Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge

Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 64-68

  Osman, David ^a   Ridel, Christophe ^a   Ray, Patrick ^b   Monnet, Xavier ^a   Anguel, Nadia ^a   Richard, Christian ^a   Teboul, Jean Louis ^a  

^a BICÊTRE HOSPITAL   (France)

^b PITIÉ SALPÊTRIÈRE HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Central venous pressure; Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure; Septic shock; Volume challenge; Volume responsiveness

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; FEMALE; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEART INDEX; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEART VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC PRESSURE; HEART VENTRICLE FILLING; HEART VENTRICLE PRESSURE; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; LUNG ARTERY PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT MONITORING; PREDICTION; PRESSURE VOLUME CURVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEPSIS; SEPTIC SHOCK;

AGED; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; CRITICAL CARE; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HETASTARCH; HUMANS; INFUSIONS, INTRAVENOUS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PATIENT SELECTION; PLASMA SUBSTITUTES; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PULMONARY WEDGE PRESSURE; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; RESUSCITATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SEPSIS; STROKE VOLUME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33845958648     PISSN: 00903493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000249851.94101.4F     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Dellinger RP, Carlet JM, Masur H, et al: Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:858-873
2. Hollenberg SM, Ahrens TS, Annane D, et al: Practice parameters for hemodynamic support of sepsis in adult patients: 2004 update. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:1928-1948
3. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al: Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:1368-1377
4. Michard F, Teboul JL: Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: A critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002; 121:2000-2008
5. Bendjelid K, Romand JA: Fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: A review of indices used in intensive care. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29:352-360
6. Teboul JL, Besbes M, Andrivet P, et al: A bedside index assessing the reliability of pulmonary occlusion pressure measurements during mechanical ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure. J Crit Care 1992; 7:22-29
7. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ: A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983; 148:839-843
8. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, et al: Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162:134-138
9. Calvin JE, Driedger AA, Sibbald WJ: The hemodynamic effect of rapid fluid infusion in critically ill patients. Surgery 1981; 90:61-76
10. Schneider AJ, Teule GJ, Groeneveld AB, et al: Biventricular performance during volume loading in patients with early septic shock, with emphasis on the right ventricle: A combined hemodynamic and radionuclide study. Am Heart J 1988; 116:103-112
11. Reuse C, Vincent JL, Pinsky MR: Measurements of right ventricular volumes during fluid challenge. Chest 1990; 98:1450-1454
12. Diebel L, Wilson RF, Heins J, et al: End-diastolic volume versus pulmonary artery wedge pressure in evaluating cardiac preload in trauma patients. J Trauma 1994; 37:9550-9555
13. Tavernier B, Makhotine O, Lebuffe G, et al: Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology 1998; 89:1313-1321
14. Kramer A, Zygun D, Hawes H, et al: Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness following coronary artery bypass surgery. Chest 2004; 126:1563-1568
15. Rex S, Brose S, Metzelder S, et al: Prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients during cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2004; 93:782-788
16. Wagner JG, Leatherman JW: Right ventricular end-diastolic volume as a predictor of the hemodynamic response to a fluid challenge. Chest 1998; 113:1048-1054
17. Tousignant CP, Walsh F, Mazer CD: The use of transesophageal echocardiography for preload assessment in critically ill patients. Anesth Analg 2000; 90:351-355
18. Raper R, Sibbald WJ: Misled by the wedge? The Swan-Ganz catheter and left ventricular preload. Chest 1986; 89:427-434
19. Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E, et al: Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:691-699
20. Feissel M, Michard F, Mangin I, et al: Respiratory changes in aortic blood velocity as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients with septic shock. Chest 2001; 119:867-873
21. Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E, et al: Preload-independent mechanisms contribute to increased stroke volume following large volume saline infusion in normal volunteers: A prospective interventional study. Crit Care 2004; 8:128-136
22. Preisman S, Kogan S, Berkenstadt H, et al: Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: Functional haemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test and static preload indicators. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95:746-755
23. De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, et al: Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: Influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005; 3:517-523