Non-invasive prediction of fluid responsiveness during major hepatic surgery

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 97, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 808-816

  Solus Biguenet, H ^a   Fleyfel, M ^a   Tavernier, B ^a   Kipnis, E ^a   Onimus, J ^a   Robin, E ^a   Lebuffe, G ^a   Decoene, C ^a   Pruvot, F R ^a   Vallet, B ^a  

^a LILLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Heart, cardiac output; Monitoring, cardiopulmonary; Ventilation, mechanical

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; COLLOID; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DECELERATION; FLUID RESUSCITATION; HEART ATRIUM PRESSURE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; LIVER SURGERY; LUNG ARTERY PRESSURE; LUNG VEIN; MITRAL VALVE; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; PATIENT MONITORING; PHOTOELECTRIC PLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROVOCATION TEST; PULMONARY ARTERY OCCLUSION; PULSE OXIMETRY; PULSE PRESSURE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; VEIN BLOOD FLOW; WAVEFORM;

EID: 34247242309     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: 14716771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/ael250     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Grocott MPW, Mythen MG, Gan TJ. Perioperative fluid management and clinical outcomes in adults. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 1093-106
2. Joshi GP. Intraoperative fluid restriction improves outcome after major elective gastrointestinal surgery. Anesth Analg 2005; 101: 601-5
3. Smyrniotis V, Kostopanagiotou G, Theodoraki K, Tsantoulas D, Contis JC. The role of central venous pressure and type of vascular control in blood loss during major liver resections. Am J Surg 2004; 187: 398-402
4. Bernard GR, Sopko G, Cerra F, et al. Pulmonary artery catheterization and clinical outcomes: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and Food and Drug Administration Workshop Report. Consensus Statement. JAMA 2000; 283: 2568-72
5. Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: A critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002; 121: 2000-8
6. Bendjelid K, Romand JA. Fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: A review of indices used in intensive care. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29: 352-60
7. Michard F. Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology 2005; 103: 419-28
8. Berkenstadt H, Margalit N, Hadani M, et al. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 984-9
9. Hofer CK, Muller SM, Furrer L, Klaghofer R, Genoni M, Zollinger A. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest 2005; 128: 848-54
10. Wiesenack C, Fiegl C, Keyser A, Prasser C, Keyl C. Assessment of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated cardiac surgical patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2005; 22: 658-65
11. Preisman S, Kogan S, Berkenstadt H, Perel A. Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: Functional haemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test and static preload indicators. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95: 746-55
12. Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Kilger E, Schmidt C, Lamm P, Goetz AE. Optimizing fluid therapy in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery by on-line monitoring of left ventricular stroke volume variations. Comparison with aortic systolic pressure variations. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 124-6
13. Rex S, Brose S, Metzelder S, et al. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients during cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2004; 93: 782-8
14. Kramer A, Zygun D, Hawes H, Easton P, Ferland A. Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness following coronary artery bypass surgery. Chest 2004; 126: 1563-8
15. Shamir M, Eidelman LA, Floman Y, Kaplan L, Pizov R. Pulse oximetry plethysmographic waveform during changes in blood volume. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 178-81
16. Teboul JL, Andrivet P, Ansquer M, et al. A bedside index assessing the reliability of pulmonary occlusion pressure during mechanical ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure. J Crit Care 1992; 7: 22-9
17. Kuecherer HF, Muhiudeen IA, Kusumoto FM, et al. Estimation of mean left atrial pressure from transesophageal pulsed Doppler echography of pulmonary venous flow. Circulation 1990; 82: 1127-39
18. Tavernier B, Makhotine O, Lebuffe G, Dupont J, Scherpereel P. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 1313-21
19. De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, Koch M, Vincent JL. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: Influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 517-23
20. Reuter DA, Bayerlein J, Goepfert MS, et al. Influence of tidal volume on left ventricular stroke volume variation measured by pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29: 476-80
21. Feinstein AR. The inadequacy of binary models for the clinical reality of three-zone diagnostic decisions. J Clin Epidemiol 1990; 43: 109-13
22. Michard F, Mercat A, Chemla D, Teboul JL. Noninvasive assessment of respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure by infrared photoplethysmography (finapres*) in mechanically ventilated patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 159: A520
23. Stokes DN, Clutton-Brock T, Patil C, Thompson JM, Hutton P. Comparison of invasive and non-invasive measurements of continuous arterial pressure using the Finapres. Br J Anaesth 1991; 67: 26-35
24. Leonetti P, Audat F, Girard A, Laude D, Lefrere F, Elghozi JL. Stroke volume monitored by modeling flow from finger arterial pressure waves mirrors blood volume withdrawn by phlebotomy. Clin Auton Res 2004; 14: 176-81
25. Cannesson M, Besnard C, Durand PG, Bohe J, Jacques D. Relation between respiratory variations in pulse oximetry plethysmographic waveform amplitude and arterial pulse pressure in ventilated patients. Crit Care 2005; 9: 562-8
26. Dorlas JC, Nijboer JA. Photo-electric plethysmography as a monitoring device in anaesthesia. Application and interpretation. Br J Anaesth 1985; 57: 524-30
27. Monnet X, Lamia B, Teboul JL. Pulse oximeter as a sensor of fluid responsiveness: Do we have our finger on the best solution? Crit Care 2005; 9: 429-30
28. Hofer CK, Zollinger A, Rak M, et al. Therapeutic impact of intra-operative transoesophageal echocardiography during noncardiac surgery. Anaesthesia 2004; 59: 3-9
29. Choong CY, Herrmann HC, Weyman AE, Fifer MA. Preload dependence of Doppler-derived indexes of left ventricular diastolic function in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 10: 800-8
30. Nishimura RA, Abel MD, Hatle LK, Tajik AJ. Relation of pulmonary vein to mitral flow velocities by transesophageal Doppler echocardiography. Effect of different loading conditions. Circulation 1990; 81: 1488-97
31. Lattik P, Couture P, Denault AY, et al. Mitral Doppler indices are superior to two-dimensional echocardiographic and hemodynamic variables in predicting responsiveness of cardiac output to a rapid intravenous infusion of colloid. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 1092-9