Assessment of Fluid-Responsiveness Parameters for Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Comparison Among LiDCO, Transesophageal Echochardiography, and Pulmonary Artery Catheter

Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 243-248

  Belloni, Luigi ^a   Pisano, Antonio ^b   Natale, Armando ^a   Piccirillo, Maria Rosario ^a   Piazza, Luigi ^a   Ismeno, Gennaro ^a   De Martino, Giovanni ^b  

^a AORN San Sebastiano Sant'Anna   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

cardiovascular monitoring; cardiovascular physiology pharmacology; fluid therapy; off pump coronary artery bypass surgery; transesophageal echocardiography

Indexed keywords

CISATRACURIUM; PROPOFOL; REMIFENTANIL;

AGED; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; AORTA FLOW; ARTICLE; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HEART INDEX; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC VOLUME; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; MALE; OFF PUMP CORONARY SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER; PULMONARY ARTERY OCCLUSION PRESSURE; PULSE PRESSURE; RELIABILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STERNOTOMY; STUDENT T TEST; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

AGED; BLOOD VOLUME; CATHETERIZATION, SWAN-GANZ; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS, OFF-PUMP; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, TRANSESOPHAGEAL; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PULMONARY WEDGE PRESSURE;

EID: 41049087999     PISSN: 10530770     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2007.07.007     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Kumar A., Anel R., Bunnell E., et al. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med 32 (2004) 691-699
2. Rex S., Brose S., Metzelder S., et al. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients during cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 93 (2004) 782-788
3. Wiesenack C., Fiegl C., Keyser A., et al. Assessment of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated cardiac surgical patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 22 (2005) 658-665
4. Tavernier B., Makhotine O., Lebuffe G., et al. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology 89 (1998) 1313-1321
5. Michard F., Boussat S., Chemla D., et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162 (2000) 134-138
6. Berkenstadt H., Margalit N., Hadani M., et al. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery. Anesth Analg 92 (2001) 984-989
7. Reuter D.A., Felbinger T.W., Schmidt C., et al. Stroke volume variations for assessment of cardiac responsiveness to volume loading in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med 28 (2002) 392-398
8. Reuter D.A., Kirchner A., Felbinger T.W., et al. Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function. Crit Care Med 31 (2003) 1399-1404
9. Tousignant C.P., Walsh F., and Mazer C.D. The use of transesophageal echocardiography for preload assessment in critically ill patients. Anesth Analg 90 (2000) 351-355
10. Feissel M., Michard F., Mangin I., et al. Respiratory changes in aortic blood velocity as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients with septic shock. Chest 119 (2001) 867-873
11. Eltzschig H.K., Goetz A.E., Schroeder T.H., et al. Transesophageal echocardiography: Perioperative evaluation of valvular function. Anaesthesist 51 (2002) 81-102
12. Rhodes A., and Sunderland R. Arterial pulse pressure analysis: The LiDCOplus System. In: Pinsky M.R., and Payen D. (Eds). Functional Hemodynamic Monitoring. Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 42 (2004), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg 183-192
13. Cahalan M.K., Abel M., Goldman M., et al. American Society of Echocardiography and Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists task force guidelines for training in perioperative echocardiography. Anesth Analg 94 (2002) 1384-1388
14. Stetz C.W., Miller R.G., Kelly G.E., et al. Reliability of thermodilution method in the determination of cardiac output in clinical practice. Am Rev Respir Dis 126 (1982) 1001-1004
15. Pfeiffer U.J., Perker M., and Zeravik J. Sensitivity of central venous pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and intrathoracic blood volume as indicators for acute and chronic hypovolemia. In: Lewis F.R., and Pfeiffer U.J. (Eds). Practical Applications of Fiberoptics in Critical Care Monitoring (1990), Springer-Verlag, New York, NY 26-31
16. Shippy C.R., Appel P.L., and Shoemaker W.C. Reliability of clinical monitoring to assess blood volume in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 12 (1984) 107-112
17. Raper R., and Sibbald W.J. Misled by the wedge?. The Swan-Ganz catheter and left ventricular preload. Chest 89 (1986) 427-434
18. Mundigler G., Heinze G., Zehetgruber M., et al. Limitations of the transpulmonary indicator dilution method for assessment of preload changes in critically ill patients with reduced left ventricular function. Crit Care Med 28 (2000) 2231-2237
19. Robotham J.L., and Scharf S.M. Effects of positive and negative ventilation on cardiac performance. Clin Chest Med 4 (1983) 161-187
20. Robotham J.L., Cherry D., Mitzner W., et al. A re-evaluation of the hemodynamic consequences of intermittent positive-pressure ventilation. Crit Care Med 11 (1983) 783-793
21. Parry-Jones A.J.D., and Pittman J.A.L. Arterial pressure and stroke volume variability as measurements for cardiovascular optimisation. Int J Intensive Care 10 (2003) 67-72