, Hannekum A. Accuracy of beat-to-beat cardiac output monitoring by pulse contour analysis in hemodynamical unstable patients. Med Sci Monit 2001; 7: 1344-1350.
29. Mahajan A, Shabanie A, Turner J et al. Pulse contour analysis for cardiac output monitoring in cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 1283-1288.
30. Rödig G, Prasser C, Keyl C et al. Continuous cardiac output measurement: pulse contour analysis vs thermodilution technique in cardiac surgical patients. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 525-530.