Influence of the site of measurement on the ability of plethysmographic variability index to predict fluid responsiveness

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 107, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 329-335

  Desgranges, F P ^a   Desebbe, O ^a   Ghazouani, A ^a   Gilbert, K ^a   Keller, G ^a   Chiari, P ^a   Robin, J ^b   Bastien, O ^a   Lehot, J J ^a   Cannesson, M ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^b LOUIS PRADEL HOSPITAL   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

cardiac output; fluid responsiveness; monitoring, intraoperative; oximetry; photoplethysmography

Indexed keywords

CISATRACURIUM; PROPOFOL; SUFENTANIL;

AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; EAR; FINGER; FOREHEAD; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEART INDEX; PLETHYSMOGRAPHIC VARIABILITY INDEX; PLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER; PULSE OXIMETRY; PULSE PRESSURE;

EID: 80051729473     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: 14716771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aer165     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Gan TJ, Soppitt A, Maroof M, et al. Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery. Anesthesiology 2002;97:820-6
2. Venn R, Steele A, Richardson P, Poloniecki J, Grounds M, Newman P. Randomized controlled trial to investigate influence of the fluid challenge on duration of hospital stay and perioperative morbidity in patients with hip fractures. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:65-71 (Pubitemid 34048564)
3. Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and highrisk surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2010, 21 Oct. [Epub ahead of print]
4. Solus-Biguenet H, Fleyfel M, Tavernier B, et al. Non-invasive prediction of fluid responsiveness during major hepatic surgery. Br J Anaesth 2006;97:808-16 (Pubitemid 44823665)
5. Cannesson M. Arterial pressure variation and goal-directed fluid therapy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2010;24:487-97
6. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009;37:2642-7
7. Michard F. Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology 2005;103:419-28 (Pubitemid 41076740)
8. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 2009;360:491-9
9. Cannesson M, Attof Y, Rosamel P, et al. Respiratory variations in pulse oximetry plethysmographic waveform amplitude to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room. Anesthesiology 2007;106:1105-11 (Pubitemid 46828162)
10. Natalini G, Rosano A, Taranto M, Faggian B, Vittorielli E, Bernardini A. Arterial versus plethysmographic dynamic indices to test responsiveness for testing fluid administration in hypotensive patients: a clinical trial. Anesth Analg 2006;103:1478-84 (Pubitemid 44949218)
11. Pizov R, Eden A, Bystriski D, Kalina E, Tamir A, Gelman S. Arterial and plethysmographic waveform analysis in anesthetized patients with hypovolemia. Anesthesiology 2010;113:83-91
12. Cannesson M, Delannoy B, Morand A, et al. Does the pleth variability index indicate the respiratory induces variation in the plethysmogram and arterial pressure waveforms? Anesth Analg 2008;106:1189-94 (Pubitemid 351450544)
13. Cannesson M, Desebbe O, Rosamel P, et al. Pleth variability index to monitor the respiratory variations in the pulse oximeter plethysmographic waveform amplitude and predict fluid responsiveness in the operating theatre. Br J Anaesth 2008;101:200-6 (Pubitemid 351989659)
14. Zimmermann M, Feibicke T, Keyl C, et al. Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010;27:555-61
15. Forget P, Lois F, de Kock M. Goal-directed fluid management based on the pulse oximeter-derived pleth variability index reduces lactate levels and improves fluid management. Anesth Analg 2010;111:910-4
16. Landsverk SA, Hoiseth LO, Kvandal P, Hisdal J, Skare O, Kirkeboen KA. Poor agreement between respiratory variations in pulse oximetry photoplethysmographic waveform amplitude and pulse pressure in intensive care unit patients. Anesthesiology 2008;109:849-55
17. Awad AA, Ghobashy MAM, Ouda W, Stout RG, Silverman DG, Shelley KH. Different responses of ear and finger pulse oximeter waveform to cold pressor test. Anesth Analg 2001;92:1483-6 (Pubitemid 32493167)
18. Awad AA, Stout RG, Ghobashy MAM, Rezkanna HA, Silverman DG, Shelley KH. Analysis of the ear pulse oximeter waveform. J Clin Monit Comput 2006;20:175-184 (Pubitemid 44056932)
19. Shelley KH, Jablonka DH, Awad AA, Stout RG, Rezkanna H, Silverman DG. What is the best site for measuring the effect of ventilation on the pulse oximeter waveform? Anesth Analg 2006;103:372-7 (Pubitemid 44140637)
20. Shelley KH. Photoplethysmography: beyond the calculation of arterial oxygen saturation and heart rate. Anesth Analg 2007;105:S31-6
21. Aboy M, McNames J, Thong T, Phillips CR, Ellenby MS, Goldstein B. A novel algorithm to estimate the pulse pressure variation index deltaPP. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2004;51:2198-203 (Pubitemid 39578017)
22. Cannesson M, Slieker J, Desebbe O, et al. The ability of a novel algorithm for automatic estimation of the respiratory variations in arterial pulse pressure to monitor fluid responsiveness in the operating room. Anesth Analg 2008;106:1195-200 (Pubitemid 351450545)
23. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:134-8 (Pubitemid 30469810)
24. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983;148:839-43. (Pubitemid 13033817)
25. De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, et al. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005;31:517-23 (Pubitemid 40543882)
26. Desebbe O, Boucau C, Farhat F, Bastien O, Lehot JJ, Cannesson M. The ability of pleth variability index to predict the hemodynamic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients under general anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2010;110:792-8
27. Maguire S, Rinehart J, Vakharia SMD, Cannesson M. Respiratory variation in pulse pressure and plethysmographic waveforms: intraoperative applicability in a North American academic center. Anesth Analg 2011;112:94-6
28. Reisner A, Shaltis PA, McCombie D, Asada HH. Utility of the photoplethysmogram in circulatory monitoring. Anesthesiology 2008;108:950-8 (Pubitemid 351589492)
29. Feldman JM. Can clinical monitors be used as scientific instruments? Anesth Analg 2006;103:1071-2 (Pubitemid 44627327)
30. Landsverk SA, Kvandal P, Bernjak A, Stefanovska A, Kirkeboen KA. The effects of general anesthesia on human skin microcirculation evaluated by wavelet transform. Anesth Analg 2007;105:1012-9 (Pubitemid 47479315)
31. McGrath SP, Ryan KL, Wendelken SM, Rickards CA, Convertino VA. Pulse oximeter plethysmographic waveform changes in awake, spontaneously breathing, hypovolemic volunteers. Anesth Analg 2011;112:368-74
32. Sahni R, Schulze KF, Ohira-Kist K, Kashyap S, Myers MM, Fifer WP. Interactions among peripheral perfusion, cardiac activity, oxygen saturation, thermal profile and body position in growing low birth weight infants. Acta Paediatr 2010;99:135-9
33. Shelley KH, Tamai D, Jablonka D, Gesquiere M, Stout RG, Silverman DG. The effect of venous pulsation on the forehead pulse oximeter wave form as a possible source of error in SpO2 calculation. Anesth Analg 2005;100:743-7 (Pubitemid 40300072)
34. Loupec T, Nanadoumgar H, Frasca D, et al. Pleth variability index predicts fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2011;39:294-9