Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: Functional haemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test and static preload indicators

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 95, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 746-755

  Preisman, S ^a   Kogan, S ^a   Berkenstadt, H ^a   Perel, A ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Heart, cardiac output; Monitoring, cardiopulmonary; Ventilation, effects; Ventilation, mechanical

Indexed keywords

FENTANYL; ISOFLURANE; MIDAZOLAM; PANCURONIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; BLOOD VOLUME; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL OBSERVATION; COLLOID; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HEART DISEASE; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC VOLUME; HEART OUTPUT; HEART PRELOAD; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; MALE; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PULSE PRESSURE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;

EID: 28844464011     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: 14716771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aei262     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Mythen MG, Webb AR. Perioperative plasma volume expansion reduces the incidence of gut mucosal hypoperfusion during cardiac surgery. Arch Surg 1995; 130: 423-9
2. Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients. Chest 2002; 121: 2000-8
3. Madger S. Clinical usefulness of respiratory variations in arterial pressure. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 2004; 169: 151-5
4. Coriat P, Vrillon M, Perel A, et al. A comparison of systolic blood pressure variation and echocardiographic estimates of end-diastolic left ventricular size in patients after aortic surgery. Anesth Analg 1994; 78: 46-53
5. Preisman S, Pfeiffer U, Lieberman N, et al. New monitors of intravascular volume: A comparison of arterial pressure waveform analysis and the intrathoracic blood volume. Intensive Care Med 1997; 23: 651-7
6. Tavernier B, Makhotine O, Lebuffe G, et al. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 1313-21
7. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, et al. Relationship between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162: 134-8
8. Goedje O, Hoeke K, Lichtwarck-Aschoff M, et al. Continuous cardiac output by femoral arterial thermodilution calibrated pulse contour analysis: Comparison with pulmonary arterial thermodilution. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 2407-12
9. Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Schmidt C, et al. Stroke volume variations for assessment of cardiac responsiveness to volume loading in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28: 392-8
10. Berkenstadt H, Margalit N, Hadani M, et al. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 984-9
11. Reuter DA, Kirchner A, Felbinger TW, et al. Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function. Crit Care Med 2003; 31: 1399-404
12. Reuter DA, Bayerlein J, Goepfert MS, et al. Influence of tidal volume on left ventricular stroke volume variation measured by pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29: 476-80
13. Perel A, Preisman S, Baer R, et al. Respiratory systolic variation test reflects preload during graded hemorrhage in ventilated dogs (abstract). Br J Anaesth 1995; 74 (suppl): A137
14. Perel A, Minkovich L, Preisman S, et al. Assessing fluid-responsiveness by a standardized ventilatory maneuver: The respiratory systolic variation test. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 942-5
15. Perel A, Pizov R, Cotev S. Systolic pressure variation is a sensitive indicator of hypovolemia in ventilated dogs subjected to graded hemorrhage. Anesthesiology 1987; 67: 498-502
16. Ludbrook J. Repeated measurements and multiple comparisons in cardiovascular research. Cardiovas Res 1994; 28: 303-11
17. Metz CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 1978; 8: 283-98
18. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983: 148: 839-43
19. Gan TJ, Soppitt A, Maroof M, et al. Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery. Anesthesiology 2002; 97: 820-6
20. Venn R, Steele A, Richardson P, et al. Randomized controlled trial to investigate influence of the fluid challenge on duration of hospital stay and perioperative morbidity in patients with hip fractures. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 65-71
21. Brandstrup B, Tonnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R, et al. Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: Comparison of two perioperative fluid regiments: A randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg 2003; 238: 641-8
22. Sandison AJ, Wyncoll DL, Edmondson RC, et al. ICU protocol may affect the outcome of non-elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Endovasc Surg 1998; 16: 356-61
23. Grocott MPW, Mythen MG, Gan TJ. Perioperative fluid management and clinical outcomes in adults. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 1093-106
24. Cheung AT, Savino JS, Weiss SJ, et al. Echocardiographic and hemodynamic indexes of left ventricular preload in patients with normal and abnormal ventricular function. Anesthesiology 1994; 81: 376-87
25. Pinsky MR. Functional hemodynamic monitoring. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28: 386-8
26. Wiesenack C, Prasser C, Rodig G, et al. Stroke volume variation as an indicator of fluid responsiveness using pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg 2003; 96: 1254-7
27. Rooke GA, Schwid HA, Shapira Y. The effect of graded hemorrhage and intravascular volume replacement on systolic pressure variation in humans during mechanical and spontaneous ventilation. Anesth Analg 1995; 80: 925-32
28. Pizov R, Ya'ari Y, Perel A. The arterial pressure waveform during acute ventricular failure and synchronized external chest compression. Anesth Analg 1989; 68: 150-6
29. Goedje O, Hoeke K, Lichtwarck-Aschoff M, et al. Continuous cardiac output by femoral thermodilution calibrated pulse contour analysis: comparison with pulmonary arterial thermodilution. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 2407-12
30. Stetz CW, Miller RG, Kelly GE, et al. Reliability of the thermodilution method in the determination of cardiac output in clinical practice. Am Rev Respir Dis 1982; 126: 1002-4
31. Galley HF. Solid as a ROC. Br J Anaesth 2004; 93: 623-6